>720p/900p handheld/docked >30fps with drops

W-WAHOOO....

File: 433544654667.jpg (41KB, 452x350px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 452x350px

god I love buttdevastated fanboys

>>388567719

and yet it's a better game than anything on xbox one this year ... man, must be sad to be you

>>388567719
It's a fucking turn based strategy game, who cares?

File: 1500348302211.png (8KB, 233x249px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 233x249px

>>388567719
85

File: 1491453498373.png (558KB, 803x707px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 803x707px

>can't attack the game for its scores
>has to fall back on performance that didn't affect playability for anyone

wew

>>388567929
fuck off drumpfling

>>388568141
Please refrain from posting my wife, thanks

File: 5x7x1u.jpg (53KB, 700x659px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 700x659px

>le fps drops maymay

that's what people have said to me about every nintendo switch game I own. Not a single one of them has frame drops other than botw and that's only in one relatively small area of the game.

>>388567719
doesnt matter.it has bosskino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Yx8zg9DoPo

>>388568240
doesn't mean the drops aren't there, it just mean you're used to games running like shit on Nintendo shitty hardwares

>Need Graham's number of frames per planck time and hyperrealistic resolution for a turn-based strategy game
At least attack the game o its faults and don't be an autismo about it.

>>388567719
>game actually turns out to be good
>have to find other ways to shit on it so he doesn't look retarded
cool, whatever makes you sleep at night.

>>388568434
>ESL retard tries to argue
how cute.

Nintendo lost.

how?

i'm not trying to shit on the game, it looks very pretty but other nintendo games look far more demanding and still hit 60fps

How's the game itself?

>>388567719
Your point being...?

>>388568309
Holyshit, this aint that bad