So now Blizzard bans you if you play their game the wrong way.

neogaf: the online game

File: 1492545564704.png (448KB, 846x900px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 846x900px

>Get banned for calling people retarded niggers
>Go cry about it on /v/

>>385224245

This is a gameplay abuse ban.

If I did as you say I would have gotten a chat ban.

>>385223983
>mfw I just uninstall the game

Checkmate, kikes.

>>385223983
>griefing in an online game
>don't expect to get banned
tough titties m88.

>>385223983
So what did you do?

>>385223983
What did you do

>>385224309
Oh. So what did you do?

Its a one day ban. Why are you crying about it?

>>385224410
>>385224423
The pic is not OP's retard, it's been in like 100 threads already.

File: overwatch.png (509KB, 645x503px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 645x503px

>>385223983

>>385224536
So what did they do?

>>385224584
deliberately threw games.

>>385224536

Then they copied my image.

It's mine. I got the ban last night.

I was intentionally throwing to get to bronze.

The only reason I play Overwatch anymore is to bully all the retarded normies/children who play that game.

Never been banned.

>>385224536
In one day?

>>385224660
Then fuck you, you're gay

>>385224640
>>385224660
So nothing of value was lost.

>>385223983
Yeah, so the way I see it, the ban was likely for trying to ghost for the other team, or not actively participating in a match, only moving around for a bit to trick the autokick.

Actively playing on your team to make them lose would be a reason to ban you.

>INB4 hurr how did I do that?

I can imagine a number of scenarios aside from just being a carebear as stated above:

>Be roadhog and hook enemy tanks to your team so they can initiate easier.
>Trolling as Reinhardt. Dropping shields on purpose.
>Never healing as Mercy/Ana/Zenyatta

really any clear form of collusion with the opposing team to grief your own is and should always be a bannable offense.

>>385224945
How long have you worked at blizzard?

>find overwatch characters cool
>decides to purchase the game and play the hero on the cover
>here about toxic community so turn off all voice and in game chat
>have fun playing tracer every game
>get banned

>>385225130
0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes, 0 seconds. Why? You gonna get me a job there?

>>385224916

I agree that I'm a dick.

However, the bans seem to be automatic. There's no "review process" I got banned instantly one game.

Therefor you could get banned for playing a hero that others don't like.

So while I deserve it yes, others who don't deserve it will still get banned.

>>385225234
Blizzard stated that you won't get banned for playing outside the meta.

File: 1495482531313.png (14KB, 506x463px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 506x463px

>Ruin the game for the rest of your team
>Cry about it on /v/ when you're banned

How the fuck can they determine what's throwing? Can't you just disguise it very well and pretend you're trying to shoot your enemies?

>>385225541
yes if you are not autistic

>don't want to play with team anymore for whatever reason
>if you leave the game you get a penalty
>if you stay in the game you get banned

What the hell is happening, this is just nonsense

>>385225373

They're lying then. It's an automated ban based on the number of reports.

>>385225541

That's what I'll have to do now.

It was fun to blatently troll as mei and put up icewalls in my teams spawn and listen to all the kiddies rage.

Was fun while it lasted.

File: Verified.png (316KB, 617x789px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 617x789px

>>385225714
Where's the proof that it's automated?

>>385224578
Who cares

>>385223983
You deserve all the shit you get for playing anything made by blizzard.

>>385225847

>>385225847

It happened immediately while I was throwing. They all said "Report this guy please other team" and 5 seconds later I was banned.

>>385226120
That just shows that they were quick to ban you, but it doesn't prove that it's an automated system. Someone could have just checked your k/d ratio and have seen you were throwing.

>>385226350
blizzdrones truly are the most retarded people on the planet.

>playing Oyveywatch

You should be playing Gigantic

>>385225230
>play Competitive and just play the same character every game because you just wanna play "for fun".
You don't get banned for griefing in quick play.

>>385226492
You're the guy playing the game and got banned. You can't give a company money and act like you're better because you bitch and cry about it.

>>385225696
Just leave then, you signed up for a game so fucking play it or take a penalty.

>>385226120
So you only threw that one game and you were banned?
Are you sure its not all the other reports finally catching up to you and biting you in the ass?
I just wanna make sure

>>385225696
>better not risk getting a penalty, I'll just get banned instead!
Can we remove South America from all boards yet?

>>385226586
Thanks for proving me right again moron, I'm not him and the fact you can't recognize that further proves how stupid the people who play this game are, furthermore supported by the fact that you really think that in a game with millions of players and who knows how many reports per minute, there's always an employee watching you ready to judge if you should get banned or not.

Pure, fucking, delusion, the system is definitely automated with a threshold of X reports triggering and automatic ban.

>>385226983
So try something that you think will get banned and test it until you can prove that it's automated.

>grief
>get banned

What does he mean by this

File: ▄█ █▄█ ▄█▀ ▀█▀.jpg (3KB, 84x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 84x125px

>>385226350

>>385223983
nice, though it'd be best if it only was a competitive ban

File: Joe hisashi.jpg (15KB, 250x273px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 250x273px

>>385226983
this is what years of getting cucked by valve and their 2 guys in the customer support looks like.

>>385225902
me (You)

>>385227207
>Say it's automated
>No proof
>Meme response
Do something like play an unconventional character, and I mean actually try to play, and see if you get banned just as fast. Get a group of friends and have them report you and see if you get banned despite not doing anything.

Prove it.

>>385227095
>Pay for game
>Get game taken off you if you don't enjoy it in the same way as someone else

If you pay for something you should be able to use it however you please. It's like having a pizza taken of you because you put pineapple on it and everyone else hates pineapple. Or using a bowl as an ashtray and having that taken off you because bowls 'are not' supposed to be ashtrays. Or having your couch taken off you because you like to use it as a bed. Or never being allowed to have a bottle because you piss in them. Imagine that anon, all you're piss bottles taken away forever.

>>385227381

It'd be a massive coincidence that I got banned right when people were reporting me for other reports a long time ago.

Usually the simplest answer is the right one. Blizzard automate it.

>x company banned me for no reason
>okay what did you do
>threw games, called everyone niggers
Every single time

>>385227476
>Food analogy
>Pay for show ticket
>Shit in garbage bin
>Get kicked out
>"WOW how was I supposed to know!?"

>>385226120
>>385224660
>>385224640
>deliberately threw game(s)

Games, as in more than one game, meaning there were more than likely many reports and this was the game they all finally caught up to you. Good riddance you fucking mongoloid

>>385226983
If a player has a much higher number of reports than the average player for generally the same reason in a small amount of time it's pretty reasonable to think their account would be reviewed before other accounts with far less reports

Why are all these retards defending a guy who got banned when he straight up admitted he was intentionally griefing and breaking the rules?

>>385227476
>Pay for game
>Autistic neet didn't read the terms and conditions before buying it
>Complaint when something bad happen

wew

>>385227517
>Goes for the simplest answer rather than actually doing research
>Isn't willing to even dedicate time to prove that a company is shit but is just willing to believe it and push it onto others without definitive evidence

You're definitely no Crowbcat.

