[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

So is anyone here looking forward to Crackdown 3? Will it flop?

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 72
Thread images: 7

File: crackdown-3-terry-crews.jpg (177KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]
crackdown-3-terry-crews.jpg
177KB, 1200x800px
So is anyone here looking forward to Crackdown 3?
Will it flop?
>>
I refuse to play games featuring basketball americans as the main protagonist.
>>
sheeeeeeit
>>
File: 2875d25251b97d796adcf2f7440a0e1b.jpg (274KB, 1279x673px) Image search: [Google]
2875d25251b97d796adcf2f7440a0e1b.jpg
274KB, 1279x673px
>>384987306
terry crews is alright tho
>>
So, I was watching E3, and they showed this, and I have no idea what these games are, or why are they so popular (apparently)?

Is this just what it seems? A dudebro "EXPLOSIONS LMAO" sandbox? Or is there something more to it?
>>
File: game3.webm (3MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]
game3.webm
3MB, 640x480px
>>384987469
Multiplayer has complete destruction
>>
>>384987258

>30fps
>>
>>384987656
PC will be 60
>>
>>384987950
Xbox One X too
>>
>>384987950
>Win10 exclusive

You mean zero frames because I ain't touching that shit.
>>
>>384987258
No, because the main selling point is it has a meme celeb in it.
>>
>>384987258
>Will it flop?
Yes
>>
>>384987258
Is terry crews the main character? I thought the other crackdowns were pretty ok but if its he same shit again but with terry crews I might actually look forward to this.
>>
>>384988063
I will.
>>
>>384987258
>nigger
Already off my radar.

I'm sick of this forced propaganda in my games, fuck you.
>>
>>384987258
I hope it's good. It looks like Crackdown should look, for sure, I just worry they won't have a good flow for the city or enough interesting shit to mess with. It's mostly just a big playground, something 1 did very well, and something 2 faltered on a bit (though it did better with enemy variety).

It's a hard game type to straight up fuck up though. But I don't know if Crackdown has ever been THAT BIG of a series. More like a moderate success than anything I'd call triple A.
>>
>>384988718
That's okay, kid. 2007 was a long time ago, how would you know "Black Agent" has been the main character of Crackdown since part 1. I mean, you were like 2 then.
>>
>>384987258
>CD1 only sold well because of the H3 beta
>CD1.5 (aka CD2) sold worse and got a bad reception
>CD3 looks like CD1.5-2

it's gonna flop
>>
>>384987258
>So is anyone here looking forward to Crackdown 3?
Yes. I like the first two games a lot
>Will it flop?
Probably
>>
>>384987258
Honestly I don't care about the rest of the game as long as it's fun as the other 2 Crackdowns. Whatever gameplay I see of it looks like it's Crackdown still, so I'm relieved. It's still pretty weird to me that they decided to leave Pacific City, and then change the game from a retelling of 1 to a sequel of 2. I hope it ends up fine but I'm worried about the changes it had in production. Transforming vehicles better come back. It'll probably sell decently.
>>
>>384989343
Right on, fellow realistic fan.

Maybe we'll play together if we both get on after everyone else has stopped playing.
>>
>>384987258
I liked crackdown 2, won't be buying this though.
>>
>>384987258
Hell to the fucking yeah! You can actually play Terry Crews in this game.
>>
>>384987258
So far the game feels like it will take the "lol so funny" route like Saints Row before it
>>
Never played 1, played the fuck out of the multiplayer demo for 2 which made me get 2 with some friends and play the fuck out of it. Looks like an upgraded 2 i'd buy this.
>>
>>384991537
>"lol so funny"
the game series always had that type of theme to it. has more of a "dark" humor type of feel, not edgy shit though.
>>
>>384987258
the more footage of 3 I see, the less interested I am, not even tery crews can pull me in.
Agents of mayhem is looking more like the true evolution and sequel of crackdown than crackdown 3, sorta like how sr4 succeeded where crackdown 2 failed.
>>
>>384987464
why do they show this? it's painfully obvious by now the game is not going to look that good with the existing footage that's online.
I'm fine with cgi ads but this is obviously trying to say it's going to look this good on Xbox one x with that wire frame like the reveal trailer with the xox, his famous face means jack shit if the game won't look this good or it's going to look more Cartoony than this realistic take, his voice is the only thing that matters.
>>
>>384992032
Crackdown 3 is bogged by empty promises leading to needlessly longer development time while Agents of Mayhem looks like a Chinese knockoff of Crackdown and Saints Row.
>>
>>384987258
>Get mocked for having really shit graphics even for a cel-shaded game for a month
>Release a screenshot from a cutscene to distract from that
>Release new gameplay 24 hours later that manages to look worse than the E3 gameplay

