friendly debate: did you kill him or not, why?

He betrayed the cause, so he had to be dealt with. No one pulls a fast one on Geralt and lives to tell about it

>>389464789
stop shilling you dumb fuck go back to /cancer general/ or just use the other thread discussing the """choices"""

>>389464789
>Killing Roche
No

>>389464789
He tried to kill Broche so yes

File: 852.png (29KB, 778x512px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 778x512px

>mfw "shove Dikstra aside forcefully"

>>389464789
>smartest character in the game, master of spy-craft, always a step ahead of everyone
>decides to charge you with his limp leg, couldn't even wait for you to leave

Amazing writing. People who seriously "debate" this game have sub 80 iq

>>389465262
seems like one of the rushes quests

File: 480[1].jpg (24KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x480px

>>389464789
>trying to fuck over Broche, Ves and Thaler, a.k.a best boy
Hell yeah, I killed him. Shame he went full retard, I enjoyed his character.

Now THIS is the true question.
>not giving him a chance to drink swallow and then killing him.

Break leg then kill always

>>389465334
No anon, rushed is not the word you're looking for, retarded is the word you're looking for.

Witcher 2 was rushed ,the game had to wrap up with 20 minutes of dialogue. And you know what it's still good, no characters were ruined, no stupid plot holes and you have to choice to let Letho go in the end after he makes the case that you're not so morally superior to him. No game has done that as far as I remember

Witcher 3 is just retarded

i helped him until he told me his plot then i just noped out of there. which led to a bad ending of course for some reason.

>>389465364
>discount berengar. jpg

No. Fuck Roche, he's willing to whore himself out for Nilfgaard.

>Is calm and calculated for his entire time in the game
>Goes full retard at the very end out of nowhere

wew