>>385227476
>what are terms of service

>you were always kicked or banned for being immature on a private server, anon!
>being banned from a private server by the admin is the same as being banned from the game by a company
/thread go the fuck back to the catalog

>>385223983
So they're becoming like League of Legends now? Pick wrong choice for your team, get banned for trolling.

>>385227476
>food analogy
really made me think

File: 1432671134612s.jpg (4KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 125x125px

>>385227381
Why don't you stop acting like a retard and use common sense, no fucking way can blizzard review and verify a report within seconds, are you dense?

>>385224328
You already gave them your money. They don't give a shit.

>>385223983
his is why you always mute the chat unless you are playing with friends

>>385223983
>halfway through 2017
>still playing SJWatch
Blizzdrones not even once

File: enhanced-11926-1417549716-5.jpg (73KB, 625x467px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 625x467px

>>385227612
>Pay for a game
>Call someone shit because they are
>Lose access to game
4th Reich

>>385227723
What factor makes it impossible?

>>385227476
holy fuck, you're on some next level delusion right now

either play by the rules and dont be a nigger or fuck off and die, cunt.

>>385227719
read the thread you dipshit, OP went on a full rampage of throwing games in competitive.

>>385223983
>f-f-fucking n-n-n-n-n-nigger children!!!
>y-y-y-you're why i lose all my bronze ranked matches!!!!!!!!!!1

I'm glad they started to prune out retards.

>>385223983
Yeah, I'm SURE you weren't doing something wrong.

>>385227708
Playing competitive games and purposely fucking with your team and idling is called griefing, and will indeed get you banned.

>>385225847
Why did they cover half the text with a massive logo?

File: overwatch ban for abusive talk.jpg (42KB, 837x355px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 837x355px

>>385227827
>be a autistic 12 years old kid yelling "NIGGER" in the voice chat

its already proven the worst they can do its silence you

>>385227746
It wasn't chat, the dude was throwing games.

>>385227912
>something wrong

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-GEhArUuZ8

File: savage faggot cunt fucking rekt.png (76KB, 1052x820px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1052x820px

>>385223983
Most likely well deserved bans.

>WAAAAAH THEY WON'T ALLOW ME TO BE A HUGE CUNT TO EVERYONE, MOOOOOOOOM

>>385227476
>Order pizza
>Punch some other customer in the face
>Get thrown out of the restaurant and get mi pizza taken from me
I can food analogy too

>>385227476
Actually it's more like going to a movie and yelling every time dialogue comes up. Of course they'll remove you from the theater, you're disrupting it for all the other paying customers.

Anyone else stole their copy of Overwatch?

>deliberately throw games like a shitter
>complain about getting banned
Fuck off

File: 6603dc5a9292104b44c349b85b5aaf7a-5-crazy-fan-theories-that-make-total-sense.jpg (35KB, 600x480px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x480px

>>385228094
Everyone is now forced to be nice,
Just like Reddit!

File: 1433136493093.png (559KB, 855x465px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 855x465px

>>385228230
IS THIS IT /V/?

HAS SOMEONE FINALLY MADE A DECENT ANALOGY?

WHAT
IS
HAPPENING

File: 1382632344856.gif (7KB, 273x536px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 273x536px

>>385228354
It's a good thing you're here.

File: banned.png (191KB, 1255x490px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1255x490px

>>385223983
They punish you just for playing

>>385228094
what game?

>>385228519
It's about the freedom to say what you want, you fucking leaf.

>>385224578

Hahaa, I've not seen someone start sucking that bad yet.

>>385228540
>plays competetive
>doesn't want to play half of the mode
>evne then it's not Riot tier suspension just silence and would likely be overturned if he either started playing comp properly or stopped playing it

>>385228540
Maybe get off Hanzo if you can't hit anyone with them?

>>385223983
I'm trying to wrap my head around how badly you have to be acting in game, not even shit talking just straight up playing the game, to get banned. How is this possible?

>>385228475
no, because theaters are to movies what arcades are to video games.

the difference is owning the movie/game and paying to see/play it

>>385228540
if he was playing hanzo, he deserved it

>>385228623
You have the freedom to say what you want. Blizzard, and all other companies, have the freedom to limit your access to their products if they don't like what you say. Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences. All it means is that you can't be arrested and tried for speech. Private companies and citizens can react however they want, within the law.

>>385228623
But whoever owns the platform you're on, or the venue you're in has the right to tell you to fuck off saying shit.

They aren't the government, you aren't protected in any way from them.

>>385228672
>trying to justify ounishing players for not playing meta shit
Honestly the reason esports fags are 000 times worse than SJWs when it comes to ruining vidya. Can't even fucking play the game I bought because I'll get banned for having fun by playing who I enjoy.

>>385228623
Okay. Stop playing Overwatch because your garbage at it and you're a retard who spent money on a nu-Blizzard product.

>>385228709
That only makes sense with single player games. We're talking about a multiplayer game where your actions DO have an effect on other paying customers.

>>385228797
There is literally a "I'm not interested in esports shit" mode, THEY LITERALLY MAKE 2 GAME MODES SO PEOPLE WHO WANT ONE EXPERIENCE CAN HAVE IT AND PEOPLE WHO WANT THE OTHER ONE CAN HAVE IT.

This is like going into a venue with a fucking smoking room and then bitching because decide to sit in the smoking room.

File: 1477511950796.png (715KB, 629x758px) Image search: [Google]

715KB, 629x758px

>>385227984
Not the point, calling someone shit will inevitably end up with harassment claims. This is why this victim daycare ideology will fail: it just finds a different thing to consume into Oblivion as it goes. Eventually saying the mildest remarks about gameplay even. Unpussify the victim, don't punish the aggressor. Make men men again.

>>385228540
lmao
>I'm Game Master!
This isn't WoW, you fucking autist, if you're gonna fake it, atleast do better

>>385228759
kids don't understand that

>>385228545
Friday the 13th
because people buy a game like that to play with randies online for some odd reason

File: 1482575682251.png (105KB, 283x253px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 283x253px

>Play like a retard
>Get banned
>Cry about it on /v/

why are modern gamers such pussies that can't handle banter?

>>385228540
>>385228920

this, worst fucking fake i've seen

>>385228354
kill yourself you piss drinking cum gurgling retarded nigger.

Faggot.

>>385223983
So glad I don't give money to those bastards anymore. They have been shit since the day they merged with Activision.

>>385228975
That wasn't F13 you liar.

>>385228797
Then don't play competitive. Godamn people are fucking retarded.

>>385228895
This is actually the most pathetic post in the thread
>Remember when men were MEN in video games?

>>385229016
>Get killed
>"wooooooooooooooooooooow lucker nigger nigger nigger kys"
>Reported
>"woooooooooooooooooow cant handle the bantz"

>>385228094
Meh. Unless logs are public, mods can just say whatever.

