/wtg/ - War Thunder General

File: lerche.jpg (39KB, 559x548px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 559x548px

First for real fuckin when?

File: shot_2016.11.28_02.42.30.jpg (317KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 800x450px

MiG-19 devblog soon™.

>>161479321
http://live.warthunder.com/post/531422/en/

nah mate

>>161479321
They could add one of the prototypes that didn't have afterburning engines. Probably wouldn't be particularly good, though.

>client stability comes out

kv1 zis has better acceleration than ausf J and climber over the hills while maintaining solid speed

>>161479321
hella fucking epic

>>161480118
I think there's a reason there's a 1.7 BR difference between the two

>>161479775
>>161480212
>>161479520
http://warthunder.com/en/news/4364-development-mig-19/
ITS OUT NIGGERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111111!!oneone

>>161480974
SHIT ITS REAL

>>161480974
>>161481120
see>>161480212

File: braveheart.jpg (57KB, 403x335px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 403x335px

https://warthunder.com/en/news/4362-news-st-andrew-s-day-en/

>>161480974
>>161481120
Who exactly do you intent to fool?

>>161480105
And the US won the vietnam war :^)

>>161480974
Shit, they taken it down...

File: not a paper plane.jpg (14KB, 480x306px)

14KB, 480x306px

When?

>>161481672
>USSR is dead
>Nam is a capitalist country now
yeah

>kill 90% of enemy team while sniping in ASU
>team still can't cap the fucking zone
jesus christ this is advanced retardation

>>161482264
>UK is still alive
>America is a white Anglo-Saxon protestant country now

UK won the war of independence. )

File: 20161130190815_1.jpg (344KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

344KB, 1920x1080px

>max uptier
>get more kills than all of our team expect 1 combined
no wonder people say leo is bias russian players play like shit

>>161483104
No, because claps don't have the queen on they're money. Typical dumb canadian.

>>161483335
The Vietnamese don't have a black president on they're money either. :^)

>>161483140
1947 T-54 can bounce lot of shit if it's uptiered, while Leos 1 can pen every tank with HEATs (making T-54s armour irrelevant), is fast and have -10 deg of depression (T-54s -4 deg only).

>>161483476
No, but soon they'll be using Trumpbucks.

>>161483540
>dude leos are so good if you're willing to pay 1200 SL per shot

>>161483701
>money
>an issue
that's like saying japs are not OP because of their repair costs

>>161480974
>>161481120

welcome to wtg, nobody has done it before

>>161483806
When was the last time you played against multiple R2D2 V3s rather than V1s?

File: tonk.gif (2MB, 613x341px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 613x341px

fucking when

File: COMENCE THE JIGGLIN.png (311KB, 900x702px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 900x702px

>shoot tiny tim at ship
>goes straight through it and hits the water

>Krauts have best CAS in the game

Why are britshitters such shitters?

>>161486154
>krauts
>best CAS
that's burgers

File: spurdo_red_army.png (70KB, 1075x599px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1075x599px

Who #Sovok here?

>>161486154
>kraut CAS
>better than burgers and brits
how

>>161486552
>>161486862
>two tiny tims or a dozen HAVRS or RP-3s
>better than literally hundreds of 30 mm HVAP
>this is exacerbated by the fuckhuge SPAA disparity, brough to you by the same 30 mm guns

Correct CAS rating
Burgers > Nazis > Bongs > Slavs
Japs aren't there because their CAS is nonexistent

>>161486552
>>161486862
It's just amazing to me how retarded Brit shitters are in this game. Their spitfires weren't enough, they have to dominate in everything or they're not happy.

>>161487094
>bullets still don't do damage to ships
hella fucking epic gayjew

>>161487224
They do, though, just not enough to matter. It takes like 15 hits with the weeb 57 m to sink a single cargo bote.

>>161487403
correction, around 3-5, still shit

PASTA WHEN?

File: 1408799167341.gif (858KB, 240x228px) Image search: [Google]

858KB, 240x228px

> playing tanks

File: spaghett kawaiii.gif (622KB, 1190x610px) Image search: [Google]

622KB, 1190x610px

>>161488329
WHEN?

>>161488524
I am going to marry Anchovy!

File: actually saw service.jpg (30KB, 564x423px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 564x423px

When?

>>161488640
>Anchovy
>not Carpaccio

File: .eJwFwe0NBBEQANBeFGB8DGH7uAIEsRKLmLlfl-393vuJ7xniEjfzpgugdMrrFEm8TmpVtrXaqGl3knk9kJhTvp86mcBYDMY65x1GHTSiAuOsC1Gj9lapqI1H-EzuPGqRezbx_gEn9CMM.g6JjtrLbix65gvH1XnSmLPnhKdM.png (708KB, 783x809px) Image search: [Google]

708KB, 783x809px

>>161488524
>DVCE

File: 1456241557787.jpg (343KB, 1280x888px) Image search: [Google]

343KB, 1280x888px

When?

>>161488779
Is fine too

File: Il-76_dropping_BMD-1.jpg (51KB, 524x372px)

51KB, 524x372px

>>161488831
I want this before that

>>161489048
When?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AWCvIcx0h6U

>KTH is such a difficult to hit target!
>When burgers regularly can go hull down so far only their gun is visible and every shot bounces against their turret

I don't even have a KTH

>war thunder
more like germanywinslol

>>161489591
?

>>161489896
>soviets dont get overtiered every match but have thrice as many players in their team

>>161490104
>soviets dont get overtiered every match but have thrice as many players in their team
>saying blatantly false shit
they have at most 2-3 more players

>>161487094
>30mm HVAP
>killing anything
April called it wants it cannon nerf back.

