21:9 Master Race

I don't really care.

There is absolutely no reason you need to see that much on the sides

>>389470280
more like
>Resolution not supported lowliferace

Really does nothing for the experience.

>>389470280
>not supported
>whack as fuck FOV

Not only don't I care yet, it's not even worth the money at this point.
Go jerk off elsewhere.

>>389470652

it's called immersion dipshit.

>>389470846
says the pleb who cant afford to try it. listen europoor, youtube vids do not do it justice.

File: 489830_20170828114900_1.jpg (2MB, 3440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3440x1440px

>>389470846

>Confirmed never played on ultrawide

>>389470280
Most of the games I play are still 4:3

File: 1504721185536.jpg (479KB, 2540x1440px) Image search: [Google]

479KB, 2540x1440px

>>389470280
WOW BEUTIFUL

File: 43.jpg (392KB, 1920x1440px) Image search: [Google]

392KB, 1920x1440px

>>389470796
There's absolutely no reason you need to seem more on the sides than this.

>>389471159
4:3 is the best

>>389470280
game?

>>389471203
>>389471252
This. Square TVs were good enough for me in the 90s, they're good enough for kids these days.

File: f63.jpg (41KB, 396x382px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 396x382px

>>389470280
>A PCMASTERRACE thread.

Digital Ebola.

>>389471325
also 4:3 is better if your game have some sort of vertical progression, like the original crash games

>>389471252
4:3 is better than sex

>16:10 and 4:3 will never do a comeback
>screen is just going to go wider and wider until everyone is hidamari

>>389471610
3:2 is finally making it's mark on laptops. Only a matter of time until we get proper desktop monitor support for it as well

21:9 only really works well with curved displays, and curved displays are stupid.

File: 1459465853773.gif (2MB, 200x160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x160px

>>389471252
>>389471325
>>389471530
>>389471568

You nostalgiafags still enjoy rewinding those cassettes too I bet?

>>389470280
>21:9
Not really worth it considering the inane price hike from standard 16:9. I'd rather just get multiple monitors instead.

>>389471292
Dragon's dogma

File: maxresdefault.jpg (61KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1280x720px

>>389471568
absolutely

>>389471952

Human eye is a curved display anon, ~1200R

File: image.jpg (909KB, 2592x1936px) Image search: [Google]

909KB, 2592x1936px

>>389471957
I've got my PC Monitor BOI

File: gsdx_20130102073642.jpg (863KB, 5760x1200px) Image search: [Google]

863KB, 5760x1200px

>>389470280
>21:9
casuals

>>389471173

>Ignores larger FOV without fish-eye on 21:9 proper

>>389470280
>broken FOV where everything is warped near the edges
no thx

File: 1610.webm (318KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 1920x1200px

>>389471530
In that case 16:10 is the master race.

>>389470280
Because 95% of PC games are designed for consoles so what's the point

>>389472943

No fish-eye in that pic whatsoever

My primary concern is framerate.

>seeing 144 frames per second

Ultra wide and 4K are great, but I can't give up them framerates.

>>389473231
I have 2560x1080@60hz. That resolution is almost as big as 2560x1440. Some games struggle to get smooth 60 fps with GTX 1080. Of course most of the vidya is fine, especially bit older titles. Don't believe the hype, you need a huge gfx card to support those fancy resolutions.

>>389473823
>That resolution is almost as big as 2560x1440
no it's not.

>>389473886
Are you mentally challenged? Fucking retard. There is a difference of 320 pixels vertically. Kill yourself.

>>389473823
You're not very good at math, are you?

2764800 pixels vs 3686400

>>389474006
>Are you mentally challenged?
>. There is a difference of 320 pixels
wew lad

>>389474006
Please be trolling

File: 16-9 master race.jpg (973KB, 3440x1935px) Image search: [Google]

973KB, 3440x1935px

>>389470280
The way I see it, 21:9 just means less vertical space.

File: 1494316612667.jpg (49KB, 616x699px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 616x699px

>older games without proper widescreen support get their UIs even more stretched

File: lg-29ea93-21-9-vs-16-9.jpg (333KB, 800x507px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 800x507px

>>389474449
That's stupid. A 34" 21:9 is as tall as a 27" 16:9. It's a straight upgrade.

>UI in the middle of the screen
>using a monitor, mouse and keyboard and sitting a desk for a comfy hack and slash RPG

>>389472795
I feel like I understand this scene so much better now.

>>389470280
>360 controller
doesn't matter how wide you make your screen if your input device is shit.

;)

File: gsdx_20130101102936.jpg (1MB, 5760x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5760x1200px

>>389474830
good

>>389474708
How it's stupid? It's all a matter of perspective. You can say a wider box is the same as a less-tall box, or you can say a taller box is the same as a less-wide box.

you try to sell the idea of a wider aspect ratio by showing more to the sides, but I could just as easily say you're just cutting off the top and bottom of the 16:9 screen and actually giving less information.

File: 1415308338618.gif (467KB, 1358x762px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 1358x762px

>>389472795
I fucking love emulation

>>389475180
>but I could just as easily say you're just cutting off the top and bottom of the 16:9 screen and actually giving less information.
And that would be a lie.

