What makes Camilla so...Camilla?

>>385581308
Being fat and psychotic.

>>385581410
In what way is she fat?

>>385581308
Being a big titted onee-san cliche rather than being an ugly tranny like Hinoka

>>385581308
Mentally ill.

It's absurd how much better Camilla's personality would be, and probably how she would have been received, if you didn't have the option of romancing her

>>385581308
I wish Camilla was my big sister.

Being a major collection of pretty much every onee-san trope, with all of those tropes being super-charged for effect. She beautiful, very busty, has a ridiculous, sexualized outfit. Her personality is deliberated made extreme, with her affection for Corrin being outright incestuous, and her clinginess is played up to yandere levels. It also helps that she's a ridiculously good unit too, with a cool class and a black dragon.

>>385582318
>It's absurd how much better Camilla's personality would be, and probably how she would have been received, if you didn't have the option of romancing her

I'm guessing you weren't around for the threads made before release. The question if Camilla being marryable was one of the hottest topics regarding Fates' discussion, and there was much rejoicing when it was confirmed.

Don't let the extremely vocal minority fool you. Camilla is consistently popular and regularly wins, or at least scores very highly in, any popularity poll she is a part of.

>>385582876
Alright lemme rephrase that

It's absurd how much better Camilla's personality would be if you didn't have the option of romancing her, regardless of what a bunch of tasteless, waifu-craving virgins want

All of Camilla's dialogue is shifted from being endearing and sisterly to cringeworthy and pandering solely by the notion that fucking her is an option.
If you didn't have the option of fucking her she would be a genuinely likable character and not shitty otaku-bait

File: 1500626780372.jpg (81KB, 842x960px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 842x960px

>>385583317
>anyone but otakus playing FE
Why should they pander to normalfags?

>>385583527
>Otaku cannot have the taste to appreciate good characters
>They can only appreciate the absolute LCD of characterization, even when that depreciates the actual character

That's a way ruder thing to say than anything I said