3 questions about this: -do i need to play the first one? -will

>>389241326
no (kinda)
no
no

They won't give Taro any more money.

>>389241326
1. I would recommend it because playing Automata first spoils the first game. There are also returning characters in the game you will have no connection to
2.No
3.No

>>389241326
No and the DLCs for this game are just fluff.

>>389241507
To be fair, it's pretty good post game DLC. Colliseums are actually a lot of fun if you're not overleveled.

File: consider.jpg (43KB, 600x451px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 600x451px

>>389241326
It's an underwhelming action game with shit combat, generic enemies and a tumblr-tier story.
Read a book instead anon, the game's shit.

>>389241596
your ass is about to consider my dick fuccboi

I completed original Nier with ending A and B now, feeling a bit bored now, are endings C/D worth it?

>>389241712
>Nierfag
>Also an actual faggot
Checks out

>>389241596
You can actually do a lot of reading in this game if you want to. There's logs that explore events and character backgrounds.

>>389241910
Too bad the writing sucks.

>>389241992
too bad your ass is sucking my dick fuccboi

>>389241992
It requires a particular taste. I don't know why you wasted time on this game if it didn't resonate with you. Should've just played something else?

>>389241596
I don't understand why someone would call the story of a game shit and then suggest reading a book if you want to experience a good story, because that implies that vidya inherently can't have a decent story and so invalidates your criticism of this particular game's story.

Also, well written or not Automata is at least an example of a story that could only work as told through a game. I agree on the combat being underwhelming but that was never the focus, and if you compare it to the original Nier it's really much the same system but smoothed out a little, so I was satisfied with it.