Star Citizen General - /scg/

File: ibPCA6t.jpg (779KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

779KB, 2560x1440px

Back in old /scg/ people used to shit on any form of playing with friends and being tactical n sheeit, but it clearly works

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qqaFp6-mTqA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1jMDebEZ2Sw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C3G5uetMxA

These guys did it, and they rekt everybody. Imagine this on the scale of 8 - 12 people with NPCs and they'd be unstoppable.

File: OkZkDdo.png (722KB, 998x941px) Image search: [Google]

722KB, 998x941px

For the Cutlassfags.

ded thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMEg14PnNNM

Around the Big Benny

>>135515639
>main weapons on 360 rotational arc

So it would be a turret of sorts? It'd be cool if it had S4s as turret guns with S1s as the ships fixed weapons to compensate.

>>135517115
Concept sale tomorrow is a Vanduul ship.

File: dV4jwyh.jpg (101KB, 1276x719px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1276x719px

>>135517676

>>135517924
It's the Blade from the asset leak.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1VUYc3kzsLE

>>135517115
>>135517676
>>135517924
>more vanduul ship sales

literally why
Fucking CIG jews.

File: A1SMJoR.png (230KB, 274x365px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 274x365px

>>135520364

Just downloaded, holy shit how is this thread so dead. More people need to play this game.

File: VfE7XrP.jpg (3MB, 10000x4340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 10000x4340px

>>135526591
Thread is dead because there's nothing to talk about. There are a couple of threads the days after major updates, but right now nothing is happening except the wait for 2.3.

>>135526591
All conversations on all aspects of the game have been done to death over the years that this general have survived. But since you want the general to live, what would you like to discuss?

Bump for 2.3

(can't wake up)

final bump

File: pN6pMhA.png (581KB, 1281x753px) Image search: [Google]

581KB, 1281x753px

So when's this game coming out?

>>135520364
Yeah, I was surprised its another vandull shit, just now with decorative non sword wings.

If I had a scythe, I'd be livid that they're doing this shit AGAIN, as though the lazy ass glaive wasn't bad enough.

And Still, the whole vandull aesthetic of skeletal with edges is garbage for that damage shader they made and the ranges you shoot them from.

Biggest ripoff in the crowdfunded game scene ever.

Let me tell you something, and I'll post the ToS if you are too crippled to find it. When you give them money, you are not "buying" a spaceship. You are not even "buying" a game. You are giving this company a "pledge", or gift, so they can build a game. You agree they may not deliver what they promise, and you agree they may not deliver a final product at all. You agree you cannot get a refund after 14 days.

The fucking thing will be, like, 30 bucks if/when it ever does release. Don't give them money now when you have no guarantees. It's stupid.

File: 1450438574353.jpg (81KB, 1010x562px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1010x562px

>>135536731
two weeks

>>135536807
Yeah, it's pretty disappointing. Not only another Vanduul ship, which are supposed to be rare, but also yet another fighter.

>>135538729
>You are giving this company a "pledge", or gift, so they can build a game
>You agree they may not deliver what they promise, and you agree they may not deliver a final product at all.
Congratulations anon, you understood the nature of crowdfunding.

File: OlDa6D3.png (141KB, 623x871px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 623x871px

>let people experience the tech
I believe it.

File: Star Citizen million dorrar club.jpg (190KB, 1277x713px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1277x713px

>>135538729
They've been given over $110 million.
But they're still suckering people out of money by releasing jpeg's of new ships, when most of the current ships they've already sold haven't even been made yet.
Fucking amazing.
Also whatever happened to this thing?

>>135540453
>its an old ship, don't worry)))

>despite being made later, nicer looking, bigger and stronger according to leaked hardpoints, and the hundreds of years old hornet being made to deal with the shitty ass scythe

Fucking hell. Ben is the cancer in CIG

will they be adding a procedural planet you can land on soon? I heard it's coming along much faster than they thought.

I'm pretty bored but I want to try out all the ships at least. Still not liking how ships blow up all at once now...

>>135538729
>The fucking thing will be, like, 30 bucks if/when it ever does release

they've already sold it at that price. And before you would get both SC and SQ42 for $45. Now they cost that much each. Only problem with this game is that it's taking years to make.

How many years before SC actually starts to look shitty and outdated and people lose interest? Or will cryengine updates make it look better?

>>135543046
>How many years before SC actually starts to look shitty and outdated and people lose interest

Already happening

Their lighting is still so garbage its looks worse than average AAA now. ROTR/Division/MGSV all look better

>>135540782
>Also whatever happened to this thing?
Released with 2.0 or 2.1.


>>135543046
>will they be adding a procedural planet you can land on soon? I heard it's coming along much faster than they thought.
Considering that Frankfurt did the procedural planet demo in like 2 months it shouldn't take that long.

File: 1439290948865.jpg (260KB, 701x728px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 701x728px

>>135517115
>http://imperialnews.network/2016/03/around-the-verse-episode-2-23/
>BL: Our moderators do an incredible job keeping the forums a place where you can debate Star Citizen, discuss, get information and share your creativity.

>>135544342
>Considering that Frankfurt did the procedural planet demo in like 2 months it shouldn't take that long

The limiting factor is design. Using the Planetary scale does not fit the game's planned combat ranges, navigation, or physics.

Probably will just be wasted with autopiloted high speed cruise.

Shit's getting physically disappointing, with landing being automated by default because IFCS is twitchy shit.

The sale of the Vanduul ships is stupid, and I don't quite know how people cope with it.

>oh, it's just a clone made by Esperia. It's not a REAL vanduul ship... the guns, cockpit, frame, missiles, and armor are all the exact same thing as the Vanduuls using the exact same game files as the Vanduul, but our new lore solves that as it being made based on new discoveries from the UEE military (...)

