Why didn't Reach get remastered?
Because people shit on it despite it being one of the better Halo games.
>>388538412
>better
Only because of what came after. CE, 2, and 3 are all better games.
>>388538197
Because it's a piece of shit
>>388538412
>it being one of the better Halo games
It's one of the worst.
>>388538412
The campaign is among the worst. Come on.
Because life isn't fair.
>>388538197
Because it's still 3 years until its 10 year anniversary.
A better question is: why no H3 anniversary?
>>388539536
Because Halo 3 doesn't need one, it would be the equivalent to Nintendo making a reimagining of Super Metroid.
1. It's not 10 years old yet
2. It's recent enough regardless of how long ago it was that remastering it would have diminishing returns, even Halo 3 has this being the case
>>388538487
>>388538495
>>388538815
>>388538863
t. people with shit taste
>Singleplayer:
2 > ODST >> Reach > 3 >> CE > 4 > 5
>Core MP
2A > 2 = 5 >> CE > Reach > 3 >> 4
>Customs/forge
5 > 2A >> Reach > 4 > 3 >> 2 >> CE
>Music
ODST > 2 >> 3 > CE >> Reach >> 4 > 5
>>388540840
Fuck off, Reach was shit.
Who cares? Halo became normie shit after 2.
>>388539536
>Because it's still 3 years until its 10 year anniversary.
>>388539913
How the fuck is that equivalent at all? Halo 3's graphics are very dated and could do with at least a light remaster.
You can play it on Xbox One with Vsync and better visuals than the Xbox 360 version, plus online multiplayer. There's no reason to "remaster" it beyond that, unless you want 343 to do it and apply their art style to the whole game.
>>388541658
Halo 3 has
>HD assets
>HDR lighting
>Terminals
>Skull menu
>4th pillar
>3D sky box
>foot prints in snow and sand
>the best water and explosion effects in the series
>Forge
>armor customization
Why the fuck does Halo 3 need an anniversary when it already has 90% of the shit already in Anniversary? The anniversary treatment will just fuck up the games look, feel, and designs with light bloom, and crushed blacks.
>>388541363
I think you mean WITH 2