>>161490104
wat?
6.7 teams consist of like 70% burgers, 30% slavs and 0% teebs.

>>161490205
>literally being this dense

>>161490505
>calling you out on your retardation
>being dense
(you)

>>161490660
>being this fucking dumb
>being this much of a worthless piece of shit that no one loves
are you doing it ironically?

File: not a ufo.jpg (10KB, 429x343px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 429x343px

When?

File: 41e.jpg (12KB, 406x422px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 406x422px

>>161490850
did I strike a nerve?

>>161490031
An argument I've seen used why tanks (actually, specifically the KTH) is Op is because you have to aim for the turret. An action which is allegedly too difficult to do for many players. Meanwhile the hull down capability of many tanks (American, some Brits) leaves only an impenetrable turret within view, requiring you to change up your tactics. Basically I'm calling out the shitters who are too shit to aim at the guaranteed weakspot of those tiger shitters.

>>161491068
T32 and jumbo sherman are the only american tanks good at standing hull down afaik
can't think of any brit tanks particularly good at it, except for chieftain

then there's the issue of penning the tiger II turret face with APHE, loads of tanks are left only capable of sniping individual nazimen, hoping the tiger doesn't get off the one shot required to kill you

>>161491068
Which burger tank gives you trouble when hull down?
KTH doesnt face hull down tanks.
Nobody plays M26, M46 and T26E-1 because they are slow, have a long reload and no armor.
T29, M56, T92 & Bulldog is the name of the game with T-34-100 filling the 7.0 gaps.

>in brummbar
>fuck up two 4202 and BP
>while being completely in cover

))) so this is what artillery feels like ?

>>161493319
yes
also,
>4202 and BP
you are based

>>161493280
Either M46 or M26. Difficult to identify when they're just showing about 1/10th of their turret. Shame my steam screenshots stopped working, I took several shots. Which is funny because it's normally a 50/50 matchup with them, they either catch me off guard or I catch them off guard. However, I've been running into plenty of them hull down with only a fraction of their turret showing, and the most I've been capable of doing is turning their crew into simpsons when the shots do connect.

>76mm bounces off an Ostwind's turret
Where's that "Tired of RNG?" ad

File: 1477750242762.jpg (37KB, 286x323px)

37KB, 286x323px

>Tiger II H still obliterates everything it faces

>>161493943
>Before recent update
>Every round either one shots my SPAA or sets me on fire
>After recent update
>Shit is bouncing off me, overpenning, you name it

>>161493943
just use the machine gun...

>Rocket plane
>Has a propeller that spins with the wind like a windmill which provides energy for an electric engine

did I just solve energy

>>161494231
no, you would obviously run out of rocket power and then electrical energy

>>161494231
you really didn't

File: 1479511140211.png (160KB, 319x258px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 319x258px

>>161493943
right here

>>161494231
>American education

>>161494231
>Buy surge protector
>Plug it into wall outlet
>Unplug it
>Electricity coursing through it
>Insert into itself
>Infinite energy

Have I just solved dark matter?

File: Aerial_view_PT658_at_35knots_Columbia_River_October_2014.jpg (1MB, 2867x1747px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2867x1747px

new bote cbt event fucking when

why is every japanese tank a chi ha variant?

File: dead.png (693KB, 832x699px) Image search: [Google]

693KB, 832x699px

>>161494803
>pt boats

>be newbie
>BR<3.7
>it's tough but manageable
>BR 3.7
>get constantly raped
Is this how is supposed to work?

>>161496239
>being bad
>not being good

Dude who gave you guys an early warning on ST-A and Obj 906, this time way more indirect. No pictures or anything I can really talk about.

Just that there's a CHANCE of T30 soon-ish.

>>161496418
>stating the obvious
>don't give any contribution whatsoever

>>161496239
There's always a learning curve whenever you go up a BR.

Stick with and become familiar with what you're using and what you're facing and eventually you'll git gud.

>>161496729
maybe you should git gud

>>161496523
MAGA

>>161496795
>shit flinging
Back to the chimp exhibit with you

File: 1451587539137.jpg (12KB, 439x222px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 439x222px

>warblunder

>>161497116
>being this assblasted about being shit
LMAO

File: had a working prototype.jpg (16KB, 405x363px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 405x363px

When?

japanese tanks will be OP as fuck and Ill tell you why

see, chinks are very very short, right? that means they can make the interior of their tanks smaller, thus optimizing surface area to armor thickness better than any normal sized nation. their tanks will be tiny lil boxes with 150 mm armor on all sides, literally indestructible

prove me wrong

>>161497527
That's ridiculous, Russian tanks were crewed by slav manlets that were barely taller than chinks, and look at how underpowered slav tanks are.

>>161497527
But everything we've seen so far short of the Marder all look to be slow, rice paper mammoths

>>161497258
>collects feces
>throws it

Not even the original guy.

>>161497527
>https://youtu.be/ao11xwciDyI?t=47s
Yep, it checks out!

>>161497702
>unironically being so shit that you have to cry about it on a Mongolian cave painting discussion forum
L O L
O
L

>>161468174
Wait, how does this work?

Like, does it replace another aircraft with a new model only you see, or is it only singleplayer, or what?

>be slavic dev
>yiff
>turn the game to crap

i should have known

>>161481220
>and will be available for Golden Eagles
ENGLISH BASTARDS
>tfw actually scottish
>tfw actually unhappy since i always wanted a saltire but don't want to give gaijin money

>>161497792
>trying this hard
(you)

>>161498031
>he's still responding
L M A O
M
A
O

>>161497869
Only missions most likely. Some made a model of AC 130 and put it into custom missions. Works alright.