It's fucking stupid. Expect F8 lightning/Vanduul bomber sale in no time. They'll just say "The F8 lightning are just extra made from the factory of a overloaded order/the bomber was found and replicated by Esperia! Totally not us going back on our word for more money"

>>135545725
They are in too deep to care

>>135545354
If I remember correctly the plan was something along the lines of 'you can land wherever you want on uninhabited planets etc. but if there's some sort of traffic control you need to request permission and they'll assign you an approach corridor which you have to follow and IFCS takes over the landing if you leave it'.
No idea how they plan to deal with the physics though.

>>135546820
Maybe you'll be able to click on a spot to autofly at

Then in theory you can fly at "cruise" speed to a different spot

Fact is orbital interactions demand at least 7-10km/s, too much for CIG's weapon design

How long will /scg/ last this time?

>>135547975
I'm going to bed in under two hours, so not long I bet.

Hopefully i won't wake up with 103 degree fever, sweating, chills, a cough that hurts my head, and a ded thread

Some you guys don't, which is understandable, but I still have hope that they can pull this off. It will take them until 2018 to make it all, but god damn if it's even half as good as described I would love it. Hopefully 2.3 has another increase in player count to something like 32. Or rather a big optimization pass to allow more than 45fps.

I can't give up hope yet

>>135548962
They'll technically make it, but it'll handle like as badly as a modern need for speed, graphics won't be very impressive either, and economy fucked over by fleet orgs.

>>135549617
>economy fucked ouver by fleet orgs
Confirmed for not knowing how it will work in SC. Players won't be able to influence the economy that much, and this is to avoid the EVE situation where massive groups run the show. They'll have advantages, obviously, but it won't be at that scale since it can ruin the gameplay.

In Null-sec/pirate areas? Team or die.

>>135547975
It'll probably die tonight when we all go to sleep.

>>135549906
Just like they would stop LTI

Or not sell new mil spec ships

They will balance ship costs by fleetfags and their far higher income than any starting player could make with sub-100 shit

At least the CIG defence force isn't here to shill the sale.

bump

>tfw star citizen wasn't made in Unreal 4

It pisses me off so much.
dont die yet

>>135556263

What's so good about Unreal 4?

>>135559190
UE4 overall has better base tools. It has better AA than CE, more support from devs, better particle systems, and I think it generally looks better than CE. I also believe it would have been better able to support a game like SC than CE would have, because CE has given the devs of the game so much trouble over the few years it's been.

>>135559453

Too bad they can't switch without having to start all over again and having everyone panic.

File: meme.jpg (28KB, 600x333px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 600x333px

>>135559803
It hurts me senpai ;_;

He only had to wait a few months for UE4. A few months could have saved him so much trouble. It could have saved us so much worry.

It could have saved us all.

>>135560079
Nah. There was no way he could have known UE4 was going to be released so soon or that it would actually be bretty good. Not with the announcements he had already made years before that point. And you can't just sit around the office, doing nothing waiting for something to drop into your lap. You've gotta do something, even if that means gutting an old engine and turning it into Frankenstein's Monster.

I agree, UE4 would probably have been a better objective choice, buy that's like denigrating the Germans for not making Stg. 44s standard issue in 1939.

I really hope that this game does not fail.

If it does crowdfunded games in general will take a hit.

>>135563219
That's my largest worry. Of course, faggots from the old general wanted it to fail for the tears of the people invested monetarily, but Star Citizen failing would deal a massive blow to gaming in general, especially crowdfunded ones.

i hope CIG realizes how much built up hype this game has for lots of fucking people, they have to pull through or this will possibly be the biggest joke in pc gaming history

but yeah dont get your hopes up anyone

ay

File: 1448768469548.jpg (193KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 1920x1080px

So, how much do you think the Blade will cost? Since it's essentially their version of a Gladius I'm guessing $150-200.

>>135520364
I aint even surprised. I have the same amount of respect left for CIG as I do to Korean cashshop mmo producers and at least they have finished games

>>135560079
>if only they had waited with their thumbs up their asses in the hopes that some other company would release a better engine for them to use
>I could be bitching about why it's taking them so long to make an overly ambitious game on that engine instead

File: Anvil_Hornet7c.jpg (899KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

899KB, 1920x1080px

>>135514382
Cringey speech but whatever works honestly.

Having the corvette be as small as 100 - 110 meters makes it basically the optimal main ship for groups of 12 fighters to be commanded from like in those videos, since it'll be maneuverable and shit. Although first we need to see large multicrew ships work, so Starfarer next

File: Rest In RIP.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

Post your webms from long ago

File: Anvil-logo-trans1.png (28KB, 209x187px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 209x187px

Which space company is the best space company, /scg/?

File: fidelity.webm (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>135569852

File: 1446812407410.jpg (76KB, 500x435px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 500x435px

>tfw you brutally murder a furfag from the forums at Covalex

One down, so many to go.

>>135570716
RSI. They'll have the corvette and they have the mining ship. They'll probably have the starter mining ship as well, so that makes them instantly best.

File: 1457113633864.gif (594KB, 239x270px) Image search: [Google]

594KB, 239x270px

>>135570880
Well done.

This constantly ship selling jewry is pissing me off

File: Screen Shot 2016-03-18 at 1.03.49 AM.png (139KB, 629x667px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 629x667px

>>135574883
>read the comments
shills in full force

File: benrum lesarnic.png (341KB, 415x482px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 415x482px

Did you pray to your lord and protector today, /scg/?

File: AC.png (164KB, 511x428px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 511x428px

>>135574883
They have no reason to stop if those retards keep giving them money.

I thought the madness would subside with the delays, the grey market being undercut and oversaturated. And yet there are shmucks ready to open their wallet again and again.

I fear Star Citizen has reached that critical mass where its presence sustains a cycle of new customers who mature to whales. Every year new suckers are buying a copy and eventually a fleet from belief in the dream.

Why do people buy new ships when the starter package is the best possible deal? Buying better and more advanced ships is like throwing away game play. What are you going to do when Persistent Universe comes out and you already have the best and most expensive ships?

