Which one you buy?

Whatever's in a PS4

nvidia gpu and threadripper. or i5

File: 1946885527112.png (549KB, 1493x1567px) Image search: [Google]

549KB, 1493x1567px

R5 1600 & GTX 1060 6GB

i7&gtx1080

prebuilt i5 & amd r 460 2gb

eyem master raec nau!

File: 1433125410148.png (651KB, 680x628px) Image search: [Google]

651KB, 680x628px

>>389476491

That pic makes no sense. You do know that Saitama is fucking strong, right?

You're basically showing that Intel and AMD graphics are better than the bald homo Nvidia in the bottom pic.

File: 1447799806641.gif (2MB, 420x236px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 420x236px

>>389477645
>You do know that Saitama is fucking strong, right?
wrong

Using Intel HD 610 until I can afford a 1050 TI

Just built my ryzen 5 1600 x 1060 3gb

>>389478201
I planned on using that same setup but instead of 3gb it was 6gb. What does your performance on games look like?

I'd rather be the bottom guy. Nvidia is the way to go. He looks like he hits the gym regularly.


Which is a lot better than being a shitty gag character from a bad anime.

>>389478394
Pretty good as far as assfaggots and bioshock remastered goes. PUBG I have to run on medium for 70-80 fps. That's the most demanding game too which will use more than 3gb of vram. Have not tried many newer games. Just bought vanquish, everything older I can effortlessly max out. Maybe 2+ years if I was guessing