It'll have a 97 metascore

It's gonna have something like 84-87 I think.

honestly, it looks really bland and boring. platforming seems extremely simplistic and basic. going to go out on a limb and say it'll be the worst reviewed mainline mario game

>>389221934
Sunshine and 3D Land are in the 90s there is no way Odyssey is getting below a 95.

>>389221884
Does that mean it will only be 3 points better than Bioshock Infinite?

>>389221884
100 is possible but there are a few people biased against anything Nintendo

I think a 98 or 99 is possible if there are enough 10/10 scores.

>>389221884
88 overall

Screenvap this post

>>389222222

>>389221884
85

>>389221884

97 at the very least; 98 is possible.

This game will surpass 98

>>389222290
I can't see this doing as good as botw

There is no way

>>389221934

Bait

>>389222335

>He thinks a 3D Mario would be in the 80 range
>He wants this screencapped

File: v.jpg (46KB, 820x492px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 820x492px

>>389221884
>October Hits
>Nintendo shows off Mushroom Kingdom
>Whole kingdom is literally a remake of SM64
>New Rooms
>New Paintings

This is the bomb Nintendo is about to drop on us. It's going to make us all tear up in joy.

File: star road crusaders.jpg (237KB, 500x389px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 500x389px

>>389221884
97-98 seems likely

>>389222504
Why not?

7.8 too much water

>>389222595
Too ambitious, but I wouldn't be surprised if the Mushroom Kingdom contained a remake of the courtyard from SM64 **complete with the waterfall entrance to Metal Cap Cavern**

File: 1467419345785.jpg (29KB, 370x370px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 370x370px

>>389221884
>Metacritic

Who cares?

>>389221934
nigga it's a 3d mainline mario. it's going to get 90+ even if it's actually dogshit.

>>389221884
89. Mainly because the game ignores Mario's ability to possess things and the questions it raises about consent

File: 1473093462749.png (796KB, 1125x1095px) Image search: [Google]

796KB, 1125x1095px

>>389221884
>only 97
THINK AGAIN.

No hubworld means it will be 92 or so. If it had a hub area it'd be 98 or 97 when some edgy clickbait reviewer gives it a low score to drag it down.

>>389222290

Jim Sterling will do his best to prevent this from being a 100, but a 98 or 99 metacritic score is definitely possible.

File: afzo58U.gif (2MB, 352x264px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 352x264px

First 100/100 game incoming.

Sonyygers are not ready.

>>389221884
It'll have a 90-95 metascore and be slammed hard as all fuck because of it with a metric fuckton of sonyfags shilling horizon zero dawn again

>>389222595
SM64 was shit, drumpkin.

>>389221884
It's going to have less than an 70 metascore due to the full scale assault that sonybuddies, xgods and pcfriendlies will launch on it to sabotage it as hard as humanly possible just so they can spend the next ten years shitposting quite literally nonstop about nintendo's downfall.

>>389224604
nice fantasy, child

>>389224659
No matter what score it gets it'll suffer every thread about it being shitposted to death because it doesn't have a 100/100 which is /v/'s new minimum quality standard.

And? Once you minus the 10-20 select Nintendo bonus (in this case, 20 for being a Mario game), you only end up with around 80 which is still good.
Face it, Nintendo gets sucked off when it releases something Mario or Zelda and scores are often not inflated because of it. Mario especially is getting pretty meh over the years so unless this game utilises it's gimmick well, i am gonna pass

>>389224749
You seem to be implying that it wouldn't get shitposted to death if it had a 100/100.

>>389224779
>are not
Haha, fucked it. Meant just are
Gotta love phone posting

>>389224809
Well yeah, that's a given because it's a mario title, everyone thinks that's the natural reaction you're supposed to have towards them. I am talking about the scale of shitposting and amount of golden face spam.

>>389224356

Only nostalgia fags with autistic standards will care about the lack of a hub world, which is stupid because new donk city during the day is basically a hub world, the most expansive we've had in a 3D Mario game, only it's technically a level. There are no enemies or hazards, it has a bunch of secret entrances to platforming sections and challenges, and it has plenty of buildings to do parkour shit just like in Isle Delfino. I'd say it fits the criteria.

/v/ will be completely uninhabitable when this game drops

if you thought zero dawn vs botw was bad, it'll pale in comparison to this shit

>>389225129
bad bait

>>389225129
The only "competition" it has is Hat in Time, which is indie and on everything except the Switch. Not sure what the point in comparing them would be but this board is autistic so anything can happen

>>389222290
100 is not possible for any game. If any get close, click bait reviewers are going to shit on it to bring the average down.

>>389222290
Absolutely impossible. A Sterling 7 needs 59 perfect scores to compensate it back to a 9.95.

>>389221884
With 'mario' in the title, that's pretty much guaranteed regardless of how the game itself is

>>389221884
Do people unironically care about metascore?

>>389225878
it gives life meaning

plus it's literally a combination of all review scores put into one

>>389225257
>implying it won't

It'll get better reviews than Zelda.

File: knack-2-listing-thumb-01-ps4-us-12jun17?$Icon$.png (1MB, 1067x600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1067x600px

>>389221884
It'll have a worse metascore than Knack 2
Screencap this

>>389227452
This is one of the sillier baits i've seen all day

>>389227452
But Odyssey will be the ONLY game that'll be better than Knack 2.

>>389227452
Even as somebody who enjoys Sony, why oh why did they decided to make Knack 2 instead of, I don't know... maybe bring Sly back from the dead?

>>389227452
wait..this didn't come out yet?
what the actual fuck

>>389227532
90% of game development is asset creation. Knack 2 can reuse stuff from Knack, Sly would have to be built from the ground up.

>>389221884
obviously it'll be over 90 just because it's 3D and "muh nostalgia"

>>389227814
But at the cost of people giving a shit? No one gave a damn about knack after it's release.

>>389221884
What pisses me off is it is merely Yooka-Laylee starring Mario. I am not saying it is going to be trash. On the contrary. I enjoyed Yooka-Laylee but Mario will get higher ratings due to the character and not much else.

>>389228014
Has anything shown so far suggested that it is a collectathon like Banjo or Yooka? It seems like your standard 3D mario game.

>>389228014
It doesn't look anything like Yooka-Laylee, which I liked too

>>389225129
KNACK 2 IS LEAGUES ABOVE MARIO SHITTESSEY