Anyone else saddened how Microsoft treated the Fable series?
Peter Molyneux may have made way too many promises he couldn't fulfill with the first Fable game but it was still a really great fun RPG even with all the broken promises. This could have led to an even better series with improved games. It could have been Microsoft's Zelda. Instead these cucks at Microsoft fucking blew it big time.
It saddens and maddens me /v/.
Games weren't even that great. First one is the only half decent one.
Yes. I will always have a soft spot for the series.
It saddens me they didn't continue with the Old Kingdom in Fable 2. The 15th centure clothing didn't click for me at first and I totally skipped Fable 3 for its uninteresting era and bad reviews.
>>387371247
Is there anything even like it these days?
>>387371608
This isn't true. The first game was amazing. The problem is that Peter just always overhyped his games to such ridiculous proportions that it would be impossible for any game regardless of developer to deliver on that sort of hype. Even Fable 2 was good. It was just way too damn easy and it was a huge mistake to have the character never die. The third game was too much of a huge letdown. Now the series is pretty much dead though thanks to Microsofts disgusting mishandling of it.
>>387372023
>amazing
>>387371898
Nope not really. Kingdom Of Amular was a lot like it but I think that game flopped.
>humor is too british for me at times
that wasn't british humor. It was just shit humor.
>>387372095
What is bad about it?
>>387372667
Combat being literally braindead. The "humor". Only saving graces are settings and music.
>>387372729
The combat was fine. It didn't need Dark Souls type of combat. What is more important is the adventure aspects of the game. Which it did very well.