File: 1435597664660.gif (435KB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 400x225px

>>135574883
It's getting annoying to see CIG going back on their word again and again but honestly, it's a good business decision as long as whales keep buying shit. Sure, they have enough money, but there's no reason for them to stop at this point. The occasional bad press just gets deflected with
>but those are pledges to support game development
At this point it's pretty clear that they aren't just going to bag the cash and run off to some carribean island, so they might as well keep making money. The ships are going to get built anyway, and if sales might actually enable them to do more, good.

Another high profile exit at CIG will be happening this month.

>>135577972
Is it Tony Zurovec?

They dont have a lot of high profile devs left in there.

>>135577972
Thanks Derek.

You're the best.

>>135577972
Cool, can I borrow your crystal ball?

>>135577164
>Why do people buy new ships when the starter package is the best possible deal?

Whales are retarded

This is the same people who play mobile games

File: 1453756070730.gif (2MB, 300x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x240px

WHEN THE FUCK did generals come back on? I thought they were good for SC.

>>135518094

Now, I only wonder how much it's gonna cost. Looks like a shit scout just like the Xi'an, so 150 minimum?

File: laughing_whores.jpg (131KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 500x333px

>>135515639
Oh man.. i remember back in 2013 and 2014 the Cutlass homos were beyond delusional. I remember one claiming "It's ment to bust up an escort and disable a transport. It'll take care of a Freelancer easily!!"

Instead they got a flying tub of shit that gets blown if a 'lancer even glances at its direction.

>>135540782
>jpeg ships
Skippy is that you?

File: Dr. Smart.png (786KB, 463x577px) Image search: [Google]

786KB, 463x577px

>>135577972
Let me guess.. in two weeks?*

*additional two weeks maybe added

>>135581653
Probably a light fighter. In some early version of 2.x it was still in the game files apparently and came with dual S2 fixed and a single S2 gimbal plus some missiles. So yeah, it's basically a Vanduul Gladius with less missiles. $150 at least seems likely.

File: 1457506613756.jpg (11KB, 211x212px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 211x212px

>>135582239

>came with dual S2 fixed and a single S2 gimbal plus some missiles

Now knowing that, if this ship is less than 200 dollars, the Xi'an owners will be fucking rioting.

>>135577164

What are you going to do when Persistent Universe comes out and you already have the best and most expensive ships?

Make more money than you ever will with LTI on my Orion. All reward, no risk. Have fun mate. I have plenty of money to pledge for the game, so you're a faggot, pretty much.

Guaranteed reply.

>>135582673
>another concept sale
>another fighter
>another vanduul ship
>LTI
It's like pottery. A ton of people will be massively butthurt.

File: c3EEC1x.png (863KB, 1667x933px) Image search: [Google]

863KB, 1667x933px

S-soon? R-right?

File: 1381858569855.jpg (43KB, 450x368px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 450x368px

I'm starting to think that The Fat One does this on purpose.

He feeds on all the responses.

Prove me wrong.

>>135577771
>At this point it's pretty clear that they aren't just going to bag the cash and run off to some carribean island, so they might as well keep making money. The ships are going to get built anyway, and if sales might actually enable them to do more, good.

This is how I started to feel about the game, only after seeing "pupil to planet".

>>135577164
Play the game however the fuck I feel instead of grinding newfag missions in my poorora until I get enough credits to do what I actually want to do in a real ship.

It's not an RPG, ships have roles, if you want to mine you need a mining ship, if you want to chart the edges of systems you need a ship with enough gas to get out there and wander around for a while without heading back to refuel.

If you wanna do Org level territory shenanigans you need either a cap ship or a relevant support vessel. I don't intend to spend two weeks flying around in a space sperm for no reason other than to appease some sort of "progression" autism.

File: 1457971943655.gif (3MB, 264x240px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 264x240px

>>135583941

>>135584276
Thank you for your help as well

File: 1455130510126.png (754KB, 854x960px) Image search: [Google]

754KB, 854x960px

>>135584276
Here you go

release date when

>>135583848

CIG is just making sure they're covering all bases with a kick to the face, aren't they? I personally don't care, cause I want to see more funding for this game.

But fuck, I don't care about any of the other details you mentioned, except for... another fucking fighter.

>>135584270
"It'll be ready near the end of january"
>Listening to Chris Roberts when a date is involved.
BUT FUCKS SAKE SENPAI ITS FUCKING NEARLY THE END OF MARCH, I WANT MY GODDAMNED TANKER TRUCK IN MY HANGAR THE LAST NEW THING I HAD WAS MY TALLY, CUS I DON"T JUST BUY WHATEVER THE LATEST FAD FIGHT IS.

LOUD NOISES.

>>135584406

Holy fuck, you have source? She looks fucking cute as fuck. I've never seen such beautiful brown eyes in anime before

>>135584503
>Ben deserves a little credit for handling it well, unlike most PR folks that post on Twitter.
They've had a lot of practice the past few years at least.

>>135584503
Wait he's against titty armor? Fuck him.
I mean, I we don't get at least one Vanu Infiltrator Tier skintight bodysuit this game will be literally unplayable.

>>135584503
>That guy is the SJW that started the female armor shitfit thread

explain

>>135584646
He got shot down, so i think our bodygloves are safe

>>135584661
The guy and some other fringe-element cuckolds started some "say no to boobplate!" threads.

File: 1453063177833.jpg (67KB, 310x253px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 310x253px

>>135584483

>"Where is the Starfarer?"

>I sort of get annoyed sometimes when I see this pop up in comments and stuff like that...
>...like 'OH! Starfarer is cancelled!' or 'where's Starfarer'
>Well, that's in 2.0, that's in 2.1!
>

File: are you fucking serious.png (90KB, 403x500px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 403x500px

>it's a "someone jacks your ship the moment you enter Kareah" episode

>>135583941
>RtV or whatever some weeks ago
>Starfarer was already done and hangar ready, but then they decided to add some rear windows and had to redo part of it

>>135585034

ALPHA™

>>135583941
>>135584870
Could be worse. You could be a BMM owner.

File: may the lord Gwyn have mercy on your soul.jpg (51KB, 394x379px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 394x379px

>>135584817
>tfw hate boobplate
>tfw hate forum autists more
>tfw just want sensible armor that looks good with some lewd space bodysuits thrown in

>>135585456
>I don't have both.
I just know BMM is pixels until at least mid way through PU beta.

