What exactly is wrong about sexualizing fictional characters?

>>390037379
It causes you to have false expectations for real women, because they're disgusting and ugly.

>>390037379
Mental Illness is wrong.

>>390037509
OP asked what's wrong with that though

File: 1505170095450.jpg (92KB, 499x750px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 499x750px

Nothing,there is nothing wrong with sexualizing real women either.

>>390037667
Women aren't humans.

>>390037379
It's problematic

>>390037379
nothing, provided they aren't children (or blatantly look like children)

>>390037379
Absolutely nothing. Especially when she's as lewd as Honkers.

>>390037379
Nothing. Women see men as objects of success, men see women as objects of beauty. This will never change, a few outliers won't change anything.

>>390037634
A drawn child is still just a drawing, you can't cause mental or physical harm on a fictional character

>>390037379

It causes depression on insecure and ugly women, so you are not allowed to enjoy what you like by nature, even if adult, just to not trigger mongoloids with vagina.

But that's pretty much feminism 3.0 and current SJW in a nutshell.

It makes the hambeasts at Tumblr self-conscious

>>390037636
It forms an aversion to social interaction and mating.

>>390037379
nothing, japan is the only country worth giving money to until they bend to this garbage too

>>390037379
It makes me literally shake at any given point, like right now.

>>390037509
But i already knew that before i was jacking off to vidya

File: latest-4.png (464KB, 400x586px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 400x586px

>>390037667
Woman can't stop men from fetishizing them, our boners are too powerful.

The only bad part is that anime garbage and DOA threads are allowed on a videogame board because they're considered videogames by definition.

>>390037749
You can't draw the line there, as that gives reason to why there is something wrong with it. Either everything is ok, or nothing is. Anywhere in the middle is for fence-sitting shitters and should be disregarded.

>>390037509
Its not like i live under a rock and the only women i see are video game characters, though

>>390037509
But I don't have false expectation, they are disgusting and they are ugly, I'm not even talking about their bodies here either.

>>390037802
While you may not be harming an actual child, it is still literally pedophilia and morally wrong

>>390038031
t. belgian children's beauty pageant judge

>>390037379
Literally nothing

>>390038031
>literally pedophilia
Umm, except its still a drawing, sweetie
Also
>morally wrong
Ahhahaha

>>390037379
Sexualisation is ok, but its not ok for nerds to have an alternative to killing themselfes.

File: 990.jpg (20KB, 600x562px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 600x562px

>>390037379
>child head with adult body

>>390038115
>>390038190
t. morally bankrupt degenerates

>>390038275
Welcome to 4chan.
Lurk moar.

>>390037379
Nothing unless you are really insecure about how you look, but if that's the case then you have bigger problems to deal with than men jacking off to fictional women.

>>390037379
Nothing.

>>390037509
Only if you can't tell between game and reality.

>>390038031
But pedophilia is only bad because you cause harm to children - why would it be wrong if you aren't harming anybody? It's just liking the small/petite bodyframe.

Morality is subjective and can deny/justify anything, so not an argument.

>>390038275
wth is your problem? Unless i attack a real child, im not a pedophile

File: 1503944386720.jpg (33KB, 477x593px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 477x593px

>>390038223

>>390038463
Where's the rest?

>>390038275
Morals are a meme, retard. They're entirely subjective. In ancient Aztec society it was considered moral to perform human sacrifices. In medieval Europe it was considered moral to marry 13 year old girls. It all just depends on the time and place you live in. It's empty. Worthless. It's just a meme for "moral" people to give themselves a mental high ground in a perceived argument.

>>390038326
>us elite hacker group known as 4chan are edgy as fuck xD
Grow up

>VIDYA CANT CAUSE VIOLENCE
>VIDYA CAUSES SEXISM
????

>>390037379
There's no inherent wrong, but if it doesn't fit the setting and context then it's out of place.

>>390038463
Disgusting. Stop posting this sick shit.

>>390037379
>>390037667

I don't get it either, modern men no longer desire big breasts yet they're still making DOA games

What a waste

File: 1481099357757.jpg (63KB, 500x526px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 500x526px

>>390038463
Milkies now!

>>390037379
There are multiple things at play here.

For one you have fat landwhales who believe that "unrealistic" depictions of women in media raises expectations in men which they cannot meet so they want to ban it. On the other hand you have SJW whores who believe that "objectification" causes sexual abuse because men are given the impression that women are not people but objects at their disposal. They don't understand that the alpha-chads who date-rape them and the lonely nerds fapping to anime tiddies in their mother's basement are actually not the same people.

>>390038463
Is god sexist? How is this allowed?