What the hell are they doing
>>
>>384987971
>He doesn't know
>>
https://youtu.be/Ri_nXKaV0mo

You do have to wonder how Xbox is still around after their constant fuckups this gen.
>>
>>384987656
>>384988063
Reasons like these is why I see this game flopping.
Too many people hate on the Xbone and Win10 and wouldn't change anything just to play this game.
Deep in my heart I feel that it will be a better game than the original, and that it'll have much better content than Agents of M.A.Y.H.E.M.
>>
File: 1298116531524.jpg (584KB, 740x740px) Image search: [Google]
1298116531524.jpg
584KB, 740x740px
>>384993194
This is fucking awful. Fuck you for linking this.
>>
>>384993194
Fucking hell Phil, What the fuck are you doing. The game looks fun as I've seem better gameplay but this is just insulting. They better for fix this at gamescom. No shitty trailers, no getting faggots who can't play video games playing this shit. show off awesome gameplay from the SP and the destructive MP, please.
>>
>>384993685
*seen
>>
>>384993194
>>384993685
>>384993736
Why does it look like an early XBOX360 game?
>>
>>384993780
Right? Looks the same as CD1 or 2 with maybe slightly higher texture resolutions. Most the special effects disappear super fast too.
>>
>>384994040
I mean don't get me wrong I'm not shitting on crackdown those games are fun
But this looks so old what are they doing?
>>
>>384993780
>>384994040
either both of you are blind, or own a ps4
>>
>>384987464
>>384987258
The graphics here look really great and detailed but it's not representative at all of what the in-game graphics' overall style is at all >>384987640

That said, I'm looking forward to it. Fucking love me some Crackdown but it's worrying to see how it really just seems to be Crackdown 1 with little expansion of the game's concept. I hope there's at least a shitton of guns, gadgets and Agent vehicles to toy with.
>>
>>384994131
I'm not blind you know
The game looks like ass
>>384994161
Fucking microsoft man
I love some crackdown I missed it, but I just can't get excited for their shit any more
Quantum break was so broken its not even funny
What a company
>>
>>384987258
All the gameplay I've seen so far looks like hot garbage...like a slightly prettier Crackdown 2.
>>
>>384993780
>>384994040
It's not impressive but it really doesn't. Looks more like a remaster of 1 than 1 itself
>>
>bix nood protagonist
>in 2017
It's going to flop
>>
>>384993780
Needs to be 4K on Xbonex.
>>
>>384994364
You choose your agent, you don't play as crews
>>
File: 1259274897957.jpg (10KB, 216x238px) Image search: [Google]
1259274897957.jpg
10KB, 216x238px
>>384994457
You can play Terry Crews, Sassy Rihanna, a trans Asian, or a brown lady in a hijab
>>
>>384994457
I wonder what sort of involvement Crew will even have in the game. He won't be your handler since we're getting the same handler as in the first and second game. Apparently, he's not one of the player characters either.
>>
>>384993780
Get some glasses shithead, the game looks far better than the 360 version. Crackdown has always been cel-shaded you would know that if you played the first one.
>>
>>384993194
Jesus Christ, that lady...
it's like when I tried teaching my parents how to play and they couldn't wrap their minds around moving the camera and body movement at the same time.
>>
>>384994646
A cell shaded game on an 8th gen console should look better than a cell shaded game on a 7th gen console. Telltale managed to pull it off, a first party Microsoft dev should too
>>
>>384994457
>>384994553
http://www.ign.com/articles/2017/06/14/e3-2017-crackdown-3-terry-crews-role-clarified
He's playable
>>
File: xbox loves rscottyg.png (236KB, 872x564px) Image search: [Google]
xbox loves rscottyg.png
236KB, 872x564px
>>384994531
Such rich diversity!
>>
Was there any confirmation about inside environments like that Asian hideout from the first game? A shame that the sequel had nothing like that and instead gave as annoying zombie hordes and those godawful caves.
>>
>>384994729
Crackdown 3 is an open world game filled with destruction and the multiplayer will have full destruction. Be happy with what you get.
>>
>>384994731
>He definitely is a playable character, and he's a character in the narrative
Maybe there are some scripted parts where you play as him? They seem to be going out of their way to avoid saying that he's in the roster.
>>
>>384994731
In multiplayer most likely.
>>
>>384994832
I will be happy with what I get. I'm not even a graphics snob. But I'm not going to ignore the fact that the game only looks slightly better and somewhat sharper than the 360 titles.
>>
>>384994927
You should look at Crackdown 1 and 2 again and compare it to this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvSz9AcQH1A
There is clearly a graphics difference.
>>
>>384987640
>Complete destruction
>Only cars blow up, no damage to buildings or structures

