>>387939510
one is free to play 10 years old game the other is 29.99 none of that 60 dollars multiplayer only bullhit
>>387939596
and they're both abject failures
>>387939510
What the hell was he thinking... releasing a game in an already oversaturated as fuck market
Those who aren't playing Overwatch are playing Paladins
Those who aren't playing Paladins are playing Gigantic
Oldfags still clinging onto TF2
The real poorfags have Dirty Bomb
And the "hardcore" 90s kids who are now nostalgia-goggle wearing grown-ups are playing Quake Champions
There was literally 0 reason to make another class based shooter
wait, why the hell are people playing Brink again?
>>387941603
it went free to play
which is probably going to happen to LB next year
I'm pretty sure whatever marketing they attempted completely failed. I only know about lawbreakers because of rare /v/ threads and an ex-CoD4 pro who's tweeted about it.
Outside of that I don't see where they're getting exposure. Doesn't help that the game is ass and didn't let me know you can more easily carry your momentum by shooting your gun behind you or some shit, which make the game feel like ass.
>>387941871
He looks like a smack-addicted rentboy in that picture.
>PC community in charge of taste
More like Cliffy F
>>387942195
you could have just stated "that's a picture of cliffy b" and lost none of the sentiment