[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Post your 10/10 games

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 76
Thread images: 28

File: Star_Fox_64_cover.jpg (199KB, 700x485px) Image search: [Google]
Star_Fox_64_cover.jpg
199KB, 700x485px
I just blew through SF64 a few minutes ago and damn, still blows me away. It's one of the few games I've ever played that I can pick up at a moments notice and have a fantastic time with it. Always feels exciting and fun. is it weird I cried at the end? The whole bit with his dad at the end and the music swell as they flew off into the sunset was too much for some reason.
>>
>What's wrong, Fox?
>>
>>387525590
>"Nothing...nothing's wrong...."

Gets me every time.
>>
File: 1476334073153.png (332KB, 411x411px) Image search: [Google]
1476334073153.png
332KB, 411x411px
I agree OP, Star Fox 64 is a legit 10/10 game.

>my face when the ending where James McCloud leads him out of Andross' lair legit makes me emotional
>>
>>387525819

The easy path on Venom is such a great level, but I can never bare to miss out on the ''You've become so strong Fox."
>>
File: ss+(2017-07-09+at+06.33.47).jpg (24KB, 282x234px) Image search: [Google]
ss+(2017-07-09+at+06.33.47).jpg
24KB, 282x234px
>>387526150
>''You've become so strong Fox."


God, even reading this line is making me tear up.
>>
>>387525514
Has there ever been a game that topped starfox 64 as far as on rails flight shootan?
>>
>>387526301


I mean does Kid Icarus Uprising count?


I think it comes close, but SF64 is too near and dear to my heart.
>>
>>387526494
I never played it, is it worth buying?
>>
>>387526570

Yes sir, it's extremely good.
>>
>>387526301

There are tons of great rail shooters but nothing really space oriented that I can think of. When I remember that SF64 is a rail shooter I start comparing it to things like arcade rail shooters and it just doesn't feel right. Sin and Punishment was pretty amazing it just lacked polish.
>>
>>387525514
Star Fox 64 is monumental. It's hard for me to call it my favorite game of all time because it's so short and arcade-y, but if you were to ask me "what is the most enjoyable game every made?" I'd probably have to say Star Fox 64. It's immensely fun every single time I play it, and I've beaten it over 100 times. It's the reason I know the idea of game length being a critique of a game is completely horseshit. Replay value is tied directly to enjoyment.
>>
>tfw i learned how to go through the mid and upper sections of the lylat system as a child
so much happiness
>>
How the fuck were you meant to get the special Katina ending where none of your allies die?
>>
>>387528827

Is this the Independence Day level?

You just can't shoot down your allies.
>>
File: 1433589075155.jpg (95KB, 653x490px) Image search: [Google]
1433589075155.jpg
95KB, 653x490px
>>387525514
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpeTnDCvsNI
>3:35
>4:44
every fucking time
>>
File: b97.jpg (255KB, 1024x1458px) Image search: [Google]
b97.jpg
255KB, 1024x1458px
>>
I can perfectly hear every single line of dialogue from this game
>>
File: 1465329281994.jpg (13KB, 308x300px) Image search: [Google]
1465329281994.jpg
13KB, 308x300px
>>387525514
Starfox 64 is a perfect game. It may not be the best game ever made, but what it sets out to do it does perfectly.
I can pick this up and play for an hour or so and enjoy it every single time.
>>
>>387530532

No.

I liked the characters but no.
>>
>>387530120
Yeah, but even so I can never stop teammates doing it, or the enemy ships
>>
>>387530532
This could have been a really fucking good game had Miyamoto not fucked it up by forcing shit controls and Wii U gamepad gimmick sections into it. So much potential.
>>
>>387531639
Gyrowing and Direct X needed to go as well
>>
>>387531632

Teammates won't do it, enemy ships don't matter.
>>
>>387531721
That's what I was referring to when I said gamepad gimmicks.
If they want to add motion controls, make it optional. I will never understand why Nintendo is so vehemently opposed to simple fucking controller options. They never let you customize things the way you like.
>>
>Enemy down! Wait, that was one of ours!

