When Knack 2 has a higher score than Yooka-Laylee

File: Untitled.png (6KB, 630x110px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 630x110px

so this is the power of the ps4...

>>389337485
Knack 2 baybee. GOTY baybee.

>>389337704
> gameblog.fr

> visual feels
> muh humor

I'm not a Knack fan but that review sounds like total bullshit.

Can someone explain why Knack stole Adam Cole's catchphrase?

Reminder that the score would be in the green if it weren't for French cucks

>>389337485
Then what?

>>389337704
I don't get it.
Why is it getting such a low score?
I played the demo and it wasn't that bad. I can name you a lot of game which are way worse and still got better scores.

>>389338452
First impressions matter and the first game was blatantly a tech demo for the PS4.

>>389337704
I heavily disliked Knack and do not plan to touch Knack II. I just read that review and honestly think they have something against Sony or SIE.

I can't for the fucking life of me wonder why people take sides. Even more so when you are a magazine/website.

>>389338602
On the other side we have a reviewer who unironically never gives a game below 90% and user reviews giving it a 10 and then saying they've enjoyed it despite its' flaws.

>>389338305
>one review keeps it out of the green
thats not an accomplishment

hahahah here comes the money!!!! hahah uh ohh did someone say knack???

>>389337485
NACK TOO BAIBEE

By the end of the week Knack II will have a higher meta than Destiny 2

>>389338602
The game was probably just too hard for them. Whenever you see some kind of platformer get an overly negative review, think of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=848Y1Uu5Htk

File: WEWUZKNACKSNSHIEEET.jpg (18KB, 343x302px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 343x302px

>>389337996
>that review sounds like total bullshit.

>but Jim Sterlings Zelda review was totally okay and not clickbait!

>>389341830
but who mentioned either zelda or jim sterling?

I can't stop watching virginal Aryan pussys getting destroyed by large genetically superior thug dominant black dick.

>>389342038
You must be new to /v/.

>>389342038
The Anon you replied to. Are you stupid?