File: 20000.0%.png (85KB, 210x434px)

85KB, 210x434px

>>161479183
>Shoot a it-1 in a fucking floor plate from 10 meters away
>no pen))))))))))))))
Remind me why i keep playing this game?

>>161497996
Isn't there already a Scottish flag from the Euros?

How important is ping in WT?

Will being 500-800 fuck me, or will it just make the other guy spark, or both? (Curious academically, I only started playing WT after getting fibre)

>>161498629
High ping will give you problems. Packet loss affects you a lot worse. With high ping you'll probably experience an annoying amount of sparking however.

File: 478454352.png (2MB, 1915x983px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1915x983px

Who #FiringRailgun here?

>>161499472
>Slow as shit
>Flanked by almost everything
>Can't get to choke points before 80% of what it faces

Nah.

>>161499660
Literally git gud.

>>161499745
Or I can just use the Panther II instead of that slow ass piece of shit.

>>161499852
The 10.5 Tiger has better speed than the original KT and thus tips the scales for its favor in my book. To sum the thing up:
>better pen
>faster than its predecessor, faster than many clap medium tanks
>oneshots more likely
>even with two crew members alive reload doesn't extend because )))
>very good armor
Flanking is an option in this tank, all of those 10 kills were made in the town and not by sniping.

>>161500098
>posted as a fucking british tank oneshots me

>>161500098
>Better speed

Does it really? I assumed that only the premium KTH has better speed.

>>161500283
It has the Panther II engine.

>>161500190
>teabs
>oneshotting anything
Are we playing the same game?

>>161500452
KT 105 always has the turret ammorack filled.

>>161500561
And the only tanks that have succeeded in blowing it up have been Russian high caliber shit that have trouble penning from the get go. Also
>not wiggling/angling your turret
>getting hit

>>161500098
>oneshots more likely

I dunno whenever I use the 10.5 KT I find that the rounds behave really weird sometimes.
Sometimes when I get a pen it kills one crew member like I'm firing solid shot.

Honestly the long 88 feels more reliable for me, at least it has the reload speed to back it up.

Maybe I'm just getting RNG meme'd, I really don't know.

B-25H when

>>161500919
>Sometimes when I get a pen it kills one crew member like I'm firing solid shot
Are you sure the fuse is detonating? It usually refuses to do so with the sides of Hellcats and SPAA, but I've noticed the same with the 88. Just fire at mass like engines and let the HE do the rest.

>>161500919
>Due to the RNG nature of this game, player experiences can vary vastly
>Despite this everyone thinks their single experience is right
>Mass/riot logic starts applying and they start getting things changed to their benefit

Can't think of any other game that is like this.

>>161501070
I'm certain that it's not the fuse. I know when the fuse should and shouldn't go off.

One instance which I think perfectly summed up the problem was when I penned the LFP of a t62 at a near 90 degree angle and all it killed was the driver.

File: 1473365569886.gif (580KB, 300x169px)

580KB, 300x169px

>>161501445
I must say that I've never encountered that. All T-62s I've frontally penetrated have entered orbit immediately. If it isn't the fuse I've never encountered it. We are talking about the APCBC ammo, right?

>>161501661
>We are talking about the APCBC ammo, right?
Yep.

It's not a rare thing either. Seems to happen nearly every match for me.

Maybe it's just my shitty ping, after all the kangaroo net only goes so fast.

>>161500561
didnt have it in the past )))

Does the Free Golden Eagles app work?

Yes or No?

>>161503019
yes but now my phones in russian lol

>>161503019
you get GE, random russians get all information you give to google/apple

Is the AC Thunderbolt worth a warbond test drive?

if a plane is flying at supersonic speed, does that mean you wouldn't hear it coming since it would be going faster than the sound of its engines?

is this a retarded question?

>>161504612
yes

no

>>161504612
>since it would be going faster than the sound of its engines?
It's more that the shockwaves form a literal barrier and the sound builds up behind it, so you only hear the boom and the engine sound once you are behind the barrier (when the plane's passed you by)

>>161504612
Yes. Autists will get upset at the cinema because they can't into the speed of sound. Proofs: https://youtu.be/PDn7zW8jTzw?t=38s

So they mentioned modelling shell diameter, what, 3 months ago? Have they even said anything about it since then?

>>161505594
>that seven example
top kek

>>161506236
They mentioned that it's something they might do in the future. That's even less of a confirmation than bomber cockpits.

>can't kill early Spitfire's engines by pulling negative Gs without going into redout territory
>only way to do it is flying upside-down for a few seconds

>>161506478
>only way to do it is flying upside-down for a few seconds
which actually kills every plane, even jets

>>161506478
You could before, iirc, in 1.32. I remember trying to apply my first courses on aircraft engine in game, and was happy when my carburetor failed after -4g.

>>161506478
they used to die from fucking nothing a few patches back

File: file.png (41KB, 373x70px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 373x70px

Shit

>>161506843
wat?

>waiting 8mins for match
>finally get one
>it's a mixed battle
>get gak'd by a R2D2 in the first 2mins

Really energized my almond oil

File: meme.jpg (110KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1280x1280px

>>161507236
>playing warblunder

>>161507236
>r2d2
>clearly an attacker
>gets a bomber spawn
might as well give the PBJs a bomber spawn too

is the b-25 the only plane in the game that sounds even a tiny bit like it does in real life?

File: Teski Tenk Vozilo A.jpg (307KB, 1280x795px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 1280x795px

WHEN???

