Was Link's Awakening morally ambiguous?

>draw a whale
>call it a fish
Why is this allowed?

>>389182106
No? Why would it be?

>>389182106
>island full of vibrant life and peacefulness
>dreamworld made from a comatose state
>evil and monsters pop up more and more frequently for the sake of self preservation
>it's your life and a "fish'es" or all of them
>the "hero" wins again
>not a single survivor save for a single seagull qt

Was there ever a right or wrong to begin with?

>>389182534
In the ancient world, anything in the sea was a fish.
Even the modern world still has the hangover from it, calling many crustaceans "shellfish."
Since Zelda is based on fantasy set in an ancient world, referring to whale as a fish would be acceptable.

>>389183272
Awakening the fish kinda vaporize all the being born from his "dream". The only question is how literal the term dream was.
If it was just a normal dream and people getting close to the fish were psychically connected to it, no harm done.
If that dream was more like "reality warping stuff out of my mind", then actual people got killed.
Unless you don't consider people created by a spell-like effect to be actual people.

>>389184138
I see. Wouldn't the island just reappear with all of its inhabitants every time the Wind Fish goes back to sleep though?