How dark souls 3 can even compete?
Whatever you're trying to achieve, you're going about it the wrong way with that cookie cutter webm. I agree bloodborne is better than DS3 though the latter is great too.
How can Bloodborne even compete?
>>387153538
by not having a retarded blood vial system
>>387154125
There nothing wrong with blood vials
>>387153990
>make a game with a cool, elaborate combat system
>ruin it by having shit enemy variety
>>387153538
bloodborne doesn't have dark souls in it's name
>ranged pulling enemies one at a time like a total casual faggot
>baiting them into overhead attacks
how do people stomach playing in such a shitty, tedious, and monotonous way
its like watching a virgin on their dark souls 1 playthrough with a zweihander
>>387153990
Man, they shit pretty well on this game.
A huge potential lost.
>>387154535
WotW variety isn't bad
>>387154925
i have no idea what wotw refers to but niohs shit enemy variety is the games biggest flaw.
>>387154804
Aside from the variety, I don't really see how they dropped the ball.
Some people don't like the diablo style loot and incremental difficultly, but that's more an issue or personal taste.
>>387155392
WotW is way of the wise, or NG+++
it adds all of the enemies from DLC1 and new enemies to the base game like ninja dogs, foxes, black/white onmyo mages, a new class of umibozu enemies, etc and also helps the variety a little bit by buffing the living shit out of a random assortment of enemies with a random selection of buffs (sort of in the style of diablo)
>>387154584
Because they don't want to die to a gank squad stunlock?
>>387154925
Yeah, but to get to WotW you have to slog through WotStrong and WotD
>>387155860
true, but I wouldn't call WotD a slog
WotStr is hardly different from NG though
>>387153538
>>387155745
fair enough but there are plenty of people like me who usually don't bother with NG++.
>>387155792
Real men fight all enemies directly. Only faggots pull.