The real solution is not to buy/play games moderated by thin-skinned faggots.

>>385229016
>fucking cuck
>faggot cunt, kys

This isn't banter, this is being an unrepentant dickend.

>Oh hey I didn't realise we had an X on our team

This is banter

>>385228759
>>385228808
>>385228721

>freedom from consequences
If what you say isn't what I like then you should be banned baka

I know they're not government, and they have all the right to fucking limit their words how they want, but doesn't mean we have just sit down and praise them for it, claiming it's a ingenious move.

>>385229084
fuck my bad. I was thinking of something else. I'm not sure what game it is then

Could be worse. Riot will permaban you if you don't follow the meta

>>385229198
>faggot cunt, kys
this is shitty yuropoor banter
american banter is much better

>>385229214
Nobody's praising them for it, you moron, it just doesn't qualify as "free speech" like you said it does

File: too much banter.jpg (112KB, 640x677px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 640x677px

>>385229280
Wrong way around buddy.

>>385229214
>If what you say isn't what I like then you should be banned baka

This literally was the rule number 1 in cs 1.6 private servers, why is wrong now?

>>385229198
>opponent is a thin-skinned faggot
>call him a faggot
>he gets unreasonably annoyed and starts playing worse
>win the round
And this is how video game trash talk used to work.

>>385229113
>"get gud"
>YOU HAVE BEEN SUSPENDED FOR PLAYING

>>385228884
attribute it towards sports then

if you're playing competitively, refs make the call
if you're playing for fun with friends or strangers (pubbies), your actions are acceptable only as far as those around you accept

competitively you should be penalized for poor sportsmanship, but non-competitive games should not be regulated

File: 1496960915290.png (324KB, 458x474px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 458x474px

>>385225498
>playing overmeme in the first place

>>385229347
They are not going to ban you for saying a single word in all chat and then ban you in the next 2 hours, they are going to ban whoever is a toxic piece of shit that insults teammates and enemies all games

>>385229313
see>>385228094

>>385229324
it wasn't right then either, the fact that people got so triggered over people just saying shit in chat that they need to literally start banning accounts to pander to the majority of the audience is sad.

>>385228759
Nearly all mediums of communication online are controlled by private entities. This is how we talk to each other now and Congress is too slow to revise the transition of our rights to cyberspace. Doesn't mean we can let private entities hinder our basic human rights because the process is so slow. Just imagine if Twitter, Facebook and YouTube just removed content they didn't like. Nothing illegal regarding the right to speech... Except it just basically restricts all speech we have over cyber which is just as significant as the real world at this point. People forgot what it means to be liberal.

>>385229347
And now it doesn't. Pretty simple really.

Being behind a screen and not in person has a major effect on social interaction so you can't act the same way you can in real life. Excess anger crops up, etc. This is a well studied effect now, unlike in 2002. And guess what, companies are more interested in all their customers being able to play their game without people making them feel shit and stop wanting to play.

>>385229129
Why would they lie?

>>385229263
blizzard already bans you for choosing unconventional heroes in ranked play because "you're griefing others with your playstyle"

>>385229461
All those platforms do do these things. And people don't like it becuase they're not VIDEO GAMES. they're an extension of daily life at this point. It's apples and cruise liners.

>>385229458
I don't see praise. I see the poster pointing out in great detail how the banned guy violated the TOS and was removed despite him saying "I did nothing wrong". That was the "savage" part.

>>385229461
>Just imagine if Twitter, Facebook and YouTube just removed content they didn't like.

>Upload porn
>get banned
>holy shit why are you so anti-consumer?

File: 1479129448218.png (502KB, 629x476px) Image search: [Google]

502KB, 629x476px

>>385229094
It's a social change and its happened long before the more modern video game communities. Weve stopped working our way up and instead just asked for treatment when were beaten down.

File: 1488531959013.jpg (49KB, 807x664px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 807x664px

>>385229319

>>385229625
More like
>upload a retarded YTP because lmao so radnum
>gets deleted

>>385224748
When you are careful they can't ban you. See a widow and pick Ana or Hanzo for example.

>>385229624
Talking shit on an online pc game, shouldn't be anything wrong, thin-skinned queers only get offended by it, others just laugh and shrug it off.

File: burgerloli.png (93KB, 189x210px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 189x210px

>can't handle the banter or get gud? just report them

>>385229632
>most of the jobs people used to "move up" we're replaced by machines or moved to china
>wonder why this discourse has changed.

>>385229625
>Go nude on street in front of primary school playground
>Holy shiz gobment come on
We have standards clearly defined since 300years ago you should read up.

File: 1449678118115.png (337KB, 981x334px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 981x334px

>>385229632
It's fucking video games, dude
People were already getting banned from servers for being a totally annoying nigger faggot that you swear made men into men and totally not the REEE-ing idiot children you see in your oh so funny grief videos
Here's a nice echo chamber for you
>>>/pol/

>>385229748
Too bad. It was against their online TOS that the guy signed up for when he bought the game.

>>385229748
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-is-everyone-on-the-internet-so-angry/

File: 1501030345611.jpg (96KB, 352x499px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 352x499px

>>385223983
Tbh you can rank up by playing comp but dont focus to hard

>>385229593
>Extensions of daily life
Seems like playing with a community of people on the regular is just another extension of daily life.

>>385229214
I never said it was a good thing. It's part of the reason I stopped playing. But claiming it's freedom of speech issue is retarded.
>>385229461
All those companies already do that. If you don't like it make your own website.

>>385230006
Only for a very small number of people, and if you're doing that you're not going to be an abrasive cunt unless that server is you know, also full of abrasive cunts and everyone is fine with that.

>>385224660
Are you mad you got banned for that?

>>385229016
Oh, you are one of those brainless cunts that call verbal abuse "banter".

Go and kindly fuck yourself.

>>385229704
my sides

i love OC

You throw games when your team is playing badly. It's just what you're supposed to do. Blizzard doesn't need to come running every time someone's fragile fee-fees are hurt. If you realize someone on your team is throwing, stop being fucking bad at the game.

>>385229352
Happened never.

>>385229850
>He didn't read the post
<<<\pol\ It's happened long before vgaming communities and the concept of bettering yourself, as opposed to punishing others for your own shortcomings unless the others are hindering your ability to become a better person, is one of the most profound philosophical concepts in history. But apparently we don't care about stuff like that anymore

>>385228884
It's like paying to play laser tag, then grabbing your teammates and holding th still for the enemy, then calling them swear words and slurs. You WILL be kicked out.

>>385230048
I'm not claiming the government laws shouldn't allow blizzard to do this, but rather Blizzard shouldn't pander to all the kids who get mad at "ggez" and they should respect the basic right of being able to say what you want.

>>385230128

Nope.