File: 263ac7d.jpg (130KB, 624x352px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 624x352px

>>135577972
Thanks Derek
therek

File: OxTuC.jpg (187KB, 499x658px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 499x658px

>>135587789
>its a watch all these posts get deleted as the thread dies general

File: 1450822380510.jpg (505KB, 2560x1920px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 2560x1920px

never forget

File: 1455851680987.gif (809KB, 480x320px) Image search: [Google]

809KB, 480x320px

>>135587901
Thats hilarious, of course it happened when I got burnt out of /scg/ from all the shills.

File: 2435234523452345.jpg (57KB, 715x685px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 715x685px

>>135587901

File: 1450389575226.png (375KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1920x1080px

More missile options when?

functional missiles when?

File: David Anam Wolfner.jpg (452KB, 2048x2478px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 2048x2478px

>>135588591

>functional missiles
>2016

File: 1441016014202.png (775KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

775KB, 800x800px

>>135589012
>do not engage

File: DoNotEngage..jpg (103KB, 756x889px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 756x889px

>>135589108

With sleep apnea, I don't know how long ANAM can stay awake against Darek, unless he cranked up his respirator the night before.

>>135589108
>>135589285

CPAP*, not respirator. My bad anon.

File: Brent.gif (1MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 320x240px

>>135589595

File: the ride is only beginning.png (54KB, 1492x426px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1492x426px

>>135589012
Oh god i'm loving this. Any other mongs who have embarrassed themselves like this? (aside from Dédé Smalls, of course)

Whatever happened to Goldwing? Don't think i've seen the head autists in months.
Or Avadon?

>>135589748
There was that one guy on RSI a few months ago who keeps writing cringy torture fanfiction. Can't find it right now though.

File: 1456758047680.jpg (65KB, 494x849px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 494x849px

>>135589748

This will make your night.

>>135589891

Oh god, please post it in any of the /scg/ threads if you come across it.

File: dI3idqW.png (210KB, 1508x889px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1508x889px

>>135591390
It seems his threads were deleted on RSI, but I found the best one. Someone posted it on SA.

I honestly can't tell if that guy was actually being serious. He had several threads with those kind of stories.

>>135591558

I don't think this guy is scary. I think he's just retarded and edgy. Just VERY retarded.

File: 1455794875857.jpg (106KB, 861x1300px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 861x1300px

>another vanduul ship sale
>not even limited one like with Glaive

>there are people who paid thousands for Glaive and Scythe to be special snowflakes on release
On one hand, I just can't not make fun of people who spend so much money on this trash. But holy fuck this is the dickest move from Ben so far.

File: Designator.png (210KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 960x540px

>>135588591
When people finally realize that the only way of balancing missiles is making them not simple F&F, anon. SACLOS by your turret gunner or somesuch.

Or at the very least, far harder to lock, using better signature mechanics.

>>135594081
True, but for some reason the concept of missiles not being 'hurr lock on and fire' and having some sort of laser/TV guided projectile or something else that requires maintaining lock seems to be lost on most of the community. This also applies to having missiles with more range than 5-10km.
>muh ww2 in spess
>go play eve if you want to shoot at red dots from a distance

>>135594569
Well, Retaliator missiles can lock at 14km, so thats something.

I think they're just holding off on the range until they get some balance in.

Not like half the missiles hit stationary targets, can't believe thats actually intentional.

>>135594625
Missiles seem to work in AC, at least somewhat. They tend to hit Vanduul.

They're just extremely broken on the Crusader map and fly off in random directions and/or explode.

>>135593927
The b utthurt is going to be wonderful. I don't care since it's more money for CIG to make shit, but anyone who thought they could be special snowflakes are getting BTFO right now. The tears will be good.

>>135595670
I have never owned a Vanduul ship but I think its pretty shitty of them to devalue and demean owning one from a rarity perspective.

Preferably I wouldn't have anyone own them; make them a skill-based challenge to aquire.

>>135595847
Same here anon. They're fucking stupid. Vanduul lore says they self destruct rather than be boarded o anything like that. They've essentially locked off their entire fleet for no reason. Well, it might be for them to sell them all eventually. I would have loved to be in a vanduul capturing org, making profit off selling them in the game somehow, but that won't happen.

>>135596140
>for no reason

Nope, for one reason: to sell for hundreds of dollara despite no tactical value

Limit the sale to 1000, they could sell the fighter for $500 and make half a million dollars in an hour.

>>135597451
They would probably do that.

Star Marine when?

>>135602810
Doubt we're going to see it in a long time. Arena Commander tweaking has been almost suspended in favor of PU work, and the same applies to Star Marine since the FPS portion is essentially there as well. I'd guess we'll get it only after SQ42 is out.

>>135602810
SM was meant to be a tide-over until we got FPS within a larger universe.

We got the latter first, so definately back burner.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trOB7WQ4et0

Do you get money from doing the array missions at some point? I'm done the first 3 or 4 missions from Tessa at the probe, but I haven't been paid anything.

>>135606125
Eventually, sure.

Not in the babby universe

>>135605657
Star Marine was supposed to be a multiplayer shooter module that was as good or better than any other fps out on PC.

What we have in the 2.x is nowhere near the functionality that was promised with the module.

>>135608368
>as good or better than any other fps out on PC.

Anon, come on.

>>135608527
Oh sorry, im supposed to assume Chris is lying to us all the time. My bad, this was back in 2013/14.

>>Page 10

Not on my watch

>>135513791
It is.

Is 2.2 worth downloading

>>135619585
Physicalized EVA is okay. The Sabre is neat too.

6/10 would spend an evening on it

>>135619585
No, unless you can download it in half an hour to fuck around and forget.

>>135619972
>>135619872
How conflicting

Does freefly mean I have every ship available for flying?

>>135621105

Follow your heart, anon.

