So /v/, where do you stack up?

>>389697002
>980
>only play at 1440
I'm still good for quite a few years yet.

0fps because I don't play shit games, and didn't fall for the windows 10 meme.

File: XB1 Halo Wars 2.png (152KB, 550x629px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 550x629px

>>389697140
HW2 is decent.
Shame it's shackled to W10.

So what about the 970 Ti?

>>389698729
n-nani?

>>389697002
1070

is the 950 TI a meme?

>>389698729
1 frame per gig of vram

>>389698729
There's no 970 ti. You're an idiot. Fuck off.

>>389699072
Aight I'll go fuck myself

2x 1080Ti SLI

Where am I on this chart???

>>389699250
Well over 90 FPS.

File: cyka.jpg (323KB, 748x749px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 748x749px

i3 540
750TI

>tfw poor

File: specs.png (244KB, 722x558px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 722x558px

>>389697002

>>389697002
1080

1070. still buying an x1x though

>1080
Fine as always. On a side note, should I go SLI or upgrade to a TI? SLI seems to be getting much better now than before.

>>389697002
Where 760 brahs?

File: cool smiley.jpg (33KB, 740x617px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 740x617px

>>389702872
This baka

>tfw 760 + FX 6300 combo
>it still holds up decently

File: Brain.Damage.1988.iNTERNAL.BDRip.x264-TABULARiA.mkv_20170903_231549.290.jpg (51KB, 720x390px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 720x390px

>>389703187
Mfw never upgrading

>>389703330
Good luck with that.

1050 Ti.

File: 1466387762512.jpg (230KB, 800x532px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 800x532px

bought a 1070 yesterday
>mfw enjoying video games

File: speccy.png (52KB, 746x604px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 746x604px

>>389697002
>gpu not listed
you tell me

2500k+770 2GB here. It does the job just fine, i'll upgrade for Netrunner if it ever comes out.

>>389706281
i'm going to buy a used 2500k for a 2nd pc i'm having to build. how is performance in games? how are temps when oc?

>>389707187
get a 2700k if you can find one, it'll live longer. Performance is great but if you play the newest AA titles and expect 100+ fps or 4k 60fps it's time to upgrade. It plays pretty much every competitive game at 100+ fps though, as long as you tweak it right.
OC and temps always vary a bit, but mine ran at 4.7GHz without giving me trouble, so i don't even remember what temps it ran at.
One thing you should know, it's not fantastic for virtualization, so if you want xzibit your OS' this might not be the CPU for you.

File: speccy.jpg (82KB, 989x787px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 989x787px

Unsure if I wanna upgrade to Coffee Lake or wait for Ryzen 2. 6600k doesn't do too bad though at 4k/60hz.

>>389697002
I use an Intel integrated laptop for my PC gaming

>>389697002
Doesn't xox have a really weak CPU?
Even with a gpu at 380X~ it still have some cpu bottleneck.

>>389707943
i'm just using it to pair with this cheap 970 i got for a pc i keep at my uni dorms. will mostly be playing at 1080p60 so i'm not too fussed about 100+ fps or doing any virtualization. the most taxing thing i'd do is some premiere pro work but i can offload that to CUDA anyway

>>389709724
Sounds good then, now all you need to do is shit up threads like this telling everyone you still rock a sandy bridge system. Don't forget to tell /g/ either, congratulations and welcome to the hall of memes.

>>389697002
I have a 550ti , planning to buy a 1070

>>389697002
>>389697510
>my 3 year old GPU is more powerful than XB1X

Jesus Christ.

File: GPUz.png (38KB, 391x492px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 391x492px

>>389697002
At the top I guess

>>389697002
980 here I was thinking about the 1080ti but i'll wait for 1180ti next year. or maybe 2019 1280ti.

>Xbox One X not even at 970 standards

What happened

>playing in 4K instead of focusing on higher framerates at lower resolutions
>VHQ probably turns AA way the fuck up even though you need significantly less at higher resolutions, murdering framerates no matter the CPU/GPU combo

>>389709102
>Doesn't xox have a really weak CPU?
Yes, same CPU as PS4 and Xbox One just running at 2.3GHz, so it's still a fraction of the performance of a 7700K.

File: DSC_1019.jpg (608KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

608KB, 1920x1080px

I'm alright.

>>389710960
>Gainward

No. No you are not.

>>389697002
Was gonna buy an XboneX originally for some nice RDR2 and improved performance for everything else, but decided to upgrade my 980Ti to a 1080Ti for the same money instead since literally everything interesting coming out on the bone is going to be a windows 10 multiplat now too.