>>390038536
No, you grow up.
Your false sense of moralitiy is worth jack shit here.

File: tumblr_mfzmsonTak1rkbpqvo1_1280.jpg (387KB, 1280x1698px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1280x1698px

>>390038535

>>390038404
>Morality... not an argument
Morally is determined by whay ever society you find yourself in. If you live within a society and don't follow its moral code, it's usually considered wrong within that group.

While you are correct in saying its objective, its still extremely important

>>390038275
>wanting people to go to jail for looking at something drawn by a fully grown adult
Yes, you are truly the last bastion of morality.

>>390038721
>fuck he's right and I don't have any counter to his argument so I'll call him a fedora hehehe

>>390037509
So we should improve the gene pool to have more beautiful women.

>>390038535
This may be true, its also true that you don't live in a society that shares these morals

>>390038535
>Morals are a meme
By the Dawkins definition of the word, no less.

>>390038757
I know what morality is and how it works, thanks. I am still allowed to think it's retarded even if I have to follow it, you know.

>>390038782
I don't think being morally bankrupt is jail worthy. It just makes you a shitty person

>>390038786
You can question morals but to say they're worthless, you smell like fedora.

>>390038969
It's nice to hear that society is utterly perfect and anything that isn't considered the "norm" makes me a shitty person.

I guess I'm an ass in America because I don't think parents should be allowed to mutilate their children, but it happens every day.

Fucking nothing.

The only people that get triggered by sexy characters (be it male or female) are people that DO NOT PLAY GAMES.

>>390037509

>It causes you to have false expectations for real women

[citation needed]

>>390037379
Fictional characters are not real people, they do not have rights and they won't be recognised as having rights by any sane legal system. Fictional characters are figments of imagination, how in the fuck do you commit a crime against imagination?

>>390037379
Hurt feelings

>>390039419
Shut up dude, why can't you think of the children?

>>390039419
>sane legal system
The world is running out of those thanks to democracy

>>390039525
In all honesty thought-crime laws are still more common in countries like Saudi-Arabia or North Korea. Even the worst of liberal democracies like Sweden can't compare.

File: 1474372701480.jpg (15KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 500x375px

>>390039419
>he's supporting being ALMOST RAPED in online games

File: 1501605925001.png (45KB, 754x407px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 754x407px

A small percentage of the population has difficulty separating "thing" with "depiction of thing" so because of those people we need to lower the bar for everyone.

>>390038535

>because people disagree, there is no right answer

Some people think the world is flat, some think it's round. I guess the earth having a shape is a meme.

>>390037379
It's a thought crime, nothing more.

>>390039710
Not even that desu

>>390037509
First post, best fucking post

>>390039897
This >>390039683 spotted

>>390040009
I never got the whole 'no depictions' thing. Then again I doubt Voltaire has ever been translated to Arabic so we can't expect them to have a meaningful understanding of idolatry.

>>390039683
>0.001% of the population can't wipe their ass without making a mess
>therefore a law should be passed to forbid everyone from wiping their own ass
Beautiful logic, too bad there's actual lawmakers who are retarded enough to think this way.

>>390038535
Actually, I would argue that over time the western world has developed to understanding that fucking 13 year olds, while fun the man, is bad for the development of the 13 year old and causes serious problems later in life.
>>390037379
There's nothing wrong with it, at all. It was a little tasteless in the 90s but as far as I'm concerned we should allow the free market to decide instead of injecting politics in to a medium. All its done so far is make people who were otherwise content to ignore politics vehemently hate neo-libs/cons. Though I would argue the moral busybodying and panicing entirely comes from the 'progressive' left.

>>390039690
>earth
>not flat

File: IMG-20170908-WA0006.jpg (69KB, 1600x800px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1600x800px

>>390038535
Morals are memes, our capabilty of creating and following them is genetic and an evolutionary trait.
If we go by the loose definition that morals are a set of guidelines to cause the least amount of harm to individuals, collectives or society as a whole, you better follow them to both be a better person and to be accepted on your society/collective.
Lusting over prepubescent girls is highly immoral because they're not mentally prepared in our current society for sex and could permanently damage them psychologically. Even if you just wank it to drawings, you know the damage you could do to the children you're lusting over by the actions of your fantasies. And you still nut with that in mind.
Tl;dr If you masturbate to children you're still a piece of shit.

>>390037379
Nothing. You can't objectify what is by all accounts and object. The problem is that people like to associate them as people.

>>390040496
I seriously hope you've never played a violent video game, you sick pervert who gets off on murdering people.

>>390040009
>my fat 3d wife is NOT ugly REEEEEEEEEEEEE
not an argument, autismo

>>390040496
Literally accusing people of thoughtcrime.