File: Warning2.jpg (434KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

434KB, 960x540px

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/comm-link/transmission/15248-Important-Announcement-From-Esperia-Inc

Oh boy oh boy!

>>135621330
You get whatever they give you. I think they recently gave non-backers a cutlass to try.

RtV when?

File: pepedout.jpg (24KB, 385x385px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 385x385px

>>135621567
>its a "we made up some paper-thin lore to justify selling more shit" episode

>>135622519
Esperia's thing was always selling knock off alien junk

I just wish they'd finish the Tevarin Prowler instead of selling yet more Vanduul shit that should be stolen from its alien owner

>$250
Ugh

>>135622864
meh, even if the lore is established, its cheapened whenever they add articles like this to push another ship sale.

I can imagine seeing the same 4 pages of tldr explaining why they've decided that Bengals are now available to purchase.

>>135622406
Blade has 2 TR2 main thrusters and 8 TR1 manoeuvring thrusters. Sabre has 2 TR3 and 8 TR2

Blade has 1 fixed S2, 2 gimbal S1 and 2 S1 missiles. Sabre has 2 fixed S3, 2 gimbal S3 and 2 S2 missiles.

Looks like the Sabre shits all over it

Does CIG need this extra cash anyway?

How much money would building this game actually cost?

>>135624041
They pay developers for their time more or less. So if they cant get shit to work, no amount of money will be enough.

>>135623601
>2 X S2, 1 X S1, 2 X S1 missiles

worse than the Gladius.

$250 bucks for a shit tier collectors edition ship, It's statistically terrible so it's not like they're selling space superiority at a premium, but the whales will eat it up for being "rare" so CIG will still get money. I'm not gonna buy one, but I am mostly ok with this.

>>135624041
If Chris wants his "weekly updates for 10 years after release" thing to work out he's going to need roughly infinity dollars

>>135583941

very soon

Lando screwed around in it and is showing off right now on RtV

4 S4's

File: 1433486135392.jpg (280KB, 710x539px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 710x539px

>$250
>worse than $90 Gladius

>>135628832
4 x Swho cares its a freighter

>>135628832
They put the turret back on top yet?

>>135629110
According to the specs sheet, it weighs less than an M50.

If they ease off the GLOC a bit, you could pull some interesting stuff with a larger M50 that has even less mass and MORE mav thrusters.

File: captain's bedsheets.jpg (97KB, 1424x732px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1424x732px

>>135630024
don't know but the captain's bed looks comfy

File: W63YReJ.jpg (129KB, 1421x794px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 1421x794px

>>135630024
Yes.

>>135630987
About goddamn time

When is it going to get a paintjob that isn't Factory Fresh Chrome

File: meL8PEL.jpg (84KB, 1275x713px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 1275x713px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FanEYdkFQXA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c2z-1ki1P3Q

>>135632523
WHERE THE FUCK IS THE CATERPILLAR

Those are decent cannons. Though unlike the Freelancer i doubt you can ever turn enough to get someone in the sights, but it doesn't really matter since it's a big ol' bobtail.

This segment feels like an apology letter after that Blade shenanigans.

>>135582673
>>135581653

TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS!

Thank god this anon>>135582239 told me about the stats, because I only finally became off by 50 dollars.

Seriously, for the price, this is fucking ludicrous. Can someone please enlighten me as to what warrants a $250 price tag?

File: 1456469938059.jpg (62KB, 278x598px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 278x598px

>>135631318

The Endeavor is going to get that shit stock chrome finish, isn't it anon? Please tell me it won't. But in higher priority, please tell me truthfully.

>>135633490
I'm guessing it's some bullshit about keeping the Vanduul ships more rare. Like, 150 dollarydoos of that price is pure prestige.

>>135631882

Shit likes this gets me kind of hyped, they're actually doing shit with all that money.

File: Light_Fighter_Blade_Materials_01.jpg (732KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

732KB, 1920x1080px

>>135633490
VANDUUL
A
N
D
U
U
L

it does look cool desu and I would have probably upgraded my Delta if it was around 100-150, but making it only slightly cheaper as the Scythe back then is ridiculous

>>135631882
>the nig has white dots instead of black
kek

>>135633946

>black people have dark skin

No shit.

>>135633946
>trying to map black marks on dark brown skin
Yeah that's going to work out a treat, isn't it

>>135633946
You're kinda dumb.

File: jesus christ how horrifying.png (133KB, 275x226px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 275x226px

>browse blade page
>"GRAB EAT"
>mfw
I had MWO flashbacks for a moment. It wasn't pleasant.

>>135583941
>>135584270
uhuh

File: animu pepe.png (1MB, 1081x945px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1081x945px

>>135634028
>>135634125
>>135634583

>>135632523
How can they make so much wrong but then make a single thing just so right?

File: 2eL1wWW.jpg (109KB, 1276x717px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1276x717px

That's a big turret

How do I access SM? Patch notes keep teasing that it's playable, but it's always grayed out for me.

>>135637151
>rivets
Yesss

>>135633916

150 I understand and I would've upgraded to; that was my initial price point. But I'm guessing the price is higher than the Xi'an Scout with the same effectiveness because we aren't at war with the Xi'an, but we are with the Vanduul.

How many retards are going to eat up this ship's ridiculous price, and then cry later when it becomes shit?

Also, I'm retarded for asking this question. It's going to fucking happen, and it's just going to get even more fucking annoying.

>>135637843

I'll bite. Give me one reason why YOU don't like the blade. I know you don't, but I'm hoping it's for the same reason as mine.

File: 1458333613957[1].jpg (64KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 960x960px

>>135638481
>Give me one reason why YOU don't like the blade.

EH,
>BUILD REPRODUCTIONS?!!

File: B9kW3DS.jpg (78KB, 1655x764px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 1655x764px

>floor made of MISC logos

>>135639707
looks NUCLEAAAAAAAAAR desu

>Blade is glorified trash
>Starfarer is great
No surprises here.

>>135642623
If the Blade is actually true to stats, it'll be insane.

Starfarer looks the same as we saw the peeks of before, so obviously thats not a surprise.

