Where were you when jewtel got blown the fuck out of the CPU market?

Core i9
Wut?

>>386839840
I thought that was wow DPS chart for a second

Why even post this on /v/ these retards can't even tell what a Xeon is.

Plus, for their autism FPS Intel 7700K is still the best option.

>>386839919
Where have been

>>386839840
You know what's the really funny part? Intel's new HEDT stuff actually loses out to the previous generation Broadwell-E chips in some workloads, notably many games.

>>386839840
Holy fuck
when did this happen?

Posts about a cpu that yes is better possibly in work situations but still isnt as good for gaming vs some i7/i9s on /v/............................................

>>386839840
yeah yeah, too bad it doesnt perform this well in games.
Its beaten intel top server CPUs in heavily multithreaded test (probably because it has 16 average cores).
If you try runing games on it then its as fast as a 2 gen older intel.
but i do agree that its because games are unoptimised pices of shit nowdays.

>>386841383
Where the heck have you been the past year
And released Ryzen and have been BTFO of Intlel in multitasking and not gaming work loads
You can buy a Ryzen that will be cheaper and perform similar in games while also doing other things like streaming

File: Such is Life.jpg (82KB, 1277x715px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1277x715px

>core i9
>im still running a first gen i3

just kill me

File: TR_Gaming_FHD-pcgh.png (35KB, 1081x573px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 1081x573px

>>386839840
AMD is garbage in video games.
A 10 core Intel CPU is already better than a 16 core AMD CPU and Intel will release a 18 core gaming CPU this year.

>>386842214
>muh extra 5 fps
Why would you pay more for a CPU that's worse at everything else?

>>386842214
Anything past 60 is irrelevant.

>>386842460
about 10% (if that) of people on /v/ would be able to buy these anyway.
Stick to the consoles kiddies.

>>386841812

everything still works great on my i3 desu :D

>>386839840
Let me give you a little info about threadripper... You don't need it. This is /v/, a video game board where people play video games. They aren't running Blender, they aren't using this in a production environment that will utilize the full potential of the cores. We play video games and as such it will only matter how games perform by the CPU. Guess what? Threadripper performs just about as well as the Ryzen 1800X because it is just two of them. To even see some use of this CPU would be to do streaming to various sites while also running playback from each and even then it's not designed for it. Intel still reigns supreme for pure FPS in gaming and the benchmarks between Threadripper and Intel prove it. Games still favor higher clocks over more cores and until they change AMD will not trump it in terms of gaming.

That all being said, I had trouble convincing myself not to get a Threadripper just to support AMD for buttfucking Intel with a great CPU to which they do not have an adequate response. AMD wins in temps, power and value, but as I said before, unless you using this in a production machine it will still be a waste of money for you, much like the other i9 CPUs.

tl;dr Price for performance graph is worthless for /v/ because higher FPS is what we want, not per core value that we won't use.

>>386839840
This happens every time until Intel release their new model, then everyone builds their gaming PC with Intel & Nvidia and three months later a major issue becomes apparent, meaning all you try hard show offs in your own bedrooms see fault in what was supposed to be their perfect beast of a PC

Cycle repeats every 2-3 years a pop individually, Intel & AMD roll in hard earned coder/engineer monies. You're being played boys

File: w0t.png (43KB, 660x521px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 660x521px

>>386842612

not for me my nigga

>>386842756
>This happens every time
Except it doesn't. Intel had a firm grip on the market for decades

>>386839840
>passmark
>gaymen

The fuck. You play passmark and office suites ?

File: 763542357.png (31KB, 654x471px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 654x471px

Pfft, who needs these fancy CPUs. My old warhorse still works fine.

>>386839840
Wow, DKs and Rogues needs a serious nerf.

>>386839840
Glad to see AMD kicking those greedy assholes from the top. Now they can get that sweet datacenter cash and do something decent.

>>386842460

Yea cause $29 is a huge diference when buying a high end cpu.
Off yourself garbage eater

>>386842214
>Intel will release a 18 core gaming CPU this year.
At the low price point of 4k burgers at this rate.

>>386839840
>Death Knights on top
Finally.

>>386846141
The difference comes down to platform. X299 is considerably more expensive than X399 (lul).

>>386846235
Not if they can't tone down the power consumption. Those i9s are housefires waiting to happen. It's what happens when you re-brand and overclock server shit for the desktop market.

>>386839840
Is a i9 really that far of a jump up?

File: 1345250153701.jpg (5KB, 252x233px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 252x233px

>>386839840
>passmark

File: 87733.png (35KB, 650x300px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 650x300px

>>386842214
But at least you won't get frequent drops below 30fps on AMD systems

File: 1502051942687.png (2MB, 1516x854px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1516x854px

>>386842214
>AMD is garbage in video games.

>>386839840
still using a 4 year old 6490k oc to 4.2 ghz. it's perfectly fine for gaming and haven't run into any issues with it at all. will probably last me another year or two.

File: Intel_Corei9.jpg (114KB, 800x436px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 800x436px

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiyGUC5Vuzs

File: 55sEKPWkL3XEDq0O[1].jpg (352KB, 1919x1080px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 1919x1080px

>>386842214
>18 core gaming CPU
Chances are it's actually even worse at gaming than Threadripper. The current Skylake-X lineup has pretty titanic thermal issues already, slapping more cores and bingbus mesh on it is going to make it even more horrifying and greatly limit the real life frequency you can reach. Especially if they keep using the chewing gum TIM on it.

>>386848628
At least post the full image.

POO IN THE CPU

>>386847879
DELID THIS
>>386848927
UMA

>talking about threadripper and i9 on a gaming board
what's the point? this is purely /g/ shit even if you were to stream and game at the same time with YouTube videos open it would still be better getting a $600 cheaper 6/8 core CPU

>>386849159
DELICIA

Ryzen 1600 or 1600x for gaming? My GPU is an OCed 8GB RX480 clocked at 1350MHz.

>>386849401
pedestal fan attached to a bit of bread

>>386849552
Sorry, I'm not trying to achieve i3 levels of performance here.

>>386849353
SOPA

>>386849401
1600

>>386849401
iirc 1600 is ultimately better value, since it's pretty much the same as 1600X, maybe 100-150 mhz lower once both are overclocked

>>386849796
DE

File: 1502091921105.png (350KB, 672x794px) Image search: [Google]

350KB, 672x794px

>>386850397
MOCACO

File: 1438798829136.jpg (57KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x500px

>>386839840
>uses 600 watts yet still performs like shit in everything that isn't fixed benchmarks

>>386839840
yes because you need a $1k+ cpu for video games

File: 3jzc2QI.jpg (167KB, 1000x1050px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1000x1050px

>>386841383
A while ago. I think people were afraid to hype up Ryzen because of what happened when Bulldozer dropped.

>>386844087
Even in pure benchmark its still impressive considering the price of comparable chips.

>>386839840
Give me a 30 game average with the same result, no hardware related issues and i'll consider Intels ass kicked like 15 years ago.

>>386842214
UMA

>>386851198
>this is what shitel shills believe
w
e
w