ITT: Vidya only you played

>>386545360
I think for once you might actually be the only one that played what you posted

Why does this exist/Did you pay money for it?

>>386545537
is it even legal? the guy who developed the original ad made a big deal about shutting down and preventing any further usage

>>386545537
Sadly I haven't bought it but that might change now that I know it's actually rare.

>>386545992
Copyright laws are easily avoidable

The guy who made AM2R could have just changed the name Samus to Samous and he wouldn't have gotten a C&D

>>386545360
I played that at Dave and busters

>>386545992
They only made this so they could make the sequel: Copyright Infringement Simulator 2017, which'll become Germany's best selling game of the year.

>>386546197
I guess the dev just doesn't care what happens with his product anymore so that prevents legal actions against it.

>>386546197
but how would that work for a literal re-do of an already existing game, right down to level design and features

>>386545360
>Recommended age: 0
Underage v&

>>386546608
>not playing vidya since 0 years of age