File: memes.jpg (93KB, 1280x1280px)

93KB, 1280x1280px

>>161507739

Fuck it I've had enough.
You win warblunder poster.

>>161512356
play something FUN instead friend :)

File: 1434407941461.gif (1MB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x168px

>about to cut inside a clap shitter
>"UH OH can't let you do that tovarich! Disconnected )))"
>check internet
>still perfectly connected

>>161512356
i had won before you knew it. have a (you)

>>161512669
>>161513032
get a life

File: 1474837121849.jpg (22KB, 350x300px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 350x300px

>>161513446

File: 1480550574918.jpg (42KB, 350x300px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 350x300px

>>161513578
why are you posting a picture of yourself you kissless virgin?

File: Capture.jpg (124KB, 929x799px)

124KB, 929x799px

R8 my attempt at decompression

>>161515035
>everything is 8.7
shit/10

>>161515035
0.7 BR spead maximum would be an easier step

>>161513896
+10 GE!

the game is fine and noone should criticize it!

>>161515397
Right now everything is 8.0 anyway

>>161515542
Chiefs shouldn't be the same
M60s shouldn't be the same
Leos shouldn't be the same
T-10M and the T-62 should swap positions and the T-54 51 should be 8.0 max
JT should be 8.0
FV4401 should be 5.7
Conway should stay 7.0
PT-76 should be 6.3 provided it gets the missing 80mm of pen on it's HEAT-FS
Also 0.7 max up/down tiering should be instated

>>161515874
>there should be more timetraveling

>>>/tv/backtothefuture

File: 1480091833439.gif (1MB, 320x239px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x239px

>>161515960
considering some of these tanks are useless in historically accurate spots and have no useful spot in their historical meta, yes

>>161516104
Should just be removed then.

>>161516294
Can gaijin even delete vehicles
It hasn't ever happened to my knowledge

>>161516363
They wouldn't. Just like they wouldn't decompress BRs or reduce match BR spread. This is all hypothetical.

>>161515874
>Chiefs shouldn't be the same
Combat capabilities are equal
>M60s shouldn't be the same
Almost same tank, some minor changes on armor that are irrelevant at such high tier
>Leos shouldn't be the same
Almost same tank, does the stabylizer even work?
>T-10M and the T-62 should swap positions and the T-54 51 should be 8.0 max
Dumb
>JT should be 8.0
Explain.
>FV4401 should be 5.7
yeah, probably
>Conway should stay 7.0
probably
>PT-76 should be 6.3 provided it gets the missing 80mm of pen on it's HEAT-FS
I thought it was sanic?
>Also 0.7 max up/down tiering should be instated
dunno about that m8

>tfw no 109L
>tfw no 109J
>tfw no 109H
>tfw no 109S
>tfw no 109ST
>tfw no 109T
>tfw no 109TL
>tfw no 109X
>tfw no 109Z
>tfw no 109W

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>161515874
>JT should be 8.0
You're talking about the Jagdtiger, right?
The tank that gets shit on even at 7.0 because it's a uselessly slow piece of shit that can be penned frontally anyway by the medium tanks it faces?

File: Ilyushin Il-40 NATO CS - Brawny.jpg (42KB, 800x451px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 800x451px

>>161479321
Yay! That breaks the meme Giajew was holding that they'd never add in planes with afterburners!!

IL-40P here we come

>>161516748
>Combat capabilities are equal
Then why did gaijin say no to the 5?
>Almost same tank, some minor changes on armor that are irrelevant at such high tier
Haha, no. M60A1 also has better penetration with APDS.
>Almost same tank, does the stabylizer even work?
Applique armor is a thing
>Dumb
A tank that can nuke shit without having to aim should be higher than a tank that should have to aim to nuke
>Explain.
Armor, mobility, and the gun
>I thought it was sanic?
Nyet, worse mobility than most slav mediums in fact
>dunno about that m8
give me a good reason not to aside from "muh queue times"
>>161517061
>JT gets dunked on at 7.0
spot the retarded nazishitter
JTs are the ones doing the dunking, I know, I fucking own it
128 doesn't non-pen or bounce on anything that fits within the constraints of the penetration on the stat card

File: 1471167920391.jpg (162KB, 1182x966px)

162KB, 1182x966px

>>161517245
>JTs are the ones doing the dunking
Funny how I've yet to see one in all my 7.0 games. I guess that's because any sane 7.0 player goes for the 10.5 KT or Panther II.

>>161516363
They got rid of the OS2U second research line and Po-2.

Well, you know what I mean, they severely limited access, deleted the former and made them novelties (for the latter)

>>161517491
that's just not available for research anymore
I'm talking about straight up deleting a vehicle from the game, anyone who has it no longer does

File: shot 2016.09.05 19.55.22.jpg (340KB, 1920x1080px)

340KB, 1920x1080px

>>161486154
>krauts
>best CAS

Go fuck yourself you false flagging turbonigger

The Thunderbolts are amazing

And you can have 3 in your line up.

>>161517572
Well, I mean, for practical purposes you might as well just kill off the ability to research it. Less complex and controversial than leaving it in, and with time as players realize the game isn't very fun and fuck off the number of times the undesired vehicle will appear will reduce.

>>161517245
>Then why did gaijin say no to the 5?
Dunno
>Haha, no. M60A1 also has better penetration with APDS.
Really? Pics?
>Applique armor is a thing
It's like 20mm lol
>A tank that can nuke shit without having to aim should be higher than a tank that should have to aim to nuke
What about the reload, depression and penetration?
>Armor, mobility, and the gun
Armor is good, useless vs HEAT. Mobility is shit, gun is good but lolnoturret
>Nyet, worse mobility than most slav mediums in fact
We shall see.

