Which were better... LucasArts or Sierra adventure games?

>>389752989
/v/ is too young for this thread. Any Sierra game loses by default by the way

sierra

>>389752989
>Underage posters actually post the bottom picture unironically, unaware that it was a joke.

>>389753272
>he ever paid for computer games
I've been pirating games since I was a young kid anon. There were entire bulletin boards dedicated to it

File: discworld-ss2[1].gif (41KB, 320x200px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 320x200px

My first Sierra game was an educational game about the American Revolution called Pepper's Adventure in Time and I loved it.

Also, picrelated is the patrician choice.

>>389752989
Lucasarts easily, though Sierra had some good ones.

Shame Thimbleweed park had such a shitty ending, worse than ME3. That was great until the plot twist

>>389754020
Yeah it's disappointing. I hated how the game was full of red herrings like characters getting kidnapped that end up having nothing todo with the game. Ron Gilbert should have never done another MI2 style ending.

>>389752989
LucasArts without any doubt, LucasArts games had better writing, better puzzles, no dead man walking traps, better engine/graphics.

>>389753421
Thanks for sharing that you've never actually grown up at all, I'm not sure how that's relevant though.

File: 1481920752056.gif (826B, 120x160px) Image search: [Google]

826B, 120x160px

>>389752989
as a classic /v/ contrarian, i hate to go with the crowd, but i must say Lucasarts; without a doubt. Monkey Island, Full Throttle, Maniac Mansion, Sam and Max, best Indiana Jones games ever made, and Grim Fandango (although I never beat this one). You just can't compete with those.

>>389755527
Finish Grim Fandangit. Never have I seen an ending as bittersweet.