>>390040438
fun for the man* (women as well I suppose if you look in to some of the hjistories of europes nobility)

>>390040496
Would you not say there's a sizable difference between wanking it to Stacy, that 10 year old you saw at the store and that 10 year old girl you saw in a hentai manga shopping at a store?

>>390040703
Fun =/= healthy

>>390040627
Who said that?

>>390040496
No I don't because I am not retarded enough to think about the damage I could be doing to pixels.

>>390040713
In both cases you aren't harming anybody

File: image.jpg (97KB, 750x922px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 750x922px

>>390037379
Nothing

>>390040774
Did you bother to read my post? I don't recall saying it was healthy.

File: she's 16 you pedos.jpg (102KB, 265x610px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 265x610px

>>390038463
What the fuck is going on with teen girls these days? My sisters friend has huge fucking titties like those. As big as the size of my head, but she's only 4 foot 9, she even showed me her bra once. Since you fags are going to ask for pics might as well post one.

>>390037379
So long as you're comfortable with sexuality, unlike burgerland, absolutely nothing.

>>390040830
>4'9
Jesus, if you haven'r fucked that, you are a failure

File: 1453075875311.gif (999KB, 500x207px) Image search: [Google]

999KB, 500x207px

>>390040830
H-how old is she?

>>390040830
Hormones in the chicken nuggets

>>390037379
It creates weebs and that's just wrong

>>390040979
>>390040940

Do people not read filenames anymore

>>390040830
It's got something to do with all the chemicals we use on crops and milk triggering development earlier and earlier IIRC.

>>390037379
It creates sadness in ugly women since they will never surpass 2D world.

>>390040830
Maybe young women always looked like that and it's clothes that are beginning to become smaller and tighter...

>>390040793
>h-heh, I'll use this incredibly weak deflection and feint ignorance!

File: 1496164551624.gif (1MB, 212x212px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 212x212px

>>390040830
Welp, i guess im a pedo now

>>390041010
>16
>pedo
>that
>looking anything like a child
You are not only a failure but retarded too

>>390040940
It's nigh-impossible to be attracted to someone in your nuclear family that you've grown up with

>>390041046
I dont remember any girls looking like that when i was 16. And im pretty sure i would if there were any

>>390041010
Not an argument

>>390041095
I don't even know which of the 3 replies you are answering to.

>>390037898
more like they don't want to. it gives them the power to control boners and through them, weak willed men.

>>390037870
yes, and?

File: 1497950799179.jpg (136KB, 812x727px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 812x727px

>>390040830
Unironically estrogen

>>390041307
Too bad it also gives tiddies to the males and it turns them into feminists

>>390040830
> several pics of this girl have been around for years
> my sister's friends
Fuck off you autistic fantasist.

>>390041307
I don't know if its straight up estrogen, but hormones in food are definitely a thing thought to contribute to this trend. Also why are dudes getting shafted? How come we don't hear about 10 year olds with 8 inch dicks?

>>390041460
>How come we don't hear about 10 year olds with 8 inch dicks?
Anon doesn't know what estrogen is.

>>390041460
Because they don't put male hormones in food and water

>>390041307
Girl on right is hotter

File: 1503425089138.png (998KB, 544x815px) Image search: [Google]

998KB, 544x815px

>>390040830

>>390037379
Makes whales insecure since they lose the attention of desperate betas. A guy will just immerse himself in his world ignoring them and whats left for whales then? Desperate average guys.... and usually those still think they can get something better.

File: 1449858326306.jpg (164KB, 500x507px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 500x507px

>>390041580
Stop being a fag

>>390040624
Violence and dominance is a whole other can of worms.

>>390040659
If you have immoral thoughts and tendencies don't expect society to accept you. If you're a sick fuck be free to be one, but don't expect people to treat you like you're not one.

>>390040713
>>390040793
Porn involves self insertion, in your imagination they stop being pixels.

File: 1475553399793.png (52KB, 1599x256px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1599x256px

It permeates a shitty business model that makes games sell on superficial crap rather than actual quality

>>390041894
>If you have immoral thoughts
Well I'm feeling suicidal after reading your post. Is wanting to kill myself immoral?

>>390040830
short girls are the fucking best

>>390041950
>crying about people who cry about things
Amazing image, anon

>>390041894
>Porn involves self insertion
Not necessarily.

>in your imagination
You can do everything in your mind

File: 1492109411425.jpg (438KB, 1365x1586px) Image search: [Google]

438KB, 1365x1586px

>>390042034
>wanting vidya to end up like anime
You're part of the problem

File: emded.png (381KB, 430x410px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 430x410px

>>390041894
>in your imagination they stop being pixels

>>390042143
Let me guess, Bioware or Bethesda fan? It has to be a B gay.

