The great debate.

The Panzer III is cuter.

>>384790304
Panzer III. That's an excellent gun and it has spaced armor.

>>384790304
The Panzer III saw more conflict and over a greater variety of landscapes and had to contend with Soviet KV series heavy tanks and the first T-34s. Thus the Panzer III is more distinguished. Add to this that the chassis served as the basis for many excellent vehicles. Including the first Stug.

>>384790304
panzer-chan is cute! CUTE!

I'll defend Crusader-chan's honor.

>>384790304
They're both 2 of my favourites but I've always fancied the crusader & it's diamond turret.

None of those can withstand glorious stalinium shells, so who cares.

>>384792251
I don't play Russian tanks, they are ugly.

File: 1469701967209.jpg (313KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 1024x683px

>>384792884
how is this ugly? come on

>>384793297
The whole upper part looks like it melted in the sun.

File: 492px-StuG_F_Garage.jpg (70KB, 492x300px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 492x300px

>>384790304
Stug III aka the most effective gun platform of WW2.

>>384793402
well, it is homogeneous armor
it was casted

>>384793570
Does that have any advantages over bent,cut and welded armor? I imagine it must weigh a ton

File: 449px-Jagdpanzer_38(t)_Garage.jpg (79KB, 449x300px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 449x300px

the most aesthetically pleasing tank of ww2

>>384790304
>rivets

>>384793848
No structural weaknesses.
Welded tears along the seams and rivets can pop and spall, shredding the occupants.

File: 1475948775907.jpg (227KB, 999x749px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 999x749px

>>384794519
>Welded tears along the seams

Only if welded by Russian.