In hindsight, did it really deserve its score?

no, it's the worst 3d zelda

yup

It deserves a 98, which is its real metascore anyway.

>>388460632
Should have been 100

>>388460632
yes

On a realistic standard? No.
On (((game critic))) score wise? Definitely.

no game deserves

I haven't played it so i wouldn't know

OoT is both better and far more influental than this game will ever be, this shit being two points away from it is an insult. No it doesn't deserve it.

>>388460632
No

>>388460632
It was fun and it had some really cool stuff, the fact that metal weapons actually conduct electricity and things of that nature, but it wasn't above a 90

Even with all the shitposting reviews I think the user score is probably more accurate. It's a very good game but they could do more with it. Cracks start to show as you get toward the end of the game, but the things that are wrong with it are just not very significant.

>>388460952
>re ddit the post
so anti nintendo of you to stand up and say this game is shit

>>388460632
Metacritic is an abomination.

In any case, I personally just thought it was okay. Lacking in many areas. I hope the sequel has more of what makes Zelda Zelda.

Yes! It's the best zelda game and the best game this generation.

yeah

>>388460632
No, 7/10 game at best.

>>388460632
>boring world
>boring combat
>boring dungeons
>terrible bosses

>>388460632
Should have been higher desu.

File: sadadfg.jpg (22KB, 340x161px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 340x161px

I hope this answers your question.

>>388460632
Yah

>>388460952
have you seen the trash that's above 90?

>>388460632

swap the numbers and I'll agree

>>388460632
can i play this on emulator at 30 fps if i have i3 6100 and gtx1050ti?

File: 3244854887.jpg (200KB, 1922x1080px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1922x1080px

>>388460632
Yes if you're playing it on a PC.