Why is it that this game looks so much worse than Bloodborne

File: THISGONBGUD.gif (1MB, 350x191px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 350x191px

>>385476182

>>385476182
No Sony money for polish/fancy visual effects/models/textures/whatever else.

BB had very bad fps and loading times s along with a bad memory leak at launch, which while fixed in the patch is still noticeable at times.

>>385476182

Really? I own both for ps4 and i always thought ds3 looks slightly better. It most certainly runs better

>>385476508
DS3 also had tons of bugs that were patched post release. Even some bugs that were introduced later on by the patches.

>>385476637
DS3 ran better and loaded faster then BB.

>>385476746
It also looks like shit.

Actually its an improvement in almost every way you stupid sonegro

>>385476786
That does not change the fact DS3 performs better.

>>385476786

If a game runs like shit it will always look like shit in motion

Dark Souls 3 made for PC

Bloodborne made for PS4

File: 1407874963534.jpg (9KB, 261x191px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 261x191px

I thought it looked pretty good. I'm not one to take scenery screenshots often at all but I took a few for DaS3.

>>385476182
Because the textures are basically blurry and bad.Not to mention they ve also used outdated models from other games

File: 20160414192012_1.jpg (267KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1920x1080px

>people endlessly shit on DaS2 for being downgraded but not DaS3

Explain.
Just look at the Skeleton King boss in the DaS3 trailer and compare that to how he actually looks in-game.

Des looks much better than Das1, unless ds1 it's on pc with mods.

File: 1470688505364.jpg (141KB, 1278x720px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 1278x720px

>>385477636
ds2 downgrade:
>all lighting literaly removed
>everything is ctrl+c and ctrl+v
>super shitty textures
>looks horrible

ds3 downgrade:
>some colors changed

File: Road_of_Sacrifices_2.0.0.jpg (213KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 1200x800px

>>385477907
Not even defending DaS2, they both look like shit.

File: qqzbee.jpg (425KB, 1600x842px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1600x842px

>>385478146
>implying this looks anywhere as bad as ds2

>>385477636
In defense of that particular texture error, it's been patched.
High Lord Wolnir still a huge disappointment regardless.

File: 20160412021945_1.jpg (500KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 1920x1080px

>>385478234
>It's fine because it's marginally less shit

File: comparison.jpg (3MB, 1920x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x2160px

Bloodborne just looks better. That's just the way it is.

>>385478419
>marginally

>>385478448
when will From learn how wrists work?

>>385478448
Bb looks clean and stiff where as ds3 looks blurry and distorted

File: floating buildings and repeating tiles, yahargul truly is a terrible place.jpg (595KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

595KB, 1920x1080px

Just as a consolation prize here's the only really egregious thing I ever noticed in Bloodborne.

>>385476182
Soul's games have never looked that good, Fromsoft games have pretty bad tech behind them.

>pour your heart into making your game look beautiful
>make this game a PS4 exclusive
>rampant framedrops out the ass and year long loading times

>time for Dark Souls 3, where we're not limited by hardware and we can actually make the game look as good as we want without any drawbacks
>make it look significantly worse

File: Smug Red Eye Orb.png (35KB, 476x484px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 476x484px

>>385479186
delete this... NOW


I don't know that BB looked THAT much better than DaS3 on PS4. It was noticeable, but then again, it's probably due to having to run on all three systems whereas BB could optimize for just one. And as people have already mentioned, BB suffered from some long ass load times (that were ridiculously long) and still has some frame drops in a few areas.

>>385479598
The load times got fixed though.

>>385479598
>some
>in a few areas

it never fucking stays at 30

>>385476182
>60 fps
>grey everywhere

>>385476182
Let's see.

>No Chromatic Asscanceration
>No Silkysmooth™ 23.8 FPS

I'm gonna go ahead and answer your question with one of my own: Why do you think it looks worse?

>>385479651
That's why I used past tense.

>>385479709
Is it 60fps on PS4? I played DaS3 on PC mostly, though I do have it on PS4. I won't argue that the game's color palette was shit, but that's more of an artistic failure, right? BB's setting was way more interesting and atmospheric, but I don't think that was OP's point.

>>385476182
Because Sony gave Fromsoft a blank check as long as it was only on the Playstation. DS3 was on multiple consoles.

File: ds3peg.jpg (267KB, 679x950px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 679x950px

>>385476182
Because Bloodborne's art design was built from the ground up for it, while DS3 tried to cram BB's aesthetic into a Dark Souls format and ended up looking awkward as a result.

>>385479887
I think it's 30 fps on PS4, but it's probably because they downgraded for the Xbone.

DaS3 had to be optimized for all systems, whereas Bloodborne had to be optimized for just one.

ds2 is the best souls game

>>385479983
Needs more swamps and it's perfect

Dark Souls 3 and BB look about the same, but BB has chromatic aberration which is a trick some people think looks better.
It also masks a ton of aliasing issues BB would otherwise have DS3 suffers from to heavier extent.

>>385480297
Time is convoluted, bro. Time is convoluted.

>>385480482
I liked how BB tried to trick me into enjoying it more too. I can spot artificial fun just as easily as artificially better graphics.

>>385479557
XB1 is obviously much more limiting than PS4.
Just turning down resolution and other detail levels doesn't help either, it's obvious with the PC version where lowering the settings just about never gives any significant increases in frame rate.

File: 374320_screenshots_20160708175401_1.jpg (430KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 1920x1080px

I don't get why you guys are bashing on DS3's graphics. shit was nice.

>>385481214
oh boy more grey

File: 374320_screenshots_20160702001751_1.jpg (415KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

415KB, 1920x1080px

>>385481307
You must be colorblind.

Dark Souls has a shit artstyle

>>385481214
You posted the one area that actually looks good. Everything else is various shades of grey and brown or yellow.

File: DARKSOULS.exe_2015-02-27-07-07-59-901.png (4MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 1920x1200px

>>385481365
the sequels do

>>385481887
>Motion blur
Kill yourself my man

File: 374320_screenshots_20160411205945_1.jpg (420KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

420KB, 1920x1080px

>>385481479
So the graphics are shit because of a colour pallete?

>>385482183
>disabling drawing
only useful for pvp

>>385482619
It looks like fucking shit you inbred fuck.

>>385483037
>autism and insults for argument
man with no taste
disables other effects too

>>385483435
Dont get mad just because you have shit taste. Its not my fault.

>>385481214
Literally every single time someone tries to defend DaS3's shite graphics they will use a screenshot from this exact spot because it's about the only decent looking spot in the entire game.

File: 32432424.jpg (461KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 1920x1080px

>>385483808
You probably see shit because your full of it.

>>385484086
>stairs look like they're made of plastic

>>385481352
Dark Souls 1 didn't look grey to me.

>>385484307
Every stone looks like it's made of clay in DaS3, never any rough edges, texture or shining.

>>385476182
Because no one wanted to make it but it was clearly a more profitable project due to multiplat release.

>ITT: mad toaster owners without any real toast

>>385483624
dat instant projection, lol

>>385476182

it doesn't

play the PC version you fucking pleb

>>385485879
Aside from running at 60fps it looks like shit.

DaS3 was also made by the B-Team alongside BB being made for a single platform and BB's artstyle.

File: 1456356639946.jpg (296KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

296KB, 1920x1080px

>>385476182
It doesn't look worse, BB has that aids CA and far worse lighting.

File: next gen graphics.jpg (2MB, 3824x2404px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3824x2404px

>>385481887
Demons Souls looked really good at times too.

>>385482445
Most would say yes. The first 2 games had good use of their artists, not so much for the following games.