/wowsg/ - World of Warships Admiral

File: __kaga_and_ryuujou_kantai_collection_drawn_by_blew_andwhite__7d46fc2119ca3ec43db3d091529ff527.jpg (504KB, 837x1200px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 837x1200px

>>157202127

Hey look you did the thread right. Compared to trying to start a thread in another thread.

First for I play ranked because I hate myself

File: 14755090340540.gif (704KB, 480x595px) Image search: [Google]

704KB, 480x595px

nth for slavchan is comfy

>just restarted playing a few days ago since CBT
>turns out I could have gotten a referral code for USS Texas when I hit tier 6
JUST

>>157202979
rekt

>>157202127
>Admiral
YOU MADMAN

File: 1404042868750.jpg (169KB, 448x480px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 448x480px

>>157202127
For some strange reason, the last time I saw a decent thread with booru art in the OP was in February...
Really redlining my V8 right now...
>no 0513 patch notes
>rumor mill on disproved shit STILL in the OP
>useless clan shit that can fuck right off for another few months
>no spreadsheets
>no pastebin
I miss quality

Why don't you make the thread yourself instead of whining about it?

File: 1475282196688.png (409KB, 853x479px) Image search: [Google]

409KB, 853x479px

>>157203496

>>157202979
>not willing to lose a few days progress for the Texas

is dis nigga fo realsies

File: 1455488817876.jpg (56KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 600x450px

>Cares SOOOOO deeply about his precious OP content beyond the image and title used
>Doesn't just make the fucking thread himself

>>157203731
>restarting low tier hell

File: 1457339191635.jpg (115KB, 400x470px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 400x470px

>>157204001
>Not having a Texas

>>157204079
>caring about the Texas

File: 1356227249023.jpg (288KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 1600x1200px

>>157204153

File: [Stars and Stripes Forever plays in the background].jpg (194KB, 742x599px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 742x599px

>>157204153
>being a commie

File: 1461849040035.jpg (46KB, 596x667px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 596x667px

>>157204153

File: howaboutanicegameofchess.jpg (10KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 480x360px

>start night at rank 11, 1 star
>10 battles later
>rank 11, 1 star

>>157204001
>low tier hell
>low tier
>hell

kek

Reminder that WG made USN tech trees shit on purpose so that you'll be a good goy and shell out some shekels for their excellent premium ships.

>>157205356
Did they just forget to make the premiums good?

File: are you having a chuckle, comrade.jpg (68KB, 742x476px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 742x476px

>>157205356
Can I justify 3000 dubsloons /20 USShekels on a camoflage for one ship? I've a feeling me and Benny are gonna be close friends for a long while...

>>157204854
>sent from my high dispersion HE spamming machine setting everything on fire

>>157205356
USN DDs are the best in class. USN BBs are very good. Half their lines are shit. Just like Germans with their CAs. Japanese DDs are shit too, and their BBs have been severely powercreeped. The only one that has maintained its dominance is the Yamato. Meanwhile the Russians, with both their lines being very good, have enough premiums in game to fill entire extra lines. Your logic's a little faulty.

>>157205513
Exactly. Why aren't cheesing your way through low tiers with your flamethrowers?

>>157205494

Do the math and see how many games it would take for the 3k gold camo to pay for itself compared to the 50g camo.

If you foresee yourself playing it that many games or more, go for it

>>157206546

pt 2

I thought I was going to use Benny all ranked but it turns out I'm a better pub DD player than a ranked/team oriented DD player so all that effort getting the 5th tier skill was sort of a waste,

>>157206415
my autism won't let me abuse fire mechanic

File: serious pout.png (49KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1000x1000px

>>157206638
My dream is ruined ;_;

Oh well.

Whats wrong with the fifth tier? I'm thinking camo expert myself. Just gotta grind that one last level

>>157207096
Concealment Expert is a must for any competitive DD play. In the past, high-tier US DDs might have been able to make Jack of All Trades work, but now radar has reduced the strength of permanent smoke.

>>157205674
I would argue that Yamato was dethroned by GK, which has better 2 week stats in everything but damage.

Montana has slowly been closing the stats gap from the small but steady buffs, and I expect the fixed deck armor will make a huge difference in its survivability and therefore average dmg and win rate.

File: 1475796520347.gif (1MB, 1200x666px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x666px

IJN DDs are good gunboats :^)

File: CufdX7AW8AIbPJy.jpg (116KB, 1024x1280px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1024x1280px

ded

>>157209753
They are. You just gotta git gud ))))))

M U T S U K I

File: AAstronk.jpg (81KB, 985x633px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 985x633px

>nazi BBs have stronger AA than american BBs

How cucked can american BBs get?

File: Bavaria_Mulls_an_End_to_Solidarity.png (83KB, 400x900px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 400x900px

nth for Bayern a best

File: cBD8Ozf.png (117KB, 283x424px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 283x424px

I want to get the Dunk

Convince me not to

>>157211434

>>157205356

Techtree not of performing well tovarisch? :(

Perhaps vladimir here can interest you of some premium ships for low low price))))))))

35 USA dollars for Texas with AA of excellence, very gud deal komrade!

File: BarbarianDD.jpg (19KB, 254x262px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 254x262px

>>157211669
I won't

Get it

It's not on sale anymore, is it?

So I've never played any ranked matches before and I'm doing quite well I would think. Anyway the unique flags you get. Are they only for that season or do you keep them for good?

To the dude from last night's thread: Did you still need a SEA server invite? I went to bed early and didn't see your post.

>>157214045
>>157214045
The flags you get for reaching R15 and R1 are permanent.
Flags that reduce repair cost only until end of season

>>157214349
Looks like this league there is not keeping any flag then. Cause the rank 15 one is repair and for rank 1 there is none. Only doubloons, credits and camo.