File: e0fd47828d80170dd58be01f6bf9508d.png (45KB, 447x207px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 447x207px

It's OK I guess. I'd much rather play a game at 1080p 144fps than 4K 60fps though.

File: NATIVE 4K 60FPS EXPERIENCE.jpg (161KB, 741x616px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 741x616px

>>389709102
Yes.

The CPU is the main reason why it's having trouble running anything above 30fps.

>>389710960
Those better be 1080ti's otherwise that massive heat sink is over kill.

>>389711164

>not using 1440p 144hz

playing at 1080p with that build is actually stupid

>>389711007
He's an absolute nutter is what he is.

>>389711306
Not a lot of games will run at 144fps and 1440p.

>>389711164
Go up to 1440p, you won't regret it.
Your games will looks so much better.

>>389711178
>having trouble running anything above 30fps.
A lot of games have trouble even hitting that 30fps mark. Cinematic 24fps isn't just a meme, the CPUs in the consoles are straight up turds. Next-gen consoles using Ryzen/Vega APUs will be interesting though.

>>389697002
GTX 750Ti
Literally at the bottom
Neat
Luckily I have low standards and pretty much just keep everything at default. I barely even play modern AAA games anyway. Also just have a 1080p 60hz monitor.

>>389697002
RX480+FX-6300 here. I'm sure I'm above XBOX performance.

File: 1474849038193.png (56KB, 370x370px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 370x370px

>>389697002
>GTX 980
Still not bad I guess

>>389710863
HW2 only has like FXAA and SMAA, both of which are extremely light on performance.

File: 1465371523762.jpg (81KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 720x720px

Who /IntelHD/ here?

>GTX 970 and 980 buyers all have 4GB of VRAM or less

Nvidia were meg jews with those cards. the 970 should have been a full 4GB and the 980 a 6GB card.

File: 1503806737538.jpg (8KB, 269x284px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 269x284px

>>389697002
RX 480 8 GB masterrace. Plays HW2 great.

So is this coming to Steam or is it Windows Store exclusive?

>>389712962
It's M$ so probably not.
They'd rather it be dead and sell like shit than not have a stranglehold on the PC market.

>>389712962
>>389713596
the definitive edition of Halo Wars 1 released on Steam so this might as well after a few more months. Quantum Break also launched on Windows 10 and ended up on Steam, as did Dead Rising 4.

>>389712245
yeaa boi
serious /Intel HD Graphics 5500/ gamer over here

>>389701418
I run 1080 SLI at 4K. I don't think upgrading from 1080 to 1080 Ti would be worth the money, especially this late in the game. As for SLI, it can work quite nicely, but isn't without issues, though knowing how to use NVPI can help with custom profiles. Still, it's late in the game. I'd wait until 2018 for Volta honestly, Pascal is already 1.5 years old, it's bound to get replaced sooner rather than later.

>>389697002
>gtx 1080
>still play at 1080p because there isn't enough space in my room for a bigger monitor

File: 1495161686031.jpg (21KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 400x400px

GTX960 4gb

>>389710648
That's clearly not the X.

4690 here, I'm waiting for Ryzen 2 to be out and just pick the best one. I WANT to go AMD but if intel are legit better I'll go with them again.

I miss my Phenom II days, it was comfy.

>>389715072
It is.
Currently runs Halo Wars 2 at 4k30 with drops.

1060 6gb

>>389708429
You're retarded my dude. Just give me that money if you're going to throw it away.

>>389697002
If you tried extending this chart vertically to make me fit, you'd get that max memory error from GIMP.

Still running a 970, see no reason to upgrade until the next generation or two of gpus come out. There aren't any games that I'm interested in that I can't max out or play on a mix of high/ultra still.

>>389697002
i have a gtx 1080, but i dont see the multimonitor bench, so i have no idea where i stand.

File: 2k17Refresh.jpg (691KB, 2183x1453px) Image search: [Google]

691KB, 2183x1453px

>>389697002
looks like this old thing just shits all over the xb1x

File: spec.png (43KB, 727x592px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 727x592px

feeling alright with my set up actually, might upgrade in a few years but this is about 2(?) years old now and still kicking just fine. not the latest and greatest sure but i'll take a minimum 60fps over the "cinematic experience"

R9 290 here

>>389709102
>Doesn't xox have a really weak CPU?
Yes
Basically 2 ultra low end AMD quad cores slapped together running 2.3Ghz
Cheap and energy efficient, but its weak
Even a FX4300 runs circles around it
Consoles need far less CPU power than PCs to get the same performance thanks to the fact that you can optimize for a single hardware config, but its still too weak to run a lot of games at 60fps