Was that too hard?

>>386543998
Muh photorealistic.

>it's the virgins cannot cope with non-beauty standards

Beauty is more than just a face, bigots

>photoshopping image of existing model = creating a 3d model itself
woah..............................................

SEXIST

HELP IM BEING METAPHORICALLY RAPED

>>386544397
I see this every time in discussions like this.

What do you think makes it so impossible to just take the fucking face mesh and textures of the already existing model and make them not look like garbage? Of fucking course no one is going to bother making the model from scratch again just to prove a point because the fucking assets are obviously not public. Retard.

>>386543998
This image is problematic - it sets unrealistic standards of beauty for women.

>Mary sues suck. I don't want my characters to be idealized and seemingly perfect in their mentality and behavior. I want them to be flawed, so I can relate to them!

>Wtf why doesn't this character look like a 10/10 instagram whore? How dare they? Who do they think they are? Fuck them and fuck feminism.

Why the dissonance between what people like regarding personality and looks?

File: 328lmxf4n0oy.jpg (551KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

551KB, 2560x1440px

>>386543998
I don't even care that Peebee looks retarded. Pic related is the real problem.

>>386544663
>What do you think makes it so impossible to just take the fucking face mesh and textures of the already existing model and make them not look like garbage?
So why don't they

>>386544446
I alerted the mods, op will be arrested and his thread will be pruned.

>>386544839 (You)

>>386544910
They are like.. asian people. Everybody's same

>>386544839
Because no one actually likes ugly people, man or woman. In terms of facial features, that is. Bodies are a different story.

File: 1475110252703.jpg (64KB, 560x560px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 560x560px

>>386544663
>I see this every time in discussions like this.
Because it's a legitimate argument that anyone with half a brain can surmise to be factual. Editing a model in a 2D plane is easier than editing it in a 3D plane since you have perspectives and different angles to consider. The "fixes" on the right would look just as ugly as the original faces in motion, maybe even far creepier.

>>386544839
Because most girls are good looking, being slightly attractive doesn't mean losing contex consistency, i don't get why you compared both things but eh... i just want them normal looking and believeable.

>>386544919
Had you managed to exert your brain just a little bit more to read the rest of the post, you would know.

>>386545006
Most women aren't, though. They spend tons of money on make up and hair products for a reason.

>>386544663
post your 1/10 face and im sure it can easily be photoshopped into 10/10

>>38654399
>peebee is still a shit nickname.
>still voiced to sound as goofy as her man face version

Asari literaly scan your mind to look attractive to the viewer
Apparently im a 1st world, sub average feminist that hate's beauty standards
Thanks bioware

>>386544991
>Of fucking course no one is going to bother making the model from scratch again just to prove a point because the fucking assets are obviously not public.
Do you think anyone is going to waste their time making a functioning 3D model for no reason FROM SCRATCH? If they gave the assets to people with artistic ability it'd be a different story.

Do you also legitimately think that people who actually draw don't constantly picture things they draw in 3D as they do?

>>386545035
So stop posting this shitty thread with your shitty picture with HURR GUIZ IT WASN'T THAT HARD SEE THIS PHOTOSHOP DURR

Come back when you actually modded it or STFU

>>386545137
Yes they could.

BUT HURR ONLY A PLASTIC SURGEON MAKING AN EDIT WOULD COUNT XD

File: 1483426072444.jpg (75KB, 680x627px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 680x627px

yet i assume all males look like chad thundrecock with a 6pack and bigger biceps than their heads

>>386545262
I love how the hipsters are now coming out of the woodwork to defend ME:A on /v/ because it's the contrarian thing to do.

>>386544910
D-did they just reuse the same face model for EVERY Askari civilian? I mean I obviously don't expect them to make a unique face for all of them but they could've at least used like 3 different faces minimum

>>386543998
AAAAAAAAAH
UNREALISTIC DELETE DELETE
A WHITE MALE MIGHT GET AROUSED!

>>386545375
/v/ says the exact same shit about left. The picture is pointless.

>>386544991
I think the point is that they shouldn't have made the models so fucking ugly in the first place

>>386545397
I don't care about the game retard, just annoyed by your shitty pic acting like its so easy yet do nothing to make it reality

File: 1488394328685.jpg (654KB, 1376x1417px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 1376x1417px

>>386543998

>>386543998
Let me guess, you're a STRAIGHT white male.

>>386545594
It's not mine. Can YOU explain why you think it's somehow incredibly difficult to make good faces on a 3D model? Most faggots here manage to make waifu tier characters in any game with a char creator. It's not that fucking difficult to take angles into account. Of course it's not the same as editing a 3D model, but your argument is about the difficulty lying in angles and it not being a flat image.

File: 1434575037348.jpg (308KB, 1100x971px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 1100x971px

>>386544351
>Beauty is more than just a face, bigots

File: 1474935798146.png (290KB, 664x602px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 664x602px

>>386545223
>Do you think anyone is going to waste their time making a functioning 3D model for no reason FROM SCRATCH?
Well, until you do your argument is basically null.
>Do you also legitimately think that people who actually draw don't constantly picture things they draw in 3D as they do?
This doesn't disprove anything I said. When you're drawing you can make constant fixes to your character design to make each angle look good logically. 3D models are set in stone and can't be changed mid-frame. You really don't know anything about modeling do you? Why do we even allow brainlets like these to post on /v/.
>>386545514
The point OP and that ancient as fuck image is trying to make is that you can photoshop a still image and make it look better than ME:A's horrible 3D models. Well no fucking shit you can, not really that major of a fucking accomplishment to go flaunting about with.

Hit me up once someone makes a better 3D render, until then OPs image is fucking stupid and should stop being posted.

>>386546018
Are you the kind of person who tells people to make a better movie whenever they tell you your favourite movie is shit because x y z? Hurr durr writing a better script proves nothing if you don't actually make the movie durr

Your argumentation is on the level of a primary schooler.

>>386546192
The image is trying to prove that they did a better job than Bioware's 3D modeling team... yet it's a 2D still image edit. Of course I'm going to ask you to make something better once you're the one that started the argument and flopped like a fish. Stop backpedaling.

If you didn't want to actually exert any effort into your logic you wouldn't have posted a comparison image and claimed one side is better than the other. ;^)

>so bad the studio shut down
so bad the studio shut down
>so bad the studio shut down
so bad the studio shut down
>so bad the studio shut down
so bad the studio shut down
>so bad the studio shut down
so bad the studio shut down