I'm worried however that since this is an automated process that people will get banned for playing off meta heroes

Before some idiot mentions
>m-muh free speech! Muh freedoms!
Your freedom ends where freedom of another human being starts.

File: 1449681277863.png (96KB, 587x337px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 587x337px

>>385230150
This shitty rhetoric of someone's fee-fees getting hurt when you're the one banned and complaining about it on an anonymous video game image board is pretty good.

>>385224640
How is losing on purpose a bannable offence? Unless he made the whole team lose or something

>>385228895

The last thing I need after working is to play overwatch, shit I paid for to have someone who is only like 100 points above me talking like hot shit and calling me garbage. We're all garbage down here.

File: 1498746631857.gif (375KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 480x480px

>>385230150
there is not a single sport on earth where if the game is going poorly the losing team just sits around an jerks off until the time runs out or the opposing team meets victory conditions. So why is it okay in Overwatch for you to throw a game because you didnt like how it was going? Ive won plenty of games on the brink of failure and those were also the most fun.

That being said, i think a reasonable compromise so shits like you dont constantly ruin everything would be a 4-5/6 vote surrender option. But competitive games are really not that long.

>>385230048
>Make your own website
And gain the traction they have. It's a bunch of unregulated Monopolies on here. You cannot catch up to these giants

>>385230358
Thats fine then. I get youre worried about that. Thats not fair. But throwing games should get you banned.

>>385230447
Overwatch is a shitty MOBA that demands team fights to win games, no one person can overcome short comings of the team like TF2
One person can actually disrupt a lot since its a 6v6

File: 1429347282031.jpg (175KB, 1000x500px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1000x500px

>>385230358
>an automated

pic related is you and your family

there is no way someone really believes that when there are no proofs and blizzard went straight up and said they verify the reports

2/10 made me reply

>>385230332
Sure, I agree. My only point was at either you or another anon calling it a free speech issue when it clearly isn't. Mad kiddies always bring up free speech without understanding what it means.

File: 1484091639477.gif (3MB, 333x250px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 333x250px

>>385230374
Jesus Christ i'm auguring with retards, or obvious bait

>>385230132
you're the type of guy that can't come up with banter when the persons tells you "u mad"

>>385230545
Capitalism at it's finest.

>>385230504
dota games can be up to 2 hours

>>385230150
>Literally supporting the concept of throwing a tantrum and refusing to play because things aren't going your way
>Bitching about anyone else's fragile fee-fees

wow

>>385230132
honestly, HONESTLY, tell me how me how much you were affected by the last verbal abuse you experience in an online video game.

If the answer is not at all, then shut your fucking mouth.

>>385230770
A game being an hour is long, but two hours either both teams must be extremely good or extremely terrible.

File: torpedo.jpg (22KB, 480x389px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 480x389px

>>385230837
>implying verbal abuse is just "HAHAH NIGGA JUST CLOSE YOUR EYES AND DON'T LISTEN"
Honestly, you are the reason we cannot ever have nice things in life and internet.

>>385230770
But this isnt DotA. Overwatch games can be like 20 mins max

File: images[3].jpg (3KB, 216x216px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 216x216px

>>385224364
>I only main 78, switch so I can play him
>Anon is refusing to switch so I can have my main
>all chat: Everyone report anon for griefing!

The state of FPS in 2017.

>>385230635
>blizzard went straight up and said they verify the reports
Not him, but I don't really believe in them. Might as well believe on Youtube saying the same bullshit.

>>385230740
It's a severely unreformed version of capitalism same one you would see in 18x0-1910s America. It's only this way because the internet has taken the world by storm and government is too slow to figure out how to implement working concepts from the real world to cyberspace. Capitalism allows private entities to grow with reasonable limitations as to how many other competing enemies it's allowed to squash out of existence. The reason we don't want one big entity is because that gives it a god complex over the entire industry and it does whatever the fuck it wants.

>>385230725
>noob hahaha
>but you died two seconds after me
>u mad?

>>385231093
Youre right its not, but you didnt answer the question, were you honestly affected by the last verbal abuse you experienced online?

>>385230216
It happens all the time you Blizzdrone faggot

>>385231226
Alright.
Yes, yes I was. It made me perform worse then I normally play and left a horrible aftertaste when game was over.

>>385231162
Then show proof?, you are like the autistic politics having a tantrum that putin won presidential elections and still having 0 fucking proof, sad thing is they keep saying it up to this day.

>>385229505
Why would anyone lie? It can range from a simple "I don't like this person," through "I'm tripping on power," to "I think I'm helping the world this way." The crux of the issue is that by providing random phrases instead of actual logs, this mod proved exactly fucking nothing.

>>385223983
dont play the video jew

>>385230447
Overwatch relies on team cooperation. Being a man down is a huge disadvantage and by feeding kills to the enemy you actually help them get their abilities up. As if it wasn't obvious by nature, blizzard went so far as to actually write out in the terms of service, as in the code of conduct that you have to AGREE TO when you play the game, that you shall not ruin other peoples games by purposely losing, which he breached. Basically he was being a shithead and ruining everyone's experience but thinks that's ok and that he should be allowed to.

I will NEVER EVER EVER play games with random teams + ranked matchmaking. It brings the worst out of people.
And leaver penalty + no joining mid-game makes everything exponentially worse. People are stuck in a match that they hate, clearly not having fun but cannot leave. So they start griefing and throwing.

It's so much healthier when you have a dedicated server, can join a map you like instead of being random, can leave if you get pissed, and new people can join to fill your place. Not compatible with ranked play? FUCK RANKING IN CASUAL GAMES. Seriously. It's the biggest tryhard shit ever.

If you really must have a ranked game mode, let premade teams join only.

File: 1494268217254.jpg (62KB, 850x639px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 850x639px

>>385231336
I don't think posting actual log file instead of an excerpt would be a wise move, ever.

File: 1492048517796.jpg (7KB, 167x144px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 167x144px

Mods only ban people because they're unhappy with themselves and they get angry when they see others happier than themselves, so they use these stupid lame game mechanics that games would otherwise be made to prevent naturally as an excuse to try and make you unhappy by preventing you from playing the game you bought.

It's a sad petty thing, but it happens to 99% of people in authority. Otherwise is an outlier.

All the people justifying this are, too, succumbing to this envy. Because "banned" vs "not banned" is another hierarchy of power.

>>385231402
ding ding ding ding

>>385231145
>main 78

Found your problem

>>385231093
to clarify here, you are in the minority if you are affected at all by trash talk online. you still come to the cesspool of the internet everyday and people call each other faggots like its their last name. Yet you get mad because someone told you they fucked your mom last night.

Its still verbal abuse, you're right about that, but when has it been anyones responsibility to police what people say on the internet.

Youll hear more affecting words from your boss criticizing you than some douche on the internet.

Seriously, and I mean this, grow up. Itll help you enjoy things so much more.

