>tfw playing an an HDD FUCK 3 MINUTE LOADING TIMES

>>387587252
It's like 3 minutes vs 2 minutes 45 seconds.

Still nice for faster access time, though.

>have 200GB SSD
>put literally no games on it because "oh this game would take up a lot of space and I dont think I'll even play it that much"

3 years now and all that on it is the OS

>>387587304
>its only this much
>still, great that its this much
r u ok

>>387587304
what the fuck

it's 10 seconds vs 0,5-1,5 minutes, did you get your "ssd" from aliexpress

File: 1277202817968.gif (226KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 800x600px

>>387587304
>2 minutes 45 seconds with an SSD

File: BF_4_Load_Time_Chart[1].jpg (67KB, 1040x722px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1040x722px

>>387587475
lolno

File: 1487699736937.jpg (49KB, 616x699px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 616x699px

>source game loading times on an HDD
never again

File: 4643603808_066e67ab10.jpg (61KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 500x281px

>>387587636
playing HL2 on release day was an experience that still haunts me

Most games already have fast load times as most are built to not be shit from the start so you only need to put the shitty exceptions such as Skyrim in the SSD in the first place. Honestly I feel most people on /v/ would be better off with just a HDD for their 10GB folder of dank memes as most of them admits that they don't even play games anyway.

>>387587374
Why even buy it then?

You can always transfer games off if you're not

>play total war shogun 2
>load time to battle is literally 2½ minutes
>get ssd
>its still bout 2 minutes

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE fuck bad optimizing

>>387587534
fuck no. my ssd loaded bf4 multiplayer in less than 15 seconds.
My pc is dogshit, but the ssd makes it tolerable