>>390042290
Bioware games have more waifu shit than actual waifu games,half of the game revolves around romance.

>>390042143
>One studio is every anime studio
You know different companies make different games for different people, right?

File: 1504934723202.webm (312KB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 640x360px

>>390040830

>>390038438
Factually incorrect. Paedophilia is the sexual attraction to children, not the act of child molesting. You dirty nonce.

>>390042063
What if I'm inserting as the woman?

File: JNr3j.png (169KB, 363x270px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 363x270px

>>390040830
I knew 2 girls like that, they both very health-conscious and physically active.
I believe that the right diet has a much bigger effect on the cup size than most people think. Just look at some identical twin models, they often have significantly different sized bosoms.
Anyway, the 2 girls I mentioned both got a breast reduction in their early 20s. It's ironic: the same health-consciousness that gives them big boobs, also makes them remove them because they care about their spine

>>390042438
>Paedophilia is the sexual attraction to children
Correct. Not the sexual attraction to Chinese drawings of children.
That's closer to schediophilia.

>>390042506
Or they could just start lifting, strengthen their backs and get literal body perfection.
But some people are too retarded to even try

>>390042427
Damn, it has been at least 5 years, since I last saw that movie and I still hear it.

>>390037379
Women will eventually be outclassed by androids with vidya knowledge.

>>390042524
That's not a real word and you're also retarded if you think I'm going to fall for that "sexual attraction to representations of children is not the same as sexual attraction to children" bullshit. What, is it the linework that gets you hard? The subtle colouration? Why not wank to a drawing of an apple then?

>>390041894
>in your imagination they stop being pixels.
Yeah they become brainwaves
Who cares about morality with fetishes as long as they don't bleed into your daily life or you act them out?

>>390042684
You're being quite unreasonable.

>>390040830
>she's 16 you pedos.jpg

Completely legal in Germany.

You need consent from her parents if she's younger though

File: 1456274918546.jpg (115KB, 733x700px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 733x700px

>>390037379
Nothing at all and if you feel otherwise you need to reevalute your life priorities.

>>390042684
Your imagination stimulated by the attractive girl, it's not actually the eyes that trigger your dick.

>>390042758
/thread

>>390041307

>the land of plastic surgery has biggest tiddies

Whoda thunk

>>390042684
Yes it's indeed not the same you mentally challenged fucker.
Or would you love shooting peoples in head in reality as much as in a videogame?

>>390042875
Read, idiot

>>390042875
>the land of plastic surgery has biggest tiddies
But that's worst Korea

>>390041307
>US caucasian and US non-caucasian are different countries
And also is this a bulge I see on the right one?

File: 293759225.jpg (32KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 960x960px

>>390041894
>in your imagination they stop being pixels

>>390042290
Not really. I just don't want every Japanese game to end up as shallow waifubait trash.

>>390042395
Except these kinds of games have become more prevalent in Japan as of late. Even good games like Nier Automata had to resort to whoring out 2B's ass to earn some relevance. It's a shitty tactic to attract sales.

>>390042874
>Your imagination stimulated by the attractive girl
Exactly, which is why representations of children are interchangeable for real children in the first place. They serve the same function in your head.

>>390042895
If someone got hard blowing people's heads off in a video game that'd get me worried son

>>390042967
Did 2B's ass negatively impact the game in any meaningful way?

>>390037870
Video games also causes violence and mass shooting

>>390042990
Yes, and? My brainwaves aren't harming children and that's the reason why pedo is wrong.

>>390042990
>Exactly, which is why representations of murder are interchangeable for real murder in the first place. They serve the same function in your head.

>Exactly, which is why representations of witchcraft are interchangeable for real witchcraft in the first place. They serve the same function in your head.

>Exactly, which is why representations of catching all the Pokemon are interchangeable for real capture of all the Pokemon in the first place. They serve the same function in your head.

>>390042990
Getting hard or not, it's all part of feeling pleasure from an action. What you're saying is that shooting peoples in a game is the same as doing it in reality you complete idiot.

Also "representations of childrens" are not in any ways actually accurate so that's even more removed from reality. In fact most of these ""children"" are way sexier than a lot of real adults.

Fuck off.

>>390043110
>Yes, and?
And being attracted to children is paedophilia whether they're real children or not. Fact.

>>390042919

You mad that your people are all born ugly and only the richest can afford not looking like dogshit?

>>390042506
>boobs
>spine

Myth. Lack of exercise and poor posture are what gives women back issues, not large breasts.