File: K bait.gif (571KB, 199x199px)

571KB, 199x199px

>>161515874
>FV4401 should be 5.7

the centurions gun

Fuck off teeb

>JT 8.0

Don't even have at and already know it gets raped by air, SABOT, and HEATFS


This is a bait post.

More good quality cockpits when?

>>161518487
DELETE THIS!

>>161518487
>the centurion's gun
on a casemate tank destroyer with no armor

>>161515035
It's ok.

.7 BR spread should be the max

Elefant should be 6.3
Remove that T30 meme, why is the T29 at a higher BR.


They just need to make it so where WW2 and WW2 proposed tanks should rarely see Post War tanks if ever.

File: 1463459237320.gif (1MB, 268x274px)

1MB, 268x274px

>>161518831
>hit tree directly
>no damage
???

File: bt tank.webm (1MB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x180px

BT TANKS

Post the craziest /wtg/ webm's you have

>>161519013
Trees are the most inconsistent thing in this game. There's trees without a hitbox and trees with a hitbox twice as tall as them.

>>161518954
T30 gun has bad pen
massive HE load though

>>161518776
> no armor

That meme doesn't work bro.
The M56 is doing just fine at it's BR and it has a similiar gone, it can get HEATFS though. But the pen is comparable with the Centurians SABOT.

also 1940's ruskies and krauts facing a tank made developed in the 60's

no bro, no.

>>161519013
IRONWORKS

>>161518487
why are you capitalizing sabot?

it's not an acronym you fucking retard

What is the justification of the m46 at 6.7?????????

>>161519378
it gets rekt by everything

>>161519303
>That's the only thing anon can find wrong with my post

Nice meme bro!!!

>>161519551
I didn't even read the rest of your post

File: xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD.jpg (137KB, 717x880px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 717x880px

>>161519612
This is not how you're supposed to shitpost redditor

I haven't played this game in weeks but I still have a pinned tab for /wtg/

I barely even check it

What's wrong with me bros

>>161520163
just hit the x button
you won't be missed, nor will you miss us

ITT: we dont stop laughing at gaijinshills

File: Entwicklung-75.png (225KB, 559x687px) Image search: [Google]

225KB, 559x687px

When

plz 88 or 105mm cannon versions. I know if they'd put the128mm at like 7.7 because )))))))))))

File: he111z-1.jpg (18KB, 500x245px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 500x245px

When?

File: )))))).webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

POST THE CRAZIEST /wtg/ GIFS AND WEBM'S YOU HAVE

File: youwillneverbethisoutskilled.webm (2MB, 950x534px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 950x534px

>>161521338

File: Mywebm1.webm (3MB, 900x500px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 900x500px

>>161521338

>>161521021
that's a long barrel

>>161521021
It's literally another Tiger II
And if there's something the game doesn't need right now, it's another Tiger II. The tiger 105 kinda is an E-75.

>>161521553
that is some of the worst aiming I've ever witnessed

>>161521553
that looks like a 2006 youtube video
Just use mixtape senpai

>>161521662
this. No more damn tiger IIs

>>161521662
>Literally just another Tiger II

No

The turret face of the E-75 is 254mm thick

The upper haul is 160mm and 120mm everywhere else.

It's gun is a longer 88mm than the tiger II

>>161522138
Source?

WG sekrit documents aren't a good source

http://tankarchives.blogspot.mx/2014/09/german-superguns.html

>there was a proposal for a 88mm L/130

Fucking hell nazis were retarded

>>161522487

what the fuck is wrong with your computer, pablo picasso up in this.

>>161522138
that makes no sense. The E75 weights only slightly more than the Tiger II and has nearly the same dimensions, yet somehow has a tone more armor?

Don't trust all of Wargaming's armor thickness values, they will change them in order to balance tanks, though it is usually a last resort option.

>>161522487

what the fuck is wrong with your computer, pablo picasso up in this shit.

>>161523136
sheeeit, something fucked up with the conversion. Looks cool though desu

File: jagdtiger derp.webm (1MB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 720x480px

>>161521338
>161521338

>>161523834

>APC shells normalize
Where did this meme come from>

File: Entwicklung-75 with 88mm cannon.jpg (272KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 1000x1000px

>>161523250
????

The E-75 would weighed around 85-90 tons just like the E-100 weighed closer to 120 tons.

Did you really think the name meant much?

It's nazi

>>161522205

I'm going off of Overlords blog. The only real publc documents are these.

http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/176874-where-are-they-e50-and-e75-blueprints/

The rest of the actual blueprints are still not publicly available. I don't know whether WG got to see the actual documents, I wouldn't be surprised. They have....connections....

>>161523890
The 88mm L/100 was never meant to be a tank gun

File: .jpg (51KB, 385x354px)

51KB, 385x354px

>>161523890
>>161523890

>>161521338

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oSTdMqYbBg

the music helps.

>>161524195
this picture will never not be funny

>>161523993
source?

http://tankarchives.blogspot.com/2015/06/88-cm-l100-pak.html

It's a Pak not a Kwk cannon
The E-75 could fit it. Probably not the E-50 though.

>>161524306
>as Yuri Pasholok writes, the project was cancelled in 1943 when the superheavy Soviet tanks it was designed to fight failed to materialize.

>cancelled in 1943
>Somehow would be used in 1945 tank

File: 2316346-2228754-w_warthunder_keyart_small.jpg (145KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 960x960px

How do I grind SL in this blunder of a game? Also is there a rp gain per match cap? I've noticed I never get more than 4k rp, independent of my performance.