>>157215368
Sorry, worded it wrong.
On rank 15 you get -repair, but also at the end of the season you will get perma flag that does nothing except looking nice.
On rank 1 you'll get Jolly Roger flag.

>>157215584
Already have a jolly roger though I have no idea what for. Never was rank 1 in ranked matches. And I won't even be able to finish it cause I don't have a tier X ship. Well that's kinda gay. But seeing how WG is pretty jewish it would've wondered me even more if we ever got anything nice from them. You know without paying for it first.

Also >ranked
3 losses in a row and I didn't lose a star yet. Fucking retards.

>>157216060
Damn you sound like a shitter, what the fuck are you even talking about?

If you've never been ranked 1, you shouldn't have a jolly roger place in the first place. You don't need TX to get rank 1.

File: roger.png (536KB, 751x499px) Image search: [Google]

536KB, 751x499px

>>157216097
Shit you're right. Nvm I'm retarded. Pic related is the one you mean right?

>>157216338
1. Yes that's the flag I mean.
2. Other anon is right, you don't need T10. On T10 you would simply get increased rewards for being R1.
3. If you get 3 R1 you'll get a boat.

>>157216338
Also, does CBT flag actually does anything?

File: nope.png (350KB, 552x468px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 552x468px

>>157216717
Not according to the description.

>>157216657
Which boat? The Flint was it?

>>157216717
No, the alpha one gives like 5% bonus XP or credits or something, but CBT just gives you bragging rights I guess.

>>157216814
>The Flint was it?
Yes.

File: --littorio-kantai-collection-drawn-by-sumisu-mondo--621ab1808acef521ac309885be231462.jpg (99KB, 1200x1028px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1200x1028px

Ranked games where BB aren't majority of the team can actually be somewhat fun and engaging

Captcha asked me to choose pasta

>>157217078
>doesn't post a screenshot where BBs are supposedly a "majority"

neck yourself shitter

File: this is totally fine muh IJN bias.jpg (139KB, 1246x665px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 1246x665px

What the fuck am I supposed to do against Minekaze? He shits out torps and I can't FUCKING DODGE EVERY SINGLE TORP HEADING FOR ME.

So SICK of this shit.

>>157217532
>posting bait
lel

>>157217639
What bait? I don't know what to do against Minekaze or those IJN DDs spitting out torps every second towards me.

>>157217532
You're a speshul guy!
It's ok mummy's here to listen!

>>157217665
How about killing him with your guns?

>>157217764
>he moves at 40 knots
>slightly touches his WASD keys
>miss

How to play Tirpitz in this ranked season?

>>157217793
>bait - the series
kek

>>157190127
Non-refugee here, pings to NA server was about 120ms which is pretty decent.
>>157217819
Play like a typical non-brawling BB for the first 10 minutes, consider going brawling mode if your team is behind in points. Bismarck is the better sister ship to bring into Ranked though.

File: 1375325980113.gif (424KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

424KB, 400x300px

>>157217532
Feel better that you aren't gun boating in mid tier USN DDs.

I AM THE LORD OF HOMOS, THE RAINBOW LORD. MY SHOTS ARE SO GAY THAT IF YOU LOOK AT THEM THEY'LL ARCH AROUND YOU.

On the bright side, I'm such a flaming homo USN DDs ignite a fire with every shot.

>>157202127
>no link to PTS
>no link to latest patch notes
>no link to ARP Takao
>only made the general to attention whore and show off your high concentration of autism
>picture has nothing to do with World of Warships

Fuck off rapespammer or should we call you IkeJM?

File: seemsfair.png (735KB, 1928x1084px) Image search: [Google]

735KB, 1928x1084px

Im not quit gonna say rigged...

But is anyone else feeling like these matches are seeded favorably for one side on the other

(usually not mine T_T )

>PTS patch already out
neat

>“Random” chest will pick”signal flag” ,”credit” ,”premium consumable” or”rare item”at random. The first three treasure chests will not drop rare items. The following loot table applies only to”random" ->“rare item”category.
"The first three treasure chests will not drop rare items"? What? The first three of any given day, or the first three ever?

>>157220049
Whenever you get a box, you can pick one of four types of box.

The first 3 types of box correspond to a type of reward (credits, signals/camo, consumables). Basically when you pick one, you'll receive three rewards, one of which is guaranteed to be the same reward type as the box. These are the three chests they're saying will not drop items.

The fourth type of box has a reduced regular reward (only a single random reward), but a higher chance of getting a rare box. This is the "random" chest that they're talking about.

Their loot table is for the rare boxes.

WG actually claims that the regular boxes CAN drop rare items. I don't really trust WG or the chinks though so let's just wait and see how this plays out.

>>157220751
>they're saying will not drop items.

Will not drop rare items.

Fuck.

>>157220751
Apparently the NA site says the normal boxes can get epic containers?
http://worldofwarships.com/en/news/common/0513-public-test/

Test server is up

How good/bad is Izumo?
I'm tired of having all the guns at the back and having to go broadside.

>>157221598
Yes. They can. It's just that container type 4 has much bigger chance of getting that rare box

File: Konachan.com - 188394 airfield_hime aoba_(kancolle) isolated_island_oni itsukia ka-class_submarine kantai_collection midway_hime rensouhou-chan seaport_hime.jpg (802KB, 1788x954px) Image search: [Google]

802KB, 1788x954px

>Arpeggio of Blue Steel ending soon
>all glowpanties will be avaliable again soon
>you could be fondling a free 9 pt myoko captain RIGHT NOW
>H A I F U R I likely next
>SEA already had its flag floating around
>soon we will get boxes for playing the game
>god i hope they dont become the main means to get a animay ship
>not many other american animays out there that WG can make a deal with
what will you do when KDKW will need to outjew WG and moefantasy for the rights to add your waifu to WoWS?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Avi4DpQeI3I

File: moskow moskow.jpg (305KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 1440x900px

:3

>>157224423
I feel the balans.

