Are there any PS3 games that are better on the PS3 than they

>ps3
>stability
kek

>>387722873
Well for instance, FFXIII and Dark Souls both run fairly consistently on PS3. Whereas on PC, their comparable ports have unstable framerates or poor resource usage.

File: Inversion.jpg (130KB, 786x780px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 786x780px

Inversion

dark souls 1 without dsfix

>>387722970
FF13 & DaS are shit ports, probably the worst of Gen 7, still way better than the PS3 versions though

>>387723290
ds1 pc port has lower resolution than the ps3 verison and also lower FPS

Some people might argue FFXIII is better due to the more consistent framerate.

>>387723542
DS1's PC port runs at any resolution without patches though

>>387724240
the internal resolution (rendering resolution) is locked
increasing resolution in the option only stretches the image

File: 20170820150908_1.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>387724343
>the internal resolution (rendering resolution) is locked
No its not

>>387723542
No, it's the exact same, the PS3 version is sub 720p also, just like Demons was

>>387724538
>dsfix

File: 20170820151107_1.jpg (752KB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

752KB, 3840x2160px

>>387724708
I am not using dsfix

>>387722761
Those are few and far between. I'd have to say anything that needs Games For Windows Live still.

>>387724768
yes you are.

File: dsfix.png (135KB, 1880x800px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1880x800px

>>387724815
>check folder
>I actually am
O-oh
Nevermind
Forgive my retardation

>>387722970
>Dark Souls
>fairly consistently on PS3
Nigger, Blighttown can drop below 10 fps on both PS3 and 360. Dark Souls port is considered bad, because it doesn't offer much above the console version, but performance for pretty alright on PC.

Saints row 2

>>387725618
GoG version is fixed.

File: IMG_2657.jpg (26KB, 167x299px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 167x299px

>>387725618
>tfw I'm going out to buy saints row 2 today

File: vesperia.jpg (109KB, 640x743px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 640x743px

>>387722761
Tales of Vesperia is impossible to emulate on PC and the PS3 version manages to hit 60fps more consistently in combat than the 360 version.

>>387725045
speed runners play the PC version even without dsfix because the framerate is so bad on consoles

>>387727278
don't they do that because so much of the game is tied to the framerate and want to abuse it? If speedrunners choose 1 thing over another it is because the inherent ability to abuse the 1 over the other is there.

>>387727572
without Dsfix it's capped to 30, the only thing that breaks at 60 is ladders i believe

>>387723542
No? It's 720p and 30fps. Ps3 is sub 720p and unstable 30fps

>>387727572
Last time I checked there was nothing framerate related to dark souls speedrunning

>>387727920
Then they do it because the game loads faster on pc than reading a blu ray. Like I said, they do it to abuse microseconds of their time, not because its objectively better.

>>387728159
Dark souls speedrunners use ingame time though, loading speed doesn't matter