>>390043256
The crime isn't the attraction, is the harm.

>>390043256
Then everyone on Earth is a paedophile by your definition of "attraction to things which aren't real children".
There are two categories: Things which are children and things which are not.

>>390042786
No wonder your women are getting fucked by muslims

>>390043258
Not even american, I can just read

>>390043401

But not argue, obviously.

>>390043019
>Nier
>"oh, it's that dickgirl game, I guess I'll give it a spin"
>in for one of the best vidya experiences of my life
I wonder for how many people it was the same with Automata, "hey it's that booty android game"

File: 1487806037137.jpg (37KB, 241x223px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 241x223px

>>390043389
That's just UK memeing to make Germany look like the UK.

Everyone can get mad pussy with consent here

>>390043517
That booty is definitly gonna prevent it from being even considered for GOTY materials, when it deserves at least a spot.

If depictions of sexual violence are bad, why does the Holy Bible depict rape?

>>390043306
Hence why I made the distinction between paedophilia and child molestation. The weird thing is paedophiles still get utterly defensive about their depraved proclivities and come up with such disingenuous nonsense as >>390043372

>>390043610
All Japanese games are automatically exempt from GOTY consideration - the sole exception being Nintendo games.

>>390043610
"At least"?

>>390043460
There is no need to because that information is about natural breasts.

>>390043517
2B doesn't look like waifupandering weebtrash though. She looks like a real human and not like a disproportionate animegirl

>>390037872
>Japan
>until they bend to sjw bullshit
nah that will never happen

>>390043656
Do you think just calling something disingenuous nonsense counts as refuting it?
Care to explain what this ambiguous third category of yours contains which is not a real child but still a child?

>>390043725
>2B doesn't look like waifupandering weebtrash though. She looks like a real human and not like a disproportionate animegirl
Hahahahaha

>>390043725
>2B doesn't look like waifupandering weebtrash though

Worse,it attracted fake weebs which are 100 times worse than real weebs.

>>390043768
Yes, okay. You set your boundaries wrong. You say there are two categories, things which are children and things which are not, but you've misclassified "children that are not real" under these terms. They correctly belong in the "children" category. If they didn't paedophiles wouldn't be attracted to them.

File: 1382952410524.png (421KB, 820x616px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 820x616px

>>390037379
Nothing.

>>390043891
So I'm asking you to define your "fake-children".
What does that contain?

File: 1485268392270.png (1MB, 1132x793px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1132x793px

>>390037379
nothing

>>390043610
At least?
It wasn't that good of a game

>>390043656
What if I am attracted by lolis but find child disgusting?

>>390043949
Depictions of children. This isn't a philosophical inquiry into the nature of reality. I'm skipping ahead to the part where I assume you're mentally well enough to identify what's being depicted in a drawing or image. Technically speaking, after all, photographs aren't children either. They're photographs. So is someone who is attracted to photographs of children also not a paedophile?

File: You wanna see my pink pussy.png (490KB, 1506x812px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 1506x812px

>>390043912
God you're such a pervert you know she's tiny as fuck right?

>>390044080
Then you're a paedo weeb.

>>390037379
Nothing. Personally if the characters look good (sexualized or not) it's a bonus on top of good game play. There are some good games out there that have sexualization of characters but the core game play is solid.

I never understood why it really fucking mattered, it's like people who complain that Samus has some huge fucking boobs. Like what's the big deal? The game play isn't tits and games in the series hold up and play fairly well.

>>390044106
Fuck off, mass murderer. It doesn't matter if it was only in your "imagination", that's basically the same as doing it for real, right?

File: drawing.jpg (17KB, 377x388px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 377x388px

>>390044106
So this image falls into your category.
Tell me also, how do you feel about the letter "Y"?

>>390042786
Wait isn't it 14 but for lower than that you need consent from parents?

>>390044106
>photograph decipts a child
>a drawing of a fictional character decipts ink, pixels or an immaterial thought from someone's head
>they're equally real
Normalkikes are mentally ill.

File: somk5mlhpuzy.jpg (81KB, 697x521px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 697x521px

Nothing but if you're going to sell at a very wide audience you have to have some compromises.

Which is why I depend on mods

>>390044106
The photograph requires a victim to create which illustrations don't.
I really hope you already know that though.

>>390043297
100% this

>>390044259
I don't understand why you're being so defensive and intentionally dense about this. Do you understand why people like pornography? Pornography isn't real people, you know. According to you, no one should reasonably be aroused by it. Much less if it's drawn.

>>390044284
It's not a very good drawing so I doubt it's enough for a paedophile, but sure, I can recognise it as a depiction of a human being, at least.

