Switch games dumped as rom files

Not like there's anything to play anyway.

>>384537617
Jesus
At least let them have some games. At this rate it is going to be the Wii U2.

>>384537617
Change that tile to Switch Game... can't be plural if there aren't multiple games.

>>384537617
Really worth using an expensive proprietary card format.

>>384537617
who gives a fuck? let me know when I can get free games, nerd.

>>384537617
Delete this fucking thread right the fuck now.

>>384537823
You need game dumps before you can have free games
This is a step along the path

>>384537725
Wii was emulated like half-way into it's lifecycle and did fine.
Wiiu was emulated post-switch announcement, it sold like shit because it was shit.

>>384537725
nintendo needs to stop making hardware.

>killing nintendo is progress

edgy

>Able to pirate Switch Games
>Switch Sales Increase because free 10/10 games
>Nintendo wins again

>>384538000
They're the only ones making different/interesting hardware, so no they shouldn't.

>>384538210

>look everyone, i'm defending a giant corporation

>>384538210
I own a Switch and support them. Hacking my 3DS breathed new life into it.

>>384537617
I hope they get locked up.

>>384538273
worked for the dreamcast

>>384538292
There's nothing different about a tablet, they've been making them for years

>>384537725
>can't even make enough switches for people to buy

Nah man, everyone deserves to play Splatoon 2 on launch day.

>>384538273
It's a win win.

>>384538273
>no chips to make new switches
>switch sales increase

Yeah, no.

>>384537617
now, if they can fix nintendo's shitty voice chat, the switch would be worth buying

>>384537994
psp was hacked in it's first year
vita took 4 years

really makes you think

Nice. We all need to do our part to make sure nintendo gets no support and no money. We all need to force nintendo to go third party.

>>384538731
this but unironically

>>384538635
Piracy has no affect on the success of a hardware platform, but I wouldn't say the same about software support. PSP had terrible 3rd party support, as did the Wii, DC, etc. 3DS is kind of a mixed bag.

A system hacked early is a death sentence if you want 3rd party I think, but perhaps Nintendo systems don't get good 3rd party to begin with

>>384538731
>We all need to force nintendo to go third party.


Yes Sony, we know you're starving for games.

This is great. I'm already ready to do the "YOU HAVE LITERALLY NO EXCUSE" threads once Switch piracy becomes available

>>384538827
psp is like the best portable ever

I don't want shitty western games anyway

>>384538731
This but without a sense of irony

I'm curious, who's hacking their Switch as soon as they can?

>>384538731
This except being sincere.

>>384538827
True. Look at the Vita -- it took nearly five years to finally have limited piracy available on it and it has almost 100% of its games be 3rd party titles. That's roughly 1300 titles if I'm being generous with Sony's 1st party games on the system.
Early piracy capabilities is a death sentence for any form of 3rd party.

Nintendo needs to realize that they're specialty is standalone handhelds. 3DS, DS, Gameboy have all been some of their best sellers. They need to make a successor to the Gameboy that isn't the 3DS.

>>384538928
>who's hacking their Switch as soon as they can?
not me

I'm waiting for the good version of switch to come out

>>384538928
Me.
Though that is mainly due to having literally no games on it other than Bomberman.

Why is piracy so rampant and early on Nintendo systems? Why don't we get Sony and Xbox hacks really early on?

>>384539157
Pokemon is a big driving factor for sure. People can not stand to play that legit.

>>384539132
>Though that is mainly due to having literally no games on it other than Bomberman.

Then just buy more games?

>>384539029
>Standalone hand helds
Fuck you. The concept of plugging it into my TV or swapping to on the go casually is great.

>>384538415
Said tablet is also a controller and can dock to be played as a console. You don't have to like it, I personally don't.

>>384539214
The only games that interested me which weren't already available on better consoles/for free haven't been released yet.

>>384537617
Is this the Sonic guy?

>>384539157

Many reasons:

>Sony and Microsoft invest heavily in security, mostly to protect their online services
>Nintendo's first-party titles are very popular
>Nintendo's hardware is weaker than most and based on hardware hackers have experience with from previous gens/other sources

Sony and Microsoft consoles get hacked too, but not nearly as often/to the extent as Nintendo's machines.

>>384537617
Free games is still not enough to make me buy a switch

>>384538731
How the fuck will we get free games from them then?

Someone redpill me on hacking my Wii U.

I still play Smash on the regular online with friends, but I wanna just shove an everything SD card with all of the emulators on it like I did with my Wii. Is that possible?

>>384539527
All know exploits were patched last night.

>>384539132
How is that a logical reason for hacking

You all know hacking will increase Switch sales just for the portability it offers right?

Are there any decent versions of the switch coming to the US anytime soon? I just checked today and my local gamestop has the red and blue version, and I'm considering getting it so I can play splatoon 2 when it launches

>>384539292
It's essentially a handheld with TV out
I think the detachable joycons are too gimmicky to actually work. Using the 6" screen as a makeshift TV is too small in practicality, especially with 2 people in front of it

It might be more powerful than most tablets at least GPU-wise, but that's because tablet gaming hasn't been something that has required beefy GPUs, and the same reason Switch has no games: only Nintendo is really taking advantage of it

To me, it seems like if people really wanted "console" experiences on the go, this is something that would have happened already. The only reason it's selling well right now is because it's Nintendo and they have a handful of 10-20 million fans (Wii U would suggest at least 13 million) that will buy anything with the Nintendo brand on it. Reaching Wii levels of success (or even 3DS levels of success) would require a degree of mass appeal which I do not think it has, currently. The only reason you'd want one is if you're a Nintendo fan or want to play Nintendo games, because you sure as hell can't do anything else with it.

>>384539612
AWWW FUCK
I KNEW I SHOULDN'T HAVE PLAYED THAT LAST GAME

>>384537617
How the fuck does this keep happening? Is it easy to hack or does the majority of hacking autism just go to Nintendo property? Where is the progress for Xbone and PS4?

>>384538552
For fuck sake this. I have hacked almost all my consoles but in the case of the Switch, this is not even the priority ahah Just hack that shit to create a decent OS.

>>384539407
>The only games that interested me which weren't already available on better consoles


If it's also on the Switch I would just call it the better version because they're also portable. I'm assuming you're talking about tittles like Shovel Kinight, Disgea 5, and Puyo Puyo Tertris.

You can download PS4 games too, doesn't mean there's a way to play them
Fuck off PC shitters

>>384539706
>Where is the progress for Xbone and PS4?

Xbone exclusives are already on PC/Win 10, Literally no one cares about Sony IPs. So never anon, never.

>>384538273
>devs lose
>again

>>384539706
>does the majority of hacking autism just go to Nintendo property
This. Probably also a bit of your first assumption too, but it's more that a lot of very well known hackers are into Nintendo this time (they weren't fond of the Wii U)

>>384539612
>>384539680

it was literally just the browser exploit that got patched. someone just needs to find a new webkit vulnerability and 5.5.2 will be as hackable as 5.5.1

>>384539850
>Literally no one cares about Sony IPs
Then why do PC gamers petition for them?

They couldn't wait 3-5 years?

>>384539982
You mean Bloodborne? that's only on /v/ bruh, the game is not even relevant anymore outside of memes.

File: 1497362131833m.jpg (60KB, 820x1024px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 820x1024px

What would switch game look like as MOM files???