Nigga you don't know what that word means. Cars blow up in almost every game with cars in it.


Complete destruction is something like Red Faction or Mercenaries. Where you can literally level buildings.
>>
>>384988784
The only reason the first one sold is because it included a copy of the halo 3 beta on the disc.
>>
>>384995343
That's not the multiplayer, but the whole game was advertised as using full destruction with THE CLOUD servers, then it got dumbed down to a different multiplayer versus mode
>>
>>384995343
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWANLy9TjRc
>only in multiplayer because POWER OF THE CLOOOOOUUUUDDDDD
Fucking dumb but it's there.
>>
>>384995424
Which begs the question, will 3 have a code for the halo 6 beta? I mean, Wolfenstein TNO came with a D44M beta code and that wasn't even redeemable until over a year later
>>
>>384995424
No doubt it helped, but nobody is buying Coca Cola for the aluminum.

>>384995486
This shit is cool and makes me want to buy an XbOne. Red Faction Guerrilla destruction is still god tier, and that game was released a very long time ago.

Unfortunately, they seem to not be showing off this destruction much. I don't even think it's in the game anymore, let alone multiplayer. Hopefully PC gets it, but then that would make the XbOne irrelevant.
>>
>>384996120
>Unfortunately, they seem to not be showing off this destruction much. I don't even think it's in the game anymore, let alone multiplayer. Hopefully PC gets it, but then that would make the XbOne irrelevant.
I know what you mean anon. Personally, I don't mind because I'm interested in the game for being Crackdown, fucking loved the first 2 games in the series. But for anyone whose sole interest in the game was the destruction shit would be wise to be cautious. They haven't showed more of this destruction for the past 2 years, there's not even any word on this multiplayer portion of the game anymore and may very well have been canned. The devs did 'confirm' that the destruction is still in at E3 but without any footage it's all a crock of shit.
>>
>>384993194
That is horrific. Every time I see new footage, it gets worse.
>>
File: IMG_2833.png (29KB, 613x556px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_2833.png
29KB, 613x556px
>>384993194
I agree with the guy that they need to present this game a lot better than they are, the SDCC footage was garbage

No surprise that people on /v/ read the clickbait title and first few seconds then post shit like >>384993445 without understanding what the video is about, all it does it make people who witness this stuff push all criticism to the side because they think it's just console war shitposting
>>
>>384994246
>Quantum break was so broken its not even funny
Was that on PC? The only broken game they've released on console this gen was MCC
>>
>>384987258
It launches in between CoD WW2 and Battlefront 2. I think it's safe to say it won't sell all that well, but I'm looking forward to it regardless.
>>
>>384987258
Whether it flops or not depends on the multiplayer "'cloud" thing.
Thread posts: 72
Thread images: 7


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.