in retrospect, this series was never actually that good

good discussion

3, vice city, san andreas are all good as long as you play the pc version. san andreas on ps2 runs like absolute dog shit

Shut the fuck up, kid, you'll never know how mindblowing october 2001 was, and you never will. You will never understand how VC was in every way better than 3 and SA was in every way better than VC, and how they came one right after the other.

>>388490653
literally nostalgia goggles: the post

>>388490801
literally underaged shitter thinking he knows better than people that actually lived through things: the post.
Let me guess, you got into video games after 2008

4 is great for riding around with a mac 10, mini shotty and an ak47 shooting up the hood.
This game actually had satisfying guns.

the only really shitty one was the advance which came out on the same day as fucking san andreas. it still blows my mind they did that

>>388490415
They were more fun when they encouraged mindless rampaging and side missions were actually about committing crimes instead of stuff like tennis.

Just like Mario, Zelda, Doom, or Half Life. All are complete shit.

>>388491208
Kill yourself.

I've always seen the appeal in franchises I don't like, but Rockstar games are just mindboggling.

>>388491321
If GTA is shit, those are shit.

>>388491352
>games with high production values, attention to detail, licensed soundtrack, hundreds of different vehicles and collectibles can't be liked by anyone.

>>388490918

literally this

GTA 3 was amazing at the time. That is undeniable.

>>388491208
Finally someone said it.

>>388491424
None of those franchises are shit.

>>388491208
Yeah dude.
Video games fucking suck.

>>388490595
how were those 3 on xbox

>>388493918
they looked great and ran smoothly, like all Xbox hueg games

all GTA was ever good for is messing around in an urban city sandbox after the first 2

SA > VC > III
All were fantastic games, though.