>>385231374

that impossible to enforce properly, but i suppose thats eula/tos for you - "we reserve the right to whatever, whenever"

>>385230374
If your freedom ends then you don't have freedom retard

File: scooby.png (166KB, 833x789px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 833x789px

>>385231254
Oh, and why would I believe you rather that keep my perfectly plausible statement (and at same time much more plausible than yours) as truth?

The only regrettable thing is that OP's ban expires tomorrow.

>>385231589
Your statement is so retarded I'm not even going to argue that.

File: wndyremtrt.jpg (37KB, 392x500px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 392x500px

>>385231402

>>385231402
Seriously, why do game developers think that forcing casual players into a ranked ladder type game mode originally intended for professional tournament play is a good idea?
E-sports was a mistake. Ranked play should be something for the top 5% of the players, and not the main game mode.

>>385231707
You can't have freedom and also be prevented from doing something it's not fucking freedom then is it? You've still got someone deciding what you can and can't do, you're just allowed to do certain things. That ain't free.

>>385231731
It's like, 5 lines, you uneducated nigger.

>>385231440
Post a screenshot then. Or trim the log. Make it at least look believable. Anyone can type ""f*****t"" (yes, double quote marks intended) and call it proof. A mod for a big online game should act professionally. He is, after all, representing the company and its policies.

>>385224245
Dumb Kememe Furries poster.
How does it feel to be a fan of Japan's equivalent to My Little Pony?

>>385231581
>Seriously, and I mean this, grow up. Itll help you enjoy things so much more.

This is the most autistic response i've heard, you literally want to play 10 out of 10 games at day where people call each other a nigger for 20min and insult everysingle one

>>385231831
Absolute freedom would suck for 99% of people on the planet. Just look at places like Africa, they're free to do what they want and it's fucking rape central, disease everywhere, poverty. There have to be limits on freedom to keep order or else we'd live in a dystopia.

So Blizzard is banning assholes that throw games when they aren't winning? Unless it's perma bans, not like it's a big deal.

Hell I've had games where a crappy Nova is dying alot and not being a good Nova, and whether I point it out nicely or bluntly and they go "lol reported for toxic", I have NEVER gotten banned at all. Though I did report their asses when they decided "We ain't gonna win and we have 10 minutes of losing to do, so instead of playing, I'm going to just sit here and do nothing/let people die because they aren't worth it".

>>385231581
Verbal abuse is never okay and I do not appreciate trash talk. Hearing constructive criticism from your boss (IF it's constructive, of course) is entirely different thing unless someone is just unable to take any form of criticism and instead treat it subconsciously as a personal attack (and I know a few people like that).

Anyway, I have seen the results of constant verbal abuse and believe me it does terrible things to people.

>>385231731
>dumb retard can't even read 120 words

How's the McDonald's job working out for you?

File: pedos.webm (258KB, 222x400px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 222x400px

>>385231831
>/v/ is supporting pedos now because they are free

holy shit this board is truly the /pol/ of 4chan

>>385231963
Nigger you have no idea about Africa OR people OR freedom. Africa's mostly normal, if worse than a comfy first-world nation. It's only places like the Congo which are rape central.

People really wouldn't do much with absolute freedom. We're boring.

But people also wouldn't like absolute freedom. Too bad, I guess.

>>385231780
Isn't it obvious? Not everyone wants to waste time drafting, they just wanna get in and play.

>>385230150
p-people don't actually think like this, right? I mean c'mon this has to be bait, r-right?

>>385232081
Pedos aren't free, what's wrong with you? Doing shit that's unacceptable doesn't make you free.

>>385231867
You've got a point, then again probably situation at the time did not require a screenshot and mod's word was plausible. Hell if any other mod found out he is lying that could end up pretty ugly.

Not to mention a screenshot can also be shopped.

File: question cat.png (277KB, 382x417px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 382x417px

>>385232081
>this board is truly the /pol/ of 4chan
But /pol/ is a from 4chan?

>>385231582
If you get reported by a shitload of random different people with no preconceived notion of you in your games for "purposely losing", you can probably bet he was. Not to mention if he really has a compelling reason they say right there that he can appeal his ban.

But he really has no excuse. Not only is it common sense not to ruin your teammates game on purpose several times but they also put it in their code of conduct so if you're a stupid child and can't act properly you can read a document telling you how.

>>385231831
Imagine being this retarded.

nice spacing
get the fuck out cucks

>>385231883
Literally not true.

File: soldier.png (26KB, 241x240px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 241x240px

>>385232081
>that webm

>>385232353
>Literally not true.
pffffftth hhaahahahah

blizzard doesn't want you to have fun in new and interesting ways. they want you to play their way, nothing else. prescriptive game design is fucking shit. look at wow, tons of 'fun' things that have no effect on other players get nerfed all the time

>>385228545
Siege

File: meme.jpg (10KB, 325x166px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 325x166px

>>385232276

>>385232081
I never knew football players were pedophilia…

>blizzdrones legitimately think blizzard will personally verify each and every report in this game of 30 million players
LOL

>>385231402
Really depends on the game. Dedicated servers are circlejerks, but with super popular and super accessible games like overwatch, its almost always shit. Helps to have a thick skin and not get upset when someone calls you a poopoohead.
That said, I do still enjoy dedicated servers in games that support it well enough. Ranked game modes and such obviously don't work in such environments so they are just for fucking around and its a good time to fuck around.
In BF2 I would spend long days on a few select servers, playing with the mostly familiar people. Same with CS:S and CS:GO. Eventually though once the fun people left, I saw no reason to join back to those servers.

Also ranked works even in casual games. Ranked its there when you TRY to care about team composition and all that shit. Who knew that tryharding a little can be fun.
While yes, its a joke in games like OW, CS, DOTA and so on, its still fun. If you really want to be full on tryhard with ranked modes. 1v1 games are the only proper ones for those.

>>385232495
There was recently a pretty big scandal in UK's football scene involving sexual abuse of minors for YEARS.

>>385232239
So what's stopping /v/ from forming a troll group going around reporting people for teh lulz?

>>385228540
>Gamemaster

this is fake.

>>385223983
dude if I play bastion and get all gold medals for my team I'll get banned because I griefed by picking bastion.

>>385232207
Faking a screenshot takes significantly more time than typing out a bunch of random phrases. Yes, it can be faked. But a screenshot is much less likely to be fake than plain text.

>>385232021
People who are penetrated by verbal abuse are just losers who can't get over their shortcomings and accomplish something they can be proud of.

File: 1493974281182.jpg (37KB, 680x262px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 680x262px

>>385232369
Give it a try. You'll love it.

File: 1428293135230.jpg (73KB, 600x602px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 600x602px

>>385223983
>i've been purposely deranking and throwing games since season 1
>people saying they've reported me every other match
>still not banned to this day
good job blizzard

>>385232885 (Me)
Especially from people whom they have no ties to.

File: 1493389501852.png (203KB, 332x389px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 332x389px

>>385232908
autism

>>385233313
>having friends is autistic
epic

>>385232908
>awfully animated garbage
No thanks, I'm not a pleb

>>385232081
in the end his thumb is clearly rubbin her nipple

>>385232908
Yiff in hell, furfag.