>>384539626
>I'm not interested in anything that requires an internet connection so I plan on hacking my Switch asap since the punishment of failing isn't significant

>>384539762
I got Shovel Knight and Puyo Puyo Tetris on the Vita already and both play perfectly. D5 is the only one that isn't portable, but why would I pay more for a game that runs worse? They even reduced the price of D5 on the PSN to $40 so there isn't any reason to get the Switch version unless you just don't have a PS4.

>>384540046
It was never relevant
Only /v/ gives a shit about Bloodborne

>>384540001
You mean when the Switch will be irrelevant, because drones will be waiting for the New Nintendo Switch XL ?

>>384540001
poor people want their free games, and they want it now.

>>384540128
>I got Shovel Knight and Puyo Puyo Tetris on the Vita already and both play perfectly.


Can't play local co-op/multiplayer.

> but why would I pay more for a game that runs worse?

D5 runs exactly the same as the PS4 version, stop shitposting.

>>384539928
I literally bought every Wii U game worth a damn, all I want is emulators

>>384540128
>runs worse

What do you mean? From everything I've seen it runs the exact same on PS4 and Switch

if switch goes hacked I'd buy one

File: If you can't innovate, imitate.jpg (403KB, 1230x1882px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 1230x1882px

>>384539292

>>384540128
>I got Shovel Knight and Puyo Puyo Tetris on the Vita already and both play perfectly

Yeah too bad about the screen though

>>384540118
Unf.

Who is this?

File: 1494452399613.jpg (115KB, 500x667px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 500x667px

>>384540403
A woman

>>384539679
>To me, it seems like if people really wanted "console" experiences on the go, this is something that would have happened already.
PS Vita had a problem with this.
People don't want console games on their handheld, or vice versa. Good handheld games are designed around shorter play sessions.

>>384540560
No, people just don't want to develop console games on a handheld

>>384540697
lol no. People will develop anything that sells. Console games on handheld do not sell.

>>384540368

They copied the Wii U stick placement in that image. It was clearly modeled after the Wii U gamepad as a proof-of-concept.

>>384540491
I said who, not what.

"A woman" is not specific enough.

>>384540804
>Console games on handheld do not sell.

seeing as you can play said console games docked it really isn't a problem for the Switch, also most people see it as a boon and not a negative.

>>384540852
>b-but

I am the only one who is gonna still buying games after hack his Switch?

>>384540259
>>Can't play local co-op/multiplayer.
Maybe on Shovel Knight but I already did everything I could do in the game to the point of acquiring its plat and have since dropped it. I actually had to google up on its multiplayer since I didn't even know it was a thing. As for Puyo Puyo, I played that shit constantly when it was initially released so it isn't like I had trouble with multiplayer. I bet 99% of the Switch owners out there don't even make use of these local co-op things either.
But despite that, why would I want to buy these games again for something so minor then?

>>384540402
The Vita's screen is great unless you got the 2k. If you're one of those who hate handhelds in general, the Vita TV was like $30 back then and could play them perfectly on your TV anyway.

>>384540804
This.
Handheld games and console games are different creatures. People who love handheld games don't want a "home console experience" even if the only time they use their handheld is under the covers in bed.
Take Tokyo Xanadu for example - it was made specifically for the Vita and it shows in its mechanics. Reviewers have even been stating to pick up the Vita version over the expanded PS4 version due to how it plays.

>>384540893
All women are the same what's the difference?

File: 164.jpg (330KB, 1573x1600px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 1573x1600px

>>384540852

>>384537823
You're supposed to buy the console and keep it in the box/off wifi until the piracy firmware is found.

>>384540984
Nah the Vita screen is too smol

>>384540984
>Maybe on Shovel Knight but I already did everything I could do in the game to the point of acquiring its plat and have since dropped it. I actually had to google up on its multiplayer since I didn't even know it was a thing. As for Puyo Puyo, I played that shit constantly when it was initially released so it isn't like I had trouble with multiplayer. I bet 99% of the Switch owners out there don't even make use of these local co-op things either.
>But despite that, why would I want to buy these games again for something so minor then?


It really does sound like you're trying to minimize the console by assumption or wishful thinking, it's a bit weird m8. I use the local MP a lot personally, and its the first time for me owning those games. And even if I did own those games I'd prefer a portable version. I do not have a Vita though.

>>384539157
Two things
>Sony and Microsoft tend to put a lot more effort in their security systems, and it helps that they have experience with other things like phones and computers, so they have experience
>Most people who buy a Playstation or an Xbox are just playing it for games like FIFA or 2K, Nintendo tends to attract more avid gamers, which in turn brings more hackers

>>384540984
>Handheld games and console games are different creatures. People who love handheld games don't want a "home console experience" even if the only time they use their handheld is under the covers in bed.
>Take Tokyo Xanadu for example - it was made specifically for the Vita and it shows in its mechanics. Reviewers have even been stating to pick up the Vita version over the expanded PS4 version due to how it plays.


I'm guessing you don't own Zelda on the Switch, because it perfectly works both docked and undocked.

>>384538731
honestly I hope it happens

>>384539157
sony and microsoft have account systems, so they can just ban accounts

>>384540268
>not selling off all your WiiU games when the device became piracy enabled

What are you doing anon?

>>384541230
>Nintendo tends to attract more avid gamers,
Then why are nintendo consoles lacking in so many 3rd party games, such as Persona 5, Bloodborne, or Nioh, exclusive to the PS brand?

>>384541614
>sony and microsoft have account systems


So does Nintendo, starting with the Switch.

>>384539157
Because nintendo makes good games

>>384538731
Would this mean that Xbox dies too since sony would get all Nintendo games and also would we see a Vita 2 for Handheld games?

>>384541648
Because most Nintendo players are idorts. But most Sony players are chads and loyalists.

>>384539635
you can change the color afterwards

File: 1490927997214.gif (2MB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 600x450px

>tfw emulating Mario Odyssey day 1

>>384541903
So those avid gamers don't play good games, but chads and loyalists do?

>Buy Switch with BotW and Disgaea 5
>Had finished BotW on Wii U so mostly play D5
>Get paid, buy PuyoPuyo, Isaac (that i already 100% in Steam) and Botw DLC
>Beat the main Story in D5 and get to play some Botw
>Having so much fun just like the first time i played it
>Buy Mkart 8 Deluxe because it's a great multiplayer game
>Don't have anyone to play it
>Keep playing D5 and Dailies in Isaac (but fuck me shit keeps crashing and i can't upload my scores)
>Already ordered Splatoon 2

I swear im gonna become poor with this shit. Heck im even thinking of buying MHXX even though i don't know jack shit of Japanese.
But a friend of mine already bought his Switch yesterday just to play Monhan with me so im pretty fucking happy

>>384541805
No because Nintendo will never go 3rd party, the day they stop making hardware is also the day all of their ips die.

>>384537617
I hope these fags get the ass fucking they deserve in prison.

>>384541054
>You're supposed to buy the console
you lost me

>>384542083
Their IPs won't die, they will go public domain. So instead of Sony making mario and zelda after paying for it, they get it for free.

File: 1498352058538.png (330KB, 841x720px) Image search: [Google]

330KB, 841x720px

>>384542132
u mad bro

>>384542248
>Their IPs won't die, they will go public domain.

You are literally retarded.

>>384538731
>nintendo to go third party
A genuine never ever. The fact that /v/ still thinks can or will happen shows how delusional you faggost are.