>>390044315
>photograph decipts a child
>a drawing of a fictional character decipts ink, pixels or an immaterial thought from someone's head
Either they both depict a child or they both depict pixels. You can't have it both ways.

>>390044367
I've repeatedly made the distinction. I think people feel attacked because they themselves can't make it.

>>390044106
I think you should legitimately seek mental help. You're the only one who can't identify depictions, if a drawing of something is the same as the real thing to you.

Do you watch action movies and feel the same way as you do when you watch documentaries on genocide? They're both just scenes of people getting shot to you, nutbag?

>>390041307

Nordic and russian women have larger breasts in average tho. Largest in the world, in fact.

>>390044473
>I can recognise it as a depiction of a human being, at least.
Have you ever met a human being who looked anything like that?

>>390044473
>Either they both depict a child or they both depict pixels.
No, one depicts an utterly fictional creation that resembles something, and one depicts a real person.

Do you think there's no difference between me photoshopping someone's head onto a pornstar, and someone getting their nudes leaked?

>>390041638
her ugly face is a huge turn off

File: 1504771919929.jpg (606KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 800x1000px

Nothing?

>>390044489
>You're the only one who can't identify depictions, if a drawing of something is the same as the real thing to you.
I am able to recognise the basic and intuitive fact that depictions of reality are recognisable to humans as corresponding to reality. The reason two dots and a curved line form a smiley face is because you're able to make that connection. It works similarly with every single depiction you see. You translate it to a real-world concept. In a certain sense even your perception of the real world is a depiction that enters your senses. What's the functional difference between a photograph and a real good photoshop to your senses? What's the difference between being a real human bean and being a brain in an impeccable VR simulation? The more realistic a depiction of something is, the more it will register as the real thing. You're being obtuse by pretending abstraction doesn't exist. If a horror movie gets realistic enough people indeed turn away from the screen and some fake snuff films have even been mistaken for the real deal.

Nothing is wrong with it but it doesn't add anything to do the game if it's just there to pander to horny WEEBS
Those kind of games are usually trash anyways, so whatever

>>390044907
See a doctor, you might actually be insane.

>>390044579
Two arms, two legs, a head, a face, two eyes, a mouth, I've met plenty of people like that. Are you going to convince me that you weren't trying to draw a human? That it's just a collection of random lines you accidentally threw together?

>>390044687
>Do you think there's no difference between me photoshopping someone's head onto a pornstar, and someone getting their nudes leaked?
Only morally. Not functionally. The fact that people shop celebrities' heads on pornstars in the first place is an argument in favour of my position.

>>390041943
Fuck off, false flagging poltard

Why are pedophile weebs so insecure that they need to use such moronic logic to explain why they're totally NOT attracted to children because they're "fake"?

>>390044907
>>390045012
>What's the functional difference between a photograph and a real good photoshop to your senses?
>Only morally. Not functionally.
This shit is just mindblowing. We fundamentally disagree on the very concept of being human, you guys should check into a psych ward as soon as possible.

>>390045002
I'm the sanest person in this thread. But then, I don't have an attraction to children I have to justify by jumping through hoops. I'm attracted to grown women and I have no problem admitting that drawings or 3d models of attractive women, especially as they get more realistic, appeal to that same instinct.

>>390044528
You better post proof anon

>>390045024
You wish. Why don't you return to your containment board? Clearly you're not wanted here.

>>390045012
It has more dissimilarities than similarities. You're selectively choosing to ignore them.

>inhuman proportions
>oddly shaped head
>limbs the size of sticks
>no knees
>no elbows
>no hands
>no feet
>no fingers or toes
>no nose
>no neck
>slice of pizza instead of a body
>2 dimensional
>17KB
>no personality, memories, thoughts, feelings or friends
>no name
>fictional

>>390045185
>We fundamentally disagree on the very concept of being human
Photographs aren't humans, Anon. They're photographs. They're depictions of humans. Same as good photoshops or drawings.

>>390044907
Lol wtf are you even talking about? Just close your eyes faggot. I can garantee to you that you will notice a huge difference between Jason running after you with a knife and some nigger doing it.

>>390045290
The photographs aren't the problem so much as the physical and mental abuse required to shoot them.

File: suzie.jpg (40KB, 1110x673px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 1110x673px

>>390045012
This is Suzie. By viewing this picture, you've become an accomplice in fictional child abuse. Actually, you're the direct cause of that abuse.

Turn yourself in at the nearest police station, you fucking monster.

>>390041553
why don't they?