File: stupid german propaganda rules.jpg (148KB, 678x708px)

148KB, 678x708px

>>161524195
Are you surprised?

Germany lost the war and the government since the fall of the Third Riech have wanted nothing to do with the 40's. It's not suprising to me that war crime blueprints haven't been released yet

The same meme can be said for the T29, IS-7 blueprints and armor are iffy

>maybe when pic related happens it'll change

>>161524604
>germans
>having any free will
>ever

>>161524442
The E-50 was canceled in 1943 senpai.

The E-75 was cancelled in 1945 when the nazis lost the war.

I think the E-75 was supposed to replace the Tiger II and Jagdtiger

>>161524604
>>161524706
>t. non brainwashed ameriblobs

File: Germany is going to commit cultural suicide so people have to admit that hitler was right.png (215KB, 874x1086px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 874x1086px

>>161524771
Have another senpai

)))

I do hope they release private WW2 documents soon. I wanna see if things like the E-75 and E-25 ever started to be made.

>>161524741
The entire Entwicklung series was concieved around the same time, as it was meant to standardize and simplify the Panther, Tiger and vehicles based on them rather than improve on them. The Panther II was the one cancelled in 1943.

remember the good old days?

I have this video (now unlisted) RamJB made back in the day, resolution suffered a bit, but still a beautiful work.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gcB2ScdGVsA

old russian catalina for grinding, best investment (cheap fun premiums)

>>161524771
t. thrown out of my house so refugees can live in it for free

>>161524982
>That picure seems like it's completely overblowing everyting it says amd was most likely made by a non-european

>>161525074
>t. went to school and got shot

>>161525250
>t. literally going to jail after reading what i wrote bellow
Hitler did nothing wrong

>>161525019
Yeah like I said. Panther II/ E-50 cancelled in 1943.

E-75 cancelled when they lost the war.

The E-75 could equip 88m L/100 PaK.

IDK where you got the idea that it couldn't.

>>161525596
>t. can go to jail for burning a piece of cloth

>>161525631
Panther II =/= E-50
Just because gaijin calls a Panther II what is essentially an E-50 does not make them the same

The E-75 was meant to standardize the Tiger II, so it would keep the Kwk 43. The gun was more than enough to destroy every allied tank. The L/100 was cancelled before the E-75 was concieved

>>161525854
>t, can go to jail for owning a piece of cloth

File: 1411323813588.jpg (135KB, 858x990px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 858x990px

>>161525969
Okay that was a good one

File: shot 2016.12.01 04.18.27.jpg (103KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1920x1080px

Oh look, they fixed the moon. When are they gonna fix clouds? And make night proper dark again?

>>161525854
>Panther II =/= E-50

Wew laddie, fine. Transmission changes. You're right.

I said the E-75 could equip the 88m L/100 just like the panther could equip the 75mm KwK 42 L/100

Source: https://www-d0.fnal.gov/~turcot/Armour/pz4.htm

It was designed to either get a 88 or 105. You're right about that as well. I think the 128mm is a Wargaming meme.

If they add the E-75 into the game I'd like it if it had the 105 because since it's an uparmored Tiger II it'd probably be around 7.0 or 7.3 already.

best reserve aircraft

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lv94XDZES50

>>161526875
The panther II also was never mentioned to use the Schmalturm turret

You're saying could, as if they ever were equipped with them, but they weren't. If I draw a super heavy tank and said it could mount a 400mm L/1000 gun you aren't gonna believe me. That's why Gaijin is reluctant to add tonks that only existed in paper.

Am I doing it wrong or are bombers just not very fun to play in this game? I'm only level 15, but I feel like every time I play bombers I just end up angry because I waste all this time climbing and trying to maneuver to the target, only to get shot down in a single strafe by a fighter. Normally I'd say that bombers are just a dumb gimmick. but the game REALLY seems to want you to use them to complete objectives.

>>161527289

bomber objectives are a joke, you either play like a coward or you suicide, both styles are annoying for both you and everyone playing with you.

theyre marginally fun in RBGF if you do not suicide, otherwise though yeah, a gimmick.

any ground attack operations, stick to using attackers and strike fighters, in Air RB the meta is designed around fighter air kills though, so do not waste a team slot loading bombs in air RB, just get good at ACM.

>>161524562

>Grind SL
Premium and Era II/III. And/or planes. And AB.

>RP Gain Cap
No, but diminishing returns which might as well be the same thing. A massive part of your reward comes from just winning the mission.

>>161527241
> If I draw a super heavy tank and said it could mount a 400mm L/1000 gun you aren't gonna believe me.

Ofc because that'd be impossible.

I never said the E-75 was ever built.

The E-75 would've been a massive tank and would've been able to fit a variety of cannons.

Unlike your meme superheavy tank the E-75 was a real thing, there was development and there were blueprints. IF Gaijin can get a look at them from the archives in Berlin then I see no reason why it can't be added.

Besides maybe balance concerns ))))))))))))))

What is the GAYEST tank in War Thunder?

>>161527854
m18

>>161526896
nah, that sabre was just a fucking retard

>>161527289
what bombers are you flying?

whenever you get intercepted turn your tail towards where they're attacking from since you not only get much longer time to attack but most planes have much better rearwards facing defensive guns (ex: beaufort) and it's easier to aim when they tail you

>>161519198

>Bad Pen
It's flat value is poor for APHE, but think of the MASSIVE overmatch/normalization. HE filler in both APHE and HE kinkshames the fuck out of the KV-2. The downside is the worse-than-IS2 reload unless they add the autoloader version. 50kg shells and 13kg something charges do that.