File: 1418859620889.gif (1MB, 264x240px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 264x240px

>>384537617
>gets hacked
>tons of emulators
>good apps
>free games

who /hype/

File: DCNz4tsVoAAAqhA.png (307KB, 679x726px) Image search: [Google]

307KB, 679x726px

>>384542042
who cares about that shit, xenoblade 2 bby

>>384539439
>all this bullshit
The knly reason they dont is cause there is no glory to get from it, ps4 and xbone are literal pcs.
Many groups attemting to hack/ emulate s and m hardware in the past have stated they drop it cause there is not an scene interested enough on those consoles compared to how much people is desperate to pirate Nintendo gsmes

>>384542357
>Blockbuster is too big to fail

>>384542317
SEETHING

>>384542243
You lost yourself

>>384542431
>>Blockbuster is too big to fail
I genuinely don't understand if you're attempting to make an argument or not.

>>384542493
I AM seething, I don't like it when brain damaged shitposters post on /v/.

>>384542512
Oh no. You're retarded.

>>384541403
>>384541194
wew lads

>>384542614
You're comparing apples to oranges, I think you're the retard here.

File: 1499846456914.png (191KB, 273x391px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 273x391px

>>384542431
Your comparing two completely different things.
You faggots remind me of people who said Nintendo was finished when SEGA and or Sony entered the market and bought a PS1 because they thought Nintendo would go 3rd party. It will never happen.

>>384542248
This is not how it works inbreed retard

Okay, and? PSP was emulated very early in its life cycle and manage to do just fine, same with the Wii. People are still going to pay for it. Nothing of value was really taken away. Also have fun waiting years just for games to even be playable, and that's without taking care of glitches caused by the emulation.

>>384542651
I know right? Why do Vita posters still exist anywhere?

File: b05.png (560KB, 600x778px) Image search: [Google]

560KB, 600x778px

>Nintendo DS line went to shit because every kid had one of those sd card chips
>Constant shovelware was pushed out because people who where dumb enough to buy gmes bought shovelware
>Let's do the same forthe switch
Ahahaha, no game for the switch ever, only wah ping waahoo for you young man.

Yo faggots are the reason why switch has not web browser nor cloud saving

>>384542717
>hack switch
>people get hyped and start buying because of muh free games
>nintendo makes a fortune
>devs don't
>devs get sick of nintendos invompetence finally making nintendo product 100% third party less
>mario 21341234 and zelda 1234145134 are now nintendos future

>>384542748
damage control, don't even deny it.

>>384538827
Nigga piracy is one of the reasons PSP got dicked hard by DS. Pirating on a PSP was so easy and it needed almost no extra hardware besides stuff you could find on a random best buy. It scared off devs.

>>384542676
>>384542690
Exactly the same and valid comparison.

>>384542927
>damage control, don't even deny it.

Oh I'm not denying the Vita damage control, that has been going on since it died.

All games installed in switch should come with a suicide function. Same way the games auto update once they detect internet, All games should have an auto eras function, so in case someone finds an exploit, Nintendo can black list the server and once the switch logs into the internet sens a.m signal to the game to unistal itself

>>384543009
please finish high-school anon, I promise it is worth it.

>>384542898
>no web browser

and the problem?

>faggots don't know how to do local co-op on a hacked Vita
You guys are fucking retarded.

>>384538827
You are likely to young to remember PSP

>>384537725
The DS had arguably the best handheld library of all time and was insanely easy to pirate on. Every platform you listed had issues that drove away 3rd parties which had nothing to do with piracy.
>>384539017
The Vita was the cheapest platform for third parties to develop for and Sony basically had no support for the system outside of Japan. Almost all of its third party games are japanese games and out of those games a large chunk of them are low budget kusoge shit.

>>384542927
>devs get sick of nintendos invompetence finally making nintendo product 100% third party less
But that never happened to the PSP, DS, or the 3DS.
Fuck, their's more people pirating games for the PC and no dev has ever stopped making games for that. Also, who cares if third part devs stop making games for the Switch? I own a fucking PC!

>>384543083
So you won't debate the point anymore and want to just start covering your ears, fine.

>>384542042
Will take some years to even come to something close to a decent emulator.

But will be years of the Cemu guy being annoyed to "just put support to the switch on the emulator" by retards that can't understand how hardware or software work.

>>384542052
>I don't know what an idort is, but instead of googling words I don't know I will just ignore them and make myself look stupid when my reply is nonsensical.

It's funny because the Wii U had no piracy for almost 4 years and by the time loadiine became viable it was getting like one game every six months.
Meanwhile the Wii had piracy less than a year in and still sold like gangbusters.

>>384543012
it was obvious that you would turn it around.
nobody cares for the vita enough to go full on damage control, anon literally told you that he played d5 and shovel knight already and really has no reasons to play them again.

>>384543178
>by retards that can't understand how hardware or software work
FUCK YOU! If the dolphin devs can do it, so can the lazy fucks who make Cemu.

>>384543131
>and Sony basically had no support for the system outside of Japan
Sony regularly assisted indie devs in the process of porting Vita titles. In fact, nearly all but the biggest developers had help from Sony.

File: NEVEREVER.png (650KB, 1272x1626px) Image search: [Google]

650KB, 1272x1626px

>>384543009
Never ever anon.

>>384543092
Not really a problem but its a feature that otherwise will be good to have yet has to be removed cause it enables easily web exploits

>>384543183
If they were idorts, wouldn't they own a sony system? But then how are they loyalists at the same time?

>>384543296
>it was obvious that you would turn it around.
Someone had to, God knows Sony couldn't.

>>384543343
>owning a sony system
For what?? Unless you are into sony IPs a PC is a better investment

>>384543343
Oh no, he's illiterate. Where in his post did he say the Sony loyalists were idorts?

>>384537725
Reminder the GBA was emulated before it was even released

>>384539157
I can say that Nintendo doesn't know shit about cybersecurity. Not saying Sony and Microsoft are perfect either but there are some pretty bad loopholes in Nintendo's systems/software. A good example of this is FreeShop.

File: RadioShack_Under_Tandy_Wide.jpg (189KB, 1405x1125px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1405x1125px

>>384543334
They've been going so long, they are too big to fail!

>>384538000
Trips of truth. Nintendo Steam bundle when?

>>384543504
Unless you imply that digital sales will kill nintendo, your comparison is retarded

>>384540560
>People don't want console games on their handheld
I do

that's why I bought a vita

>>384543326
Like I said, the Vita was the cheapest console to develop for at the time. Sony helping indie devs port all their games to the Vita had more to do with company politics at the time (see: adam boyes) than anything to do with piracy or lack therof. Also most of these indie devs were porting games they originally made for PC, a platform that is infested with piracy.

>>384543504
anon, comparing Radioshack and Blockbuster to Nintendo is fallacy all on its own.

>>384543552
>>384538000
>not sublte sony fans cry out for games

File: sawako.gif (644KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

644KB, 500x281px

>>384543373
it outsold the switch in japan.

>>384543407
Then why are personal computers lacking in so many 3rd party games, such as Persona 5, Bloodborne, or Nioh, exclusive to the PS brand?

>>384543409
You can't be idort without a sony system. But then how are sony system owners loyalists?

File: 8cffaa945ae121573b2e48e0dff24cfc042fe3f9cc7fc1f66677d889be6bfaa6.gif (2MB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 800x600px

>>384542410
honestly this most games are multi-plates for these platforms, where as nintendo games are only for nintendos hardware which makes cracking them that much more valuable

>>384542898
Funny since the Switch can still display webpages if you trick it while linking your social media accounts. But I'm sure piracy is the reason why the switch doesn't have built in voice chat either, and why it doesn't have proper Youtube/Netflix apps (despite it having niconico on the JPN eshop)

>>384543407
90% of Vita titles aren't on PC.

