/v/ meta thread Is it safe to say we can call each other /v/ro

>>387380757
>/v/ro
Get the fuck out

Only two things can work. Bring back dubs and OP throwing himself off a tall building.

>>387380757
No. You shouldn't even have to ask.

All that's needed is consistent moderation, and less whining from retards who are too stupid to report, hide, and simply ignore threads.

>>387380872
Fuck dubs. I want to see the return of public bans.

>>387380757
Remove drawthreads, console tan, vermin, and e celeb threads. Bring back IDs

Ban all e-celeb threads, these are not video games
Ban console war shitposting, actual discussion is okay.
Ban pol baitthreads

Just shut down 4chan already

File: imagine a v with thread ids.png (357KB, 1301x1840px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1301x1840px

Add thread IDs and hire mods who will enforce the goddamned rules.

>>387381049
>drawthread
>/v/ermin
those are the only good fucking things about this board

File: 1502876376761.png (156KB, 852x719px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 852x719px

how can janitors even compete with this thread?

Ban nerds from /v/.

i hate the fact that there are filtered/censored words and acronyms

i mean for what fucking purpose?

>>387380757
these threads aren't allowed anymore even with that image. mods and hiro don't care. enjoy your ban /v/ro

>>387381190
Sure get rid of the threads, but /pol/bait in otherwise shitty threads for the sole purpose of offtopic trash like trapfaggotry works greater wonders than dubs ever have.

>>387381313
To make you mad you impotent cuck

>>387381313
baka desu senpai does it really matter

Ban pigskin crackers

>>387381049
>remove
>drawthreads
>vermin
What a faggot.

>>387380817
calm down, /v/ro

>>387381313
Always been part of 4chan culture you roody-poo

Give users the ability to ban each other for a short period of time. The cooldown on banning someone should be longer than the ban length, and banning should only work on posts that have been made in the past 5 or so minutes. It multiple users ban the same poster for the same post, the time gets added up. No repercussions for handing out bans indiscriminately.

>>387381368
pfft jokes on chink moot. i'm always mad anyways

>>387380757
make this a e-celeb and politics board, if you want to discuss video games, go to /vg/.

>>387381449
>muh culture
back_to_reddit

>>387381524
>users able to censor other users
that's called reddit

>>387381524
THIS

/v/ is supposed to be a board for videogames enthusiasts and hardcore gamers, and yet at any given time it is possible to see multiple threads about Nintendo, a company infamous in the sector for being the one that most widely caters to the taste of casual and occasional gamers.

Now, I don't see any threads on /tv/ about series like Modern Family or Grey's Anatomy, despite both being some of the most popular TV series airing, and that's because the userbase is mature enough to either not watch those programs clearly aimed at a completely different audience than the film enthusiasts who browse it, or to realize that discussing them is out of place in a site dedicated to enthusiasts of particular interests like 4chan is.

On the other hand, Nintendo threads plague /v/ constantly, and are some of the worst threads on the board in the matter of quality of posts. This, of course reflects the immature and non-internet-savy nature of the average Nintendo fan, which is not and could ever not be a videogames enthusiasts, so these threads pose an actual nuisance to the actual hardcore gamers that wished to discuss their hobby with likeminded individuals on /v/. They are also known falseflagggers, shitposters and general console warriors, further decreasing the quality of content on the board.

My proposal to solve this issue, which is arguably one of the root causes for the current state of /v/, is to ban any user that mentions anything related to Nintendo, be it games, consoles or IPs. I'm sure that the quality of the board would increase tremendously, as the moderation makes clear that Nintendo fans are not welcome on /v/, driving them away from the userbase in a permanent manner, thus removing the main source of bad content on the board.

Feel free to discuss how long the ban should be, I advocate a 3 days ban for first offenders and then a permanent ban for repeat offenders.