>using anything else than 16:10
it's like you like looking at stuff through a shit filter

File: 85e.jpg (263KB, 764x551px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 764x551px

>>389471203
>>389471325
you morons

while a single eyes FOV ratio is close to 4:3, the fact that you have two eyes and that they're at a distance from each other and your brain interlaces them, makes your FOV is a sort of oval, so wider displays make sense, they fill more proportional space of your overall field of view, rather than a fucking square

>>389475452
16:9 fills my glasses almost completely. I can't imagine wanting anything wider. 16:10 or 15:10 are easily the best sweet spots for genuine human vision

>>389475648
four eyed freak

>>389470280
>not even 32:9
when will you fags ever learn

>http://www.samsung.com/us/computing/monitors/gaming/49--chg90-qled-gaming-monitor-lc49hg90dmnxza/

i cant wait for 4k VR

hopefully i wont die of old age or whatever first

File: 1504451329819.png (387KB, 1268x1208px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 1268x1208px

>>389470280
Ultra-wide monitors with 120hz+, FreeSync, non-TN panel,... are all pretty expensive and only 1080p
I'll definitely buy one over 16:9 trash though

File: photo-1002553794-54a30a20.jpg (8KB, 124x129px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 124x129px

>>389475180
>but I could just as easily say

With the vertical size being constant, 21:"9" and 16:"9", there is no "perspective anon.

You're either grasping for straws or need a refresh in geometry.

File: 20170801221741_1.jpg (872KB, 3440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

872KB, 3440x1440px

I do like me some morrowind in ultrawide

>>389476679
>With the vertical size being constant
Okay, so you completely misunderstand my point. The point I'm making is that the vertical size doesn't need to be constant. I could just as easily say "with the horizontal size being constant, 16:9 shows more than 21:9"

>>389476932

Impractical argument though. To fit a 21:9 in say a standard 24" 16:9 screen, you would need a 17" 21:9 screen.

And your argument ignores the clear FOV advantage that 21:9 will retain no matter what size it is.

https://youtu.be/5ZG9zh8hyrI

File: 20170906_144136.jpg (2MB, 2603x1584px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2603x1584px

>>389470280
I agree with you OP, I could never downgrade to 16:9 ever. There is no compat issues, I don't know what these tards are talking about. I came from 3 1080p in ultrawide and that is where issues came up so I went to a single ultrawide and it is perfect. The Asus PG348q, with a GTX 1080 powering it, gets me over 100fps in all the games. Could not be happier.

If you aren't gaming on an 40inch 4k HDR monitor you ain't gaming. Get on my level

>>389478221
>There is no compat issues, I don't know what these tards are talking about.
You barely play any games.

File: Deus Ex Mankind Divided 09.11.2016 - 15.14.33.01.jpg (1MB, 3440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3440x1440px

I like it

File: Skyrogue.webm (3MB, 1147x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1147x480px

>>389478397

>>389478221
only a 1080?? what a pleb.

honestly though i can't afford a 21:9 UW monitor since i bought a 1080ti, otherwise i would. also, do the UW monitors have the vertical option? i've always liked vertical monitors.

File: v goes to a stripclub.webm (3MB, 1337x560px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1337x560px

>>389478507

File: choppertank.webm (2MB, 860x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 860x360px

>>389478593

>>389478357
>monitor
lel
enjoy your input lag

File: comfy.jpg (1MB, 3440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3440x1440px

>>389478678

>>389478368
Yes I don't play your weeb games, or dress up waifu.

>>389475346
16:10 just gets shat on by zooming into 16:9 until it fits in the majority of games. In the end you usually get less vision unfortunately.

>>389479089
t. PUBG player

>play AAA+++ games
>cant unlock fov
>have to spend 500+ on a monitor

>>389479293
I don't know about that poster but I play a shitload of games, even /weg/s and untill now only a handfull of games have not worked in Ultrawide, with all but 3 or 4 being RPGMaker games or similar.

I'm kind of butthurt because I could buy a 1440p ultrawide but I read that model had problems with flickering and ghosting. But apparently they fixed those recently, but I already have a 1440p 16:9 monitor. Bummer. At least this one has more Hertz.

16:10 > 21:9 > 16:9

quote me, ultrawide will become the new standard for the "gaming" scene in the next couple years.

is this the dragons dogma thread? post pawns so i can rent them

>>389481225
thanks

>>389470946
Wouldn't it make FPS games with good FOV options (~120) seem natural?

>>389470280
nice meme resolution

kinda nice but eh how many gimmicks do you want me to buy these things are kinda expensive

>>389483556
"FPS games with good fov options" aka old or modded games -> dont even have a ultrawide support. So many times even for new indie games I see people complaining about WHY NO ULTRAWIDE in steam forums its just so baka.

>>389470280
Ultrawide monitor is the best gaming purchase I've made in years, going back to 16:9 physically hurts my eyes and makes me violently ill.

I didnt expect it to be as good as it is, I would recommend it to everyone.
>>389470946
>not supported
>supported by everything
>>389471347
>consolebabby telling PC to go back to plebbit
Ironing
>>389472943
>things that never happen
Pls don't talk about things you know nothing about

>>389475180
>if you add extra width you're actually cutting off the top and the bottom and receiving less information
>hows it stupid
This is the stupidest post I've read in a long time

>>389484481
A lot of competitive FPS have 110 or so.. CoD, BF..

>>389478507
This just looks especially dumb with the UI right in the centre of the screen then just a useless expanse of blue either side of it.

>>389474969
Any tips on setting up PCSX2 with ultrawide? I'm getting a 3440x1440p monitor in a week.

>>389485314
110 is what you should use on 16:9

>>389485769
learn to hack.
http://www.wsgf.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=26677

>>389470280
Cause 16:10 is good for games and internet.