oh you and your war crimes
>>
File: SFZisMediocre.jpg (2MB, 975x1600px) Image search: [Google]
SFZisMediocre.jpg
2MB, 975x1600px
>>387531915
>>387531721
>>387531639
>>387530532

>B-But the controls

Zero suffered for a multitude of reasons and it discredits 64 as a "10/10" game for the fact it's the same thing. It also nearly got Platinum destroyed when it failed.
>>
>>387532205

I loved how even Bill didn't know who was who.
>>
>>387532407
You're a retard, literally half of the comments you posted mention the controls.

Also you say it discredits 64 yet many of the flaws in your reposted infographic are features that were in 64, but absent in 0.

>Medals are too hard to find
>Amiibos barely do anything, as you can unlock it with the 70 medals which are apparently hard to find.
Besides would you really want it to do what the Metroid 2 re-make is doing and have extra shit locked behind shitty happy meal toys?

>>387533096
Yeah, he did. Everytime you shoot one down, he says "Try shooting the bad guys Fox!" or "Fox that's one of ours"
>>
>64
>Good

How come it didnt sell anywhere as good as it did 20 years ago on a system with a high population? Bare in mind that near million mark it has took six years since it released in 2011 which only did about 500k.

>A month after 643D, OoT3D releases
>Crushes the fuck out of it
>The Selects edition 643D got didnt help it at all

Zero is blatantly obvious, it had no other excuse for failing other than it being 64 again with what support it had with Splatoon and Mario Maker being critical successes before it released.
ZHugeEX was dead on about Zero not hitting 500k in a year
>>
>>387533096
>>387532205
ARR ROOK SAME
>>
>>387532407
>>387533287
>StarFox now has its own PokeBarneyfag
Fuck off, dude. Assault was my first StarFox game, didn't play 64 until it was on 3DS, and I still think it's a better game.
>>
File: 1497600978794.png (783KB, 1300x1080px) Image search: [Google]
1497600978794.png
783KB, 1300x1080px
>>387533221

>I didnt actually read the entire image

I can tell you didnt.
Medals arent hard to find but some of them have the "how the fuck was I supposed to know that" shit, which shows the game has bad design on top of its shitty attempt to cash in on nostalgia.

Amiibos completely defeat the point in even getting medals since they just grant you the Black and Retro Arwing anyway. Unless you didnt buy them, you most likely have Fox and Falco because of Smash.
>>
I want to fuck Krystal
>>
>>387533287
64 3-D was released when the 3DS was struggling before the price drop, and it being BTFO by Zelda, one of Nintendo's two biggest franchises isn't really surprising at all.

>>387533627
>medals aren't hard to find but some of them are hard to find.
Nice
>>
>>387533574

>Hating 64 = being a barneyfag

Not everyone jerks off to one game like it's the second coming, or are you just pissed off someone's pointing out how 64 wasnt that great of a game you thought it was 20 years ago?

Last time a fanbase did this it was with Final Fantasy 7, the second they got that remake they've been wanting for years they got royally fucked as soon as they saw how drastically different it is from the original. This was to the point where some regretted ever asking for it.

In the case for Star Fox, the handful who jerked off to 64 got fucked when Zero happened. All that hype of it being the triumphant return to it's glory and it all blew up in their face. To think they bitched years ago over the series doing new shit, looked like it was their favorite game that was at fault.
>>
>>387534095
>20 years ago
I just said I played it for the first time just a few years ago, nice reading comprehension.
>>
File: 1407635530987.gif (1MB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]
1407635530987.gif
1MB, 600x338px
>>387533982

>Zelda's just a bigger franchise than Star Fox so it gets a free pass

No it doesnt, between Star Fox, Mario, and Zelda, those three were big at the time especially during the 64s life. So there's no other excuse.

