Is the PC version still fucked up?
not really. it still drops frames from like 60 to 30 depending on your system, but at least it works now.
>>384619874
can confirm
>>384619678
no. but it still sucks as a game on any platform
>>384619678
No. It's a great port. Even better than others games without any criticism about their optimisation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rGNfveTD4Q
I get locked 60 all maxed and it's fucking beautiful.
But it's the worst fucking game I ever played.
>>384620039
>buttblasted Nintentoddler
NEVER EVER
>>384620095
I envy you if this is the worst game you've ever played
>>384620048
Yeah. AK is now better than most of console ports on PC.
>>384619678
the port is perfect now
too bad the batmobile which is 80% of the game is garbage shit
bought it on sale couple weeks ago, played all week
honestly I was expecting garbage after all the drama and it was pretty good, on par with city I would say. Lots of shit to do, some fights are actually challenging. I think it all stands on whether you hate the batmobile gameplay or not, I thought it was decent and added a third system on top of the stealth and the fighting
>>384620193
low effort, apply yourself
>>384620398
Only for Nvidia cards. Arkham Knight is doomed forever on AMD systems.
It will never work smooth and perfect as it does on any mid/high end Nvidia card.
>>384620754
it runs great on AMD though
>those fights where there's every type of thug
>suddenly forget how to fight each type of thug
fug
>>384620754
I have an AMD GPU and CPU and I can run it perfectly
Its okay.
Even with a great rig youll get frame drops in the batmobile. Aside from that I got 60 mostly everywhere except for some areas but I did turn down the paper physx
i5-7600k oc'd/gtx980
>>384619678
It's all gucci, shame is the game doesn't get truly fun until ng+
>>384619678
Who cares, get bent you fucking manchild, playing with comicbooks at your age, no wonder we live in this miserable existence.
I had a fucking crash every time I died that made me rage more than the gameplay ever did
>>384620095
How many games have you played total?
>>384622308
Stopped counting at 300, that was a long time ago.
>>384621373
Get bent you fucking manchild, playing with retards on the internet at your age, no wonder we live in this miserable existence.
>>384622441
>Arkham Knight is the worst game you've ever played
>Actually counting how many games you've played
You must be autistic or trolling.
>>384621373
Why are you here?
It runs pretty well now, although it depends on your setup. Back when I played it with a GTX 970/4790k near the end of them still patching it, I was able to get 60 FPS/1080p with almost everything maxed out (Had most of the Nvidia Gameworks stuff off). Only time it ever dipped was some of the tank battles near the end where they throw a shitload at you (Worst was a boss battle that dipped to sub 30 FPS on average).
When I was playing a lot of the side stuff later on with my 980 Ti, it ran nearly flawlessly at 1440p and above with everything maxed outside gameworks stuff. You get small dips every now and then, but nothing too terrible.
I say pick it up, they fixed all the major issues and it actually runs better then a lot of PC ports that should run better.
>>384619678
No but it's still a Bamtrash game so why even bother?
>>384619678
worst batmania ever
>>384619678
I played it recently and had 0 issues. it ran flawlessly
>>384621031
jump over them & throw pocket sand.
>>384622535
>ask someone how many games theyve played
>act like they are autistic for giving an answer
>>384621031
Eh, when all else fails, get a special attack charged and use disarm/weapon break. Solves most problems.
Only real issue are the brutes with special weapons, but typically it's a combo of cloakstun after electric-shock, or cloakstun into jump strike.
It runs great now.
Arkham Origins has more problems than Knight
>>384621032
>AMD CPU
>>384619678
Playing it at 90 fps on a 980ti I'll get fps drops when im driving through a shit load stuff in the batmobile