Based WG finally embracing the majority of the player-base; Brazilian Children

>>157224423
>Received 301k
Ayy lma0 just punish the good players!

File: 0513CVimpression.png (2MB, 1920x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x2160px

Obviously I'll play a bit more and at different tiers too, but my first impression is WG (((upwardly revised))) credit and xp gains compared to the Live Server, but still less then 0.5.11

>>157225562
I forgot to mention that "Potential damage" or basically the tanking section has been completely removed for CVs, it's still present when playing other ship classes (Rip frontline skillway).

>>157225562
>-50 doubloons
good goy

>>157225685
Do I Have to Start From Nothing?
Nope! Your Public Test account has:
Tier VI ships manned by Commanders with tons of Skills
Account level 12 on first login, including all the rewards you'd earn along the way
Reduced XP research requirements for ships tier VI+, and module prices drastically reduced for all ships
Account Level 12 on first login
Seven days of Premium time
30,000 Doubloons to spend on Commander Skills, Premium consumables, or anything else you'd like
500,000,000 Credits
5 Signal Flags of each type
Discounted ability to re-spec Commanders: 1 Doubloon = 1 Skill point.

>30,000 Doubloons to spend on Commander Skills, Premium consumables, or anything else you'd like
Really makes you think huh...

>>157225685
It's PTS

>>157224206
They don't, they won't. There's a reason they're successful and you're a worthless peice of trash

File: QT Hotel43.jpg (165KB, 640x1136px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 640x1136px

Hotel: Literally, the QTest.

>>157227076
she's fat

>>157227129
Not fat, but healthy

>>157227341

F A T

>>157227129
>>157227341
Fat is OK in those places, anon.

Your lust for chiselled, manly muscles and the D is too obvious, tone it down a bit.

File: Yamato_Trial_1941.jpg (886KB, 3430x1756px) Image search: [Google]

886KB, 3430x1756px

Fat in all the right places.

>There will never be a more aesthethicc ship than Yamato
JDIMSA

File: this smug was made for a mug.png (330KB, 750x500px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 750x500px

T H I C C armor plates

>>157219627
Yeah my man this MM is totally rigged. Just make sure you don't bring Benson, it's so shit compared to Fubuki.

File: Tiny Hotel, a Moetel, if you will.png (53KB, 300x200px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 300x200px

>>157228619
I'm now realizing I need a mug with this design.

>>157228613
The front bow looks so long in some pictures and in-game, but look closer and it's not so much. What's the deal?

>>157229997
perspecthiccve

>>157229997
The curve of the deck makes it look longer or shorter depending on the angle and distance.

Or, in the case of the pic above, the huge amount of spray.

File: yamato last config.jpg (989KB, 1920x1036px) Image search: [Google]

989KB, 1920x1036px

>>157229997
Depends on the angle I guess

File: yamato with reactive armor.jpg (1MB, 1200x1603px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x1603px

>>157229997
The bow is actually fairly long. But it's fairly thick, which is why it doesn't give the same appearance when looked from above.

Still, literally the most aesthetic battleship ever designed.

File: contribute to lithuania's suicide rate.png (391KB, 487x720px) Image search: [Google]

391KB, 487x720px

Lads, Leningrad is too strong.

When will they remove it from the premium store? I thought it would be a meme with the turret layout but it's actually amazing.

>>157230864
>Leningrad is too strong.
Is not too strong!

Is just better at fighting than other ships)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

File: eventually everyone snaps.jpg (56KB, 1024x640px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1024x640px

>hits a DD with a BB shell that weights 1/10th of the DDs weight
>it survives with minor scratches
>hits a CA with a BB shell that weights 1/15th of the CAs weight
>fucking vaporized

>>157230985
What?

>>157202127
Just started playig this game today, had plenty of fun until now. How does the referral work? (I'm playing in the EU server)

>>157229997
Yamato isn't actually that long, when compared to say Iowa even. She just looks bigger because they built the superstructure farther back than in most designs, to give her some unexpected agility when turning.

>>157230985
>1/10th of the DDs weight
DDs come in at several thousand tons.
>1/15th of the CAs weight
CAs weigh 10k tons and more.

The problem is WG's choice of game mechanics, which come down to 'Fuck CAs'

>>157231307
>which come down to 'Fuck CAs'

That's why you can set everything on fire while being invisible and dodge every shell with not ONE but TWO rudder upgrades.

File: infinite resource sink.gif (855KB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

855KB, 480x270px

>>157231112
Somebody has to post a link to his own referral, you click on it an accept it.
It gives you a free T2 ship. Upon reaching T6 (play one T6 game with a techtree ship), you get a free T5 premium Texas battleships, some credits and 80k free XP.

I'd give you a referral link, but I'm from NA.
You're welcome to switch to the NA server.

>>157231112
Ref link if you still want to play eu

http://playtogether.worldofwarships.eu/invite/LKvlv39

>>157231421
Oh, thanks for the explanation!

>>157231513
damn,seems like I've already played too much to get the referral.

>>157231689
You can always restart

>>157231689
>started today
>played too much
wot m8

File: shipbearing-hips hotel.png (575KB, 700x933px) Image search: [Google]

575KB, 700x933px

>>157231189
The turning agility has more to do with how wide she is AFAIK.

>In-game Yamato will never have a 600m-ish turn radius
Why does WG hate fun? I'd gladly give away concealment (which can get pretty ridiculous for a ship of her size) and a bit of damage potential in exchange of super fun turning radius. BBs would be much more fun if they could mount the new rudder upgrade too.