>make a quick shitpost
>come back
>nintendo fans are losing their minds
Just imagine when Switch piracy and emulation comes to fruition. I can't wait.

>>384542927
>>devs get sick of nintendos invompetence

buddy you're like 20 years too late for this shit.

>>384543561
It's not retarded at all. Nintendo is obsolete. Or at least part of them is, the part that makes hardware. I don't see the demand for Nintendo games going anywhere, but eventually people will just refuse to buy redundant devices just for the privilege of playing Nintendo games, and Nintendo will concede and go 3rd party. Maybe this is 50 years from now, but it's written on the wall. It has been for a long time

>>384543823
Neither can I.
I'm definitely going to help spread it around as much as possible too, if only because I want to see how drones react to a smidge of piracy.

>>384543337
why is it good to have? from my experience console browsers are an absolute nightmare. especially ps3. it's like pulling teeth. I would think from their perspective it makes sense locking everything down, so you don't have access to copyrighted moviess, etc. and instead watch them on their channels. also, concerned parents don't have to worry about timmy watching porn.

>>384543881
>Nintendo is obsolete. Or at least part of them is, the part that makes hardware

You wrote this unironically while the Switch is a huge hit for Nintendo. You're fighting an uphill battle there bud.

>>384543310
I know you in particular is baiting, but by october, a fuckton of people will be screaming just that.

>>384543824
lego city undercover, haha buddy jokes on you. :^)

>>384543504
I miss radio shack. I always used to go to the electronic parts section to see what was in the shelves. Fun.

Then again, been ages since I last did that so I guess there is a reason the shack went under.

>>384543661
>Then why are personal computers lacking in so many 3rd party games
PC has by far the most "3rd party" games. The phrasing is also retarded considering there is no such thing as PC first party.

>>384543661
>You can't be idort without a sony system. But then how are sony system owners loyalists?

Look man, I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt by assuming you just didn't know what an idort what. I wanted to believe there wasn't anyone this fucking horrible at comprehension. Please quote, exactly, where it said all Sony owners were idorts like you think he said.

>>384543661
If you want those games sure get a ps, but if not why bother?? Same with switch, if you want whatver they offer buy it, if not then not

Its not a hard concep anon

File: v waiting for nintendo to go 3rd party.jpg (32KB, 298x403px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 298x403px

>>384543881
>any day now!

>>384543772

Oh boo hoo, you can't play anime indie game with zero replayability #493004.

>>384543748
Youtube and Netflix don't write the apps for their content. They provide hardware makers a basic toolkit to make the app and say good luck. It's Nintendo's responsibility to make the app, and as their eshop and entire OS is about the most barebones conceivable, it isn't any wonder they haven't put the time into making streaming apps yet

And the voice chat is simple. Switch just isn't powerful enough to handle it. Not enough CPU/RAM. CPU is laughably under powered with 4 1GHz ARM cores, and 4GB of ram for the whole system likewise doesn't leave much for a game and OS to be running concurrently with voice encoding/decoding

>>384544032
oh no, what will we ever do without lego and other literal childrens games on a nintendo console

fucking hell boys don't pirate or else I won't get to play Just Dance 5 on my Nintendo switch >:(

File: America.png (291KB, 614x1020px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 614x1020px

>>384538000
>nintendo needs to stop making hardware.
this guy gets it

>>384540118
I want to kick her teeth in

>introduce dlc cancer to zelda
>able to """fight""" back by getting the full game for free
Will buy one used if it gets hacked. Fuck nintendo, they were supposed to counter the DLC cancer, not embrace it.

>>384543772
90% of vita titles are shit anon

>>384538000
>>384544198
They kinda already did it.
The switch is pretty much designed by nvidia.

>>384543976
>Switch is a huge hit for Nintendo
This has yet to be demonstrated. It's sold out because it's in criminally short supply. It hasn't even reached the Wii U's half way point yet. Obviously Nintendo has millions of fans globally. But if you really think 100 million Nintendo fans bought a Wii, you're a total fucking idiot. For starters, more women bought Wiis than men, because Wii had broad appeal that hit demographics of people who had never owned a Nintendo product, or ANY video game device, in their fucking life.

The demographics alone show that Switch is another Wii U at least in regard to gender. Over 90% of owners are male.

>>384544195
You sound like those PC Master Race retards on Reddit who call anything not available on their platform shit.

>>384538329

...and?

So can we see the file structure of, say, ARMS?

>>384543748
They only added that "web browser" cause of the linking and the need to accetp ToS from publins internet, had it not thye will just kill it totally
And Vc is an over rated meme, no one other that loosers without friends uses the built in ones, most people use discord or skype

>>384544121
Did you get a nigger education?

>nintendo are avid gamers
>then why are sony systems the ones with the games
>n-no nintendo fans are idorts, sony are loyalists
>but then that means nintendo fans need sony systems to play those games, therefore how are people who buy sony systems loyalists?
>SHUT UP

>>384544198
>When you finance communism

Stopped reading there.

>>384543881
>Nintendo is obsolete
>makes game of the generation
AHAHA

>>384537725
>Wii U2
The Nintendo Bono

>>384544461
>reading comprehension

>>384544171
>Youtube and Netflix don't write the apps for their content.
I'm not buying this considering pretty much every modern console, smartphone and smart TV has youtube and netflix apps. Apple didn't write the modern Youtube and Netflix apps for iOS, and the apps used on the PS4 are identical to the ones you find on non-sony smart tvs.

>And the voice chat is simple. Switch just isn't powerful enough to handle it. Not enough CPU/RAM

If a fucking 360 with 512mb of RAM can handle both party chat and in-game chat encoding, Nintendo has no excuse.

>>384544254
>Fuck nintendo, they were supposed to counter the DLC cancer, not embrace it.
Why shouldn't they? Even if they were the perfect company you faggots would still nit pick to justify your hatred of them.

>>384538000
honestly if they just sold software they would do so much better, and then there devs wouldnt get stuck programing for toasters.

a part of me likes nintendo for trying to innovate there hardware and not DOING FUCKING MOTION CONTROLS ON A TOASTER this time around and i might get it but that hinges on sum fucking games besides just zelda being released for the thing

>>384544347
>This has yet to be demonstrated. It's sold out because it's in criminally short supply

It has been demonstrated pretty well so far.

> It hasn't even reached the Wii U's half way point yet.
It's already slated to surpass the Wii U lifetime sales in under 1 year, this is hardly another Wii U situation.

>But if you really think 100 million Nintendo fans bought a Wii

never claimed that, strawman, etc.

>The demographics alone show that Switch is another Wii U at least in regard to gender. Over 90% of owners are male.

So every console is a "Wii U in regards to gender", I can't even extract a line of logic from this part of your argument,

>>384544171
>vita has it
Nintendo is smart and chooses not to waste resources on a "feature" no body uses cause even games with built in chat get ignored in fsvor of Skype or the likes

>>384544365
dude you're defending lego city undercover and just dance games as a reason not to pirate on nintendo consoles. examine yourself before you call anyone retarded.

>>384544573
360 was a tricore 3.2 ghz PPC
Switch is a quadcore 1ghz ARM

The power discrepancy is so large that the 360 could probably emulate the A57 in the Switch

This is why I bought a Switch on day 1.
Gotta get that low firmware.

>>384544419
>>then why are sony systems the ones with the games
>said games dont sell
>only thing keeping the hardware alive is the yearly shooter and sport
Every knows sony and microsoft are the dude box/ casual consoles.
Most new different ips sell like trash

I can load blurays on my PC and dump PS4 ISOs. I'm making progress.