It also had APCR ammo developed. There was 155mm APDS/HEAT ammo that could theoretically be fired out of it, but it was meant for the T58 project instead.

>>161527854

Kugelblitz

>>161527854
The Panther II

>>161527854

what do you drive?

>>161527854
Strv 81

>>161528052
delet

>>161527289
It just gets worse as you go on

Aside from a few planes, bombers are generally seen as nothing but free RP

>>161527289

With only a few exceptions of things that can both shoot forward, but also defend their ass (Tu-2/IL-28), bombers don't fit the meta and are all awful to play and fight. Gunner mode is a piss-take in a lot of planes and unless you're loaded to the brim, people just park on your ass 100m away and hold M1 until you die. The whole experience is miserable, don't bother. Especially strategic bombers.

Attacks are alright-ish, but stop fitting Air RB's meta really fast. Fine for AB/Tank RB. Light/Med bombers work in Tank RB kinda. Strategic Bombers are dumb with the exception of Pe-8 and Tu-4 for being death stars.

>>161515035
>tiger II facing cold war tanks

lemao

>>161528790
>posted from my invincible railgun nazibunker

>>161526896
I hate those

>>161527854
Strv 81

>it's not swedish if the meatballs don't touch

>>161527854
Gayest?
I don't know
Faggiest?
IT-1 by far

>>161528986
+3 GE!

File: 75aa3b653fa23a3fa5c25e62cf57a595.jpg (33KB, 564x419px)

33KB, 564x419px

>>161528986
THATS RIGHT

>>161528790

kys

how are you supposed to see planes in Enduring meme

>>161529609
i use a hack that turns planes pink and are forced to render, not sure how others do it

>>161529609

with your eyes.

>>161529609
Try turboslav

>>161529609
turn off aa and glue your eyes to your monitor

File: IMG_1794.jpg (880KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

880KB, 3264x2448px

with your eyes senpai.

>>161528986
>lost the war
>slavs need to time travel to beat them in a video game
chimps

>>161530983

>shitty reliability of german maintenance and part replacement not modelled
>industrial issues and logistics not modelled
>PVP game based on technological characteristics rather than some history channel levels of fantasy

wehraboos.

>>161531241
>M62 explosive filler was so unreliable, they eventually just stopped putting the filler in.
If this game was historical, American tanks would be using solid shot

>>161531382
source?

>>161531382

historical and realistic, why do people presume physics is somehow a part of history...

accurate DM models is realism, and I expect them to work on that, I do not expect them to go "full historical" unless you want to see a game which is boring for everyone.

>>161531597
t. mouthbreather
no wonder you're playing war thunder

would you rather have to face a typhoon or a hawker typhoon?

>>161532263

you don't play? what the fuck are you doing here.

File: 1478495025667.png (439KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 400x400px

>tfw you singlehandedly kill an entire squad

>>161532769
things that never happened
(rather you never did)

how do i make nazi d9 skins work for the slav d9?

>>161532405
>leaving the general to shills like you
Kys

>>161532851
commit suicide

>>161533142

>expecting "historical accuracy" in a pvp game, complain your t(n)igger 2H doesnt face Bt-7s and T-34 1940's

kys, people use historical as a buzzword now.

>>161532851
realize that lend lease planes are cancer and you gave money to crooks

File: 1450559557013.png (368KB, 960x878px)

368KB, 960x878px

>>161533305
>>>/reddit/tracksuitslavs is that way

>>161533517

anal fissures from being the history channel's bottom bitch can cloud the mind.

File: 1474770305470.jpg (59KB, 321x285px)

59KB, 321x285px

>>161532838
Not hard to kill a buncha squadded shitters with the same squadron tag, anon.

what would happen if you put a turboprop and vulcan cannons on a i-16?

>>161527289
Bombers aren't fun, but you can be lazier with them. I tend to alt-tab for most of the trip to target.

An alternative I like to do with Tier 1 bombers (especially the Do 17) is to get the Operation Bastogne map and dive immediately at the row of supply vehicles. With proper bomb-release timing one can get 10 or so vehicle kills and then turn away, which netted reasonable RP gain.

Alternatively in Essen I tend to rush for the bridge to the left and armoured cars there.

Generally one still gets shot down, but my recollection is of reasonable RP gain and fun compared to bombing targets. I'm often No.1 in my team just because you get such good score for blowing up vehicles.

>>161533736

the I-16 gets ripped to shreds by firing them.

>>161533690
>p-panthers brake down aa lot!
>german kdr's are inflated because russians are subhuman XD
>japkills s-should count twice as much!

>>>/reddit/cuckshed

>>161533305
I expect balance. WW2 tanks fighting Cold War every 3 matches is not balance.

Fw-190 in IL-2 1946: One of the most enjoyable aircraft I've ever had the pleasure of operating
Bf-109 in IL-2 1946: A nice aircraft, but ultimately one less suited to my flying style.

Fw-190 in War Thunder: One of the least useful aircraft I've ever had the displeasure to operate. Less enjoyable than the OS2U which at least has novelty value.
Bf-109 in War Thunder: One of the more enjoyable aircraft I've ever had the pleasure of operating.

>>161534079

>P-51 best fighter WW2
>.50 calibre means 50mm right?
>german aces best aces
>british navy better than us and japan, gib first pls
>japan playerbase has most skill, samurai of the skies
>bussian rias omg

everyone is stupid in this game, the community fucks itself in the ass and wonders what went wrong.

