Graphics thread?
Anon that is a film
>>384469463
>that rock texture
>>384468304
harry styles die
Everyone's Gone to Rapture
>>384469463
Why do the rock textures in this game look absolutely horrendous?
>>384468304
The very best of video very games
On ultra
>>384471198
Snake Pass is a fun game
>>384471103
Because it's a console port
>>384471280
is that Asseffect Andromeda?
>>384472920
Yep. This is literally the highest possible shadow quality. Everything maxed barring TAA and some post-process crap like chromatic aberration
>>384472542
th-thanks consoles my rig wouldn't have been able to run that
>>384472542
Imagine how amazing PC gaming would be if consoles died out and they weren't hand holding graphics & game play for consoles.
>>384471682
this aint real
>>384473407
>implying having a lowest common denominator is bad
It's bad when it's explicitly the only thing being catered for.
Having a lowest point, like consoles, means it forces devs to optimize if they want a good looking game.
Don't blame limitations, blame lazy devs first, then blame the consoles
>>384473661
What's your point.
>>384473762
its not graphics its fan art
>>384473751
Majority of the reason why Skyrim was ass is due to console hardware limits
>>384473751
>Implying we can't have that for lower end PC builds
We can still have that lower budget catering but still cut consoles out of the formula so devs are forced to work within their limitations for PC builds and not static consoles. Limitations are to blame, but lazy devs are apart of that.
>>384473803
>Fan art
>An in game cut scene from Halo 2
k
>>384473887
>consoles
>not bethesda
>>384473961
Devs are garbage, that means them attempting a multiplat game makes it double garbage
>>384473376
It would probably look better at low settings than it does now at ultra.
>>384473946
you think bungie a triple A company would make scribbly lines as clouds, rivers and mountain ranges in a cutscene? they actually have QA, unlike its retarded mutant ofspring.
go somewhere else 343 drone
>>384473376
No problem, it's not like you could put it on low or medium anyways.
>>384474467
>>384474467
>you think bungie a triple A company would make scribbly lines as clouds, rivers and mountain ranges in a cutscene
on the xbox hueg yeah
>>384474556
prove it then
>>384474817
It's literally from an HD port of the game to PC, you sperg. It just looks decent on the Xbox because of the resolution.
>>384470730
no one cares about your shitty kino here
>>384470730
We all die anon.
What is the best reshade for Witcher 3? I'm still testing presets and so far none reminds me of the E3 graphics
>>384473407
You mean like Witcher 3 would not exist because CDPR admitted in an interview they wouldn't be able to finance PC only game?
Also go look at the STEAM HW surveys.
70% of PCMR are toaster jockeys and craptop owners.
>>384476940
>70% of PCMR are toaster jockeys and craptop owners.
Well yeah, that's what happens when you let something like greenlight exist
>>384476940
>"If the consoles are not involved there is no Witcher 3 as it is"
>"as it is"
That means something else than what you said. It means it would exist, but it would be a different game, meaning more like TW1 or 2, which are better games.
>>384468304
>>384473407
Then you'd bitch about integrated graphics and the 99% of PC rigs that are only on par with modern consoles or worse
>>384477658
These colours man
>>384478056
>that glow the first guy has
>>384478137
Yeah, it's GTAV's pisspoor SSAO
>>384477658
Thankfully there's a thing called "settings" for such PCs. The max settings wouldn't suffer because of the low settings, like they do for console parity.
PCfags go home
>>384477869
What is this?
>>384478056
Damn the lighting is fucking great.
>>384479178
Not bad looking by any stretch, though it really does look like an old game with a freakishly high polygon count.
>>384479549
I have never played Dark Souls 3, but every single screen shot I see looks so muddy and unappealing. The game clearly suffers from a blatant overuse of assets, since they seem to copy-past the same 4-5 candles everywhere and don't even bother to rotate them most of the time.
Also those trees are PS1-tier.
>>384471103
There's a mod for it.
>>384480125
Oh I don't know anon, it's got the odd nice vista
>>384480846
Pictures of those place are the only ones I see that aren't awful, but they're still a muddy, blurry, mess that has a 3-color pallet.
>>384476675
the one that removes the piss filter is good
>>384477509
what game?
>>384479048
Because you think that consoles are preventing dev from doing that?
Theres no such excuse now that consoles are basically mid rig PCs when they are released.
CDPR wanted platform parity.
>>384481943
looks like fallout 4
>>384476675
>I'm still testing presets and so far none reminds me of the E3 graphics
It's impossible to fix it since it's an entire different version of the game, ie the lighting/geometry/shaders, etc. were butchered.
>>384482171
Most devs want parity. Or forced, or bribed to do it. Either way, if consoles didn't exist, console parity wouldn't exist, and most games wouldn't have their max settings dumbed down for shitty hardware. Only the usual MP games would.
>>384473407
Shit like that wuold only happen of only top of the line gpus and shit would exist and if everyone could afford them. A huge part of PC players use intergrated shit or a 750ti etc.
It wouldn't be worth the money and the time for devs to create something that only a small part of the userbase can even run.
>>384478056
what mods?
>>384483476
>what are settings
And graphics are always worth the money, they're the best form of advertisement.
>>384483984
simple aesthetics
>>384480125
that´s because of the new engine. Look at souls 1 has much better textures.
Just picked up Arma 3, running it maxed out yet it looks like ass compared to all the screens posted here. What am I doing wrong?