How about a low spec thread?

File: ultra low oblivion.jpg (43KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 640x480px

how low can we go?

File: ultra low.png (1MB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1366x768px

lower

I like this

File: low settings DOOM.png (63KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 640x480px

keep going!

Tfw I played dark souls on my laptop with low specs but blight town still had such shit frame rate that I stopped playing. I killed the capra demon, gaping dragon, the moth thing I think, but blight town just runs like fucking shit!

>>385810210
Is that fucking gunz?

>>385809338
>>385810574
So far the only low spec pictures in the thread.
The rest are mods.

>>385810629
Don't worry, it runs at 12FPS on PS3 so if your shitty laptop gets 13FPS it's faster than the hardware it was meant to play on.

File: half life 2 ultra low.png (555KB, 900x507px) Image search: [Google]

555KB, 900x507px

>>385810629
maybe this can help? great channel for toasterfags

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKYS7jW1vxs

>>385810702

What the fuck did they do to fuck it up so bad?!?!?

File: Blight_Town.jpg (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>385810828
Lots of polygons to render for all the wood sticks.
You're not walking on a low poly flat surface when you're in BT.

>>385809260
indeed just like BoTW

>>385810754
Thanks anon, but sadly this is what I used to get the game playable in the first place. Never buy a 2000 dollar gayman laptop because it will be obsolete in a few years. Well maybe that isn't true anymore. But whatever, I'm working 70 hours a week so hopefully I'll be able to buy a new computer soon. But then I probably won't have any time to play. Fuck.

>>385810629
>>385810828
their's a mod the fix that shit.

>>385809083
>that view distance
Not low enough

>>385811435

Shit I'm gonna have to look that up. Dunno why I didn't think about that.

>>385809083
Take it from someone who actually played the game on ultra low, if you can see those mountains in the distance you're not going low enough.

File: First DeadSpace on low settings.png (1MB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1366x768px

Always thought the first Dead Space on low settings looked neat as fuck. Not bad texture quality, just real smooth and matte.

>>385810210

I miss that game a lot tbqh

>>385809083
Still looks comfy though

>>385811210
It's still true
There's no such thing as a gaming laptop
It will be able to play current gen poorly and that's it

>>385811046
nah, botw had visible, non flat-texture grass.

>>385812917
>LOOK MOM I POSTED IT AGAIN

File: 1499367875759.jpg (38KB, 432x454px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 432x454px

>>385809009
How do you make your game look like this? And if this particular picture is just setting everything lowest, then how do you get it looking textureless like I've seen in some of the other pics?

File: TESV.exe_DX9_20130829_143611.jpg (339KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 1920x1080px

>>385816303
In rendering there's an LOD bias which in short dictates how sharp the textures are. If you set it to something really high it just gets indie game tier.

I know a couple of hidden Nvidia control panel options let you force it in games, forgot exactly which. I think LOD bias + AA_MODE_REPLAY_MODE_ALL

>>385816873
Damn, looks a WIP area
Or an indie game

File: f4.jpg (340KB, 2133x900px) Image search: [Google]

340KB, 2133x900px

>>385809009
low spec optimization thread?
this is fallout 4 running on gtx 760 on low-high with some texture mods

>>385818072
Jeez, I wouldn't even have bothered with texture mods if you have aliasing that bad. Why don't you enable TAA/FXAA? It costs like two fps at most.

>>385809260
lost at the filename

>>385818072
Does it make the game fun though?

>>385809260
>custom maps.jpg

File: f42.jpg (230KB, 2133x900px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 2133x900px

>>385818219
I guess i can turn on fxaa

>>385818631
Okay now stop saving such low quality JPGs and you're good.

File: f43.jpg (2MB, 2133x900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2133x900px

>>385818880
but i was worried about your bandwidth anon..

>>385812684
you should see Dead Space 3 then.