ITT: Underrated games

File: arkham shitty is easy.jpg (286KB, 1343x718px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1343x718px

>Throwing people through windows

So satisfying. It was actually nice to play a comic book game with a GOOD combat system. The Arkham games are complete shit compared to this tbqh

>>385207159
Combat is easily the worst part of Arkham. Knight was pretty bad all round though.

>>385206759
It's worth mentioning in a vidya cape thread, sure. Leaving the fighter aside, Wolverine is more combat focused than WoS and Arkham but its combat isn't as good as any of those games.

File: arkham shitty maps.jpg (360KB, 1410x828px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 1410x828px

>>385207329
I don't know where people get off saying the Arkham games have good combat either. I play them because I like button mashing, but they lack any sort of skill like Devil May Cry or player involvement like Xmen Origins Wolverine does.

File: arkham shitty challenge.jpg (477KB, 1680x1050px) Image search: [Google]

477KB, 1680x1050px

>>385207537
>but its combat isn't as good as any of those games.

Arkham games have awful combat systems.

>>385207673
I agree.

Anyone have that webm of the dynamic healing system in OP's game?

>>385207537
>WoS
>bad combat
you're smoking dick, niggaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

>>385207850
didn't say that

>>385206759

Luigis mansion dark moon

>>385206759
I rented this game from a blockbuster and what a fucking wild ride