Did you play it?

Yeah, I did. They delayed the PS3 version pretty hard, and while the 360 version was getting terrible reviews, I thought:
>Well maybe they'll fix these things on the PS3 version since it's so delayed

Turns out it was just delayed to get the straight port done.

Yes. While is is a messy poorly designed game, it was still playable and not as bad as people make it out to be.

>>389284715

>Not as bad as people make it out to be.

Must be nice to have such low standards.

>>389284856
Its bad, just not the worst thing ever.

I think Boom is worse

>>389284251
Yes it did and it was fucking awful and I didn't buy it.

>>389284251
>PC
wait, what?

>>389284981

Of course it's not the worst thing ever, it's still nothing short of embarassing that SEGA released this piece of garbage.

No, but I watched a sleep deprived Let's Play of it and honestly that was enough to make me want to never play it.

Yes. I still have my copy.
It's really funny to sic the game on friends who haven't played or watched any of it, and watch them get frustrated at the bad programming and shitty design.

Yes, I 100%'d it. With all subquest.

>>389284251
It's better than SA2

>>389285679
Me too anon. Harder than the other 3D Sonics because load times and ring bonuses.

I would if it didn't cost $20

>>389285126
Cancelled

File: Game_Dude.png (396KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 640x480px

Hey did you know if you stand on a pillar and use the FPS as Rouge you can glitch the camera to see her cleavage ha ha thought I share

File: 274.jpg (28KB, 458x458px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 458x458px

>adventurefags will never admit that this was Sonic Adventure 3

Ive heard the demo version (Kingdom Valley Sonic) is actually a later build than the final game, which was never used as the final build because apparently, despite having more details and being closer to complete than the actual game- was more unstable.