Why does everyone feel the need to shit on this game? It's just a little 20$ indie shootemup that's taken a long time to be released. does /v/ shit on it because it's going to be successful and popular? because it has a different art style?
Or is it just /v/ being /v/ as usual hating anything popular
>>389145910
level design is shit as are the boss battles
if they bothered to develop that instead of old cartoon graphic it could have been a good game
>>389145984
Thanks for the reply Dean
>>389145984
I don't know about anything gameplay related, but you shouldn't downplay the art style, it makes everything feel more vibrant, especially compared to some other 2d gamessamus returns
buy dusk instead
> a little 20$ indie shootemup
>20-person team
>millions of dollars spent on shilling
>shit level design (if any)
>>389146021
How can a "game journalist" be so fucking BAD at video games?
reddit will be all over this game but I don't care, I'll buy it and refund if it's not fun. because that's what matters
>>389146751
why don't people do this instead of just bitching and moaning. it's what i do.
ofc most faggots on /v/ just pirate the game and don't pay a cent even if they enjoy it
>>389145910
its just /v/ hating on the game for the sake of hating. i think it looks pretty neat
>See artstyle
>Oh fuck this is good, i was craving for a platformer
>Turns out it's not a platformer
>Gameplay looks really simple and boring
>>389145910
It provided another example to display how much journalists are subhuman retards. Good game just for that event.
>>389145984
>If they chose to not focus on the thing everything is buying it for it could have been good
Thing is, I agree with you. The level design looks really shit.
But the only reason anyone gives a single solitary shit about this game is the old timey cartoon graphics.
If it didn't have that and was just another above average platformer in a sea of above average platformers it'd just be another 10 dollar title on steam a dozen people would buy.
>>389146437
Go to bed, Szymanski
What doesn't /v/ hate on
>>389145910
more like KEKhead