>>135639203
Who dat?

>>135633662
All misc ships will likely get that finish when factory new. Maybe you'll be able to choose a color when you buy one.

It was said a long time ago they intend to include at minimum a Forza Motorsport tier painting system.

>>135643213
>If the Blade is actually true to stats, it'll be insane
For what purpose? Yes, it might weigh less, but it's still just a Gladius with less missiles and really not worth that much. Apart from that, it's likely that it can't even be upgraded properly because Vanduul ships aren't designed to fit human component sizes. Also without a significant skill advantage the chance to win against fighters like the Hornet is probably rather small.

File: afe[1].png (195KB, 1135x1500px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 1135x1500px

>>135643680
WOW ARE YOU FOR REAL RIGHT NOW? I DONT EVEN

>>135645505
Yes, who's that?

File: 930[1].jpg (65KB, 530x530px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 530x530px

>>135645813
Aids-Skrillex' GF
http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/carl-the-cuck-and-aids-skrillex

File: 3497813093.png (268KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 1280x720px

>>135639707
Can't wat for muh high fidelity Carrack

File: StandardRSI.jpg (110KB, 1200x588px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1200x588px

>>135647315
When did they show that image? Haven't seen it before.

File: 1414777342044.gif (627KB, 373x360px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 373x360px

Are waifus finally coming in the next update?

>>135651064
no

you will never be kawaii uguu~ in the first person immersion simulator

File: 1451606200830.jpg (303KB, 1920x1079px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 1920x1079px

>>135651064
No. Only shipfus in this game.

>>135651680
Why not?

>>135652838
Because the character creation is basically choosing between face morphs with some customisation, none of which are fetal alcohol syndrome suffering 12 year olds

File: XmwwSKo.jpg (646KB, 3456x1944px) Image search: [Google]

646KB, 3456x1944px

Can't wait for comfy repair ship gameplay

>$50 store credit

I fucked up

>>135656005
You could just shell out $15 and grab a Delta while it's on sale.

>>135655896
Did you see the monthly mag for it? This will be the most useful ship in the game. Along with repair, it will be able to refuel as well. It also has a rearming module for giving ammo out to ships.

Fuck the corvette as a standard mini-fleet ship, the Crucible would be way more useful by being able to increase the range of the fighter squadron with fuel and repairs, or being able to replenish ammo for kinetic weapons.

>>135659056
Problem being of course is that the 'gameplay' will mostly consist of small minigames, so you would have to be comfortable with that.

>>135659269
>implying that would be a problem

I kind of still have my hopes on the NPCs being hired to do whatever extra tasks are needed. Of course, we have yet to see the advanced AI they plan for us to be able to hire/encounter, but from what they have shown of the AI it looks promising. If not, I think the benefits of the Crucible would make it worthwhile to most medium - hardcore players that seriously want to fly distances as groups of fighters. The uses of the crucible seem almost too good to be true. You do a strike on some faggots it space and then warp back to the place with the crucible to fix you up and continue on. The minigames are worth the post-combat effectiveness.

File: Mu7lTzZ.jpg (201KB, 1028x873px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 1028x873px

>>135659056
Yeah, after reading that I CCU'd my Reclaimer to a Crucible. Of all the industrial ships so far it's probably the best.

>>135659269
As long as it's not starliner-tier drink mixing it's alright. The idea of making armor stronger than before through using good materials and doing well in the minigame is pretty nice.

>>135660367
>The idea of making armor stronger than before through using good materials and doing well in the minigame is pretty nice.

Its alright for a side mechanic like MMOs use for crafting, but I wouldn't want to do it as my main job within a squadron

File: 1450307385234.jpg (95KB, 1285x393px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 1285x393px

>>135589748

>>135660502
Then it's a good thing you're not required to do it

People who want to play fixer-upper with robot arms or their hangar's workbench can do it and sell shit on and people who don't can buy these goods and/or services from them

File: Blueprint.jpg (435KB, 1446x600px) Image search: [Google]

435KB, 1446x600px

>>135660502
Yeah, that's true. But having mechanics like that is definitely making noncombat roles more appealing, even if it's just an occasional side-job or whatever.

On another note, I'm considering melting my meme Hornet and Delta to grab a Blade. I know the value is terrible, but I'm a big fan of the design. Already have a Sabre sitting around to use as a fighter. Thoughts?

>>135661070
3 x S2 on a ship lighter than an M50 with more mav thrusters sounds like a fun ship, anon.

As long as you're comfortable with it being overpriced as fuck.

>>135661070
>chromatic aberration on a fucking blueprint

Just get one in game. If Esperia is making a knock off then it wont be difficult to go down the ship dealer and just buy one.

>>135660502
Wanting to do it as a main job in a squadron depends on what the potential profit is. I think it would be worth it if you actually have some big attack job for your org.

>>135661070
Keep Hornet, sell Delta. The Blade is a literal waste of money. The appeal of looking at it won't last forever.

File: 1450300881922.png (1MB, 1358x757px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1358x757px

ded

https://forums.robertsspaceindustries.com/discussion/322807/2-3-0-published-to-ptu

Why is this thread full of shills for what is obviously a scam?

>>135669025
because you are our audience

>>135668962
>Starfarer hangar ready
>Khartu-Al flight ready
>new component system for powerplants
>FPS shotgun and sniper rifle
>new FPS animations
>new lighting in the VFG and Aeroview hangar

>>135669025
>Something Went Wrong page
Why can I never view these things?

>>135668962
Downloading now, but it will take a while. I'll put up some webms of the Scout and Starfarer animations if the thread is still alive then.

>>135672817
>scout webms

Yes please.

I'm looking forward more to SQ42 now since it might be released in my lifetime. Plus they actually finished some things apparently. and the online PU servers are shit. The combat barely works.

>>135668962
>Fixed an issue where missiles were acting erratically in their pathing after having been fired.
Finally

>>135639707
can't wait to walk on that with my highly detailed spacefeet

>>135673391
>releasing part 1 of SQ42
>when it's not even certain the current flight model is final

Don't die on me now.