>>161534235

>PT-76 is cold war
>literally worse than garbage

whining about balance because of year of introduction is why you cucks still have a shit game.

technological performance over bullshit era shit, and the BR spread needs to be fixed. retards bicker missing the forest for the trees and get butthurt when called out for it.

File: 1447036766091.jpg (43KB, 330x319px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 330x319px

>>161534432
>WAAAAAH I NEED TO TIMETRAVEL!
>I CANT PEN LEOS WITH 200MM PEN HEATFS

kys

>>161534321
>japan playerbase has most skill, samurai of the skies
the fact that people really believe this shit makes me very angry

>>161534753
T. Shottwr turnfighting with zeros

>>161534709

>M19s can kill leos
>PT-76 is shit at every tier, who gives a fuck where it lands

time travel? the retarded idea is to liken balance to time, correlative argumentation at best, no method or mind to it. almost as retarded as the player stat based balancing gaijin is doing right now.

the WT community's primary complaints are essentially shitposting. kys.

>>161534753

back in 1.29 it used to be true, then all the weebs came and now if I try flying japan I have to deal with retards going hyper sugoi mode at 1000m wondering why the americans don't turnfight them.

>at least with all the shitters we can have lower repair costs

>>161534432
Don't be a fucknig shill.

How is it balanced for tanks with 88's to fight tank that were specifically designed to be immune to 88's every 3 games.

How is it balanced for solid shot to be so shit?

End it you shill.

>>161536409

>Solid shot is shit, ergo time travel is the problem

>88 immune vehicles in the form of russian and american 7.3+ heavies, instead of blaming a 1.0 BR spread, blames "time travel".

>complains that a higher tier tank is better than a lower tier tank

>Oh yes those 88mm immune M46 pattons, IS-2 1944s, and T92s. hmm yes.

getting pounded by phly must be comfy, call me the shill? which backwater outhouse were you birthed in? clearly the shitwater is still in your brain.

File: Panzerkampfwagen E-100, Gerät 383 (Prototyp).jpg (46KB, 640x468px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 640x468px

>>161524982
they did create the hull of the E-100 but thats about it

>Always against 6.7 vehicles at 6.3
I have a feeling once I hit 6.7 it's all going to be 7.7's.

>>161537451
pretty much yeah

>>161537451

its worse than before, but 6.7 is still going to have a decent number of games where at worst you are hitting 7.0.

6.3 can be a sweet spot if you have the right tanks.

generally the 1.0 BR spread fucks everyone hard though.

>>161537595

and stona said the BR is not overcompressed, cant expect the 9.0 BR tank project to get off the ground until gaijin slow ass team does some actual worthwhile playtesting.

>>161537570
>>161537595
Only way to not deal with this bullshit is to hit 8.0 huh.

Even then I'm sure the game will do something to fuck with me.

>>161537745

8.0 is HEAT-FS spam.

people whine about ATGMs but this shit began way earlier. ATGMs are just another level on top to fuck over any chance of sniping.

overall it is fun though, just get HEAT-FS and expect to lose money all the time.

>>161537946
I just want to get the Maus because I never really got it in a game before that wasn't an RTS.

>>161538049

not competitive, but the Maus is fun. good gun, armour doesn't matter.

get a leo 1 as well while you are at it though, if you are not trash it is the best tank at 8.0 outside the chieftain. USSR gets shafted outside of gimmick tanks, tough but honestly I am fine with the leo meta, just squad leo+Ho229.

File: shot 2016.11.18 21.24.38.jpg (738KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

738KB, 1920x1080px

>burger closing at mach 9 on my WW2 float plane
>I'm barely doing 200mph
>he open ups with his Plasma Accelerators and Gamma Ray Railguns
>his convergence must of been set for 20 miles instead of 15 because they went wide
>hes closing too fast, he must of forgot to reduce the flow of dark matter to his Delta Class Reactor
>my brave gunners start opening up with their under powered ancient boom sticks
>he must of not been fitted with the standard reinforced bulkheads for his craft so my brave gunners were able to set him on fire after pumping only around 5000 rounds
>not even the hyper advanced Kendian tech FPE systems fitted to his craft could stop the dark matter fire
>his wing rips off and falls to earth

Holy fuck that was close

I did not survive the ensuing nuclear holocaust when his Delta Class Reactor went sub Super Nova.

>>161538213
>USSR gets shafted outside of gimmick tanks

IT-1/ZSU-57/T-62 Combos with IL-28s
A few players rolling that will stomp anything that isn't a hardline of well-equipped Germans or absurd teamwork.

t-10m or t-62?
I have to get the 1951 t-54 or the is-4m before either so which one is worth it more?

Holy fuck, Serverside replay is great.

First day of fucking around with it, I got less suspicious of calling people out, noticed some issues I have with situational awareness, and already caught one slav cheater. Neat.

>>161539270
T-62

>>161539270

END-GAME USSR POWERLEVEL

>GOD TIER
IT-1, ZSU-57-2
>GOOD TIER
T-54 1947, T-62, ZSU-23-4 (deds planes, struggles with tonks)
>OK TIER
T-10M, T-54 1951, IS-3, T-44-100
>NOT SO GOOD TIER
IS-4M, SU-122-54, T-54 1949
>NIGGA DON'T EVEN TIER
ASU-85

>>161539542
ASU-85 can be pretty good depeding on the map desu

>>161539542
how is the asu-85 end game at tier 4 and br 6.7?

>>161539189

ZSU is a gimmick tank, T-62 is shittier 1 on 1 vs leos, IT-1 is trash outside of ambush and counter sniping.

>omg I move my mouse and the shell follows wau

having both a leo and an IT-1, I hate my IT-1, trash can only be used when camping.