>>385233416
>watch anime
>assume the position that the characters in it are your friends
Yes anon, that's autism

>>385233420
I thought /v/ said graphics do not matter.

>>385233502
They literally are.

>>385232585
Because it would be inconsistent. We would have to either follow the target around somehow which would make it obviously fake, or have such a big group that we get matched with him in-game several times. One game won't be enough. So we would always have to be online looking for him to keep a consistent flow of valid reports from different people every time. Its not plausible. And even if we somehow managed, it would likely be easy for him to appeal given he didn't do anything. And even if he couldn't if we selected a new target and all got that guy banned too, blizzard would catch that its the same exact people reporting several people and ban all of us while un-banning the ones we reported. It would take a tyrade of autism and cooperation for no real reward or benefit.

>>385223983
The kind of thing a woman would do

>>385230403
fuck off back to >>>/co/mblr

>>385231145
'I can't get what I want.
Its everyone elses fault'

This thread makes me sick.

So instead of implementing a mechanic that punishes griefing, they just ban people on the count of reports.

And most of the people here are okay with it.

>>385235985

And they lied about it, saying it's "verified reports" when it's clearly just a certain number of reports.

>>385232081
Looking it up, the guy was "hugging" his daughter

So there's no proof other than unverified anecdotes that it's automatic and occurs after only one game with a previously spotless record?

>>385236629

It's automatic yes, but it takes more than one game.

>>385236742
>automatic
What proof

>>385236882

I don't have a camera in blizzard offices proving that they review every single report, if that's what you're asking.

File: 1425215919454.png (247KB, 570x668px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 570x668px

>>385223983
>Sign EULA agreeing not to be a massive shit head and disrupt other peoples' experiences online

>Be a massive shit head and disrupt other peoples' experiences online

>get surprised when the legal contract you signed is followed

lol

>>385237121

EULA isn't legally binding you dumb dumb poopy head

I imagine its automatic with conditions. it probably has a metric of shots fired, accuracy damage done screen movement idle time

Im actually fairly positive they have run it live flagging accounts amd matches, and then they verify a sample size.

Im also guessing they did what valve does, false reporters end up being punished and having their reports unweighted.

there is an appeal, although the blizzard reps are pretty stupid when it comes to ban, I had to appeal my silence 3 times for it to finally go away, and then submit another ticket that lasted a week to get unbanned from comp because of a rampant bug I was unable to get resolved on the forums

>>385223983
Im confused. Someone bought this game, played like a complete moron and didnt win the game? Then posted this ban on retardit (its a casuals game and casual retards live there) and op decided to save the pic and post it here claiming he played overwatch and/or is a reditard?
The confusion is: is the player retarded, is the op a faggot or are we the morons for reaponding to stupid shit?
Sage goes in options.

I'm against chat bans but bans for throwing is a-OK.

>>385225230

>being this autistic

>>385238023

grr im angry at everything i am an angry male nerd

>>385237250
It is in the united states

>>385237121
>Live in a country where you may say what you want as long as it's a reasonable expression of your opinion
>Company thinks they can take it away

>>385238847
Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequence, dumbfuck
And they can do that if the rules say so. Private ownership allows them to reserve that right

>>385238847
Yeah you're totally right man! You can walk into your university classroom and yell "NIGGER NIGGER DIE NIGGERS I'M GOING TO KILL ALL THE NIGGERS" and nothing bad will happen because we have Freedumb of Speeches in da United States of Free Flying Eagles (っ˘ڡ˘ς)

You fucking "freedumb of speech" retards have no fucking god damn idea what that amendment means or what it does, what it's intended for or the responsibilities that come with that right. A fucking private business has a right to not deal business with you if they don't like the tone or tenor of your speech, just as much as you have the right to freely say what you want. With every Right comes Responsibility and the Responsibility attached to your Right to free speech is to not abuse it or be a massive shit head while using it. Don't be surprised when people choose to FREELY walk away from your immature gay ass while you are FREELY saying what you want about niggers and kikes being an inferior species.

>>385231145
It's your fault you don't take the time to learn other classes.
Also your fault for buying a shit game, fagion

>+ 257 posts and 40 image replies omitted.

Yeah. Not reading over all this shit.

I would assume OP got banned for screaming NIGGER FAGGOT KIKE at anyone who beat him, but Blizzard has been known to ban players for arbitrary reasons like using GNU / Linux.

I got banned from Diablo for modifying the EXE to optimize CPU usage so running the game wouldn't kill my fans. I managed to get a refund for the game, and haven't purchased a single Blizzard product since. Later, I found out they were pushing always-online DRM in some of their single-player games. That was the final nail in the coffin for me.

Stop giving money to this company. That's the only way to send the message that their corporate practices can't continue.

The industry is overflowing with devs and businessmen who real pieces of shit for a wide variety of reasons, so my first inclination is to believe accusations of foul play, but after hearing the actual story, OP's assumptions are pretty flimsy.

>threw several games
>assumed automation because the ban happened almost immediately after a bunch of reports

That said, I don't believe that devs should have the right to ban any paying customer for anything short of illegal activity, or activity which breaks the spirit of the law (i.e. fraudulent behavior). Whether he gets on people's nerves or not, he still payed a good chunk of money to play a videogame.

Current IP laws are in massive need of reform. The kind of reform that significantly depowers the creator and actually gives ownership of more than just a license that the IP holder can revoke at-will to the customer. That was a great way to make it easy to prosecute bootleggers in the 90s, when devs would have to literally break into your house and steal the cartridge from your console in order to actually deprive you of your ability to play, but it's not the 90s anymore. The law needs to catch up.

>>385239602

Nope. All I did was play torb

>>385223983
No proof.

Threw 25 games in competitive as Mei to tank my alt accounts elo and didnt get punished.

Ive been verbally abusing players since the game came out and the most ive got is a 6 month silence.

By the time they read the tiket your ban expires. IKR

>>385229198
yeah and there's a mute function for these people so that you don't get bothered by them and they still get to play the game they bought.

What the fuck is wrong with people who have to get their fun by taking it away from others? Is it poor upbringing? Lack of attention? Lack of consequence? It's like being that kid that kicks the soccer ball on the roof just because they are a piece of shit.

>>385238448
Yes. No girls on the internet. Good meme. Well memed you retard.

>>385223983
If this happens and you are Euro, you can tell them to fuck off because you did things the game allowed whitout a single warning, and honeypot is illegal.

>>385223983
What's the problem?
Stop playing if you don't like their rules.
>To retarded too play with kid's toy correctly.
>Make a crying thread on 4chins..

>>385242872
>their rules
But the game allowed everything, so no rule was broken. The Eula can't cover unwritten meta rules they invent on the spot.