File: B7Vi3nZ[1].jpg (246KB, 900x1238px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 900x1238px

>>390045250
>You're selectively choosing to ignore them.
Yes. It's instinctual, really. Humans are very good at recognising humans, even in the abstract. Hence why even a crude drawing of a pair of boobs can get someone going. Or how about this picture of dolphins? ;^)

And hence also why an abstract depiction of a child can still register as a child and if that arouses you you're factually a paedophile.

>>390045290
So you're saying a photograph that decipts a real person is the same thing as a drawing that decipts someone who doesn't exist?

File: Untitled21.jpg (90KB, 690x535px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 690x535px

>>390045378
This is a gay orgy. You're all fucking faggots now.

>>390045378
Gross, dude, she's naked

Holy fuck this thread massively derailed

>>390045353
>>390045378
For the fourth and fifth time, I'm not accusing anyone of any crimes. Just stating the fact that attraction to children is paedophilia.

I'm also pleased to say I'm not attracted in the slightest to your drawing.

>>390045525
So you're advocating we ban nature in case it grows some humorously shaped vegetables which might be illegal?
I don't understand how you can understand what you do and still think depictions are reality.

You're arguing what I would argue but claiming the opposite conclusion.

>>390045542
They function very similarly to the person interpreting them. If the drawing is photorealistic they would function identically, I'd say. Even if it does not depict any real person.

>>390045290
I would maybe somewhat agree with you if we were talking hyper-photorealistic drawings, but we're obviously not. What we actually have in vidya and anime/manga are far from those, both technically and stylistically.

>>390045598
Huh? You think a court cares if you say you were attracted to that depiction or not? You've viewed it. It's on your hard drive right now, you pervert.

Turn yourself in already. Do the right thing by your own moral code.

>>390045675
For the sixth time, I'm not concerned with legality. I'm stating the fact that attraction to children is paedophilia. I can only imagine what a desperate nonce you have to be to wank to a vegetable which vaguely reminds you of a child.

File: 523513.jpg (58KB, 570x768px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 570x768px

>>390037509
>It causes you to have false expectations for real women

Wahahah no this is some shitty femitard logic. REAL WOMEN cause you to have expectations that cannot be met. So unless you're going to ban fashion TV, beauty magazines, TV adds, movies, and basically everything else that can feature 10/10 women you won't get anywhere.

Having "false" expectations is a byproduct of the age we live in, and is not caused by drawings or video games. Such a stupid idea.

>>390045789
>You think a court cares if you say you were attracted to that depiction or not? You've viewed it. It's on your hard drive right now, you pervert.
They do care, actually. If it's only a thumbnail in your browser cache you can argue pretty convincingly you didn't go looking for it. Add to that that they can do psych evaluations to determine whether you're actually attracted to children or not.

And for the seventh time, that's entirely besides the point, you defensive paedo.

>>390041943
How is that /pol/? Sounds more like /r9k/. /v/ has to be the fucking gayest board because you fags cry nonstop about /pol/ that it just causes most bystanders to take their side instead lol. /v/ is filled with neogaf niggers.

>>390045797
>he's from Bongistan
That explains everything

>>390045759
They're still obviously depictions of people. Who do you think animu tiddies appeal to if not an audience of straight men, and why do you suppose that is? And what does that say about loli porn and its audience?

>>390046008
The difference between 2d lolis and actual children is even greater than between glorious 2d and pig disgusting 3d in general.

File: Probably Pornography.webm (3MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x480px

>>390045797
I'm not really concerned with legality either I'm just saying that your definition of paedophilia is extraordinarily broad and makes light of what is actually a serious crime.

>>390045837
Fuck off roastie sympathizer

>>390045837
>real women
>10/10
Nice joke, man. Have you never heard of supernormal stimuli? Anime skews the scale, that chick is like a 5/10 tops.

>>390037667
false expectations indeed

File: 513513.gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x281px

>>390046524
>Nice joke
Except it's not. I've been jacking off to picrelated tier "Super duper stimuli" for YEARS and i haven't become desensitized to real women at all. "That chick" is 10/10 btw.

>>390037379
Not sexualised enough, need to forget about the ugly abomination of real life

>>390044302
14 is the lowest. Legal if you're not older than 21 I think.

Not really sure, I heard a lot of things and I'm too poor to be a sugar daddy so I never really looked into that much to be certain

>>390037379
what do YOU think?

>>390042990
Dude in hentai they make minors much more sexually attractive than real life, what you see in hentai isn't interchangeable with real life dumbass.
>>390041894
>Immoral thoughts
Yeah, I am totally going to tell society about my pornography habits

>>390045213

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3746109/Target-Map-releases-map-average-breast-sizes-world.html

I know I know, it's daily mail, but the same result can be found in a million other places too if you google it.

>>390040830
Nice copypasta.