>>157231689
Unless you're too attached to your name, it's better to just start all over again with a new account.

File: 42f8d408e2c490eae29e9c8ffecbb983.jpg (350KB, 1200x429px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 1200x429px

>>157231421
>filename
That's what I feel when I send Yamato to fight the last battle of any event.
She always gets me through, pure love.

>>157231381
>That's why you can set everything on fire while being invisible and dodge every shell with not ONE but TWO rudder upgrades.
Which results in earning less XP and credits than the comparable BBs while relying on the most stupidly broken mechanics WG put into the game (HE/fires)

>>157231942
Only retards and shitters complains about battleships.
Don't show your broadside, it's not hard.

>>157231845
yeah, I'll probably restart

>>157231756
But then you'd be able to evade like a cruiser, is not of balans tovarish))))

>>157231756
Because scaling aren't accurate in the first place
1km in this game is like 500 meters or something

File: le_tricky_nose_faec.gif (1MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x500px

>>157232052
>Don't show your broadside
>while BBs pen through your bow, stern or deck
Oh wait, I forgot, I can just invisifire while not gettign any XP and credits, it'll be OK.

>>157232274
>he thinks his cruiserr gameplay in the low tiers matters

N-e-c-k yourself

File: QT.jpg (110KB, 897x718px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 897x718px

>>157231908
Yamato always does her best!
Even if you're a kuso admiral who only takes her out when it's convenient for himself.
Don't be THAT admiral. Take her out more often. She wants to feel the sea flowing through her rudders.

>mfw I unlocked Saipan in PTS

u wot m8

>>157232419
So goy, do you like this boat? It's a good boat

File: 1457717170199.png (665KB, 644x529px) Image search: [Google]

665KB, 644x529px

post your rewards

>>157232097
But cruisers can now evade like destroyers!
>>157232247
While scaling is indeed wrong, BBs and cruisers used to have smaller turn radii and shorter rudder shift times, back in CBT. They were nerfed to unhistorical values to make torps more effective. As an unintended consequence dodging in hightier BB gunfights is less effective and only further validates the effectiveness of the bow-front reverse meta.

Buff BB turn radius
Nerf BB concealment
Buff torpedo speeds
Remove the 40% rudder upgrade and just make it a flat buff on ALL ships.

Would make the game much more dynamic.

>>157232301
>in the low tiers
t9 and t10 is not 'the low tiers', anon.

I understand that you are afraid of nerfs to your pet BBs, but the game is already in a terrible state thanks to what teh CVnts pulled last year.
Let's not just kill it completely by letting the baBBies repeat that bullshit.

Also, it's not even BB nerfs that are needed. It's mostly changes to CAs. Allow them to do other things than 'firespam from beyond detection range'

>>157232850
Like? The BBs whined when CA AP could reliably do damage, and we all know that the one AP-dominated cruiser line, the Germans, are the worst-performing cruisers in-game.

Torpedoes? BaBBies are angry enough at DDs, they'll have an aneurysm if cruisers could rely on torps. And for everyone else, overmatch mechanics prevent them from closing in enough to use their torps anyway.

>>157232765
>Remove the 40% rudder upgrade and just make it a flat buff on ALL ships.
We can't have that, comrade!

It would imply that the changes WG made during the transition from alpha to open beta were completely idiotic, and it would allow all the alpha testers to come back and say 'we fucking told you so, you retarded slav vodka addicts'

>>157233098
all 50 alpha testers that are still playing?

>>157231942
>relying on the most stupidly broken mechanics WG put into the game (HE/fires)
To be honest I don't see any other way WG can balance cruisers in this game.

If you make their AP more effective, they can either:
a) Fuck up battleships even more than now with damage that can't be repaired as well as fires/HE
b) Rendered useless with some simple angling, which only validates another stupidly broken mechanic/meta

>>157233062
>and we all know that the one AP-dominated cruiser line, the Germans, are the worst-performing cruisers in-game.
Tbh, ironically t10 germans have the worst cruiser pen of all t10.

>>157232850
>t9 and t10 is not 'the low tiers', anon.

How are you dying in high tier cruisers when they're capable of:
Invis firing
Having wo (2) upgrades to dodge salvos with ease
Invis firing
Dealing 10k+ damage with AP on everything consistently
Invis firing

>>157233165
We can't have people who told WG almost two years ago that the changes they were introducing were idiotic and would have to be rolled back in order for the game to work be proven right!

Better to watch the game crash and burn than to admit that not listening to the dvice from the people who actually play the game was wrong
.
For previous examples of this WG polciy, see artillery in WoT, TDs in WoT, 'corridor' map design in WoT, carriers in WoWS, DDs and torps in WoWS, and for the lulz all of WoWP.

>>157233202
i think its HE that is fucked, so much that in order to match AP damage they added fires, wich is more that 50% of all cruiser damage

if HE could do something like wear down armor it could really work. as it is theres no reason to be a CAsual as a CLit can do the job of spreading fire better

File: 1448232374640.jpg (834KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

834KB, 1920x1080px

>>157232319
I take her out every day for exercises.
Because all the damn extra maps where her supreme firepower comes in handy demand fast battleships only.

File: stalin_approves.jpg (39KB, 220x345px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 220x345px

>>157233521
>Dealing 10k+ damage with AP on everything consistently
Moskva is not 'every cruiser', comrade.

Moskva is design from Comrade Stalin himself, able to fight better than other cruisers)))))))))))))))))

>>157233165
I still play, it's fun being on a sinking bote :^)

>>157233590
Or if they did it like someone suggested a couple threads back where you can control secondaries, which fire HE shells. Where the main battery guns will only fire AP.

>>157233682
I'm not talking about Moskva.
I'm talking about every t9+ cruiser.