>>385242995
Why can't they? I'm guessing it falls under the "hindering the enjoyment of others through unsportsmanlike play" shit that's written into basically every eula ever..

File: 1479132599824.jpg (850KB, 4020x3066px) Image search: [Google]

850KB, 4020x3066px

>>385239336
Instigating violence is not an opinion, nice attempt at a strawman. The argument is something like this: dialogue is essential in formulating power and true opinions, if you honestly believe something you want to discuss it with other people who in turn hit you with their ideas, dialogue happens, someone or both have a more refined opinion than before.

This is incredibly general of course but that is why freedom of speech is good no matter how inflammatory as long as it does not infringe on someone else's rights. Calling someone shit doesn't infringe their rights, calling niggers stupid because so and so is not infringing on anyone's rights.

Maybe I want to have a political discussion on overwatch about the crime rates being incredibly high in the black community in the US, I have some thoughts on statistics. If someone is willing to defend an opposing argument so be it be convincing to me and I will try to be to you and we have a different or stronger understanding than before. Same applies for something more overwatch related such as "you are bad because you walk in as a support without your tank" or as a vtard would say it "stop being fucking shit you retard wait for me to go in".

>Dumb assholes think the only way they can tell their teammates to step it up is by yelling at them and being a pugnacious faggot.
You do know you can give constructive critique and point out potential faults without being an obnoxious asshole right?

>>385242661
they are the same kind of people that cheat on csgo, they dont cheat because they are bad, they do it because they want to see everyone assblasted

>>385223983
Fucking good, I wish more devs did this. I was playing Overtime Rumble in GTA Online (yes, I know, I'm an idiot blah blah blah) and it was fucking ruined by suiciding retards, AFK faggots and griefing teammates and there was absolutely nothing you could do, no vote kick or anything.

You should be banned for not playing properly.

>>385243706
No but you don't understand. I have the right to call someone a nigger faggot and yell at them all game if they make a single mistake or play in a manner I don't approve of.

>>385223983
Overwatch is dogshit, you should be thankful you have an excuse to escape.

>>385225234
Get fucked faggot, like he said
>Nothing of value was lost.

>>385227517
>people were reporting me for other reports a long time ago.
and thus your account finally got reviewed and you were banned. Just because you were playing when it happened you assume it's automated? You're retarded and I'm glad you're banned.

/r/ing the screenshot of the off-meta Teemo league player who got permab& by Riot for not following the meta

>>385243775
I have a friend who have gotten like 6 accounts banned in CS GO. He does it to feel good at something cause he isn't good at anything for real. Not saying people like you're describing don't exist but it isn't why everyone cheats.

>bans for disruptive gameplay
>Hanzo isn't removed from the game

>>385244249
>riot is the same than overwatch

wew lad

>>385238847
>THESE KIKES ARE TAKING MY FREE SPEECH!
1. A person's Freedom of Speech is 100% not being violated by a simple denial of service.
2. Freedom of Speech isn't consequence-free speech -- these are two different things.
3. A person's Freedom of Speech cannot, does not, and never will override Freedom of Assembly and Freedom of Association. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few and people are free to make private assemblies which they may decide on who is able to participate.
4. Freedom of Speech frequently doesn't apply when using commercial communication, it only applies to public property and your private property. Furthermore, you opt-in to compromised rights when using these services.

>>385242871
>whitout a single warning
What are ToS?

>>385244406
No nigger I just want the screenshot because it makes me almost as angry as
1
2
3 4

>>385244208

You actually think blizzard has a review team that reviews every report lmfao you retarded autistic fuck

>>385239865
I'll never understand why people like you think a company shouldn't have the right to prevent access to their servers. It doesn't matter if you paid, you also agreed when downloading the game to behave in a certain way when you agreed to the ToS. In what reality is it not acceptable to hold someone to a previously made agreement?

>>385244581
They actually do, but they'll only manually review if a player hits a high threshold of reports.

>>385244249
>Got banned for trolling
>LOL GOT BANNED CUZ OFF META
lmao

>>385244581
No they clearly review accounts after a large volume of reports not everyone. Here's a question, can you possibly communicate with another human without insulting them to make yourself feel good?

It's no surprise that actual autists like you who behave like chimps are the ones who always have a problem with people being banned form games. Learn to act like an adult human being who doesn't have a developmental disorder.

>>385244769
The dude was like diamond rank and actually won a lot of games because of his off-meta escapades

They L I T E R A L L Y banned him for not playing the way they wanted him too

>>385244431
Not an actual contract

>>385233313
>>385233420
>>385233496
>>385231883
Fucking plebians

>>385244427
freeze peach is a idiotic meme anyway

>>385244427
Read the rest of my pol tier posts itt an hour ago. I understand companies have total control and legal privilege to restricts what is said over their networks, but summarizing what I said: cyberspace has grown so fast that legislation has not engulfed it to grant people in the US similar rights as they have in real life, despite cyberspace right now being nearly as significant, and certainly more significant at communication, as real life. Private entities are getting too much control over how we are allowed to behave i.e. Facebook Twitter YouTube could unilaterally destroy a single political opinion if they liked, but at least maybe that would speed up legislation.

>>385244581
judging by how often you insult i think its safe to say you are toxic as fuck and deserve the ban

>>385244957
I never said it was. I said it was an agreement and it is. You are accessing someone else's servers, why do you feel they are obligated to provide this service? Advertising? "Not a real contract bro" You can't just not hold yourself to agreements you make then get angry and claim a company has to hold a promise they made even though you broke your side of it.

You are seriously mentally damaged if you don't see what's wrong with that. I don't care if it's legally not a contract where you live, that means nothing to me.

>dumb fucks arguing over bm in chat and freedom of speech

It was a gameplay ban you fucking retards

>>385245205
nigga you really think he read the ToS?, no one read that shits anyways, there are a fuckton of people using facebook that hasn't read that they can do whatever the fuck they want with your info

>>385245080
Stop trying to relate those real issues to be being banned in a video game for calling someone a nigger and losing on purpose. If you actually cared about those issues you'd realize how damaging it is to your cause to try and tie it to somethign so juvenile.

>>385244957
They don't need a contract to revoke service actually. Freedom of Association and Assembly protects the rights of groups and corporations when they deny service, just like when a private group/gym/movie theatre/event/bar/restaurant/etc remove disruptive people, they're protected legally.

File: pepe-happy.jpg (21KB, 533x477px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 533x477px

>people actually pay for online games

its like you faggots purposefully want to get robbed

>>385245319
So? That's their own fault. He said "Without warning" There was a warning and he chose to ignore it. Realistically though he didn't need to read it if he's not a moron. Every online game reserves the right to ban you. Why would a company not reserve the right to restrict server access to a customer if they do things that could damage the companies profit?

>>385245205
>I never said it was. I said it was an agreement and it is.
Not an actual contract. It's about as much of an "agreement" as me writing on a napkin saying you owe me a million dollars.

