is this worth playing?
>>387953672
Its like a worse quake1 and worse RE4 in one game so its probably not to bad.
>>387953873
>it's like a worse version of two shit games
confusedanimeboywithinterrobangsontopoftheirheads.avi
Looks like shit. Sucks to see the whole hipster indie "retro looking" trend has finally catch up shooters. Only a retard would pay for this
>>387953873
>RE4
explain
>>387954124
both games have a grey village with potato sack chainsaw enemies.
>>387954121
it literally looks exactly like the mid 90s games its like
what is the problem
>>387953672
yea its pretty fun
>>387954403
We are not in the 90s anymore, i don't remember the actual classics looking like games made in the 80s. Classic shooters became classic because their good gunplay and level design, not for being cheaply made shovelware.
>>387954302
It has similar aesthetics in many aspects to RE4 but it plays nothing like RE4.
>>387954570
>>387954870
no shit autist faggot nigger
>>387953672
It's pretty fun does exactly what it set out to do. Your not going to get a good answer here really. Your either going to get oldfags hating it for not being identical to Quake or people hating it because its too much like Quake or other 90's shooters.
It's Quake but much easier with maps that are less like mazes.
>>387954570
I meant to say that slide look cool
>>387955003
>It's Quake but without the good level design
Yeah, so tempted to buy shovelware. I remember when better games where being given for free.