Also OoT3D released during this struggling period, so you're full of shit if you think 64 3D didnt do well because of that. It's equally as retarded as saying Zero flopped because it was on a dying console, when you had Splatoon and Mario Maker be major successes, selling well over a million in less than a month. Christ even Breath of the goddamn Wild did better than it and that came out long after Zero, and that was the last game Nintendo made for the WiiU.
>>
>>387534095
>Re-make gets fucked because of stupid design choices
>Haha that shows the original was never good
>Uses FFVII as an example when people have been saying Square Enix don't understand why it was good, and would mess it up since day 1.
>>
File: header.jpg (15KB, 460x215px) Image search: [Google]
header.jpg
15KB, 460x215px
>>387525514
>>
>>387534476
Zero being a bad game doesn't make 64 retroactively bad. Why are you so adamant on convincing people that they're wrong and should feel bad for liking an old game? Should we not like Ocarina of Time because Skyward Sword was bad?
>>
File: 1502751229446.png (153KB, 308x294px) Image search: [Google]
1502751229446.png
153KB, 308x294px
is Star Fox 64 3D worth playing?
>>
>>387534484

>Dumb design choices
>Not because it's the same game you could just buy for $10 via the virtual console that while aged rather poorly is not as shitty than Zero.

Let's see;

>64 gets remade at least four times
>Only unique games of the series are 2, Adventures, and Assault
>>
>>387534476
>Zelda outsells Star Fox
Wow, who would have thought?

>Implying 64 was bigger than Pokemon which had just completely blown up.

Zero flopped because the pre-release stuff looked shit, so the only people who would buy it were long time star fox fans, or long time platinum fans who also had a Wii U.

>>387534735
Not going to say Command is good, but how do you consider it a re-make?

Nothing you said refutes my point that Zero being bad doesn't mean 64 wasn't.
>>
>>387534735
>Zero didn't have dumb design choices
You're really fucked in the head if you think this.
>>
File: 1501637980461.jpg (49KB, 800x567px) Image search: [Google]
1501637980461.jpg
49KB, 800x567px
>>387525514
all memes aside, BB+DLC is a legit 10/10
>>
>>387535008
>Nothing you said refutes my point that Zero being bad doesn't mean 64 wasn't.

cuz it's a retarded point that makes no sense. fuck off
>>
File: 59646545_p0.jpg (634KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]
59646545_p0.jpg
634KB, 800x800px
>>387534713

It does because it made a bunch of people realize "holy shit that game I liked 20 years ago wasnt really that great". The fact it's a remake of it only adds to it, it literally took over a decade for people to realize this and even more than a decade for more to realize that the genre fucking died. The difference between Skyward Sword and Ocarina of Time is that it isnt a remake of that exact game written in the most retarded fashion.
>>
>>387535128
>It does because it made a bunch of people realize "holy shit that game I liked 20 years ago wasnt really that great"

>source: my ass
>>
>>387535128
Except that 64 is still a good game that people can enjoy for their first time right now. Ten years from now, newcomers can still enjoy 64, but they won't enjoy Zero.
>>
>>387535128
Who said this exactly? Zero got bad reviews mostly because of the controls and the lack of content and features you'd expect from a game coming in 2016.
It has less features than Starfox 64.
>>
File: icon.jpg (14KB, 288x288px) Image search: [Google]
icon.jpg
14KB, 288x288px
>>387535085
>Blood Vials are the worst healing system
>No built variety
>Most bosses are big creatures that flail around relentlessly

>10/10
I like the game but stop.
>>
>>387535201
>>387535305

>Star Fox Zero is like visiting a place you remember fondly but have outgrown
>I-It was bad because of the controls

Boy some people are still on that excuse arent they? The game having normal controls would've made it worse.
>>
File: 1503034811188.png (1001KB, 1241x821px) Image search: [Google]
1503034811188.png
1001KB, 1241x821px
>>387535446
Does this kill the nostalgiafag?
>>
>>387525714
E V E R T I M E
>>
>>387535305