>>390047904
>Dude in hentai they make minors much more sexually attractive than real life, what you see in hentai isn't interchangeable with real life dumbass.
Yeah, I'm not talking about the ones which are "12" but depicted with mature proportions, but rather the ones who are "really 3000 years old" and look like children, see?

>>390048359
But even little anime girls are hyper idealized, I`d like to think most lolicons aren`t attracted to the little devils in real life.

>>390048669
>390048669
most lolicons are jerking off to lolis at their home /theard

>>390047620
It's 14 here in Canada.

>>390040830
Chemicals but also environment influences puberty. A lack of men in your social circles makes children born around that become fertile and more promiscuous.

Basically if you lack protectors then you breed quicker to make some.

>>390046221
Not him, but pedophilia (as in, attraction to children, as the other anon correctly defined it) is not a crime and saying it is or should be is advocating for thoughtcrime. Abusing people, be they children or not, or be the abuse sexual or not, is a crime.

>>390050652
He didn't define it as attraction to children. He defined it as attraction to children or anything he personally deems close enough in resemblance.

File: 1503888198551.jpg (49KB, 590x452px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 590x452px

>>390037954
>leaving your house at all
GTFO

>>390037379
nothing, at least inherently.
but there comes a point where it becomes distracting.
one-moment fanservice SCENES are one thing. but if a character looks like the leftmost girl in that image then it would become distracting.

i don't fucking need that much porn in my game. i can get actual porn for that.

File: DEAD OR ALIVE Xtreme 3 Fortune_20170712162104.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

I thought we might have been talking about DOA/Honoka in this thread, instead I find discussion about the legal definition of pedophilia and why some girls grow tits early and some never do.

Never change, /v/

>>390050809
Fair enough.

>>390050809
No, I did explicitly define it as attraction to children. I'd be surprised if you understood half the conversation.

>>390051157

Oh well, at least Honkers is pretty fun in the new musou game.

I wish she and Marie would star in more action games that arent fighting games.

>>390037509
>false expectations
Wouldn't they be real?

>>390041950
>go back to their hentai games
Hentai games have better gameplay than Senran though. This person has no idea what they're talking about.

>>390037379
Nothing, as long as they are of legal age.

Honkers a shit though

>>390050608
t. Pseudoscience

>>390037379
It makes women who can't meet up to this new standard feel bad about themselves...which probably is a good thing.

>>390052538
Epigenetics exist retard.

>>390037509
They way to go with real women is find a crazy girl and fuck her silly
Now you have a sex partner for life

It makes women insecure, however I don't consider that to be a bad thing.

>>390037509
Hate to break it to you but beautiful women exist, if you went outside from time to time you would agree.

>>390038535
Talking about aztecs is cultural appropiation, pay me white boy

>>390037667
>>390037705
Women are a meme.

File: tv discussing stargate.png (694KB, 567x709px) Image search: [Google]

694KB, 567x709px

>>390051157

>>390038535
Some morals are better than others, there is historical/current evidence of this.

>>390037379

It's base

>>390041460
>>390041548
Also beccause the first step to metabolizing testosterone is to convert to estrogen, so any spike in testosterone levels is immediately followed by a spike in estrogen levels. This is why steroid abuse in male atheletes produces feminizing and demasculinizing features such as gynecomastia and shrunken dick/balls

File: BlueReflection-2.jpg (231KB, 842x623px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 842x623px

>>390044348
Mein Gott. Are there any javs with this outfit?

>>390050936
>mocks leaving the house
>tells him to get out

>>390053489
>he doesn't realize that leftards are basically just christians without a god
They don't believe in science when it comes to humans. We're all angels with no base in biology as far as they're concerned. Best case scenario is evolution stops at the neck.

>>390055625
No idea but the word is セーラー水着 if you want to go searching.

File: 1502463358739.jpg (134KB, 767x1024px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 767x1024px

Y'all are fucking idiots. Until an actual real child is involved, you can jack off to kids all you want.
It's not illegal, but it sure as hell is frowned upon. Like shitting in a urinal.

File: 1.webm (3MB, 700x392px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 700x392px

We need more of it.

File: 2.webm (3MB, 700x392px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 700x392px

>>390057107

>>390042427
underrated

File: 1502354520691.jpg (368KB, 840x700px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 840x700px

>>390056651
>It's not illegal, but it sure as hell is frowned upon. Like shitting in a urinal.
Anon...

>>390056651
Who's this seed guzzler?

>>390057706
No clue but reverse image search seems to be doing something

>>390043019
Yes, because the gameplay was utter garbage. Just baby tier braindead permavirgin mash X to win: the game.