Is there a good ww2 tanks game? Not the f2p garbage please.

>>387117541
red orchestra 2 has fully modeled tank interiors

>>387117541
>Is there a good ww2 tanks game?
Sadly no.

File: PzKpfw VI Ausf_B.jpg (468KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

468KB, 1680x1050px

>>387117541
The best you'll get is the usually disappointing but sometimes amazing Warthunder. There are "paywalls" where you're forced to use a terrible under powered tank every few levels.

>>387117541
Coh2

I wonder how far this thread will go without the usual shit flinging about which tank was the best and who sucked how many dicks and why in ww2

>>387118423
He said good.

>t-34/76 can't pen PzIV G at any angle under 800m
>PzIV G can't pen T-34/76 at any angle any range

Also it has anti tank rifles that can penetrate more than 20mm of armor. RO2 is many things, an accurate tank sim it is not.

>>387117541
COH1 + blitzkrieg mod
Men of War + dynamic campaign generator
Tanks fighting nothing but other tanks bores the hell out of me.

>>387123627
Can you give me a quick rundown on the DCG for Men of War?

>>387123718
Haven't played it for a while but the jist of it is that you get a randomly generated set of maps linked together so you select which maps to attack.
You get a bunch of points to spend on units after each turn to build up your army.

>>387123627
>Tanks fighting nothing but other tanks bores the hell out of me.

Don't understand why people find it fun, when combined arms is way more interesting.

>>387120479
Is War Thunder still grindy as fuck? WoWS and WoT are grindy but fuck me, if War Thunder didn't take the biscuit.

>>387122538
>Also it has anti tank rifles that can penetrate more than 20mm of armor

Soviet 14.5x114mm antitank rifles could penetrate up to 40mm of armor at close range.

>>387124125
Yeah, the first 2 tiers are fast but it can take years to get to a couple tanks in tier 5.

>>387124052
This. I don't normally like competitive gaming, but the competitive CoH2 scene is actually pretty fascinating, despite how small it is. Just watching a play-by-play of a tournament match makes me realize how good these guys are.

>no panzer general
C'mon /v/

>"IT'S A LONG WAY TO TIPPERARY!"

>>387120479
>WoT
>German Steel facing post-war allied/soviet tank
>WT
>German Steel facing post-war allied/soviet tank
fuck those game. german tanks are a mistake

>>387120479
Is it true what the reviews say about a process in the launcher acting like a malware?

You haven't played World of Tanks yet?
WHY THE HELL NOT?

>>387127264
I did and it's shit like every f2p game.

File: King_Tiger01.jpg (102KB, 674x343px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 674x343px

"They are scratching your paint job helmut"

>>387127264
Its shit. At least in warthunder tanks don't feel like small toys.

>>387127514
CoH 1 is pure kino.

>>387127514
CoH2 has the most under performing tanks for axis I've ever seen.

I sure do love getting shat on by cheaper jacksons, cromwells and 34/85s.

>>387117541
panzer elite from 1999

>>387125087
As much as I like WT I can't really argue with that. Over three years I've gotten every tank and plane tree to T4, but don't have a single T5 unlocked yet. The game's good enough that I personally don't care, but anyone going in expecting late-war / early cold-war units is going to be very disappointed.

File: Tank.jpg (182KB, 1274x908px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1274x908px

Step aside, pleb

>>387122538
What the hell are you talking about? I've never had any trouble killing an enemy tanker on both sides.

Panzer Front for the ps1 tbdesu

>>387117541
Amusingly, tanks in Battlefield Heroes aren't too far-removed from being realistic. The was an EA F2P that died, but there's a community-operated revival in the works.

>>387126370
this always annoys me to hell and back. i mean sure gimp the respawns in german armour or something, but dont up-age them.

>>387120479
Yeah fuck this. I got to soviet tank tier 2 with a T34, then it becomes a cross-map sniping shitfest where I can't penetrate other tanks for shit while they 1hko me with their big fat cannon
At least with plane I can dodge and retaliate, in tank games I just become free kill

>>387127708
Must suck to lose a German tank to tanks that historically kill them fairly reliably.

Steel fury is a pretty good game, but it's a sim so your mileage may vary.

Blitzkrieg and Blitzkrieg II are my favorite strategy games

File: 238.jpg (211KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1024x768px

look for some older russian games

>>387128040
the only correct answer

>>387122273

>click this unit which happens to be a tank to move there

Woooow, engaging tank vehicular combat. Amazing!
What's up with you retards recommending anything, not even related, just because you want other people to play "your" game? It's not your game. You didn't contribute anything to it. You're just feeling pride for consuming other people's media.

File: pfrontbis.jpg (152KB, 646x505px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 646x505px

>>387128924

Spent so much time in that.
Why did only the Japanese release have a map editor. FUCK that shit, I wanted to create my own maps and enjoy the extra content.

>>387133072
Having the tanks be specced fairly even in 1v1 is okay. One side having significantly cheaper tanks if okay. Combining the two is not okay.

>>387132213
That's not really my experience with the early T34's. Sure there's some tanks in the game that have trouble penetrating equal tier mediums and heavies, but T34's aren't one of them.
This does remind me of one thing that is very wrong in WT, though. The respawning system meaning it's a bad idea to use a new shiny tank you're just unlocked. It'll uptier your entire lineup, resulting in you having one appropriate and a bunch of underpowered tanks. Grinding an entirely new lineup before you get to test your new toys is a bit shit.

>>387137141
>Having the tanks be specced fairly even in 1v1 is okay. One side having significantly cheaper tanks if okay. Combining the two is not okay.

I don't know what you're talking about, everytime allies ran into a german tank they couldn't reliably destroy, they just modified their tanks to be able to. Firefly shermans was just a botch to fit a gun cabable of destroying tigers on a sherman.

And really, the german tanks weren't THAT much superior to the allies.

>>387135061
>T-34 model 43
>Bigger than a Panzer IV F2
Clearly is Ivan very drunk when made this game.

>>387137710
Youre Fucked. P4s had to be up gunned to match Shermans. Anything carrying fancy HVAP rounds for a 76, anything with a QF 17lb or a 90mm could penetrate German armour. Hell early war it was Matildas and chars that were immune to German weapons not the other way around.

>>387137710
Sorry, ignore my previous post to you. I had a brain fart and totally misread what it was you said.

File: 1407633198815.jpg (467KB, 1597x1014px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 1597x1014px

>1945

>not based 1989

>>387137710
Historically speaking, you're entirely correct. Game balance speaking, one side being afford 4x more tanks when the tanks are roughly equal is not good balancing.

>>387127264
rng ruined it and then they dropped all-chat because little babies couldnt handle the banter

>>387127151
it is true. But you can delete it and create empty file with same name and mark it as read only.

>>387117541
>Are there any good WW2 tank games?
>Not the good WW2 tank game please.

MEN

OF

WAR

ASSAULT

SQUAD

2