No Patch In Sight Edition
>Patch Notes (Latest 0.8.72)
https://playgwent.com/en/news#5030
http://wpc.4d7d.edgecastcdn.net/004D7D/mkt/document/Positioning_Update_Changelog_EN_38urjqsh3l.pdf
>Upcoming Gwent Challenger Tournament
https://www.playgwent.com/en/tournament
>Useful Links
http://www.playgwent.com
http://www.gwentdb.com/
http://www.gwentlemen.com/
http://www.gwent-tracker.com/
>Gwent Level & Rank Rewards Table
http://pastebin.com/f5cvmJzJ
>Gwent Closed Beta Rewards
http://i.imgur.com/DyAx99S.jpg
>Leaked Premiums & Campaign
https://streamable.com/album/nxzsn
>Trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqNet72FPF8
>Gameplay Demo (E3)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zabgNv6f2ZY
>Gameplay Demo (Gamescom)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avlMgLy4H_w
>Nilfgaard arrives! Trailer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dEwsyGr-tQ
>What card should I pick?
http://gwentify.com/card-picker/
>Looking for a beta key?
>google it yourself
Play a card from your opponent's graveyard: >>175241450
just merge with wtc already
sage
>>175445896
Waifuspam is no bueno and /wtc/ is nothing but waifuspam at this point
I am become devour nilf. I AM FULLY ERECT
>>175446752
Nice
HAVE YOU EVER SEEN THE RAIN
BUT YOU DIDN'T HAVE TO CUT ME OFF
CAN'T START A FIRE WITHOUT A SPARK
At which rank does the meta start to manifests itself? I'm quickly climbing with my shitter SK control/yencon deck, Rank 6 now, and I have yet to lose a single game. I'm facing mostly people that seem not to know of the existence of card lock and dimeritium bomb. Those who have those usually use them at the wrong moment or on the wrong cards. When will I start to get rekt, as the netdeck shitter I am?
>>175457105
>When will I start to get rekt, as the netdeck shitter I am?
Never. You will join the ranks of the netdeck shitters who make it the opposite of fun for everyone else
>>175457105
At around rank 10 you will start seeing other netdeck shitters with 4 golds.
Too fast for you, dh'oine ?
Lambert, Lambert, what aPEGI-13
Google doesn't help atm, any keys to spare?
>>175465134
try the reddit thread
>>175465134
i bought mine from kinguin for like half a dollar
I NEED YOU TO RECOVER
HAVE YOU EVER SEEN A ONE-TRICK PONY IN THE FIELD SO HAPPY AND FREE
>>175457105
>>175457347
>>175457370
as of today for me it was around 7, consider I'm only playing ladder, at <15 facing lots of >20 and I my new balance is still positive
if your golds happen to fit your archetype and if you keep an healthy array of specials you may have a longer mileage
> First Lego in ~40 kegs
Can't complain thou, I'm only missing Succ, which is just bad, and Draug, which is meh.
>>175476945
I told you to be careful with the keg, sir!
WHEN THE NIGHT
>someone posts on reddit asking rethaz for an update
>he posts in the thread but only to respond to someone crying about imbalance
> 4 cards left
> He decides to pass
Ok.
>>175483619
It's still in beta
EVERYTHING IS QUIET
EXCEPT FOR ALL THE VOICES IN MY HEAD THAT SAY YOUR NAME
any new news?
>>175487438
No
I SEE OCEANS ACROSS THE SEA
WE WILL LIE UNDER
DIFFERENT STARS
So, who else doesnt like the look of the stand alone gwent...
>>175497198
It's less comfy than the minigame version.
SPACE JAM
>>175476945
I just got a keg with Hjalmar and Aglais. Too bad I crafted Aglais yesterday.
>4 viewers
JUST
>>175457370
Golds ain't no thang anon. Lotta good epic golds. Once the golds start turning into every monster deck having caretaker in hand and every squirrel deck having Thunder Thighs in hand do you start to worry.
>>175497198
I feel like the game board is pretty nice, and all the card art is absolutely fantastic and the premium art is head and shoulders above any other card game. The UI is various levels of clunk though, and a lot of the "BLACK OUT THE ENTIRE SCREEN TO SHOW YOU A COUPLE CARDS" popups are way overdone.
>>175485484
Your point is...?
>>175502876
kekus maximus
To be honest, Gwent streamers haven't been getting good numbers in the last months. Or that's the impression I get when I go on twitch. They have around 25-50% less.
>>175502876
It's still more than the average amount of people posting here simultaneously
>>175508764
delet this