What is better?
1. Free games
2. Laughing in ninggers faces

>>384544760
Voice chat encoding is nowhere near as CPU intensive as you claim it is.

>>384538415
No other tablet on the market can be plugged into a TV via HDMi and don't forget about the proprietary and defective controllers with HD rumble that still hasn't been used for anything at all.
Nintendo is breaking the mold.

>>384544703
Not him, but he's right.
Though I don't care if you pirate or not, you do sound like those PC Mustards who hate on anything not on PC. Even things that do get ported to PC are shat on if they aren't perfectly tailored to the platform too. It happens all the damn time and each time I see it, I'm reminded that PC is, bar none, the worst fanbase around.

>>384544792
https://www.vg247.com/2017/01/23/more-impressive-than-ps4-sales-so-far-is-the-consoles-software-attach-rate-report/

If sony games sold so bad, why do devs keep making exclusives for it?

>>384538731
THIS, followed by xbone, sony should be the only one in the market so devs don't have to worry about ports

>>384544842
Shitposting on /v/ without reading the thread is much funnier.

>>384544642
>It has been demonstrated pretty well so far.
It hasn't at all. All we've seen is mass fan adoption, which was *completely* expected. It didn't fail out of the gate. You know what else didn't fail out of the gate? The DC, the Wii U, the Vita....

>It's already slated to surpass the Wii U lifetime sales in under 1 year, this is hardly another Wii U situation.
At the current rate they're supplying it (150k units per week, globally) this is impossible. It will take nearly 2 years.

>never claimed that, strawman, etc.
>so every console is a "Wii U in regards to gender", I can't even extract a line of logic from this part of your argument,
Because you're a fucking idiot. You and other drones like to make the claim that Switch is another Wii when this is extremely unlikely based on the gender break down. The Wii was a massive success because it appealed to people who simply weren't gamers. Whether they were men or women, I'm not getting into that, but certainly a large chunk of the women had never owned a console in their life.

Without that female chunk, it is absurdly unlikely that the Switch will go on to become another Wii. Because that's over half of Wii owners right there.

>>384544926
>PS4 and Vita have incredible attach rates
>Switch doesn't, but it does have a higher than 1:1 attach rate for Zelda specifically

There are so few games for Switch that some people bought Zelda multiple times. Think about that.

>>384543471
Does FREEshop still work on the latest update?

>>384545056
That is fucking hilarious. No games is the Switch's theme song.

>>384544926
Cause sony pay for em
Duh, you think street fighter V was ps4 exclusive out of capcoms good will??

>>384545040
Ninggers have done nothing this whole thread except shitpost.

>>384538000

No fuckyou
olo

>>384544926
>why do devs keep making exclusives for it?
They do?

File: image.jpg (12KB, 258x245px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 258x245px

>all the nintenkiddies ITT

remember when suddenly /v/ hated emulation?

>>384545191
Most threads on /v/ are just shitposts whats your point?

>>384545056

To be fair, the best 3DS game for a while was Pilotwings Resort.

>>384537617

Oh anon.
I cant wait download Switch roms in all those download links with adfly

>>384544926
>has higher attachment rate than wii
Not it does not, Wii had 9.3 AR

>>384544923
>Not him, but he's right.
>repeats the exact same anti-PC line almost verbatim
Sure buddy, sure.

Please keep using shit like lego and just dance as justifications for third party exclusives by spewing the same ol "hurr PC mustards are jealous the worst fanbase around" rhetoric.

>>384545187
So sony paid for something like Dragon's Crown? Why?

>>384545195
There needs to be a /nin/
/vp/ should be repurposed into a nintendo board

>>384545037
So, are you willing to pay 60 dollars per month to rent a console that have 100 dollar games and the console have ADs up your ass?

>>384538928
Me, I'm hoping for a great emulation scene on the console. I've been dreaming for rom injection if Nintendo brings GameCube emulation to the console so I can put stuff that they will never be able to sell like Timesplitters 2/FP, Chibi or the Sims games

>>384545340
No idea, ask em

>>384538827
>PSP got terrible 3rd party support

>2 GTAs
>2 MGS games
>2 Silent Hill Games
>2 Megaman Remakes
>A fucktons of MonHun
>Fucktons of Rockstar games
>Square made KH, 2 Dissidia Games, Crisis Core and ports of FF III and IV

Nigga wtf are you talking about?

>>384545315
>source: mynintendonews

>>384538928
Not me. I will however stop firmware updates.

Need to make sure it's stable and Nintendo doesn't find someway to swing a ban hammer

>>384545403
They don't. They get exclusives out of good will.

>>384545195
>>>384545384
>unironically suggesting board splitting after the /v/ and /vg/ split
Stop breathing. Both of you.

>>384545405
>spinoffs: the post
No.

Honestly, the only time I've ever cared about hacking consoles is when it came to the PSP. Mainly because it was not only cool easy shit to do from a user standpoint but also because online shit wasn't so intertwined into it all that having a modded console held no risk for online. It was pretty much always this way when it came to non-portable consoles which is why I couldn't really give a shit if hacking means that I have to go out of my way to make some fake account, not go online at all, or always be worried about getting banned.

This is still cool and and all but really, really the cons outweigh the pros, for me at-least.

>>384545552
it will be difficult

>>384545054
>It hasn't at all. All we've seen is mass fan adoption, which was *completely* expected. It didn't fail out of the gate. You know what else didn't fail out of the gate? The DC, the Wii U, the Vita....

It has actually, it's already made more than the Wii U made in a year in its first month of release. Also, the PS3 had an abysmal release and performed quite horribly for the first 2 years of release, but it eventually managed to become a great hit. Even if the Switch was doing worse it's not exactly indicative of lifetime performance.

>At the current rate they're supplying it (150k units per week, globally) this is impossible. It will take nearly 2 years.
possibly, but depending on how things move forward since Nintendo is bumping up production to supply more.

>Because you're a fucking idiot.

interesting argument.

> You and other drones like to make the claim that Switch is another Wii when this is extremely unlikely based on the gender break down.

Again, I never claimed that. Second time you made the same argumentative fallacy, good job.

>Without that female chunk, it is absurdly unlikely that the Switch will go on to become another Wii. Because that's over half of Wii owners right there.
Genuinely curious, are half of PS4 owners females? am actually intersted in the numbers now since you claim that's the only way to get Wii numbers.

Nintendo actually unlike SEGA
It is an old weird japanese company if sale products go very bad vary high chance it just said "fuck it" and gone forever, not downgrade it self to 3th party software.

>>384545428
Soucer: investor relation web pag fagget

File: 1484438928405.jpg (58KB, 500x380px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 500x380px

>>384543881
Look man here's the honest truth of this. You wouldn't even buy a Nintendo console even if was on par with the other two because you would still wait for the games to be emulatedable or pirateable dont fucking lie behind some stupid false "code of ethics" or excuse like hardware or you wouldn't buy either a Xbone or PS4 when you have a PC.

>Written on the Wall.
>This delusion.
You do realize Nintendo was the ONLY console manufacturer who was still able to turn a profit these years even with the failing Wii U. They're not going anywhere and are infact slowly building themselves back up again with the Switch. I'am sorry you want a Sega 2.0 to happen but their situation is COMPLETELY different from Sega who had multiple unprofitable consoles in increasing power release in SUCCESSION despite the Dreamcast being as great as it was it sold like shit proving power doesn't always sell when the general consumer doesn't want to part with the money for the latest tech this was also proven as well with the PS3 when it was revealed to be 600 USD which in the end turned out to be the worst tech to program and debug something Sony is known for since the PS2.

