Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
File: 1500662935706.png (123KB, 240x286px) Image search:
[Google]
123KB, 240x286px
>muh Skylake
>muh Gaymen
The 1600 on 4GHz literally performs within 10% of a 7700k now.
30 Games with a 1080Ti in July 2017, recent BIOS and game patches. Literally no excuses.
https://www.techspot.com/review/1450-core-i7-vs-ryzen-5-hexa-core/page9.html
Oh - and just ignore that 7800X :^)
>>
>>384710252
Iwata what have you become?
>>
File: 1465839691160.png (9KB, 308x330px) Image search:
[Google]
9KB, 308x330px
>>384710252
Okay but what if you do other things besides gaming, like 3D modeling/rendering? My 6 year old Intel CPU beats the shit out of my 3 year old AMD when I do shit in zbrush even though my AMD averages 37% faster in vidya gaems benchmarks.
>>
how well do the ryzens run emulators?
>>
>>384712637
i played the ratchet and clank trilogy and jak and daxter on my 1600, it performed well
>>
>>384712637
I like the new ryzen but this is where it sucks. There's still a noticeable performance gap between amd and ryzen but you're still getting a good experience with ryzens but you will get a better one if you use intels with emus.
>>
>tfw just bought r5 1600 and gtx 1080
this won't bottle neck, right?
>>
>>384711484
>3 year old AMD
Well that's likely Bulldozer. Zen is a completely different story, especially on FPU heavy tasks.
>>
File: dance spurdo.gif (65KB, 69x120px) Image search:
[Google]
65KB, 69x120px
I just built a new computer with a 7700k last week.
Feels good to not be a filthy AMD pleb.
>>
File: 1500515097038.jpg (510KB, 1315x794px) Image search:
[Google]
510KB, 1315x794px
>>384714330
>>
I'm just an AMD fan, I just really hate Intel.
>>
>>384710252
> literally performs within 10% of a 7700k now.
So does a i5 4690K at 4.6Ghz FROM 2014
>>
>>384715236
>tfw I'll probably never need to upgrade my 4690k as I'll either quit playing vidya or off myself before it becomes obsolete
>>
>>384715236
Actually at this clock speed it outperforms the 7770k at stock clocks.
>>
>>384710252
Hitting 4Ghz on a 1600 is inconsistent though. Some have different setting over others, Some can only hit 3.8Ghz.
>>
>>384716331
You can hit 4GHz on most 1600s given adequate cooling, but results with the stock one usually vary between 3.6 and 3.9 as you can't do more than about 1.35v on that.
>>
>>384710252
Is this the woman that muttered "got it done" thinking her mic was off right after she went off-stage?
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5