Just a reminder of the damage control Zero had for two weeks
>>
Somehow a silly space opera game starring furries on the N64 is a better "cinematic" experience with choices that actually matter than 99% of games today.
>>
File: 1434826171308.png (124KB, 265x265px) Image search: [Google]
1434826171308.png
124KB, 265x265px
>>387535446
>The game having normal controls would've made it worse.
BAHAHAHA HOLY SHIT
This just in: anti-64 autists think better controls would make a game worse.
>>
>>387535446
>Star Fox Zero is like visiting a place you remember fondly but have outgrown

one reviewer's opinion doesn't prove every single person who has played Star Fox Zero (which is basically no one in the grand scheme of things) has outgrown a superior game from 20 years ago
>>
>>387535446
This doesn't make sense to me. Zero brings in nothing new to the table save for poor motion controls that can't be turned off, and a bunch of really, really bad sections where you're forced to play as different ships that no one likes.
This is like saying that the Silent Hill HD collection being bad means the originals are bad. They completely fucked up what made the originals good.
>>
>>387534720
The new voice acting is the only real detriment to playing 3D, and even then only for Fox and Falco, although they're probably the two characters you would want to have the best voice acting. If you wanna play 3D, give it a shot.
>>
>>387535128
>Google Star Fox Motion controls
>Only 3 of the results in the first page aren't explicitly negative about the controls.
>Even the review you posted talks about the controls not being particularly good.

But I guess you can't like a game, because a new one with less content, and poor design came out, just like how the Chinese expansion pack showed Age of Mythology was never good
>>
File: 1475038756629.png (4KB, 300x310px) Image search: [Google]
1475038756629.png
4KB, 300x310px
>>387535707

>$60 game
>Beat it in less than an hour
>>
>>387535898
This is fine for SF64 because there's replayability in the form of different paths, difficulty and fucking multiplayer. Zero barely had that and it got rid of multiplayer completely. No wonder it's so shit.
>>
>>387535898
>dodging your embarrassment by jumping to another issue
You just said here >>387534735 that you can play 64 for 10 quid, now it's suddenly 60?
>>
>>387535898

>Game is on clearance for $40 now
>No one buys it, even Mighty No. 9s Signature edition sold over it
>It's the same 1st editions that have been sitting on the shelves since April.

>>387536036

The point is the game having traditional controls would've made it worse because then you'd beat it even faster. For $60 that isnt worth it no matter how hard you try.
>>
File: OI YOU LOT.jpg (186KB, 693x717px) Image search: [Google]
OI YOU LOT.jpg
186KB, 693x717px
>>387536158
>having traditional controls would've made it worse because then you'd beat it even faster
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>
>>387536083

64 is $10 on the virtual console
Zero is $60

The main argument is Zero having normal controls would make the game worse because then you'd complete it much faster. You'd then feel cheated out of $60.

No, replaying for a higher score does not make it good.
>>
File: 1401902134004.jpg (35KB, 546x479px) Image search: [Google]
1401902134004.jpg
35KB, 546x479px
>>387536325
Keep on defending shit controls, kike.
>Wow, I'm playing this game way too fast! Thanks a lot for these normal, serviceable controls, Shitendo!
>>
>>387536158
Having traditional controls would have made the gameplay better, but it won't save the other design flaws. You're embarrassing yourself.
>>
>>387526301

Starfox 64, Panzer Dragoon 1, 2, Orta and Rez are my favorites.
>>
>>387526641
Are people still playing the PvP? I remember really liking it.
>>
File: 1484994630893.jpg (149KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]
1484994630893.jpg
149KB, 1280x720px
>>
>>387525514

Played it a lot as a kid and had a blast back then. I'll still pop it in when my Genesis is hooked up and play. Even ran through it with a buddy a couple weeks back. Great music and a good beat-em-up.
>>
>>387537453
>those watermarks and shit
for what purpose?
>>
>>387537523
I always preferred Golden Axe, no idea why I just thought it had more charm. Also on that note, even though I don't think they play at all similar, are any of the modern Golden Axe/Conan games worth playing?
Thread posts: 76
Thread images: 28


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.