>You are accessing someone else's servers, why do you feel they are obligated to provide this service?
Because they're charging for a product that literally does not function without this "service" by design.

You are seriously mentally damaged if you don't see what's wrong with breaking a product someone bought from you after they purchase it based on nebulous pretenses. I don't care about your agreement, that legally means nothing to me especially the flimsy, ambiguous parts of it.

>>385225498
>make a video game
>certain characters are so bad you have to ban people for playing them competitively
excellent game design blizz

>>385245663
>Because they're charging for a product that literally does not function without this "service" by design.
Which you knew buying it so how is there "no warning"?
> if you don't see what's wrong with breaking a product someone bought from you after they purchase it based on nebulous pretenses.

But they aren't nebulous, they are in writing and you can view them before purchase. If you choose to ignore them and say "I don't have to follow them" you're a moron.

>>385245432
>Freedom of Association and Assembly protects the rights of groups and corporations when they deny service,

Except when the person is gay, then they're obligated to provide service even if it goes against their religious beliefs

>>385245387
I don't throw and I try to calm autistic spergs who do to the best of my ability, the social political correctness upheaval is slowly degrading what a classic liberal would call free speech. Sure in this regard it does not pose itself as big an issue as it would for the bigger social network giants doing it, but it is a wrong and I am only here to defend against it. It's social engineering put simply and I find it reprehensible so I try to convince a major gaming community I'm part of that something wrong is happening. And it will keep happening until a stand.

>>385227829
Not him. But to receive a bunch of reports in your queue in a particular guy. Assuming there is no delay receiving it in the queue(likely impossible, probably takes roughly 500ms), no delay in opening the reports (might be consolidated by player, still incurs a delay due to processing power and latency), they would still need to read the reports. Assuming OP is not full of shit and he did get banned seconds after his match, then likely cases are
a) trigger happy GMs not reading/verifying reports
b) automated system
c) OP getting his report cases viewed at the time of the match and coincidently getting banned after his last match.

>>385245841
We can revoke access to the service required in order to use the product you bought at any time for playing the game wrong or for any reason we want is pretty nebulous. If you think it's concrete just because it's in writing you're a moron.

>>385245880
>And it will keep happening until a stand.
And I won't because I understand capitalism and that's what this. It's capitalism at work. You want to deny a buisness the right to restrict access to their servers on the grounds they choose (and present to the player before purchase) and I don't support that. Furthermore I don't care about the kind of speech they are targeting so I don't care in general because it's a video game and as you admit not a major social platform.

>>385245004
>freeze peach
you're an idiotic meme anyway

>>385245080
Honestly, I think you're shortsighted and this is where your argument falls apart:
As more online legislation falls into place, these things you're seeing now with the bannings, will continue to be upheld (and to an even greater degree) because these are all private services and so real-life law will apply the same to these online services in regards to Freedoms of Association/Assembly (think of being removed or asked to leave a business for being disruptive).
These companies have the power now to remove you by the nature of force, and soon they will be doing so with 100% of the US Constitution backing them.

The review you want actually won't favor your goals at all.

>>385246004
It's not nebulous in the sense that it's in writing and you are aware of what you are subjected to before buying the game. If you choose to buy the game you are aware of this and can blame no one if you get banned. You said it was "without warning" but are now admitting they do warn you that you could be banned at any time. So in other words you are warned what their policy is.

If you are saying it's nebulous because that policy is all encompassing in many ways, well maybe you're right. But that's not really what we started this discussion about, it was about whether or not they warned you that you could be banned and you admit they do.

>>385228540
They punish you for playing like a thrower/griefer and I couldn't be happier about it.

>>385246218
You're assuming it will be implemented in the same regard. But who knows? They will have to balance it but will certainly consider how much power these companies should be allowed to have on how people behave GIVEN that people basically have to use these services because they are so efficient. Almost no alternative to Facebook, why would there be? It works for everyone! I think you should reconsider how "optional" a lot of these services are, because when it's an obligation assembly can't stand in the way of open discourse.

>>385228797
Don't play comp you idiot. Go be a mei troll in arcade mode or something.

When the thread 404s pol poster is out unfortunately not that anyone even likes talking to him me

>>385245848
And the same applies if you're straight and gay people attempt to refuse you service. Denial of service or employment based on sexual grounds is discrimination, straight or gay, and shouldn't be allowed unless this denial of employment or service was based on the grounds that their preference would cast doubt on their ability to carry out a job or directly interfere with a business' ability to conduct business.

But I actually support businesses having more rights and being able to outright refuse service, clientele, and workers based on any means.

File: 1500688882674.png (445KB, 1280x711px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 1280x711px

>>385230374
kill yourself leaf

>>385223983
>tfw i haven't bought a game in over 4 years

Not one good game worth paying for has come out, all the games ive pirated have been complete shit too

That's okay, you're only banned from the official servers. Just go on a privat-
Oh wait.

>>385246094
>>385231170
Doesn't matter how minor just because you're willing to filter it, it doesn't mean it's a non-issue

>>385223983
>play team shooters
>want to play alone like deathmatch
Why dont you just play UT or something?
>muh tomboy diverse waifu shit
>>>/owg/

>>385246882
I am assuming, yes. I think I'm making a safe assumption however.
Regardless, I don't think this agressive banning will be a real problem after enough people get displaced. New games, opportunities, and services will continue to allow complete consequence-free speech. Things like 3rd party chat services becoming more prominent, developers making new games and advertising consequence-free speech as a feature, and "18+ servers" on existing games may potentially become a way for gamers to say whatever they want.

>>385246345
>It's not nebulous in the sense that it's in writing

Ok so you are a moron.

>>385224245
Every time.

How come SJWs turn into Randian ancaps whenever the subject of censoring people online comes up?

>>385248691
Except this time, if you weren't a dumbfuck and actually read the OP

>>385227952
To let you click on the "Learn more" link, so they get paid through it.

File: northkorea.png (22KB, 1203x411px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 1203x411px

Hey I didn't know Club Penguin v2 was out already.

>>385227517
>It'd be a massive coincidence
No it wouldn't be. The system could easily automatically tag you as a faggot and have somebody ban you manually after evaluating. There are lots of easy metrics to filter by, a real person would only require a cursory look to confirm you are indeed a faggot and to ban you.
>large numbers of reports
>no/few kills
>no/little damage
>no/little damage
>no objective participation
>running around in the spawn room not actually playing
>etc
Those could easily be checked automatically, a real person would only need a very quick look to review your behavior and confirm you're a faggot.

The system worked perfectly fine anyway, it's not like you got banned for no reason, they removed you in accordance to the rules you agreed to and then broke.

>>385249152

Or they just automate the number of reports.

You're making this way too complicated to try to do mental gymnastics to defend blizzard.

They ban automatically based on the number of reports. End of story.

>>385227476
I pay taxes, I should be able to shoot anyone and get away with it.

>>385225498
I've never seen any casual being banned for ruining it for the rest of the team by being garbage and uncooperative.