>>135672735
meant to reply to >>135668962

>>135672735
>>135677310
Are you banned or something?

>>135668962
Anyone on the PTU that could show the Khartu-Al a bit?

Also the rate of these updates has certainly accelerated, which makes me cautiously optimistic.

>>135559453
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jV-_7JbiqDs
Are these considered particles?

>>135677703
I don't think so. I have an account, but I don't have a game package. I can sen PMs to people, and in MY ACCOUNT it doesn't know the red sign saying I'm banned (I've been probationed before).

>>135678645
Some bits of it are paricles, but most of it are alpha images, or images with transparency. They're layered and offset to the camera and in different directions/orientations to give the illusion if a true particle system. While it looks ok, they aren't the same thing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNfsSUfxp0c&feature=youtu.be

khartu al

>>135679417
that fucking nigger should have voices muted if he gonna upload something like that JESUS FUKIN CHRIST GOUGE OUT MY EYES

>>135679417
>>135679638
the engines look neat tho

>>135678495
>Khartu-Al

Wasn't that in the last in the last patch, not this one?

>We have a new component class – Power Plants – have been added to the Holotable.

so engines aren't powerplants after all? Didn't people used to shitpost about this for hours?

>>135680172

I thought it would be pretty apparent that power plants would not be the engines, they're more like car batteries or something.

>sniper rifles in indoor maps

pretty stupid desu. I hope it's less gay than CSGO at least.

>>135681021
>not wanting to 360 noscope someone into perma-death

shaking my damn head.

>>135681074
more like juke noscope

Scout has 2 S3 hardpoints, no missiles and comes with its own qdrive effect. Speeds are 220/325/620.

>Login Failed.

>>135681769
No, it has 2 S4 hardpoints.

>>135682198
It does? Can't check it in the holotable because I don't own it, but the M5A laser it comes with are S3.

>>135682314
>M5A
>S3
m8...

File: eUhRzze.png (230KB, 1879x883px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1879x883px

>>135682595
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xeQYXiNtLlNhRxCN8wYqK4LgZy0ztN9sPVmCTQoawLc/edit#gid=1241570521

Finally got logged in, and god damn, rainbowvomit.jpg

This thing is so cool. I've actually gotten lost several times. It has ELEVATORS and crawlsapces and shit.

>>135683593
Any other way in apart from the giant-ass cargo ramp they showed on RtV?

>>135684156
as far as I can tell no, there's airlocks and exterior access via the two EVA chambers and Catwalk door, but no other way to access from the ground.

I can stream my wandering around if people would like. I'm just kinda casually splorin.

>>135683593
>>135684156
where's the tl;dw version?

>>135684807
sure

>>135684898

twitch /armedandharmless

>>135685240
wew I almost forgot

>that Starfarer interior

Jesus Christ, that thing is fucking massive.

Boarding actions will be like an entire FPS level to itself, basically.

File: missterious.png (151KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 500x281px

>>135688617
>refueling in progress
>EVA from 500m out, slowly move over
>play haunted music behind captain's chair

What's happened so far in 2016 in regards to this game?

Making my bimonthly check-up to see if Derek Smart has gone postal on the main studio and ended the whole thing.

>>135689375
It got gud

>>135689538

So it's not going to crash and burn, and my 70 dollars didn't go down the drain?

>>135689639
I wouldn't worry unless you don't see something really tangible after the 5-year mark.
Some nice strides lately since the Universe's release, even if it is still not even comparable to what you could do in Freelancer.

>>135690028

Cool. Anything interesting in particular? Last I remember, the test universe had just gone public.

>>135690230
i don't follow the game nigga
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5XSiww9ZO4 was pretty kool

File: ayylmao.webm (3MB, 710x400px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 710x400px

Scout takeoff and landing animations.

>check out top streamer
>non star citizen music
>check out next streamer
>old man talking about citizencon
>check out next streamer
>nigger spewing fun facts about star citizen!
>check out next streamer
>beaner
>check out next streamer
>can see fat old man from the icon
hopeless

>>135692815

>seriously caring about the race of your streamer

well, it's your problem m8

File: cinematic 24fps.webm (3MB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 800x450px

Nice doors.

>>135693209
i don't

>>135693708
>29th century
>still need handrails
baka

File: 1406179187114.jpg (44KB, 438x542px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 438x542px

>>135693873

File: ScreenShot0045.jpg (200KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1920x1080px

Cockpit view

File: ScreenShot0040.jpg (395KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 1920x1080px

Minor amounts of unused dashboard space

>>135694238

At least that's acceptable, since you know, it's a fucking tanker.... I wonder if CIG did it for "optimization", or if they're just shit at design, or lazy.

So how will you board bigger ships in the PU? By bigger I mean those that can't feasibly fit on standard landing platforms like the Idris or something.

>>135694474
>scale is still fucked even with the latest ship

Whats with CIG and making things slightly too big?

>>135694497
Is the complaint here that the viewport is too small?

>>135694929
laser-cutting tools

File: ScreenShot0041.jpg (396KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 1920x1080px

Uploading a quick tour of the interior, will take a couple of minutes due to my shitty connection.

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/25jqd3aftziggr/source/JumpPoint_04-03_Mar-16_On-The-Leading-Edge.pdf

Newest JP

>>135695095

Is that what you interpreted?

>>135695430
ye

>>135695352
>https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/25jqd3aftziggr/source/JumpPoint_04-03_Mar-16_On-The-Leading-Edge.pdf


The TL:DR for everyone

>Sabre development takes half the Jump Point
>Customer Service takes one fourth
>Chronos synth world lore shit takes the last fourth

Now you know what's in this last Jump Point without paying 10 dollars, or having to click on that shit.

>>135695641
sounds like shit
when can i run trade routes in PU

>>135695708

>when can i run trade routes in PU

If you really want genuine advice, forget about Star Citizen until 2017.

I'm not kidding you one fucking bit.

>>135695241
You could set up a fucking campsite on that dashboard.

Was that the best solution they could come up with really..