>>387381449
kys lmao

File: edddd957-813f-4c07-961e-de550eef1119_1000[1].jpg (63KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1000x1000px

>>387381572
You should try this new flavour

Ban the following threads
>filename thread
>weekend what are eating,playing
>shilling threads,actually enforce it
>console war threads, including sales number threads
>copy paste threads. False flag threads, the obvious ones

Ban homos, amd this board will be fixed. Every problem I've ever had on this board is due to a faggot.

stop deleting faggot threads

File: 6gencons.jpg (172KB, 1920x652px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 1920x652px

i think its time we get /vr/ to accept the rest of the 6th gen consoles

File: 1475681536828.png (3MB, 1920x1090px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1090px

>>387381009
>(USER HAS BEEN BANNED FOR THIS POST)
>Queue 500 replies going "LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL BTFO BTFO PUT ME IN THE SCREENIE"

>>387380757
>/v/ro
Meta threads are the new Shitposting places now ok
>>387380872
>Dubs
>Good
Yeah no you're just asking for derailments
>>387381049
>No fun allowed
>>387381239
IDs are just dubs in letter form it isn't gonna solve shit

>>387381362
This would be true if the mods didn't let /pol/ threads autosage.

>>387381697
It doesn't make any sense. They haven't been around long enough.

16 years ago isn't that long. Just because the technology has progressed a lot doesn't matter. 16 years is still 16 years. Retro should fall under 25 years or older.

stop deleting fun threads, you're not getting any good discussion here anyways.

>>387381840
so why does the dreamcast get accepted then?

ALLOW E-Celeb threads when they're about gaming related figures. It's gaming culture and gets good discussion going. Ban those that come into E-Celeb threads just to shit it up with telling people to report it.

>>387381606
>Nintendo makes video games
>you shouldn't be allowed to make thread about then in /v/
Kill yourself you pretentious fuck.

These threads don't help, since no one actually looks at them. You're better off posting on /qa/, or maybe even emailing Hiro directly.
/v/ can be fixed by deleting all threads that do not have a vidya related OP image.

>>387381858
Pre-2000

>>387381654
nothing wrong with sales number threads

>>387381842
this! those late night horror threads are some good shit

Allow "off-topic" threads, as long as the OP is gaming related.

>>387381726
That crap would die off if public bans were handed out much more often. People only lose their shit because it's an event.

>>387381726
Okay fair enough.

yeah drawthreads are awesome its cool to have a dedicated thread on every board dedicated to two other boards /r/ and /i/. really cool and fun

>>387381918
its not 25 years old though. good job breaking your only rule

>>387381970
no.

ban wojak images.they were funny at first but now its just fucking annoying. there hasnt been a single funny meme from /v/ since toddposting and its because everyone is posting those retarded wojak images

>>387382009
Different guy, I'm stating the /vg/ reason as to why its the only 6th gen console allowed

>>387381606

here you go anon, one (You)

your hard work is paying off!

>>387380757
OP here. Goodnight /v/ros. I'm impressed that the thread has blown up so much.

>>387382179
>Goodnight
?
its only 8pm pussy

Quarantine mobile game shit to /vg/. There's nothing to discuss in these threads and they devolve into waifu shit threads.

>>387382246
It's midnight on the east coast you foreign fuck

File: 1487809744590.jpg (7KB, 250x221px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 250x221px

>>387382081
>tfw I stepped into a puddle with only socks on

>>387381572
>>users able to censor other users
Not necessarily delete the posts, just prevent them from posting more for like 10 minutes. There's a lot of shitposting that doesn't necessarily break the rules, and it's not like the mods care half the time when they do break the rules anyway. I think it would encourage more on topic posting and less bait and shitposting if users could do something themselves about people being stupid. I can see the potential issue that people would ban others for posting unpopular genuine opinions, so perhaps there could be some number of ban submits it'd have to reach before it actually goes through. Not like this matters, though, it'll never be implemented anyway.

Delete /pol/ pls

>>387382457
this

>>387381776
>you're just asking for derailments
Well yeah.