What I'am trying to say here is its not fucking happening.

>>384545387
it's $60 per year, not a month
and games are $60
and there are no ads aside from what shows up on the ps store
I understand only owning a nintendo switch but you're utterly uninformed

File: IMG_0530.png (183KB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 750x1334px

>>384545428
Soucer: your tears

>>384545643
Its a retarded idea and you know it.
Might as well make a board for Sony and Microsoft while you are at it.
>i-it will be difficult!
Fuck off.

>>384545649
>Genuinely curious, are half of PS4 owners females? am actually intersted in the numbers now since you claim that's the only way to get Wii numbers.
I don't think I've ever seen the "Switch is the next PS4" because it seems self-defeating. Nintendo fans don't want to acknowledge the success of the PS4. Yes, Switch could be a big hit among gamers whereas the Wii was a big hit among casuals, but without 3rd party support I find that unlikely. The only type of person who buys a Nintendo console for gaming is someone who enjoys Nintendo games, and that is a limited demographic. It will not reach Wii levels. At best it's a NES. How the handheld factor plays into that is unknown, but I think the Switch is too expensive to have appeal as broad as Nintendo's traditional handhelds especially since it's $50 more than the 3DS launched at, and the 3DS bombed at its launch price

>>384545790
I meant to stop breathing
I've tried a few times

>>384538731

All consoles should be dead and turned into Steam like services for PC, with their respective exclusives. Y/N?

>>384544375
If nindy cares about not dying, perhaps they should get with the fucking times instead of being retarded chinks about everything?

http://vocaroo.com/i/s1UrRgJXBteg

>>384545946
This limit hardware evolution

>>384545596
Going online is only really an issue if you get in early on hacking. At least with Nintendo consoles, if you wait it out and don't do incredibly dumb shit like play pirated games early or use cheats online, you can easily get away with going online after modding.

File: 1491997157767.png (353KB, 710x842px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 710x842px

>>384537617

D
E
L
E
T
E

>>384546010

I don't see how. Are you saying that, despite what mustards think, consoles are necessary?

>>384538928
>who's hacking their Switch as soon as they can?
i will be. im currently up to date with nintendo titles but theres some titles like blaster master digasea and the inevitable virtual console games that i cannot be fucked to buy again. fuck nint for trying to sell me super mario sunshine when they do for like 30$. ill pirate that shit in a heartbeat.

>>384546070
Wojak posters should be banned on sight.
Same with frog posters. You losers and your forced meme have never added anything that was not mindless shitposting.

>>384545860
>I don't think I've ever seen the "Switch is the next PS4" because it seems self-defeating.
I haven't either and I don't claim that.
>Nintendo fans don't want to acknowledge the success of the PS4.
What are you smoking, the PS4 is a huge hit for Sony. I never denied that.
>Yes, Switch could be a big hit among gamers whereas the Wii was a big hit among casuals, but without 3rd party support I find that unlikely.
possibly, it also depends how see 3rd party support, Because there is a strong precedent for 3rd party staples like Fifa showing up but not necessarily BF2. I'm more interested in 3rd party games exclusive to the system personally, but I get what you're saying.
> The only type of person who buys a Nintendo console for gaming is someone who enjoys Nintendo games
That goes without saying.
>It will not reach Wii levels.
it probably won't, it also won't be a failure like you're writing it out to be.
>but I think the Switch is too expensive to have appeal as broad as Nintendo's traditional handhelds especially since it's $50 more than the 3DS launched at, and the 3DS bombed at its launch price
And I refute that by reminding you that the Switch not only has the home console appeal but also the portable console appeal, meaning we will be seeing more games since the old portable devs and old home console dev departments at Nintendo are now one department working for one platform.

You didn't really answer my initial question, but I appreciate the response I guess.

>>384546126
Up to last this gen yes, ps4 and xbox do were a waste cause poor man Pc

>>384539679
you dont have one and have never used one, amirite?
for me, youre right about the console on the go. im satisfied @ work or w/e with a bluetooth controller and a phone snes emulator. but on a plane or during a road trip is where this shitter shines.

cracked Switch when

I would actually buy one then

>>384545092
Don't know, never used it before. Wouldn't be surprised if it was still usable. Was pretty sure the hack it uses to download games for free is not an easy exploit to patch.

>>384542989
>implying DS wasn't affected by piracy

>>384538210
If their headset announcement was anything to go by, then killing Nintendo absolutely is progress.

File: 1498090754017.png (304KB, 722x768px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 722x768px

>>384541054
I have a launch day PS4 still for this exact reason, still sealed

Aint shit come of it yet. what am I supposed to do with this thing?

>>384545779
I'm not talking about the present here, and this you described is almost the switch as well.
I'm talking about the future where sony holds complete dominance on the console market and you have no place to flee in case they start to gouge up the shit.
Monopolies are HORRIBLE, and only a complete retard actually asks for one.
Or a socialist.

>>384544375
corporations are not your friend.

>>384544913
>No other tablet on the market can be plugged into a TV via HDMi

>>384545092
Freeshop will literally always work because of how Nintendo's eshop functions. Unless they do a complete overhaul of the eshop (unlikely, it would be more expensive than the "lost" sales of pirated games), freeshop will work. That's how bad their security is.

>>384546625
>ancaps are now socialists
nice

>>384538292
>nintendo are the only ones making different/interesting hardware
>most recent product is the nvidia shield 2
>which would've literally been released by nvidia anyway had nintendo not asked to use its design
lol

>>384546625
sony would not raise prices, they're the only company that doesn't hate their customers, and no one would buy a $100 game

Now we just need to wait 10 years for a half decent emulator

>>384546730
What is a system where only one entity manufactures everything and is also the government?

>>384546828
State capitalism

>>384546750
>they're the only company that doesn't hate their customers
They're a company, all they want to do is to get more and more money.
And they will do everything they can get away with.

And with no competition? they can get away with a LOT more.

>>384546042
Thats what they said about the 3DS and there wes a massive ban sweep in march for most that went online just because they were able to detect a modded system. And even prior to this the same was pretty much done for all consoles. Ps3's get an instant ban once going online with a modded system, same with xbox. Nintendo has always been in last place in terms of this but not anymore. I guarentee you that once modding becomes a full fledged thing for users, they will either have to give up online or buy a separate console to mod, as the video suggests.

I understand if you're fine with that, because im sure there will be alot of single player games out to play but for me atleast, social stuff and online play are still too big to give up just for that.

>>384546875
And what is the difference to socialism?

>>384546341
>it probably won't, it also won't be a failure like you're writing it out to be.
>You didn't really answer my initial question, but I appreciate the response I guess.
The initial question being what, how is Nintendo obsolete? In terms of hardware. I've been trying to spell that out

I don't think the Switch is a failure, first of all. I mean it's virtually impossible for it to be another Wii U, but what about a GC or N64? Where to we arbitrarily place "failure" and "success" goalposts for a company that profited even off of the Wii U?

Right off the bat you claimed the Switch is a "huge hit" which I think is deceptive, mostly because it's exactly the narrative they're trying to make everyone believe. Yes, it's sold out, but that's only half of the supply-demand equation. There is demand enough to meet what limited supply they're putting out, but how much more is there, and how much more will there be over time? It's unknown.

But even if I imagine the Switch going on to be at least as strong as the 3DS (which is worth pointing out as being Nintendo's worst-selling handheld), that is not a road that looks too favorable for them in the long-term because they're fighting really hard to retain less and less of the pie in each generation.