>>135695804
s-surely after summer this year

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EQNikClqdo

Here you go faggots

File: IlI.jpg (24KB, 378x363px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 378x363px

>>135696760
Sweet, definitely the first spaceship in our hands that is believable as something you would fly independently for long distances.

File: qdrive.webm (3MB, 710x400px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 710x400px

Scout jump animation.

File: lewd as fuck.jpg (51KB, 850x550px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 850x550px

>>135691965

I think I have a boner

>>135638185
>How many retards are going to eat up this ship's ridiculous price, and then cry later when it becomes shit?

None of them because they'll just melt it and buy something else.

>>135543046

>And before you would get both SC and SQ42 for $45. Now they cost that much each.

Wrong friendo. You can buy the singleplayer and multiplayer portions of the game for $60 total.

Or you can buy either the singleplayer or multiplayer on its own for $45, then later if you want you can buy whichever one you didn't get for $15.

How do people still keep getting the prices wrong? Are they incapable of reading a website or what?

File: ScreenShot0050.jpg (247KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 1920x1080px

Crusader got a size upgrade.

>>135570791

Ever notice how every time someone posts a FIDELITY image or webm it's always from a build that is years old at this point?

File: starmarine.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>135699528
>making new webms

>>135582673

My Aurora LN comes with dual S2 fixed plus dual S1s and missiles.

And it was only $35.

File: ScreenShot0008.jpg (909KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

909KB, 2560x1440px

>>135699654
>TFW this cost less than constellation, less than vanguard, less than tally, less than a whole shitload of things, and only fifteen bucks more than a friggin meme sabre.

>>135700237
reminds me of those nerds who never stretch and they have those hunched up shoulders

>>135621567

I hope this means we'll get to consider all pilots who are flying Vanduul ships to be kos without getting penalized since the Lore(tm) says they will get shot at by civilian vigilantes.

File: vlcsnap-2016-03-19-17h22m41s650.jpg (563KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

563KB, 1920x1080px

charlotte a kawaii

>>135701324

> Blackhole Ben
> Ben's Black Hole
> Guy I see riding the bus a lot
> Looks like she was on a TV show on Nickelodeon when she was 7
> Tyler the Creator
> Jabba the Hutt's stoned infant

File: ScreenShot0055.jpg (508KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 1920x1080px

I wonder what kind of weapons they plan to put on this.

File: ScreenShot0056.jpg (401KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

401KB, 1920x1080px

>>135702573

>>135694238
I love how much this triggers RSI. I like the roomy cockpits, like a giant airliner

File: ScreenShot0053.jpg (273KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1920x1080px

Citizens Creed

>>135696760
who would ever need 60fps, 24 is is all you need.

your video literally gave me _joy__

>>135702732
Sick spoiler

Can the turret detach itself and fly away to have awesome adventures

>>135699623
There are at least 3 new webms in this thread.

File: ScreenShot0002.jpg (240KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

240KB, 1920x1080px

>>135705064

>>135697531
fucking turtles why is it green

>>135679638
He sounds like a countdown AI. Imagine him saying

>Self Destruct. in T. Minus. Twenty. Seconds.

The interior of the starfarer gets me slightly hyped to see the RSI corvette.

File: 1333795168255.gif (402KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

402KB, 250x250px

>"There are too many fighters!"
>"We don't need anymore combat ships"
>"Most of the game won't even need guns"

>>135696760
>all dat maintenance

Hnnng, the only but that still obviously needs changing is the living quarters, no excuse on a giant tanker like that why there can't be cabins.

>>135705892
Honestly I'm sort of getting close to that point. Of course, combat is currently the only thing to do, but we still don't have at least concepts for the different levels of industrial careers like a starter/medium mining ship, starter/medium fueler, starter/medium repair ship (Unless if the Crucible is the medium, then we don't have a large/starter), or starter/medium salvaging ship. We need all of those things in the game, but all we've been getting are combat ships. It makes sense that we get combat ships right now because Sq42 needs them, but at the same time at least having concepts for the many other careers would be assuring. It's possible they could be just holding those concepts back for when those careers actually see some daylight after Sq42 is done, but we'll just have to see.

File: ScreenShot0038.jpg (891KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

891KB, 2560x1440px

>>135705892
Yeah, the people who think "non combat" ships exist give me a giggle. The Starfarer is probably the ship in game with the very lowest desire to be in, and yet it is covered with guns and heavily shielded. There's a reason for that, and I feel like there's gonna be a legion of crying carebears when they realize that being able to deprioritize PVP does NOT mean they get to opt out of combat.

>>135706284
>who think "non combat" ships exist
Yes, that's literally any ship designed to do something other than fight other ships

Just because it has guns on it doesn't make it a combat ship, retard

test

File: 97b4f6b763.png (749KB, 720x569px) Image search: [Google]

749KB, 720x569px

Last post saved the thread it was at the very bottom at page 10.


Have a jump point

https://robertsspaceindustries.com/media/25jqd3aftziggr/source/JumpPoint_04-03_Mar-16_On-The-Leading-Edge.pdf

>>135710308
>>135695641

Didn't they say that ladders in ships are always going to be "on use" objects rather than actual ladders like from other games? Because the ladders in the Starfarer sort of act like normal ladders

File: 11326170.jpg (305KB, 707x1000px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 707x1000px

>>135710935
You mean where you always have to press a button to use a latter?

Is their anyway to earn rec in the mini PU?

>>135710935
>implying this is a problem
I'd have having to always click a button to use a ladder. I prefer to sprint, run into it, and immediately be going up. It's faster that way.

Did anyone find the new weapons yet?

File: sZgd2PN.jpg (410KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 1920x1080px

>>135712038
Here's this picture from reddit of the sniper

>>135711087
>>135711110
I mean that upon using it you automatically climb it, losing all control in the meantime. They said ladders inside ships are going to be like that, but the ones in the Starfarer allow you to go up and down as you wish. (which is obviously superior)

>>135712337
Huh, I'm honestly surprised that the scope actually works without..uh..scoping.