File: Oh you wish I was kidding.png (10KB, 356x376px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 356x376px

>>157232319
I don't think rudders would be very effective if water flowed through them.

>>157233521
>How are you dying
Nice movement of your goalpost ;^)

Why do you suddenly bring up survival?
BBs can invisifire as well, why is that so special?

>>157233713
Sure. Please show me screen of Baltimore doing 10k damage consistently to a BB.

File: !!.jpg (67KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1280x720px

>>157232614
5.13 when?!

>>157233824
>BBs can invisifire as well, why is that so special?
You make it sound like it's a systemic thing when its not.

File: shot-16.10.12_12.14.59-0387.jpg (988KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

988KB, 1920x1080px

Spoogy

>>157233840
Confirmed for being a shitposter.

I bet your only t10 cruiser is Zao.

>>157233972
Around 18

File: 1351557596078.jpg (97KB, 685x677px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 685x677px

>>157234078
I hate october, my friend keeps sending me pictures of skeletons. I just want it to be november already, for many reasons this year.

>>157233713
>every t9+ cruiser.
>10k with AP
Not with Ibuki, Roon or Baltimore.
And not with Hindenburg or Zao, either

I don't have Donskoi, Moskva and DM.

German AP will simply shatter or bounce, Jap AP does no damage even if it pens, US AP only pens at short range.

Actualy, wait. You can use US AP to pen for this amount of damage at suicide ranges. So I guess DM can actually kil things at under 10 km with AP.

Hooray, cruisers are fine, l2p.

File: 06db883dd0f0de1abbfe40151966a9d4.gif (316KB, 556x800px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 556x800px

https://thewarshipspodcast.simplecast.fm/episodes/49678-episode-10-listener-q-a-with-wargaming-na

>Possible Mogami rework in the future
Luis! Your botefu may be buffed soon™!

>>157233824
>BBs can invisifire as well, why is that so special?

What did he mean by this?

>>157234113
Wut?
Cmmon it can't be that hard to present proofs

File: myoko.jpg (193KB, 596x954px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 596x954px

>>157233824
>Yamato with range upgrade+scout plane
>BBs can invisifire!

>>157234175
>Not with Ibuki, Roon or Baltimore.
>And not with Hindenburg or Zao, either

Please stop shitposting you fucking turd, it's super obvious your most played cruiser is Zao, you never load AP and you love setting everything on fire from your cute little safespace.

Please fuck off, you won't fool anyone.

>>157234175
>German AP will simply shatter or bounce
Wrong. German AP will actually do good damage if shot at broadside BB superstructures. More even than Zao's HE on the same target under the same condition except that Zao can continue to utilise her HE beyond those circumstances. Also fires, fires everywhere.

File: elaborate_ruse.jpg (42KB, 503x518px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 503x518px

>>157234202
>>157234228
Look how it triggers the baBBies enough to start flailing around helplessly.

>>157234382
Why don't you explain what you mean with "invis firing battleships" you autistic fuck

>>157234307
Please tell us about your most played ships, and how the evil CAs set you on fire all the time.

>>157234078
>how do you want your camo, captain
>just halloween my shit up
>say no mo'

>>157234478
My most played T10 is Hindenburg

>>157234337
>German AP will actually do good damage if shot at broadside BB superstructures. More even than Zao's HE on the same target under the same condition
So all you have to do in your german Ca is shoot at teh unarmored parts of the enemy ship when it's broadside-on.

In this situation, US AP could potentially citpen the enemy to actually deal relevant damage, IJN HE would have burnt the target to one third hitpoints long ago, and BALANS battlecruisers would still be sitting bow-on in the back together with the actual BBs.

Sounds like a great ship, I'll start grinding for that right away!

>>157234430
>Why don't you explain what you mean with "invis firing battleships"
TRy learning about detection ragens, and using some maths, it will all become clear in the end ;^)

>>157234174
What if I told you there is a skeleton hiding inside you, waiting for it's chance to be free of it's fleshy prison?

Ok So the NO armor buff is legit. I tanked 24+ Iowa shells and 20+ Grosser Kurfurst shells with my bow with 0 citadels. Moskva just tickled too.

Figures I just finished playing her and sold on live.

>>157234814
Ok you autistic nigger, have fun trying to hit targets at 30+ km with the range upgrade and scout plane.

>>157234540
Sooo, proofs about constant 10k per salvo.?

>>157234938
Play the game? Watch a random Youtube video about high tier cruisers? Do you want me to change your diapers too

File: 1473096861849.jpg (135KB, 310x281px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 310x281px

>>157234848
aaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>157234863
whut

is this why they make you use NO for rewards

>>157235631
Yes.
And Mogami got better turret angles

File: 1197385820273.png (106KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 500x500px

>>157234848
Iron in your blood probably used to be part of warship too.

>>157235227
So no proofs.
You made a claim, and you wasn't able to lrovide any evidence supporting this claim, even though all I wanted was a few screenshots.
Conclusion? You are talking shit.

>>157235526
No tears now

Only rattling now

>>157235808
I knew I was a cute bote girl all this time :'^)

>>157235941
>he is so bad, so autistic, he can't load AP and deal 10k+ damage

Wew. Maybe one day you will eventually figure out how to switch ammo on Zao.

>>157236234
Gotta need proof on that :^3

File: 412342323.png (54KB, 1711x433px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1711x433px

>Nigga bought a 15k prebuilt to play wows.
>Computer can't even run it

These are your SEA players.

File: 412342323-2.png (109KB, 1689x861px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1689x861px

>>157236693
>Posted specs

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

>>157236842
>>157236693
>Windows 10
Well there's your problem.

File: Littorio and Roma.jpg (609KB, 1063x1063px) Image search: [Google]

609KB, 1063x1063px

>Italian girls are...

File: speechless whores.jpg (45KB, 583x498px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 583x498px

>>157236842
Jesus.