Because 5 years from now, what will it be? Can Nintendo really keep up this pace of releasing their two biggest flagship titles in launch year? Doesn't that kind of mean you shouldn't expect another Mario/Zelda on the Switch? In 5 years, it will be Switch owners being thrown under the bus again just as Wii U owners are now, with games they should be getting being pushed (perhaps arbitrarily) to the next platform. And I think I'm not the only one getting tired of this

Maybe 5 years from now Nintendo comes to the plate with something that amazes us all and I'm dead wrong about them. But right now I just see a company desperately trying to cling to the coat tails of others. They could just make games and be done with it

>>384537767
Here's your reply

>>384545258
>suddenly
No? There were always some who preferred original hardware on CRT to emulators, people preferring to pay for portable versions on switch is no different

>>384539439
It's lack of interest for other consoles. Many Nintendo consoles have superb security (especially the 3DS). And that last point doesn't apply anymore because the Switch uses completely different hardware from the hardware in the Gamecube/Wii/Wii U

>>384547307
>Many Nintendo consoles have superb security (especially the 3DS)
what the fuck am i reading

>>384544029
>current gen, working emulation happens like it has not in a long while
>the console is dropped out
Fucking hell.
To have an emulator working for 2 gens was a miracle we probably will never witness again.

>>384545195
holy shit this is golden
>ban company i dont like
you can easily argue that sony fanbase is just as bad if not worse

>>384545784
WTF? its not fair sonybros, people should only be buying consoles for 1 game

>>384547405
Switch probably will get caught mid-gen.
But i hope it's some debugger friendly thing, like visual boy was, instead of an HLE shitter made to run the hottest game of the moment, like PJ64/Cemu

>>384547401
3ds hacking didnt really take off until late 2015. console was extremely secure

>>384547004
>The initial question being what, how is Nintendo obsolete? In terms of hardware. I've been trying to spell that out
No, I clearly asked you this "Genuinely curious, are half of PS4 owners females? am actually interested in the numbers now since you claim that's the only way to get Wii numbers.". Anon you're not being sincere at all and it's pretty rude, even by /v/ autism standards.

>Can Nintendo really keep up this pace of releasing their two biggest flagship titles in launch year?
When was the last time before the Switch that Nintendo released their two biggest tittles in launch year? and Do you mean for the Switch's lifetime?

>In 5 years, it will be Switch owners being thrown under the bus again just as Wii U owners are now, with games they should be getting being pushed (perhaps arbitrarily) to the next platform. And I think I'm not the only one getting tired of this
I don't understand the claim here because console cycles is something that other guys do as well, I don't see how this is an issue exclusive to Nintendo. Are you so quick to forget about KH III, The Last Guardian, FF XIII Versus being on the PS3 but later pushed to the PS4? Are you also "getting tired of it"? I really doubt it because as I stated above you're not a sincere person.

>But right now I just see a company desperately trying to cling to the coat tails of others.
This I can tell you right now you could not be more wrong, Nintendo has finally acknowledged that they don't have to be the third Xbox on the docket. They chose to carve out their own niche, they're literally going in a completely different direction. I really don't see how that's "clinging to coat tails" because it isn't.

It's ok anon, no one is forcing you to like Nintendo. You are entitled to these opinions, but don't present these opinions coming from a lamenting fan because you're not.

File: Ninturdo x PC meme.png (22KB, 670x869px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 670x869px

>>384541230
>Nintendo tends to attract more avid gamers
Dispense with this turd, please. Most Ninturdo console owners are either rabid Nintentards, (man)children, or casuals & gaymergurls (OMG I play Zelda I'm such a gamer XD!!!!!)

The reason most hardcore gamers move away from Wii, WiiU, and WiiU 2.0 is literally because they only have shallow bright & colourful dumb fun casualized wagglin' shit (see ARMS, Splatoon, Kirby, etc.).

Us PC gamers aren't interested in those childish shit. Where's TW3? D44M? Total Warhammer? We will even get MHW while you shit get denied MHXX.

File: file.gif (1MB, 255x202px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 255x202px

>>384540118
i dunno but i really wanna fuck that girl

I mean, this is half the battle, all that they need to do now, is load a dumped rom and play it, and you'll be able to pirate them.

>>384538928
As much as I want to, I'll at least wait till it's stable and shit.

I don't wanna brick it or something.

>>384547738
>us pc gamers aren't interested in those childish shit

man, you sound like such a champ, I'm so jealous

>>384546984
I have never had to compromise going online with modding modern Nintendo consoles except in the earliest stages of softmods. The majority of people who got 3DS banned online are people who either played pirated games before release or fucked around online in Pokemon. The banwave was nowhere near widespread and I am still able to go online with my modded N3DS hassle free to this day. Same with the my modded Wii U, I've been playing Smash with pirated DLC and am still not banned. Going online with a CFW PS3 is much more dangerous in comparision, but Nintendo has been woefully inept at detecting modded consoles in all cases where the user isn't doing dumb shit (aka the same user who cries about getting banned after the banwave)

If Nintendo goes third party (Which is not going to be anytime soon) They should go exclusively PC.

>>384547701
>No, I clearly asked you this "Genuinely curious, are half of PS4 owners females?
I don't know PS4 demographics but I imagine they're mostly male. Wasn't your point that the PS4 could obtain success without females? I understand that. My point was that the Switch is often compared to the Wii but the Wii looked very different from what the Switch looks like now.

> Do you mean for the Switch's lifetime?
Yes. And future consoles. If this is what it takes for Nintendo to have a hit in this market condition, then they'd certainly look to repeat these conditions which means saving heavy hitters for release of their next platform. I mean, if you want to look at it in a certain light, Wii U didn't even *get* a Zelda or Mario. I'm just saying, what if it's all down hill from here? It has to be because it's not just about the Switch's success, Nintendo's ongoing success is hinged on the fact that its fans will perpetually upgrade, so they have to keep games from you and make their be a reason to continually keep jumping to the next hardware. I'm 34 and I've been doing this since the NES and I'm tired. I have tons of devices that are better than Nintendo's hardware and I'd be happy to use any single one of them, because chances are I could (for instance) play Nintendo games on my PC for 2 decades without the need to upgrade once.

>but the other guys do it too
I'm not a particular fan of any console, but the vast majority of video games we have are a direct result of that system. PC games are largely ports of console games, and console games only exist because of consoles (nintendo consoles NOT inclusive). If Nintendo consoles dropped off the face of the earth it would not affect the main industry at all. It would only affect Nintendo's niche. And because of capitalism they'd be making games on other hardware before you can blink. If Sony and MS went bankrupt we simply wouldn't have video games. Except Nintendo.

>>384547738
Personally I think an enthusiast would be PC/Playstation/Nintendo. Consoles in general are already for less avid "gamers", but only Microsoft is the true bottom of the barrel.

>>384548165
>If Nintendo goes third party (Which is not going to be anytime soon) They should go exclusively mobile.

Fixed that for you, Anon, and for free. No need to thank me.

>>384548328
and by Microsoft I mean W10/Xbox

File: 1499903072582.jpg (23KB, 612x612px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 612x612px

>>384548165
Hopefully not. I don't want a bunch of happy rainbow fun fun sweet fluff fluff turds for babbies to shit up Steam or GOG. And we certainly don't welcome autistic Nintenbabbies into our community.

>>384548041
Well, if that still holds up that would be cool but I still feel that there is a good chance now more than ever for them to start modification detections.

>>384538273
how can switch sales increase when they're always sold out everywhere? i wouldn't be able to buy one even if i wanted to

You think Nintendo has ever sent assassins to silence people like this?

