.

>>387954863
Nioh

2 is better to replay so it wins in the end. 3 has a nice initial impression though

just fuck off

>>387954863
>GRRR MY GAME IS NOT SECOND WORST, YOURS IS

Pointless argument Dark Souls should of never got a sequel

they both have good and bad aspects to them. Personally I like 3 more, it has better: bosses, enemies, and music

Bloodborne > DS1 > DS3 > DS2

move on to another thread now, the next 200 posts will be variations of this and people at each other's throats for their favorites

I like 2 more. It's more interesting mechanics and gameplay-wise, and some of the levels were so absurdly hostile I loved them.
3 has better bosses and the combat is more polished but that's it.
My personal rating is
DaS>BB=DaS2>DaS3. Never played Demons.

>>387955047
Shit taste

I hate you guys

>>387954863
DS2 PVE is bland making PVP the only good aspect, areas are complete shit and a long slog ridden with artificial difficulty and abuse with hordes of enemies so that the world doesn't appear easy to overcome. bad world design and keeps going on with the "time is convoluted" so nothing actually matters in this game. i-frames are tied with a stat. soul memory. iron keep. earthen peak. harvest valley. shrine of amana. shit game.

DS3 PVE stays true with the original while PVP gets the short end of the stick by having centralized controls and movesets looking like a bootleg fighting game
story progression is linear, world design is gray and gloomy without any considerable lush life in a dying world that is post-lordran/drangleic. not only does it have one, but TWO swamp areas, although the fast pace makes up for it.

being better to replay is a retarded ideology.

Bloodborne > Dark souls 3 > Dark souls 1 > Dark souls 2

>>387956863
Retard