>>157235707
Wow nice
Oh wait it's still citpened by literally every BB shot nvm
I love Mogami to bits but the chance of getting deleted by every half assed salvo makes me hate her sometimes

File: 57b76ea344b6a07d135e5e4fcc5a6c4c.jpg (28KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 400x400px

>>157237020
Best when they are drunk.

File: 1436369640536.jpg (26KB, 720x394px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 720x394px

>>157236842
>when retards have the money

>>157236842
what the hell is this

wich jew managed to rip so much money of him

>>157236268
Where I said that I have Zao?

File: ships de pizza.gif (427KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 640x480px

>>157237020
for memes

File: 1476148261344.jpg (100KB, 740x740px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 740x740px

>>157236842
>8GB RAM

>>157237020
Akagi no!

File: rip.png (183KB, 606x283px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 606x283px

this was £29.80something last month

J U S T

>>157236968
Win 10 is perfectly fine. It's not the best thing ever, but it works. That's good enough.

>>157237909
Demand went up, you saw it :^)

>>157238065
>t. NSA

>>157238065
its possible he got it when it was free

think about that for a minute

File: Littorio and Roma bikes.jpg (630KB, 5391x3257px) Image search: [Google]

630KB, 5391x3257px

>>157237020

for fun.

>>157238065
>It's not the best thing ever, but it works. That's good enough.
t.WG

File: 8651023[1].png (407KB, 700x629px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 700x629px

>>157238185
I don't live in the land of the free to care about NSA.
>>157238327
Can be said about anything, yes.

>>157238065
Lordmotochika please stop shilling you autistic fuck.

>>157237645
That guy must have been the happiest guy that day.

File: 134587595624.png (547KB, 451x579px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 451x579px

damn this general sure is full of NEETs and weebs

brb just going to buy a Sharnhorst and keep the servers afloat on EU

>>157238663
http://www.jpcomputersolutions.com.au/ek-ekoolant-evo-liquid-cooling-coolant-uv-red-1000ml.html

likely the water itself was 20 USD

20 USD for 1L of CLEAN water

clearly i am in the wrong job

>>157239139
That must be some amazingly clean water.

File: 1476043796451.gif (4MB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 200x200px

>>157236842
>rx 480
>8gb ram
>15,000
This gets me
This gets me

>>157236693
>>157236842
holy fuck

>>157237909
>pound
Well, you wanted to leave teh EU.

Now you earn the 'benefits' ;^)

>>157236842
Dat MAINGEAR RUCH Chassis with Tempered Glasses Sides though. Dat liquid cooling with [CLEAR] EKoolant extra pure, distilled, and deionized water, man.
That's a monster of a PC right there.

>>157240201
>raping that Z170 with such a shitty graphics card, the bad variant of the i7 and no RAM
I love it when idiots build a PC, or get tricked into buying prebuilt shit.

File: laughing dragons.jpg (211KB, 805x945px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 805x945px

>>157236842

>>157238065
do you have the one with KTKM + Ooi

File: laughing torpedo whores.png (390KB, 674x745px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 674x745px

>>157241136

File: Contemplating.jpg (13KB, 220x308px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 220x308px

What first skill should I pick on a Nassau captain if I decide to stick to that line

>>157242309
Tirpitz or Scharnhorst?

>>157242351

None

I just started and really like the Nassau

>>157242450
BoS or BFT

>>157242309
Basics of survivability.

>>157225631
Are you sure? It normally doesn't show up if you haven't tanked any damage.

I request your expertise sea men.
There use to be this Russia girl on youtube who did videos of her playing Warships. I'd like to find her channel again, anyone exactly who I am talking of? She was like THE girl people would link at any mention of warships a year back or more.

Thanks.

>>157242865
>>157242819

Noice.

And after that?

>>157243337
Expert marksman, faster turrets.

Next

Superintendent for another health pot

Then

Go buy a fucking kaiser you filthy seal clubber.

>>157243248
This?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO2AwgKWqCQ

>>157243439
O Captain! My Captain! our fearful trip is done;

Thank you comrade.

>>157243425

I will, but first I am going to research it

File: 8f57ab1993e449a8c4c5d2f77832f766[1].jpg (57KB, 899x600px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 899x600px

>>157243771
Oбpaщaйcя.

>face a competent Des Moines player three games in the row
>seems like a concealment build since nigga always gets the jump on people

Good grief, forget the Zao, how ridiculous is the DM's flamethrower potential once in range?

>>157244108
You're not supposed to use HE with DM. Most likely he used AP and that deals 10k+ per salvo

>>157243439
What the fuck is this.

superintendent or high alert for IJN BBs?

>>157244671
torpedo accel

Is Udaloi playable stock?

>>157244108
You're shitting out 9 17% fire shells every 6 seconds. Better than zao's in the long run.

>>157244108
Zao w/ DE: 11.56 fire/min
Des Moines w/o DE: 12.60 fire/min

>>157244974
you can start the match with it

cant you?

>>157244108
>AP that deals 10k+ per salvo
Who is trying to force this fresh meme?

>>157245418
Not me, I was asking about DM's flamethrower potential.

Remember to think of the children today.

http://worldofwarships.com/en/news/common/thinkofthechildren/

>>157244671
Superintendent.

File: __yamato_kantai_collection_drawn_by_aikawa_ryou__bb9c710f307906b71fb4ad7fe55f49f1.jpg (747KB, 912x1156px) Image search: [Google]

747KB, 912x1156px

Hotel a _______.

File: 1452396878029.jpg (27KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 640x640px

>>157246052
Why do we care about the sub-humans that inhabit brazil?

File: ss+(2016-07-11+at+01.00.27).png (364KB, 1338x733px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 1338x733px

>>157236842
Can't be any worse than my toaster.