>>384548284
>Nintendo's ongoing success is hinged on the fact that its fans will perpetually upgrade, so they have to keep games from you and make their be a reason to continually keep jumping to the next hardware.

You're stating this like Nintendo is the only one that does this, every hardware producer does this.

>I'm 34 and I've been doing this since the NES and I'm tired.
again, not buying into this sincere gamer crap.

>I have tons of devices that are better than Nintendo's hardware and I'd be happy to use any single one of them
That's great, but if you want Nintendo you buy Nintendo. It really is that simple, plus you get to have something none of the other guys are offering.

> play Nintendo games on my PC for 2 decades without the need to upgrade once.
So just to be clear, you're not a fan of any console maker then? Because all of them make you upgrade.
And you'd also be upgrading your PC every 5 years, so it is kind of a moot point really.

>And because of capitalism they'd be making games on other hardware before you can blink.
You really do talk like you never finished high-school, no offense anon. But the whole joke about Nintendo never going third party isn't because they wouldn't avoid making money, it's because they literally will not go out of the hardware making business. And now that they're getting into theme parks and movies, it cements that even more.

> If Sony and MS went bankrupt we simply wouldn't have video games. Except Nintendo.
Another self defeating statement, because videgames would still exist on Nintendo and PC. Not that it would happen either, at least not in the near future.

File: IMG_5568.jpg (686KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

686KB, 1200x1200px

>>384540403
>>384547763
She's a literal goddess.

>>384548764
Import from Europe? It's region-free, and as has often been gleefully mentioned by console warriors here, the Switch isn't particularly hot on that side of the Atlantic.

>>384548951
>literal

>>384548419
This. Mobile games might be the only way for Nintendo to make money in near future but developers will take their game experiences to other platforms and make game of similar quality.

>>384548648
Wow, edgy my dude xD

>>384549029
Is there a problem?

>>384548284
>because chances are I could (for instance) play Nintendo games on my PC for 2 decades without the need to upgrade once.


How are you enjoying that windows 98? gotta love The Witcher III running on that integrated graphics card from 2 decades ago.Good thing you didn't have to upgrade once! you're a fucking retard.

>>384538210
You know I would agree with you a few months back but after they showed the way they handle voice chat in Splatoon 2, I'd rather have Nintendo die

File: 1499750898852.png (241KB, 300x425px) Image search: [Google]

241KB, 300x425px

>>384549114
>I don't watch Dora the Explorer and Teletubbies anymore.
>F-fucking tryhard e-dgy!
Nintentards really need to grow up.

>>384539157
Nintendo have better games.

>>384549114
>>384538210
Why is /v/ filled with a bunch of pansy moral fags now? How is this edgy? Quit being a cuck pirating is and always will be fine.

>>384548927
>again, not buying into this sincere gamer crap.
So what exactly are you accusing me of

>That's great, but if you want Nintendo you buy Nintendo.
I simply don't think it's sustainable in the long run. If they come up with something truly innovative (I dare say the Wii even though it really wasn't), then there might be a reason when the hardware is truly unique and truly the only way you can play games in a new way, then it would make sense. But they've basically made a gaming tablet for 2 generations now. Why? Because tablet gaming is taking off. Coat tails.

>So just to be clear, you're not a fan of any console maker then?
I have reasons to despise them all. The only reason I like Nintendo is because of the games they make, but the hardware they make cancels that out

> it's because they literally will not go out of the hardware making business.
If people stop buying redundant hardware (which tends to happen with redundant hardware: smart phones have made tons of devices obsolete), then yes, they will go out of the hardware business. They absolutely will. It's ironic that you're essentially calling me childish when here you are pretending you have any control over the mass market.
>And now that they're getting into theme parks and movies, it cements that even more.
How on earth does it solidify their hardware business to make non-hardware? Solidifies their IPs? Yes, absolutely.

At the end of the day, you look at BotW. BotW is an incredible game that anyone who claims to enjoy video games should play, but most won't because they have to buy a $300 device to do it. What if that game that sold 2.74 million units could have sold 6 million by now? Or more? Yes, licensing fees and etc but the sheer volume would offset it by such a ridiculous amount as to make Nintendo's hardware business look redundant in their OWN eyes.

This is all about money at the end of the day. Your misplaced sense of loyalty is irrelevant

>>384543334
>Nintendo is a piece of right wing garbage
What? So 30 years ago libshits were just as insufferable as they are today.

>>384549163
Since when is the Witcher 3 a Nintendo game?

I am willing to bet my PC from 1997 could run BotW at minimal settings. I'm willing to bet LOTS OF MONEY.

>>384539157
Nintendo is shit at security and being banned from their online doesn't matter because it's shit.

File: 1499901523370.jpg (19KB, 645x643px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 645x643px

>>384543407
I can already emulate most WiiU, 3DS, and later Switch games on my PC (even though i'm not interested to do that), why should I buy an underpowered waggling piece of turd?

Imagine being such a cuck that you jump to the defense of a corporation whose sole interest is sucking every penny they can from you. Seriously, just take a second and imagine what kind of a person you'd have to be to think like that, how much of a mindless drone, imagine.

I unironically support the persecution of pirates. They need to bring back public lynchings and make examples out of these parasites.

>>384549768
t. retard posting on a taiwainase loli sharing board full of copyright infringing material

>>384549747
I think only half of them are genuine nintentoddlers. There rest are on nintendos pay roll

>>384549747
Not being a corporate dicksucker makes you a commie now

>>384548698
It depends, people said the same thing when 3DS and Wii U hacking first got started and Nintendo barely did shit to detect modded consoles
The only real threat to going online with a modded switch is Nintendo's paid online service, they might ramp up security to protect the integrity of their service and make sure people can't play online for free. Then again this is the same company that let pirates download games directly from their servers using homebrew apps so who knows.

>>384549895
announcing sage isn't allowed

If you can't afford video games, then you don't deserve to play. Nothing is free or should ever be free, you fucking marxists.

>>384539157
Piracy on the Wii U was inaccessible for most of its lifetime.

Friendly reminder that Nintendo has a website dedicated to shutting shit like this down.

https://ap.nintendo.com/report/

File: 1492469022741.jpg (45KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 400x400px

>>384550163
>Nothing is free or should ever be free

File: Frodo Baggins 400w.jpg (31KB, 400x286px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 400x286px

>>384537617
>Switch games dumped as rom files
>Switch games
>games
>s
cute

>>384550267
Friendly reminder that you're a faggot

>>384550338
Get a job faggot, maybe then you won't have to break the law to play video games.

>>384550267
Yes that site has been so effective at preventing piracy on the DS, 3DS, Wii, and Wii U

>>384550163
>t. corporate shill

>>384550387
but I own a Switch and you sound like a gigantic faggot

>>384537709
fpbp

>>384550418
>but I own a Switch
Then why are you crying about nintendo shutting down piracy? Because your parents didn't buy you a game along with it? As I said, get a job and buy them yourself, underage shitter.

File: 1498497083108.png (363KB, 738x824px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 738x824px

>>384550267
I'm already on it

>>384550484
but I'm 28 though :-)

File: IMG_1867.jpg (57KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x500px

how come its okay to make fun of the PS3 emulator but how ever when someone talks about Wii U emulation/switch hacking its bad now

>>384550405
t. poorshit

>>384550484
>>384550387
getting this assblasted over people downloading shit off the internet for free is like screaming at people for jaywalknig

>>384550512
>lying on the internet
>not having a job
I feel sorry for your parents.

>>384550578
stay mad hehe :-)

>>384550552
fuck off todd