Why don't you have a 240hz monitor?
buy one for me then
Because the human eye cannot see past 24hz
>>388352402
>buying 120/240hz monitors when you need a 1080ti to get over 100fps in modern games in ultra settings
>>388352402
It's not feasible to keep upgrading and have 240fps solid in brand new games and some games will never hit that despite having the best hardware - hell, most modern games have 200fps caps or lower. I'm content with 144 for the time being.
>>388352402
because 60hz is perfectly fine
I could only find 144Hz.
there are like 8 games supporting hz that high
what would be the point
Because I only have a 1070
>>388352807
Fucking this.
>>388352862
Any game made properly supports it
>>388352658
Every multiplayer game I care about runs at more than 240fps at 1080p on my machine. Overwatch, CSGO, R6 Siege (all modern Ubisoft games actually), etc.
I run even Crysis 3 at 240FPS on this setup, just need to drop the res to 1280x720. Can even do it on high settings.
At low resolutions CPU is much much more important than GPU.
I'm happy with a solid 30 FPS in most games. 60 FPS is plenty for me.
>>388353004
so, like 8 games
Why don't you have a PMW3366 mouse, /v/?
>>388352807
the human eye can only see 23.67215 hz
120hz is good enough for now
MEGAHURTZ
Why don't you have an overclocked 8Khz WMO, /v/?
Because I prefer high resolution over high refresh rate and don't have real need for one.
>>388353013
>just need to drop the res to 1280x720
>>388353013
>the only modern games that support high frame rates are all low skill ceiling, casual bullshit
It's honestly the most depressing time in my 28 years of playing video games.
>>388353013
>720p in 2017
>he doesn't have a 360hz monitor!
>>388352402
diminishing returns
>>388353476
>>388353335
You forget about the blurriness quickly. It's smoother than real life.
>>388353127
because logitech has abandoned good design in favor of gaymer shit
For gods sake stop designing your keyboards and mice as if they are ferraris.
Have a neat, clean look and I'll buy it. Minimalism is the key
>>388353657
just use temporal filtering you dingus
>>388354128
Nobody cares. Go back to /g/ and post arch screenshots that nobody will look at.
>>388354128
G Pro and G403 look like office mice, you have no excuse.
>>388354237
The only game that does it in a way that's useful is Titanfall 2.
>>388354274
No. If you have a single useless LED that serves no function on your product, I wont buy it
>>388354362
R6S does it good too
Why don't you hold off for seven days so the body activates rape mode, granting you incredible motivation and energy, /v/?
>>388354237
Temporal filtering makes games look like ass, worse than fxaa. I don't get why everyone loves it.
>>388353013
>>388353476
You will be way more angry with me.
My monitor is e943Fwsk from AOC.
1943W (1366x768@60Hz)
Old as fuck.
>>388352402
Because of diminishing returns and price.
I'm not going to cock around and say "The human eye can't see more than 144Hz!" or some shit, but do you really want to pay twice as much for a 240Hz monitor and the accompanying grafix capabilities for that extra smoothness?
60 is great and 144 is fantastic, but 240 is the point where you really need to ask yourself why you need the extra 100 frames and why 144 wasn't enough.
>consoles struggling to get 30hz
>PC is hitting 480hz
What went wrong?
>>388355519
>PS4 Pro runs native 400hz
Um, try again sweetie
>>388355519
lowest common denominator got a taste of interactive movies in 2007 and the rest is history
>>388355821
* 30hz at checkerboard upscaled 1440p
>>388352658
Gameplay/playability > graphics, all game could look like N64 polygons for what I care if it meant I would get the best framerate.
>>388355846
Ironic than Nintendo warned about it, and here they are championing the regression to 30hz.
>>388355519
>PC is hitting 480hz
>still has no games
Hmm....
>>388356019
When the fuck did Nintendo even adopt this mentality?
>>388356194
>still has no games
What did anonymous mean by this?
>>388356019
Ironic that Nintendo talks shit about their consumer base
>>388356341
Is it though? They've been abusing them for decades, they're not even trying to hide it.
Reminder that while your eyes can only see 20 frames per second, your sense of touch operates at over 1000 frames per second, so if you're really pro, you should be playing via feel only.
I think I can see what OP's image refers to. Try moving your mouse back in forth somewhere on your screen, you'll see the image of it is only distinct a few times while you move it.
>>388356402
I suppose it's more an issue of capitalism. Nearly anything that gets popular enough will eventually see a quality hit as the quest to cast the widest net to rake in maximum profits begins. Who wouldn't do what these companies are doing? That's the problem. Idiots with money.
>>388352402
Because I'm not a le ebin esports player
>>388354975
it depends on the person though, I personally don't see any difference when I'm using it on Rainbow Six, and the fact that I get 50fps more is enough for me to completely overlook any imperfections whatsoever if I ever notice them.
>>388352807
>>388352989
Fox and the grapes plebs.