File: smug german coffee, grinded not preprocessed.jpg (61KB, 500x485px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 500x485px

>>157246676
sunk

File: 1471221510729.jpg (504KB, 900x1141px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 900x1141px

>>157246818
Free 2x XP.

>>157246676
submarine.

File: QT.gif (1MB, 500x282px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x282px

>>157246676
QTEST

File: 1475189449518.jpg (202KB, 600x700px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 600x700px

>>157246676
cute DD

File: UHCSQcl[1].png (788KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

788KB, 1366x768px

>HEAVY BREATHING

Are all kraut BBs this fun?

>>157248185
Mostly, yes.

File: NOT A HOTEL.png (669KB, 755x718px) Image search: [Google]

669KB, 755x718px

NO A HOTEL

File: NOT A HOTEL.png (1MB, 850x1203px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 850x1203px

>>157248680

File: old_spice_guy_nod.gif (1MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x360px

>>157248680
>>157248939
>thousands of seamen got to stay for a while
>they were all so satisfied by the services provided that they told everyone they met

File: Abyssal tomato.png (3MB, 2010x2010px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2010x2010px

>>157246676
dominatrix!

File: 9fad0d258df7fb92355a04fe5467f8e9.jpg (1MB, 1200x977px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1200x977px

>>157246676
Strongest battleship.

File: memories of a DD under 7km of a bismarck.gif (448KB, 540x304px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 540x304px

>cant bring myself to play on main server
>cant stop playing the PTS ever since it was released
>even when i cant find anything new on PTS
well i know bong ships wont be coming with 5.13 or they would be avaliable for testing

right?

>>157245356

Ship sections get HE saturated pretty quickly, fires have a DOT cap (with 2 fires going, trying to aim and start fires on the remaining sections can take many salvoes if you can manage it at all)

Meanwhile you can be rekking them for 5-10k ap damage a salvo.

Tldr; start a couple fires then switch to AP (unless you have a nice broadside to fuck from go, in which case forgo the foreplay)

>>157250435
WG still has no idea on what to do with the bong cruisers. So no, they're not coming in 5.13. Most likely not even on 5.14.

>>157250435
Just like kraut BBs were available for testing?

>even when i cant find anything new on PTS
Crates?
There are missions for New Orleans and Mogami for a reason too, you know.

File: 1476238825104.jpg (185KB, 555x739px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 555x739px

>first shells that hit me in the match detonate me
>Fit's my first win of the day

>>157250435
>>even when i cant find anything new on PTS
NO front citadel armor is much lower.

File: shot-16.10.12_15.13.14-0042.jpg (949KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

949KB, 1920x1080px

Nurnberg AA hull looks a little silly.

>>157251504
>12k exp for 2 crates, 20k more for a last crate
i wont even keep the rewards, whats the point

>NO
>mewgami
NO is signifcantly tanky but still a CA with 1 barrel less that pepsicola

im not sure what could be helped on mogami, better turret angle sounds irrelevant compared to NO buffs

>>157250435
>>157251659
Also, if you hover over someone's name on the scoreboard, it will show you their full IGN.

>>157251747
Its also complete trash since the guns have no range and you lose the catapult fighter

>You can actually see seamen on that crate supply ship.
WG seamen on BBs when?

>>157234713
>US AP could potentially citpen the enemy to actually deal relevant damage
haha no.

>>157252240
>haha no.
T9-10 US AP has second biggest pen of all 203mm.

>>157236842
>480
>EIGHT GB of RAM
>AN OPTICAL DRIVE IN 2016
>All this bullshit devoted to cooling

>15k on an outdated PC with bells and whistles that do nothing

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>157252385
And its still never going to be enough to penetrate a BB at anything other than point blank range, which German AP also does but for more damage.

USN AP is still better, but the claim that it will citpen a BB where German AP wont is bull-fucking-shit.

File: Samus upset about all the spilled yogurt.png (539KB, 659x712px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 659x712px

>>157252131
Fucking this

I want to see my botes covered head to toe in a thick layer of seamen.

>>157252686
>that it will citpen a BB where German AP wont
Well, duh, German AP has lower pen. So it is possible for USN to pen, and Germans don't.
For example. Montana has 409mm side armor,
To pen from side USN needs to be at around 4km range. Zao -- 5.7km
Gernans -- 2km.
As for deck pens, I honestly don't know since I have no idea how shell behaves once it is inside ship.But for example superior USN autobounce angle can play huge role here.

>>157252686
>but the claim that it will citpen a BB where German AP wont is bull-fucking-shit.
No matter how much you don't like it, US AP will pen and citpen at longer ranges than German AP.

Both will only citpen at suicide ranges, bit with a DM you can point your bow at a baBBie and actually delete him, in a a Hindenburg you will take too long with just your front turrets, and die as soon as you expose your side.

>>157234848
fuck you

>>157253302
No, it won't. Not against BBs.

File: broken hotel.jpg (868KB, 1973x1041px) Image search: [Google]

868KB, 1973x1041px

>>157253043
this desu

>>157253423
Once again. Even fucking Pensacola has better pen then Hindenburg. You can be at range where USN AP pens, and KM doesn't

>>157253463
post more

>>157253423
see
>>157253253
It can, and will.
Yeah, ridiculously short range, thanks to baBBies whining about evil CA AP being a threat to them.

>>157253696
No, it doesn't.

Why do you insist on being so fucking wrong?

File: Capture.png (615KB, 1196x899px) Image search: [Google]

615KB, 1196x899px

spoopy ghost ship confirmed for 5.13

>>157253847
Okay, so I base my argument on this forum post
http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/59528-armor-penetration-curves/

What do you base your words on?

