Predict its metascore.
67
5
With that being said. I know I'm gonna enjoy it regardless. I'm a boostfag.
>>387795945
Metascore won't matter, cause I'll be loving the fuck out of it anyway.
>>387796032
>5
Meant to say 50
>>387795945
Copy and paste of Lost World's score
60.
>>387795945
My last two digits.
>>387796101
thanks for the episode anon
>>387796289
I found that it cut out after a bit, which is a shame. I thought it was going to compress the entire thing into a gif.
68
>>387795945
75~
>>387796279
decent
>>387795945
However many posters there are in this thread when it archives
>>387795945
9.11
Low 70's
Less points than generations cuz its less special
Some points lost cuz Classic wont control as good as Mania by far
Some points gained for OC Maker
Some points lost for confusing story (it will be entry level dimension fuckery that a 7 y/o could follow but reviewers are dumb)
Check my last two digits.
I don't have my hopes up. Look at the classic sonic stage of green hill zone and compare it to green hill in sonic mania https://youtu.be/q1wYD5b4VUw
Sonic team have been outdone by fans on their own series
76 or below.
41, I don't see this being good.
>82
>>387796465
>360 version of unleashed lower than Wii
>>387800651
IGN did this too.notice a pattern?
Probably under 70 because "Sonic was never good XD" despite 3 out of the last 4 3D games being good.
>>387801421
Which is the bad one? Lost World?
H A R R I S O N F O R D
>>387800651
why is it part of the 360's hits collection or whatever it's called, were they that desperate
>>387801504
Yeah. Even then, I personally don't think it's that bad, just super unpolished. But it could certainly have been a lot better if they had made most levels similar to Zelda Zone.
>>387801421
>>387801601
You forgot Sonic Boom, unless you somehow think that's good
>>387795945
Probably around 82
>>387801686
I actually legit forgot Sonic Boom was a thing, shit. Then again, it's only Sonic by name, and wasn't developed by Sonic Team.
72 at best
>>387796124
>>387796279
>>387796465
>>387797476
>>387798569
>>387800425
>>387801686
You guys are being way to generous. I cant see it being above 60. Sonic Mania only managed an 86 and that game looks way way better than Forces.
NOTHING about forces looks even somewhat good.
Sure hope this game does well but who am I kidding the journalists can't wait rip this game apart especially IGN with that saliva inducing wrench who reviewed Sonic Mania complaining about the lack of checkpoints like casuals there are.
>>387801826
Generations probably only got that low because it was a short ass game
Forces has more gameplay styles and will hopefully be longer, and it's not like reviewers can tell that the plot is bad or the level design is off or that classic sonic still doesn't handle right, so it'll do better even if it ends up being worse
>>387802560
>lack of checkpoints
What the fuck, there are checkpoints everywhere.
>>387795945
if it brakes 75 I'll let a bullet spindash through my fucking jaw.
>>387802682
they need games that save every second like mmos
>>387795945
70.
>>387801575
That just means it sold above some threshold, the game's quality doesn't matter at all. Same thing as Greatest Hits on PlayStation or Player's Choice on Nintendo.
>>387801826
I'm only being generous since I'm basing this off their past games. Personally I find Forces to look pretty poor in comparison to Unleashed, Colors & Generations but I can see it at most getting a 75 range since Colors & Generations got around that ball park, maybe 70 will suit it more but I doubt it'll be in the 60 range even though I think it looks like it should be one.