AHHAHAHAHAH

>>387187113

What is the problem here. That seems about right for an indie 2d retro game, were you expecting the same score as persona 5 or the witcher 3 or some shit?

Watch this game sell the most on Switch.

AHAHAH- Oh shit, a good Sonic game.

>>387187113
I bet it's too hard for many reviewers.

None of the genesis 2D sonic games were any good, so I don't understand how this could be.

File: 1500768735667.jpg (27KB, 386x274px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 386x274px

>>387187113
Looks fine to me OP
Have your (you) and shove off

File: v review scale.jpg (43KB, 802x704px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 802x704px

>>387187173
Remember where you are anon.

File: reAL.png (476KB, 1830x742px) Image search: [Google]

476KB, 1830x742px

AHHHAHAHAHAHHAHHAHAHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHHHAHH

Reminder that mania is more like a 6/10 than anything and critics are COMPLETELY retarded.

>>387187292
>exactly on the edge
Sonic Mania wins

>>387187173
90+ - Outstanding
85-89 - Great
80-84 - Good
75-79 - Okay
< 74 - Mediocre

>>387187113
I don't get it. Isn't that a good score?

>>387187113
>sonic games have been so terrible that they have to back over 20 years just to be decent again

>>387187113
85 is the sweet spot

>>387187292
5/10 should be "meh" it should be the absolute average. 6/10 should be just slightly above average.

>>387187292
Why don't you employ the standard normal distribution?

File: YOU RETARD.gif (113KB, 600x338px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 600x338px

HAHAHAHAHHAA THE "SONIC WAS NEVER GOOD" MEME IS FUCKING DEAD.

SO LONG NIGGERS, TIME TO CRY IN ARIN'S COMMENT SECTION

>>387187113
I'll buy it at midnight just to spite you

Already available for nintendo switch ?

>>387187292
the first bare is objectively correct. this whole fucking image is correct fuck

>/v/ is now the shithole 9faggots go to be """"irreverent""""

>>387187592
The reason this happens is because people think of it like inflated school grades for some reason. 70 is average there.

But if it was a Mario game
>Nintendo is finished xdxdxd

File: Screen Shot 2017-08-14 at 9.14.03 PM.png (67KB, 668x210px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 668x210px

>>387187173
>indie 2d retro game

>>387187113
Soniccers BTFO, now sit back and watch Mario get a 98

>>387187358
Yeah if you factor in the SEGA bonus it clearly is a mediocre title

File: mass effect 3.png (81KB, 648x359px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 648x359px

>>387187113
Member mass effect 3?

BETTER THAN FALLOUT 4

File: 371.gif (309KB, 379x332px) Image search: [Google]

309KB, 379x332px

>>387187113
alright motherfuckers I've about had it with this shit, do review scores matter to you sad fucking sacks of shit or not, because this is fucking stupid.

>>387187592
as this anon said>>387187975
but also ideally 1-2 should be for games that a outright broken. Not haha shit game broke but won't launch game reliably broken. Like those really shitty Phoenix games like snow white and the seven clever boys as an example as something that could fit down there.

Doesn't get the 1 point Nintendo bump like Mario.

>>387187113
Better than Arms and Splatoon 2.

>>387188574
Only when it allow /v/ to shitpost

>>387188574
They matter when they're good and you like the game, they also matter when they're bad and you don't like the game.

That's how I always saw it.

>>387187179
Considering the Switch only has two games at the moment and appeals only to autistic people and 7 year olds, that is a guarantee.

IT WAS 86 BEFORE REEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>387188118

>11 critics

File: salama.gif (655KB, 416x416px) Image search: [Google]

655KB, 416x416px

>>387187576
This. Many games around that mark have tons of charm and creativity that you don't see in the 95+ rated uncharted clones and other bullshit.

Not to say that all games in the 90s are bad ofc

>>387189434
>appeals only to autistic people
so its /v/'s favorite console then?

>>387188574
> /v/ = one person

>>387188401
23 critics

>>387189783
Judging by how much that Splatoon cancer gets spammed and how mad everyone gets when the objectively weak sales of the console get mentioned, I'd say yes.

>>387188082
if it was a mario game NintendoGA/v/ would deflect all criticism either as "they just didn't pay the reviewers enough" or "normies just don't understand fun"

>>387188401
Only the first one was good rest were shit

>>387188574
Review scores only matter to shitposters who only use them for the sake of shitposting.

>>387187173
Sega is indie?

>>387187292
They may not be "dogshit", but there are so many games to play in the 8/10-10/10 range that there is no reason to waste you time on anything less. The games below that should be skipped no matter which scale you are using.

Why are nintendoshits talking shit of Sonic, I thought they didn't like shitposting and always cry when sonybros talk shit of them

Why do I feel like there will be a review starting with "Sonic mania is the dark souls of platforming" giving this game a pretty shit score?

>>387187113
IGN gave it 8.7. Is that good?

File: cLEro7u.jpg (117KB, 1080x1298px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 1080x1298px

>>387187113
That's great for a Sonic game. Only Nintendo games and artistic games really get inflated scores.

>>387194286
IGN gave Twighlight Princess 8.8. Was THAT good?

Torrent when?

>>387189691
11 paid reviews, amirite?

File: 1382135798945_zps79202326.gif (2MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x225px

Remeber this is Sonic. The media has a natural hate for him cause the games are too hard for them, so 85 is outstanding.

>People get off to a game "failing"

Why do I come here again?

>>387188574
If a review gets people around here mad, then yeah, it's more likely a good game.

>>387196689
You come here for the shitposting like everyone.

fuck yes I hope it sinks the studio and everyone with it

>>387196689
I ask myself the same shit. I just don't know where else to go.

>>387188118
SUCK MY DICK, CHOKE ON IT

>trusting in sites that are famous to get payed reviews
>2017

>>387196689
How the hell is 85% for a game that hasn't even come out yet failing?

/v/ still sucks this much after all this time? I'm going back to /vg/