>>157253998
Actual in game experience with both lines all the way up to T10 and not some blind groping at ballistics formulas WG refuses to release. You find those and maybe you can change my mind, otherwise its a bunch of fucking hearsay.

Why doesn't WG just include the impact angle and potential armor penetration of a shell alongside the flight time information? This way we don't have to make guess work and they keep their super sekret formula under wraps.

>>157254565
>Why doesn't WG just include the impact angle and potential armor penetration of a shell alongside the flight time information?
They are working on it and promice to release Soon™

File: Soon.jpg (3KB, 140x62px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 140x62px

>>157254417
>>157253998
Why don't you two just get a training room and shoot at each other.

>>157254565
Too confuzing for new players ))))

>>157246851
Since you're using PSX, I'll be nice. You should be careful at 105C cause you'll melt your PC friend

>>157254565
>>157254692
engine can not of handlings ((((

File: 1457866706252.jpg (88KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 500x500px

>>157248185
>69k damage
>high caliber
wat

>>157256484
It's T3

>>157254565
> We are going to add penetration values to game wiki in some form, and later, when we develop a smart way to show it, we wil surely add it to game client.
Wait for it in 2019

File: 1366821705311.png (123KB, 256x368px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 256x368px

>>157248185
Yes

File: 1472915625075.png (980KB, 1000x1497px) Image search: [Google]

980KB, 1000x1497px

When impressing shipgirls, look doesn't really matter.

t. Chadwick Thundercock who spoils all ur botesluts

>>157256785
>later, when we develop a smart way to show it, we wil surely add it to game client.
If only there was a perfect example of such a tool for WoT from 2013.

But of course WG first has to turn it into a dumbed-down piece of shit, just like how their armor viewer is way less accurte and informative than that jewish website.

>>157256590
oh, I misread
thought it said Gneisenau

What's the shitty discord again?
I feel like feeling awful and being among autists.

>>157257730
https://discord.gg/UYajY8w

What the fuck is the minimum arm distance on DD torps?

I just got hit by 4 torps ~15 meters away from a leningrad I was charging in my gneisenau when we were about to lose the game anyways

>>157258727
You see the deadzone around your ship when you select torps?
That is the arming distance.

>>157257273
>If only there was a perfect example of such a tool for WoT from 2013.
You mean that armor piercing value?
In WoT distances are not long enough to lower your pen value by significant ammount. Unlike WoWS.
Though they could've simply, for now, show 1km pen, 5km, 10km, max range. But I guess that would be confusing

>tfw still have to fight the urge to go broadside.

>>157259518
>In WoT distances are not long enough to lower your pen value by significant ammount.
Actually, penetration values for APSDF does drop with range in WoT.

>>157260210
Tfw you go broadside to a Yamato at 15km and he overpens you for 2960

File: Blini questions.png (89KB, 353x332px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 353x332px

Should I use AP or HE for cruisers if I'm a battleship?

>>157259518
I mean the third-party tank viewer that lets you select a gun to shoot at the tank you are viweing.
You select a gun, and then you set an impact point on the tank.

Also, note that WoT compresses energy loss beyond 100 meters for KE ammo to make long-range sniping less effective, so those values are of course not perfectly reliable, but it gives you an impression of when you will autobounce, where you can overmatch, etc.

The exact same thing would work for ships.
Select a ship, a gun, a range, and you get a trajectory that simulates the angle of fall into the target point, showing you where your shell would end up.

Of course all this information would confuse new players(((((((((((((((((, so we can't have it.

>>157260858
AP
You can do a bunch of damage with either regular pens or citadel pens and potentially one-shot them
or you'll get fucked by RNG and get overpens and not do much, but the decent potential to take off a big chunk of their HP makes it worth it

>>157260858
>Should I try to penetrate their armor with my fuck huge shells or not

???

File: tUPhcxj.gif (288KB, 613x345px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 613x345px

>>157260858
AP for CA, HE for CL. AP will work on the CL with thicker armor.

>>157260858

AP in almost every situation

Vs other BBs it's more interesting. There are a few legit scenarios where HE is a better choice.

>>157260586

>tfw it seems the second I'm no longer directly pointing at an enemy I get citpened

What's the most beautiful modern (1990+) warship?

>>157262215
>hitting Kuma/Omaha/Phoenix with HE when you can citpen them with AP at any angle for 10k+ per salvo

"no"

File: 1427746196993.jpg (1MB, 4036x2689px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4036x2689px

>>157263936

>downloaded and played world of tanks to tier 3 just so I could get 8 days of premium for botes.

did I do good /wows/?

File: muh freedoms.jpg (2MB, 2016x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2016x1440px

>>157263936

>>157264269
Oh shit nigger

You're 100% fucking wright.

>>157265140
>sea dildos
>attractive

File: shot-16.10.12_19.20.23-0380.jpg (728KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

728KB, 1920x1080px

>Draw in domination

I thought Russians were supposed to be aggressive brawlers.

File: babby entered kuma's detection range.gif (2MB, 500x556px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x556px

>>157264173
>citpenning kuma
>not knowing the new mexico man eater was built to be thinner that BB AP arming distance

>>157266404
Kumas belt is juuuust thick enough to fuse most BB shells (minimum threshold is roughly 50mm)

So bong cl's have smoke again?

File: zynxZDH.png (62KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 300x300px

>>157266404

I remember that thread like it was yesterday.

>Do tier 6 ranked in Farragut
>Every game is exciting
>Have to play tier 8 ranked in North Carolina
>Every game is boring as shit

I really regret grinding the burger BB line.

>>157266806
the shell explodes literally on the other side of kuma. it overpen citadels unless kuma is inclined.

File: 1427209342109.jpg (539KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 1920x1080px

>>157263936

File: 1471926880640.png (17KB, 393x377px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 393x377px

>>157267550

>Dat CV in the middle.