>This kills the tripwiredrone
Who would have thought that releasing a game with no replayability wouldn't be a good idea?
>>385408757
You know, I wouldn't be surprised if quite a portion of the peopel in the graph have both the games, and are alternating them.
>>385408757
how the fuck do you compare a fun little vietnam shooter thats like 12€ with a try hard realistic boredom simulator thats 37€
>>385408850
I've got Insurgency, Squad, Arma 3, and RS2V on rotation. Life is good.
>>385408923
Someone was falseflag shilling Squad in LITERALLY every single RS2 Thread and shitposting that it was dead.
The way playercount is dropping RS2 will be actually dead by the end of the year.
Also that hard realistic boring game costs double and still has more players LMAO
>>385408757
>Who would have thought that releasing a game with no replayability wouldn't be a good idea?
You act like they didn't do the exact same thing with KF2,. Stop supporting Shitwire.
>>385408757
What's the issue here
>>385409182
>The way playercount is dropping RS2 will be actually dead by the end of the year.
I remember when you fags said the same about RS/RO2 and yet it still has small but dedicated playerbase.
>>385409686
Why don't people get this? I've been playing RS/RO2 on and off for a long time now and I quite enjoy doing a RS campaign on a Sunday for a couple of hours.
>>385409686
Because RO2 was a somewhat competent game with tactical and realistic aspects, RS2 is a casualized mess that makes BF1 look like VBS2
>>385408757
I own both. I enjoy both, though SQUAD is to me without a doubt 10 times better.
RS2 has a bunch of problems, but in small doeses it's fun.