Still trust in the review (scam) business /v/?

>>387146396
The creator of Mario reviewed the game?

>>387146396
I don’t care much about review scores, I just play what looks fun to me

>8.7 is a bad score

holy FUCK this entire board should be gassed

I lost most of my trust in reviewers when Dragon Age 2 came out. Then the last bit I didn't even know I still had when Diablo 3 came out.

>>387146463
*tips fedora*
the reviewer is a feminist dyke that hates Sega due to Yakuza being sexist.

>>387146554
It's too good for a Sonic game.

>>387146595
Shame. I'd be interested in reading his review of Sonic Mania.

How long until 9 is a bad score.

File: 1426449401426.jpg (3KB, 125x123px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x123px

>>387146554
SORRY, I MUST HAVE MISHEARD YOU. YOU SAID "9.8" JUST NOW, RIGHT???

>8.7
>"""Bad"""

>>387146690
8.8

>>387146640

I wholeheartedly agree, but it still isn't enough for sonic fans. They keep waiting for the 10/10 sonic game that will save the franchise, when the very core of sonic keeps it from being an above average platformer, let alone a 3D adventure game.

File: 1357931479356.png (355KB, 500x447px) Image search: [Google]

355KB, 500x447px

Of couse I dont trust them.
>4 fucking new zones
>They aren't even all good
>They way they fucking bungled announcing that PC delay 5 fucking days before "launch"
Sonic Mania deserves a much lower score.

8.7 is a great score, and especially for any Sonic game, even a 2D one.

>>387146554
>>387146764

How newru

>>387146595
I'm not even shitposting this is fucking disgusting. Stop. Even ironically just stop.
Because I used to do this. It leaks out onto you into other sites. Just stop.

>>387146396
>Still trust in the review (scam) business /v/?

review sites are aimed at the lowest common denominator. Like shit fag even though you may not realize it but fuck why are you upset that something is not written for or panders to you like some sort of beta ass faggot?

>>387146861
>4
5

>>387147026
No no, THIS is a 5

>>387147026
>It isn't diarrhea, it's slightly solid!
Ok

>>387147095
WITNESSED

>8.7 for an autistic shitty sonic game

So the new trend is releasing decades old games again for the next few years

>>387147782
did you miss the 'MANIA' part of the title?
it's a new game

You guys can read the review
http://www.ign.com/articles/2017/08/14/sonic-mania-review

>For example, it’s neat to see a callback to Sonic 2’s Sky Chase Zone, but let’s face it -- the forced autoscrolling and wonky controls in Sky Chase Zone were not very fun then, and they’re still not great now. And that incredibly annoying “keep the lights on” mechanic from Sonic 3’s Sandopolis Zone remains just as incredibly annoying 23 years later.

>>387147782
Fez, Shovelware Knight and Undertale received 9.5/10

https://waypoint.vice.com/en_us/contributor/heidi-kemps