.
>>386719796
While 3 might be better PvE wise 2 has a much better multiplayer and far better online mechanics, that and 2 has far more content
Dark Souls 2 has durability degradation directly tied to your frame rate.
It also has the worst hitboxes in the series.
And your invincibility frames on your roll are tied to a stat.
This alone is enough to make it inferior compared to any other in the series.
>>386719796
Dark Souls 2 is ultimate shit. Fuck off redditors.
3 with a bullet
WOAH
>>386719796
3
2 had more overall content, but the quality of all the content was pretty low.
3 was better in every way except for longevity.
Hell, it wasn't even a short game. 20-30 hours at least of consistently good levels and bosses.
2 had 40-50 of a lot of "meh" to "ugh" levels and bosses.
>>386720397
forgot to say:
2 is still a lot of fun. Not a bad game in the series really.
>>386720469
You just lost your credibility.
>>386719796
2
sage
op kill yourself
>>386719860
>far more content
That's a bad thing, when the content is bad.
>>386719796
i preferred 2 by a long shot, i played 2 first though, then 1, then 3. for me 3 was like, they got the message that 2 was too different and that people just wanted 1 but with flashier moves ...and people really did just want that.
i know it's video games, so you can't expect sophisticated consumers but i wish people were less lame.
(plus i prefer humanoid enemies personally)
>>386720658
Hey hbomber
>>386719796
>>386720119
That's actually Dark Souls 3, the bandwagoner choice of normie rehashed pleb sequel.
>>386720658
>I played two first though
Does this not sum up all the redditcirclejerkingfags we have defending this game?
>>386720658
>it's weird and different so that makes it "sophisticated"
I really hate this mindset
sometimes a misstep is just a misstep
>>386721183
it's not that the game is sophisticated, it's the consumer who is.
this is unsophisticated
>duh i liked dat, moar pls
>dis not da same, u bad
this is sophisticated
>duh i liked dat, moar pls
>dis not da same, interdusting
>>386721356
but
different != interesting
>>386720620
(you)
>>386720658
>i preferred 2 by a long shot, i played 2 first though, then 1, then 3.
>I played 2 first
>first
Come the fuck on guys
>>386721567
I also played 2 first through a bizarre set of circumstances and I don't like it
>>386721567
Better than playing 3 first that's for sure.
DS3 lacks a lot of new ideas, it playsit way too safe. DS2 feels the opposite because it does some real fucking retarded things.
DS2 got fucked even though they can both be equally disappointing.
>>386719796
I honestly had a much richer experience with 2, but then again I probably just got burned out with the souls formula after Da1, 2, and BB.
I don't like the bosses in Dark Souls 3. The pontiff was aight. Dancer will stay with me for the wrong fucking reasons. In general I think they were pretty boring. I mean come on, every boss has to have a phase 2? It wasn't interesting. I know 2 had pretty much objectively worse bosses but I just didn't have as much fun in 3.
Covenants suck in both.
pvp in 2 was almost as good as my nostalgia for the first one is. None of the retarded meta golem shit from 1 and none of the light spam from 3.
FUCKING MAGIC BUILDS WHERE 3??
god my go to for the series was str/fth my first run of 3 was str with some useless fucking stay bc miracles blow. Having to do Merle builds is a big issue I think a lot of people ignore. This isn't bloodborne i shouldn't be forced to play it like it is.
Speaking of which, the ability to role play in 2 was the best in the series, hands down. Loved replaying 2 as every time a new build was fun and satisfying.
I also enjoy what they did with the lore in 2 a whole lot better. 2 felt fresh. 3 felt like a rehash with fan service.
The dlc set for 2 was also great. It was shit but it was super great, which goes for the whole game.
Again I have the bias of being tired of the series by the time 3 came out, but damn if I didn't have a much better time with literally every other game in the series.
>>386721665
Whatever. Your first souls game was shit. Keep defending it.
>>386721771
Spotted the DS3 reddit babby.
>>386721754
My order of play was in order of release in case you are dumb
>>386719796
i have no desire to play either anymore, but i put like 3 times as much time into 2 than 3
>>386721391
different allows for interesting, because the same is boring.
i don't mean to say everyone has to like 2. but if you say, 'i don't like 2, but 3, now 3 was just what i wanted' then you're lame.
>>386722164
>the same is boring.
not when there's 5 years in between
sometimes I just want more. DS3 did enough different.
>>386719796
OP if you played the games in order then you'll understand why most people hated Dark Souls 2.
>>386722192
well then you aren't sophisticated, sorry
you don't have to be if you don't want to, most people aren't, and most sequels are safe boring affairs
>>386722281
if sophistication means liking garbage then I'm simple af my dude
>>386722329
good, glad that's settled, too bad you miss out of ds2 though, the most interesting one
>>386722329
This
>>386722371
I didn't miss out on ds2, I played it and did not enjoy the things that it did differently, I thought they were poorly handled and half-baked
>>386719796
DS2 was good. It was also the worst souls game
DeS > DaS = BB > DaS 3 > DaS 2
>>386721423
>2011+6
>defending DaS2
>liking DaS2
ISHIGGYDIGGY
>>386719796
Lets just end this here.
DaS2 at least had good pvp until the soul cap shit fucked everything up, nothing about DaS3 pvp is good.